User talk:ManducatingMouser

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Taxis of Hong Kong, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

• Copying text from other sources
• Policy on copyright
• Frequently asked questions on Wikipedia's copyright policy
• Policy and guideline on non-free content

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

• Introduction
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 23:52, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

July 2024

Hi Ilovefood123123! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Hong Kong that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Adding references and figures are not minor. — MarkH₂₁^talk 13:00, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

My apologies, I never realised the actual meaning for "minor edits", please forgive me as I am rather new to editing the Wikipedia. I appreciate and thank you for pointing this out. Is there a way for me to revert this? Ilovefood123123 (talk) 13:05, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

It's okay! There is no way to change past edits, but you can avoid clicking on the "minor edit" box in the future unless the edit is just fixing a typo or something else mentioned at WP:MINOR. Thanks. — MarkH₂₁^talk 19:10, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Okay :D Ilovefood123123 (talk) 06:40, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

August 2024

Hello, I'm Rusty Cat. I noticed that in this edit to Handover of Macau, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rusty 🐈 15:08, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at University of Hong Kong, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:20, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

I was trying to rephrase and update information based on the Hong Kong University Students' Union page. I apologise as I wasn't quite sure how I could cite sources from that, could you please tell me how this is usually done or do I just copy the same sources from that page? Ilovefood123123 (talk) 19:38, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of St. Francis of Assisi's English Primary School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article St. Francis of Assisi's English Primary School, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Francis of Assisi's English Primary School (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:00, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Hong Nga Court for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hong Nga Court is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hong Nga Court until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 04:36, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:10, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Hornell Hall moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Hornell Hall. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 06:27, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Hong Kong Tang King Po College for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hong Kong Tang King Po College is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hong Kong Tang King Po College until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Rahmatula786 (talk) 10:09, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of St. Anne's Church, Hong Kong

The article St. Anne's Church, Hong Kong has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Run-of-the-mill parish church; WP:BEFORE turns up no evidence of special notability, though there may be Chinese sources I'm not seeing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Moriwen (talk) 20:35, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Ilovefood123123! Your additions to Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:41, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies

Hello Ilovefood123123, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Noleander}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Noleander (talk) 13:12, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi Ilovefood123123! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

I've noticed that you've expressed an interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Unfortunately, due to a history of conflict and disruptive editing it has been designated a contentious topic and is subject to some strict rules.

The rule that affects you most as a new or IP editor is the prohibition on making any edit related to the Arab–Israel conflict, which includes discussing articles on talk pages, unless you are logged into an account that is at least 30 days old and has made at least 500 edits.

This prohibition is broadly construed, so it includes edits such as adding the reaction of a public figure concerning the conflict to their article or noting the position of a company or organization as it relates to the conflict.

The exception to this rule is that you may request a specific change to an article on the talk page of that article or at this page. Please ensure that your requested edit complies with our neutral point of view and reliable sourcing policies, and if the edit is about a living person our policies on biographies of living people as well.

Any edits you make contrary to these rules are likely to be reverted, and repeated violations can lead to you being blocked from editing.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

If you have questions, ; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!

Happy editing! Longhornsg (talk) 18:19, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Hornell Hall

Hello, ManducatingMouser. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hornell Hall, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:06, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

C-SPAN table

Hi ManducatingMouser! A while ago we worked together on some changes to the CSPAN article and you had requested updates to an infobox in the article. I posted an updated one in case you are still interested in reviewing. I can't make the change myself without a volunteer's review because of my COI. I'm curious to hear your thoughts! Cheers BINK Robin (talk) 17:21, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Michael Meldman article

Hi ManducatingMouser!

Sending a friendly ping and making sure you got my reply to your questions on the Michael Meldman Talk page. Just wanted to make sure this did not slip through the cracks. If you have any more questions, let me know! AmandaDLC (talk) 17:01, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:University of Hong Kong Faculty of Science

Hello, ManducatingMouser. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:University of Hong Kong Faculty of Science, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:07, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:University of Hong Kong Faculty of Science

Hello, ManducatingMouser. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "University of Hong Kong Faculty of Science".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 09:27, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

Defining Education moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Defining Education. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:49, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

C-SPAN request

Hi ManducatingMouser! A few months back you had reviewed some of my edit requests for C-SPAN. If you are interested, I have another one up on the C-SPAN talk page. Cheers BINK Robin (talk) 22:23, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

CS1 error on Far East Finance Centre

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Far East Finance Centre, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:02, 5 September 2025 (UTC)

Ways to improve Far East Finance Centre

Hello, ManducatingMouser,

Thank you for creating Far East Finance Centre.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

I am unable to determine from the article and its sources what makes it notable per our General Notability Guilines at WP:GN. For example, notability is not inherited by being climbed by Alain Robert or people who lived there or or tennants: WP:NINI.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Kudpung}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:33, 6 September 2025 (UTC)

Commemorative Medal of the Thirtieth Anniversary of the Establishment of the Border Guard moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Commemorative Medal of the Thirtieth Anniversary of the Establishment of the Border Guard. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:13, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

September 2025

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to William Young (judge). When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in yellow at the top of the page. Thanks. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 04:09, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Temple Chambers, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Queensway and Admiralty.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

National Retail Federation

Hi ManducatingMouser, a while back you had reviewed some requests of mine for the National Retail Federation. I was wondering if you would be interested in looking at the request I currently have up? It's a bit on the beefier side but it's mostly just a reorganization of a section. If not I totally understand. Cheers ~~~~ NRFrepBeteck (talk) 18:16, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

Certainly, I will get back to you tomorrow. Thanks. @NRFrepBeteck ManducatingMouser (talk) 19:12, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

@ManducatingMouser: just wanted to see if you still had interest in this! Cheers NRFrepBeteck (talk) 20:18, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi ManducatingMouser. Thank you for your work on Robert Thomas Mitchell Henry. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 03:44, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Defining Education

Hello, ManducatingMouser. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Defining Education, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:09, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi ManducatingMouser. Thank you for your work on Hong Kong Emergency Alert System. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for this translation, and for linking it to template:Cell Broadcast System; well-written and clear.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 20:36, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

@Klbrain: Thank you for taking the time in reviewing my work and for your compliments! ManducatingMouser (talk) 17:27, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Commemorative Medal of the Thirtieth Anniversary of the Establishment of the Border Guard

Hello, ManducatingMouser. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Commemorative Medal of the Thirtieth Anniversary of the Establishment of the Border Guard, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:09, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Commemorative Medal of the Thirtieth Anniversary of the Establishment of the Border Guard

Hello, ManducatingMouser. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Commemorative Medal of the Thirtieth Anniversary of the Establishment of the Border Guard".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 15:25, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

March 2026

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to change the title of King and Wood by cutting its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. ASUKITE 04:05, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

King and Wood moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to King and Wood. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ASUKITE 03:49, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:King and Wood.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:King and Wood.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 01:49, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

April 2026

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to set Preferences → Editing → Editor → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary). Thanks! Graywalls (talk) 20:57, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello ManducatingMouser. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:ManducatingMouser. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=ManducatingMouser|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Over multiple articles, the nature of your edit hints paid public relations editing Graywalls (talk) 20:59, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello @Graywalls, thank you for your message. I apologise for not using edit summaries to edit on the Wikipedia, I will be using edit summaries going forward.

I am not entirely sure as for why you might have an impression that I have been paid or is expected to be paid for my edits. I am someone who is currently studying law in Hong Kong and have simply seen the inadequacy in the up keeping of law related article pages in Hong Kong (and law in general throughout Wikipedia really), alongside other Hong Kong related articles, and have seen the need to fill in some of the gaps of such as much as practicable. The work I mainly focus on, given the time when I am able to, is generally based on law and perhaps to say the very least very broad and is not specific to one organisation (nor is it something done to improve one specific organisation's public relations or however you may frame it).

Regardless of your suspicion, I shall take it as a compliment that my work has been recognised to the point where it is mistaken as something that may have been paid forward.

Please do not hesitate to contact me further if you have any further inquiries, such that we can both do our best in improving the Wikipedia as a whole. Cheers! ManducatingMouser (talk) 07:40, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CUHK Coat of Arms.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CUHK Coat of Arms.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

August 2026

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Phantom of the Opera (1986 musical). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Also, I can't help but notice that despite your earlier claim that you would use edit summaries going forward, this edit did not have one. DonIago (talk) 19:57, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

HKSAR v Tong Ying Kit.

Hi ManducatingMouser! I noticed your recent excellent contributions in creating the articles HKSAR v Lai Chee Ying & Others and HKSAR v Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China. I was wondering if you might also be interested in writing an article for HKSAR v Tong Ying Kit. There are corresponding articles on the Chinese and Cantonese Wikipedias, which might be useful as references! —👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 21:14, 22 August 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for the suggestion! I’ll have a look at the existing Chinese and Cantonese articles and the judgments, and hopefully put together an article when I have some time. ManducatingMouser (talk) 21:19, 22 August 2026 (UTC)