Maosone

Your submission at Articles for creation: Telelaudo (August 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bobby Cohn was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Telelaudo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bobby Cohn (talk) 19:58, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Maosone! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bobby Cohn (talk) 19:58, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your kindness. I will look for help to improve my contributions to Wikipedia. Thanks a lot! Maosone (talk) 20:15, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Telelaudo has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Telelaudo. Thanks! CNMall41 (talk) 08:31, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

@CNMall41 Thanks for your feedback, CNMall41. Initially, I included sources that provided more in-depth coverage, including those discussing the company before its merger. However, another editor advised against using those because it used the acquired company. The company is notable in the medical field, so many of the sources are specialized and not from general media. I’m unsure what qualifies as in-depth coverage since discussing awards and company achievements was previously flagged as promotional. I don’t think I can find other sources beyond those I’ve already mentioned. Do you think this article could be published as a stub so other fellows could help improve it? I appreciate a lot your help. Maosone (talk) 15:02, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the ping. Size of the page does not matter so having a stub would not make sense. It would first need to qualify under notability guideline. Unfortunately, I do not believe it would be notable if the in-depth coverage about this specific company does not exist. --CNMall41 (talk) 15:30, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Hmm, I understand. Should I go ahead and delete the draft myself, or should I wait for someone else to handle it? Maosone (talk) 15:54, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Telelaudo (October 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tavantius was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Telelaudo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tavantius (talk) 15:34, 12 October 2024 (UTC)