Welcome, Marcus1234!

Welcome to our community!

I'm glad you've decided to join us - this is a great project. We do have a lot of users, and are currently working on 6,905,279 articles, so things can be a little intimidating! Don't worry - we love to help out, and we'll try our best to make your stay here as comfortable as possible.
Here are a few links I found helpful when I first arrived here.

You should sign your name on talk pages, discussions and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. Also, if you don't want to jump right into editing articles right now, why not check out the sandbox? Feel free to make test edits there.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian - I definitely do. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or problems, leave me a message on my talk page, and I'll try my best to help. Otherwise, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We hope you stick around, and make sure you enjoy yourself! Cheers, riana_dzasta 15:01, 18 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Magic Book

edit

Hi Marcus1234 I always wondered what happened to the magic book i donated and thank you for letting me know. I am happy to know that the Magic Book I donated actually ended up with someone who does enjoys the subject. Regards Brian Role

Sorry

edit

Hi Marcus, I was hoping no Maltese would read my comments. Im sorry for offending you. Language is, in my opinion, the principal feature of ethnicity. Most Moroccans or Algerians for example have little or no Arabic ancestry yet they still consider themselves Arabs because of the language. Some Lebanese Christians, who speak the same Arabic as all other Lebanese, deny their Arabic identity because they claim to be descended from the Phoenicians, mainly out of spite for the Muslim majority in their country. One can argue that ethnicity is a matter of personal choice and of politics. Most Mihrazi Jews in Israel do not consider themselves Arabs. They probably would though, had it not been for the establishment of Israel and the Arab-Israeli conflict. If the Maltese overwhelmingly feel that they are not arabs then they are not. Nevertheless, one must not forget that Arabs, as a people are a multiracial and multi religious ethnicity who are held together only by language. It is not a clear cut issue and you must not take it as an attack. Ethnicity is just complicated. --Burgas00 19:12, 27 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

No actually Moroccans do consider themselves Arabs although genetically they are mainly berbers. Cheers :-) --Burgas00 12:02, 28 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Just to add something to your discussion. Morocco is a mix of Berbers or Amazighs (natives) and Arabs (conquerors). The official language is Arabic though Moroccan Arabic and Berber languages are the ones to be used widely (as well as French). Historically, most of the dynasties that governed large parts of North Africa and the Iberian peninsula for centuries were Berbers and not Arabs (i.e. Almoravids, Almohads, Merinids). -- Szvest Ω Wiki Me Up ® 12:02, 29 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yes but one could say that Moroccan Arabs (as opposed to berbers) are fundamentally the descendants of arabized berbers...--Burgas00 18:38, 29 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

That's a debated point as mass arab immigration from the Arabian peninsula didn't stop until 2 or three centuries ago. -- Szvest Ω Wiki Me Up ® 11:51, 30 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for Image:Norman Lowell.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Norman Lowell.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:07, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

edit

I see you have contributed to some Malta related articles.. Would you consider visiting the Wikipedia:Malta-related topics notice board to help with coordination? Thank you for your contributions. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Srl (talkcontribs) 03:35, 4 December 2006 (UTC).Reply

Maltese words in Sicilian

edit

Done. Your translation were all right, I've just added the Sicilian equivalent of "police" (polizia, as in Italian). --Angelo 15:08, 7 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

I revised one of the Sicilian words, "pulizzìa" rather than "polizia" which is an Italianism. The rest are pretty good. There are so many dialects of the Sicilian language and unfortunately no standard as of yet. So at this point a couple spellings and pronunciations could be debated:
ripùbbrica vs. ripùbblica;
'uvernu vs. cuvernu, the ' representing a glottal stop, commonly found in place of "g", "c" and "v", for ex. rè'ula (Lat. regulam), pa'ari (Lat. pacare) and 'urpi (Lat. vulpem); and
(c)uernu /(c)wernu/ vs. cuvernu.
Thank you for putting the time and effort into filling the blanks regarding Sicilian! Salutamu...Calicchiulusiculu 14:59, 6 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source for Image:Kmb.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Kmb.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 10:52, 8 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging for Image:Operahouse1935.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Operahouse1935.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:40, 12 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Your userpage

edit

You state that the essay you've placed on your userpage "probably ... goes against Wikipedia's soapbox policy ..." - I'd go further and say it definitely goes against WP:SOAPBOX. Don't get me wrong - it isn't imflammatory or offensive or whatever - I just don't see why you've added it? --SandyDancer 22:38, 18 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

I was just bored I guess? Dunno... I wanted to tell other users something about me. Something interesting rather than the usual My name is X and I am X years old and I live in X and I like X music etc. But somehow it took the form of a political essay rather than a short bio. Oh well... Marcus1234 12:30, 19 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image:Waterfrontvalletta.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Waterfrontvalletta.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chowbok 19:07, 29 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

AfD Nomination: Qerq

edit

An editor has nominated the article Qerq for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qerq. Add four tildes like this ˜˜˜˜ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Qerq during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. Jayden54Bot 18:45, 21 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned fair use image (Image:May 2005.JPG)

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:May 2005.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 22:42, 3 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Tignepoint 2005 January.JPG)

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Tignepoint 2005 January.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 23:33, 3 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Tignepoint 2005 August.JPG)

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Tignepoint 2005 August.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 04:54, 16 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Tignepoint 2005 March.JPG)

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Tignepoint 2005 March.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 04:54, 16 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Carmelo Pace

edit

Hi Marcus - First of all, thanks for your support re the Ghonnella article! I'm surprised that you found it! On the Carmelo Pace article, I meant to go back and put in references, but got distracted. I've added the sources of my info now. Take a look and let me know if you feel that the tag can now be removed. Cheers. lamato 02:34, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Max break b.s. deletion

edit

Keen. I suspected that was unadulterated bovine excrement, and pared it down from utterly insane to perhaps plausible, but wasn't certain if the entire mess should be removed. And now I don't have to think about that any longer. >;-) — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 11:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

SmartCity

edit

Hello! I've left a message at Talk:SmartCity that might interest you. Please take a look.--thunderboltz(TALK) 05:38, 3 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Malta Height

edit

I see you added the average height for Malta, but the source is not complete enough. We need some link, or AT LEAST the name of the study, the author, and the date of publication. --Criticalthinker 06:29, 12 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Malta WikiProject

edit

Dear Marcus1234, Because of your activity and/or contributions to articles/pages related to the island nation of Malta, I, founder of WikiProject Malta am here to ask you if you would be interested in becoming a member of the project. It is a relatively new wikiproject, and we need as many members as we can get; you would be a valued addition to the list of members. If you are interested in getting involved, then please do sign, because your contributions to the effort would be infinitely appreciated. Anonymous Dissident Utter 03:59, 20 May 2007 (UTC)Reply


Thank you for Joining the Maltese WikiProject

edit

Dear Marcus1234,

I would like to thank you for joining WikiProject Malta, a collaborative effort that aims to improve, write, expand and organise material related to the island nation of Malta. We currently need as many members as we can get, and you are a valued addition to the list of members. Please see our To-Do list if you would like to further contribute to the project, or help construct our project page.

Thank you,

The WikiProject Malta Team


Non-free use disputed for Image:Angli.jpg

edit
  This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Angli.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:26, 31 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Borgolivier.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading Image:Borgolivier.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:54, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Demarco.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Demarco.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:06, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Enricomizzi.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Enricomizzi.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:29, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Non-free use disputed for Image:Angli.jpg

edit
  This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Angli.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:33, 4 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Non-free use disputed for Image:Qerq.jpg

edit
  This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Qerq.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:52, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Paulboffa.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Paulboffa.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:58, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Strickland.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Strickland.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:16, 3 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Strickland.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Strickland.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:43, 10 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Malta related article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St John's Square

edit

Dear member of WikiProject Malta, I'd like to invite you to participate in an ongoing Article for Deletion debate about St John's Square in the capital of Malta. We'd like your input about whether the article should stay and go (and if you want to expand the stub, that would be great too!) All the best, Eliz81(talk)(contribs) 21:22, 20 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Maltese people

edit

Marcus - can you take a look at the revisions I have proposed for the Possible genetic links section of this page? I am disturbed by the frequency with which amateur observers assume Arab or Phoenician origins based purely on language (which is as ridiculous as the assumption that all Maltese must have English ancestors, because we speak English, or that Canadians have "French ancestors" because French is an official language of this country). However in the context of the Maltese people article, I am concerned about presenting all sides of the debate, in a neutral tone. I look forward to your comments. lamato(talk) 12:17, 7 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Borgolivier.jpg

edit

I have tagged Image:Borgolivier.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. MER-C 13:09, 11 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Maltese People: Regarding selection of people

edit

I have noticed that you reverted the box to what it was before, with only 4 persons: namely Boffa, Mizzi, Strickland, and de Bono. While I agree with you that they did their own work well, and are honourable people, however I do not agree with the fact that you removed contemporary people. People nowadays identify themselves much more with Michael Mifsud (who, by the way, does have an article) rather than Gerald Strickland! How is he afterall, anyway? Go ask people out there who is Michael Mifsud and Joseph Armani and you would get cheers from Maltese and foreign people, and ask who is Enrico Mizzi and you would probably get offended for wasting people's time! My point is that these contemporary people are true samples of Maltese people and what they have achieved. Yes, I agree with you about Rachel Vella, and I will change that. Thanks for your time mate Tsum60 12:41, 9 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Good work as usual. If I had an award or something I'd give you one. I'd like to see some solid policy on this, i'm sure wikipedia has one somewhere. From the Malta/Maltese usage point of view it is pretty clear that the names are best as simple names with articles given just as interest in the article. An English speaker is not going to refer to Ħ'Attard. 「ѕʀʟ·19:51, 15 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

National Action (Malta)

edit

Hi, I think it is important to note that it is primarily Malta Today saying they're a far right party in the article. MT is politically alligned with the left, so it may not be a neutral source on the topic. - Soprani 20:44, 9 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Tignepoint.JPG

edit

I have tagged Image:Tignepoint.JPG as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Rettetast 21:34, 11 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use Image:Portomaso.JPG

edit
 
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Portomaso.JPG. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chris Btalk 12:16, 13 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Enricomizzi.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Enricomizzi.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:29, 15 December 2007 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Normanlowell.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Normanlowell.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Kmb.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Kmb.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Newoperahouse.JPG

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Newoperahouse.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cottonera lines.JPG

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Cottonera lines.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:31, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

could you take a look?

edit

at Florentine Histories? I have attempted to translate from it:Istorie Fiorentine - but I am not as fluent as to understand as well, or to be sure that I am correctly translating. I would appreciate your help. Thanks.--Kiyarrllston 00:49, 29 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree Image:Portomasodevelopment.JPG

edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Portomasodevelopment.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 22:12, 7 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I need the maltese word for the hoopoe. Thanx

edit

Eliko (talk) 11:28, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Changing the names of the Maltese village articles

edit

There is currently an ongoing debate about whether the articles on Maltese villages should be given their English names. Kyarichy has already gone and renamed a bunch of articles such as as Kalkara citing these changes from an old obsolete paper and http://www.geody.com, even though these names are no longer in use.

The naming conventions clearly state that foreign location names commonly used in English should be used as the article names.

It would be appreciated if you could assist us in this discussion. ~ ► Wykebjs ◄ (userpage | talk) 11:00, 1 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

mt.wiki

edit

I saw that you are from Malta.. why not participate also on the Maltese Wikipedia? Nistenna risposta mingћandek ;) Chrisportelli (talk) 06:04, 8 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use Image:Metropolis.JPG

edit
 
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Metropolis.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Garion96 (talk) 22:14, 6 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Royal Opera House.jpg

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:Royal Opera House.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:52, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:52, 1 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Portareale.jpg

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:Portareale.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:29, 2 April 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (Talk) 21:29, 2 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Smart cities

edit

I am editing the smart cities article heavily at the moment and am inviting you, as someone who has contributed significantly in the past, to it to engage. Please engage on the article talk page if you are interested rather than here. Thanks. PeterEastern (talk) 08:30, 4 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

edit

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 10:04, 6 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Maltese legislative election, 2008

edit

 Template:Maltese legislative election, 2008 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Steel1943 (talk) 00:44, 2 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Operahousedetail.jpg

edit
 

The file File:Operahousedetail.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused image, age needs to be known to verify licencing tag

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 21:01, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply