User talk:MarioWonderExpert
Add topic| Due to personal issues, MarioWonderExpert will be away from Wikipedia for an undefined period of time. |
Emergency user slap button
Editors: Use this button if the user is malfunctioning. (direct link)
Unregistered users can a malfunctioning user to Wikipedia talk:Village stocks.
Trout Counter: 3
Archive
[edit]Fish Tank (Trouts)
Nouabalé-Ndoki National Park
[edit]Hi Mario, thanks for taking the time to review the edit. The content I added was based on the cited sources and written by me as part of an effort to improve coverage of the Sangha Trinational protected areas. I normally work on the Catalan Wikipedia first and then adapt and expand the material for the English Wikipedia. Could you let me know which specific parts of the edit made you think it was LLM-generated? If there are issues with the prose or sourcing, I'd be happy to improve them. Thanks. JosepMGracia (talk) 14:51, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer granted
[edit]
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Sandun Perera (singer)
[edit]Hello MarioWonderExpert, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Sandun Perera (singer), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Unclear which of the two G15 subcriteria is being applied. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Ca talk to me! 01:01, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- It is possibly AI, and does not clearly fit either subcategory.
- MarioWonderExpert (talk) 01:48, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
Quick Question
[edit]Hello. You just restored uncited text, in an article that has been tagged for lack of citations for years, where the text was deleted because it was not cited and because of the tag. You did not add citations though. And you asked that it not be deleted. I was wondering what you’re thinking. Thanks. ~2026-30203-63 (talk) 23:41, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- I did that too fast. I re-reverted myself in the page Sperm donation.
- MarioWonderExpert (talk) MarioWonderExpert (talk) 00:11, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you. --~2026-30203-63 (talk) 17:42, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
Moving pages
[edit]Please note per Wikipedia:Requested moves#Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves, if there has been any past debate about the best title for a page, any move of that page should be treated as controversial and should not be performed until after a new discussion. Since there has been previous discussion at Talk:Uruguay v Brazil (1950 FIFA World Cup)#Requested move that page should not be moved without a new discussion. DrKay (talk) 06:15, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
Rollback granted
[edit]
Hi MarioWonderExpert. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:
- Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits. For more information about when rollback is appropriate, see Wikipedia:Rollback § When to use rollback.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the permission will be revoked.
- Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!
I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, and feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate use of rollback. If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin) and Wikipedia:Rollback. Good luck and thanks! CoconutOctopus talk 06:42, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for granting me Rollback.
- MarioWonderExpert (talk) MarioWonderExpert (talk) 14:51, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
Thank for editing back my page that got deleted by random user
[edit]Hello There, Brother
I'm here to thank you for Editing back my page that got deleted from random user named Coffee Femboy67
Thank you alot and may god bless you, brother. SakanaJohn126 (talk) 14:47, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- I am filing a report to him right now.
- MarioWonderExpert (talk) 14:47, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
July 2026
[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Luis Gómez-Acebo, Duke of Badajoz when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance.
Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:26, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- I was rolling back edits from a sockpuppet account.
- MarioWonderExpert (talk) 17:29, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- You are still responsible for every edit you make and need to make sure you aren't reintroducing bad code. Just because they were a sock doesn't mean EVERYTHING they did was bad. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:30, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for the note. Per WP:BANNED, edits by blocked sockpuppets have no consensus and are routinely rolled back. However, I take your point regarding the code. MarioWonderExpert (talk) 17:32, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- You are still responsible for every edit you make and need to make sure you aren't reintroducing bad code. Just because they were a sock doesn't mean EVERYTHING they did was bad. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:30, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Jerodlycett. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Hongik University, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page, which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Remember, you are responsible for the edits you make with tools. Stop, and do research if it's not a clear case of vandalism. The source of the old file you were reverting to
which is this shows that the newly uploaded file has replaced it at the source. Jerod Lycett (talk) 11:29, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
Why were my edits non-constructive?
[edit]On the article Oswald Mosley, I made 2 edits to the article, which you can see in my contributions. They were swiftly reverted and were told they were "non-constructive" without further detail. What made them non-constructive and how can I make my edits more constructive? ~2026-40507-90 (talk) 21:38, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
Why weren't my edits non constructive?
[edit]Hi, can you explain this edit? Jerod Lycett (talk) 08:12, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
- It removed content from an article. MarioWonderExpert (talk) 20:50, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
- You were the one removing the content. The IMO website has a link to the current results which do show Alexander Wang as having received not only a fourth gold, but now a perfect score. The TA was correct in adding sourced content which you removed. Jerod Lycett (talk) 02:00, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
- I am so sorry that I thought it removed content. MarioWonderExpert (talk) 03:12, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
- You were the one removing the content. The IMO website has a link to the current results which do show Alexander Wang as having received not only a fourth gold, but now a perfect score. The TA was correct in adding sourced content which you removed. Jerod Lycett (talk) 02:00, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
Please slow down a bit
[edit]A lot of your recent reversions using the interceptor tool have been of constructive edits. Please slow down a bit and review the edits you're reverting carefully. Thanks and good luck! Yue🌙 (talk) 08:29, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
- I am now focusing on accuracy over speed. MarioWonderExpert (talk) 20:56, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]| The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| Nice work already, considering you've only been on Wikipedia for a few months. You're off to a great start! SHSR T • C 21:14, 20 July 2026 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
[edit]| The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| Keep seeing you around here! Nice work! WikipediholicRat (talk) 15:05, 21 July 2026 (UTC) |
Beam Me Up Scotty
[edit]Stop reverting my edits and saying it’s unconstructive (which is NOT even a real word) when what I’ve added is the correct format for Nicki Minaj’s pages Hiphopbarbieminaj (talk) 15:08, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
Hi there. I'm sorry that you almost got caught up in an edit war. I was actually making a notice about this war on WP:AN3, but I didn't notice that it was already resolved with you and Hiphopbarbieminaj while I was typing there. I discarded the AN3 report. I hope no near-3RR situation like this happens again to you, or anyone else. SHSR T • C 15:31, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
DIY transgender hormone therapy WIKI EDIT
[edit]The links that were put were links to external resources to buy medication. I feel that the wiki should not have that information and that their removal was necessary. There are dozens of wiki pages dedicated to DIY-sourcing of various medications, yet none of them have links directly to the storefronts. To make a good analogy: The wikipedia page for Advil would not include a direct link to the Amazon page to buy Advil. That is very clearly not how this wiki operates. Doing so would impact the liability of Wikipedia as the wiki then comes across as unbiased and endorsing of companies and brands. MiraHaze212 (talk) 16:11, 22 July 2026 (UTC)
Promotional awards on company articles
[edit]Hi. Please note that we only include notable awards (awards that have a Wikipedia article) on company articles. We don't want promotional content on our company articles. Thanks ~2026-41278-77 (talk) 03:36, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
- Got it. MarioWonderExpert (talk) 03:37, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
- Why you have warned me again? I've followed the MOS of Template:Infobox company. Please assume WP:GOODFAITH. ~2026-41278-77 (talk) 03:43, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
LendingCrowd and the TA ~2026-41278-77
[edit]Please. You're literally starting to get on that TA user's nerves. SHSR T • C 03:46, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
- I will stop reverting their edits MarioWonderExpert (talk) 03:49, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
- Glad to hear that. The whole situation is resolved anyway. Let's just forget it and move on. SHSR T • C 03:50, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
- I set the Interceptor threshold ot 0.75 to stop seeing borderline edits, which are my struggle. MarioWonderExpert (talk) 03:54, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
- Just asking out of interest: how does Interceptor work differently from Twinkle? SHSR T • C 03:55, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
- Interceptor works differently as it gives you edits above an ORES rating (probability of vandalism), with 0 being completely safe and 1 being absolute vandalism. At the bottom, there is a Rollback button, however, you can pick a custom template to put if you click the button on the right (just discovered this today). It is different than Twinkle, as Twinkle is often used with the normal Recent changes page.
- MarioWonderExpert (talk) 03:59, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
- Just asking out of interest: how does Interceptor work differently from Twinkle? SHSR T • C 03:55, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
- I set the Interceptor threshold ot 0.75 to stop seeing borderline edits, which are my struggle. MarioWonderExpert (talk) 03:54, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
- Glad to hear that. The whole situation is resolved anyway. Let's just forget it and move on. SHSR T • C 03:50, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
Emory Tate
[edit]Please explain clearly the issue with my edit, or I will report you for vandalizing ~2026-41358-66 (talk) 05:12, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
Go easy on the Emory Tate guy
[edit]He's just a new editor trying to improve the article, he's not a troll or a vandal. Maybe all this anti-vandal activity has hardened you, but we still need to WP:AGF. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 10:48, 25 July 2026 (UTC)