Marion Hallet, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Marion Hallet! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 26 October 2020 (UTC)


Your submission at Articles for creation: Norwich Women’s Film Weekend (November 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 03:21, 26 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter John Graham

edit
 
The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Madhavedits (talk) 06:56, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Peter John Graham moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Peter John Graham, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Currently, most of the article is uncited.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 10:26, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter John Graham (March 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 05:48, 17 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Norwich Women’s Film Weekend has been accepted

edit
 
Norwich Women’s Film Weekend, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Modussiccandi (talk) 14:45, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

March 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm CommanderWaterford. I noticed that in this edit to Ginette Vincendeau, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:22, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Tacyarg. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Ginette Vincendeau have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. This could go at the end of the article in the External Links section. Tacyarg (talk) 12:39, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Teresa Grimes (November 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jamiebuba (talk) 18:45, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Teresa Grimes (November 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Vanderwaalforces (talk) 04:40, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Teresa Grimes (December 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:40, 27 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Teresa Grimes (January 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MurielMary (talk) 10:31, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Teresa Grimes

edit
 

Hello, Marion Hallet. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Teresa Grimes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:07, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply