User talk:MarkZusab/archive6

Latest comment: 4 years ago by HasteurBot in topic G13 Eligibility Notice

Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.

 Talk page archives
 User talk:MarkZusab/archive1
 User talk:MarkZusab/archive2
 User talk:MarkZusab/archive3
 User talk:MarkZusab/archive4
 User talk:MarkZusab/archive5

TheWikiWizard/Workshop/Issues/March 2019

edit

(PLEASE NOTE: THIS ISSUE WILL BE MAILED MANUALLY DUE TO THE SHEER LACK OF SIZE OF THIS NEWSPAPER. PLEASE SUBSCRIBE HERE TO RECIEVE THE NEWSLETTER. THANK YOU FOR READING THIS NOTICE.)

Hello, MarkZusab! Here is the March 2019 issue of TheWikiWizard.

Hope you like this month's issue! If you'd like to discuss this issue, please go to this issue's talk page. Happy Reading! --Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 01:04, 15 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

NPR Newsletter No.17

edit
 

Hello MarkZusab,

News
Discussions of interest
  • Two elements of CSD G6 have been split into their own criteria: R4 for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons (Discussion), and G14 for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page (Discussion).
  • {{db-blankdraft}} was merged into G13 (Discussion)
  • A discussion recently closed with no consensus on whether to create a subject-specific notability guideline for theatrical plays.
  • There is an ongoing discussion on a proposal to create subject-specific notability guidelines for chemicals and organism taxa.
Reminders
  • NPR is not a binary keep / delete process. In many cases a redirect may be appropriate. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See a classic example of the templates to use. More templates are listed at the R template index. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them.
NPP Tools Report
  • Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself.
  • copyvio-check – automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar.
  • The NPP flowchart now has clickable hyperlinks.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828
Looking for inspiration? There are approximately 1000 female biographies to review.
Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.


Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Brown is a Beautiful Color

edit
 
With regards to Brown is a Beautiful Color, it could really use a couple of additional references. Especially to reviews of the book if available. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)(click me!) 23:22, 17 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
I have added several references to reviews of the book since you posted this here. MarkZusab (talk) 20:32, 24 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 12, 2019)

edit
 
Many of the internal organs of the human body
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Organ (anatomy)

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Zipper • Wanted poster


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 18 March 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Request for clarification/education

edit

Hi,

I put a PROD on this page, which you declined https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antibodies_from_lymphocyte_secretions, and I wondered if you would be willing to educate me on criteria for deletion. I'm not arguing about this page in particular -- I can see why a bias towards keeping information that might be useful one day to someone, once it's been reviewed, makes sense -- but I still think this is a bad page and I'm interested to know whether I didn't communicate my reasons properly, or whether I'm just wrong. What happened was this: I noticed the page on a list of pages with issues, and wondered if I could help. The page is a mess, unclear and with a number of inaccurate statements. So I looked at the original paper and the papers that reference it to see how I could clarify the page. Bottom line, there is no "there" there: the assay is hardly referenced at all, and nobody has built on it; it is not recommended by any of the papers on best practices for diagnosing tuberculosis that I checked; and the "method" is so basic that it doesn't deserve a name ("isolate white blood cells from a patient and see if they're making antibody to a suspected pathogen" is not exactly a major advance). It seemed to me that this is almost the equivalent of listing a self-published novel on Wikipedia, and even though it survived initial review I thought there was a case it should be taken down. I didn't explain all this in the note, and I wonder if discussing these issues in detail would have been helpful, or if there needs to be more of a smoking gun to justify removal.

I'm not sure if it matters, but when I put the PROD on the page itself I also put a note on the talk page of the original author https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mamunbmb and found that s/he has a history of putting up dubious pages.

Thank you for any advice you're willing to offer this newbie! Logophile59 (talk) 00:57, 18 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #356

edit

19:44, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

A Dobos torte for you!

edit
  7&6=thirteen () has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.


To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen () 20:20, 24 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 13, 2019)

edit
 
Lady Gaga playing a keytar, which is a type of keyboard instrument
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Keyboard instrument

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Organ (anatomy) • Zipper


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 25 March 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Cookies

edit
  Cookies!

DrewieStewie has given you some cookies! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else some cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Thanks for helping me with my userpage picture! I truly appreciate it. :)

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookies}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

DrewieStewie (talk) 02:47, 25 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #357

edit

18:05, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

De-PRODs

edit

Hi,

I've BLAR'd the de-PRODs you suggested suggested for merges (Ipostparcels and Gentoolkit) and tagged them as {{R with history}}.

Thanks,

SITH (talk) 19:31, 26 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

StraussInTheHouse, thank you for your edits and for notifying me. MarkZusab (talk) 00:42, 27 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
I'll also note that you cannot "decline" prods or speedy deletions, you're welcome to contest or de-prod them but as you're not an administrator, you can't decline much of anything. Thanks! Praxidicae (talk) 00:03, 27 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Praxidicae: I am aware that I am not an administrator, but do not see how that affects the wording of my de-PRODs. I've used the wording "remove" and "decline" in the past, both to indicate the same thing. As I understand it, the word is means (in this context) to politely refuse or to withhold consent. This seems to fit the action of removing a PROD. I also can not seem to find any specific policy saying that the word "decline" may only be used by administrators. Could you please elaborate why different wording must be used?
To add on to your statement that "as you're not an administrator, you can't decline much of anything", I'd like to point out that being an administrator is not a requirement to decline draft submissions, decline requested redirects, or to decline edit requests. MarkZusab (talk) 00:42, 27 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
You can't decline deletion requests was my point. Praxidicae (talk) 00:44, 27 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Praxidicae: I can't just remove an AfD template or speedy deletion without reason, but I am free to remove controversially placed speedy deletion tags (on a page I have not created & when another process should be used) or to remove any PROD. Are you saying that I am not allowed to decline/remove a PROD? MarkZusab (talk)

Children's Literature Newsletter March 2019

edit
 
Children's Literature March 2019

More good work has been underway since our last newsletter. Thanks to all the project members for what you to do to support Children's literature on Wikipedia.

Newly Recognized Content

 Finding Winnie Review by Guettarda
 Hello Lighthouse Review by Nova Crystallis
 Jew in the Thorns by Shrike and Nishidani
 The Rough Patch Review by Nova Crystallis

  Stellaluna by Enwebb
  Ursula K. Le Guin by Vanamonde Review by Chiswick Chap
  X: A Fabulous Child's Story by Bobamnertiopsis

Article Assessment

With the completion of our project banner project, we have a large backlog of unassessed articles. Doing article rating is a great way to find interesting articles with-in our project's scope and to also find articles that were incorrectly tagged. This project will hopefully let us better monitor and aid in the development the many articles that this project supports. Thanks to Legoktm for all his work in making this happen.

Google Custom Search Engine

Looking for information on a book? Try out the new Children's literature custom search engine. This custom google search engine will look at designated sites for information. Included so far are Kirkus Reviews, School Library Journal, Horn Book, and Publisher's Weekly. If you have ideas for other sites which should be added start a discussion on our project talk page.

You are receiving this because you are listed as an active member of the Children's Literature WikiProject or have chosen to subscribe to the newsletter. If you would like to sign-up for just the newsletters or want to be an active member but not get the newsletters you can do that here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:31, 26 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

This Month in Education: March 2019

edit

This Month in Education

Volume 8 • Issue 3 • March 2019


ContentsHeadlinesSubscribe


In This Issue

Facto Post – Issue 22 – 28 March 2019

edit
Facto Post – Issue 22 – 28 March 2019
 

The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.

When in the cloud, do as the APIs do

Half a century ago, it was the era of the mainframe computer, with its air-conditioned room, twitching tape-drives, and appearance in the title of a spy novel Billion-Dollar Brain then made into a Hollywood film. Now we have the cloud, with server farms and the client–server model as quotidian: this text is being typed on a Chromebook.

File:Cloud-API-Logo.svg
Logo of Cloud API on Google Cloud Platform

The term Applications Programming Interface or API is 50 years old, and refers to a type of software library as well as the interface to its use. While a compiler is what you need to get high-level code executed by a mainframe, an API out in the cloud somewhere offers a chance to perform operations on a remote server. For example, the multifarious bots active on Wikipedia have owners who exploit the MediaWiki API.

APIs (called RESTful) that allow for the GET HTTP request are fundamental for what could colloquially be called "moving data around the Web"; from which Wikidata benefits 24/7. So the fact that the Wikidata SPARQL endpoint at query.wikidata.org has a RESTful API means that, in lay terms, Wikidata content can be GOT from it. The programming involved, besides the SPARQL language, could be in Python, younger by a few months than the Web.

Magic words, such as occur in fantasy stories, are wishful (rather than RESTful) solutions to gaining access. You may need to be a linguist to enter Ali Baba's cave or the western door of Moria (French in the case of "Open Sesame", in fact, and Sindarin being the respective languages). Talking to an API requires a bigger toolkit, which first means you have to recognise the tools in terms of what they can do. On the way to the wikt:impactful or polymathic modern handling of facts, one must perhaps take only tactful notice of tech's endemic problem with documentation, and absorb the insightful point that the code in APIs does articulate the customary procedures now in place on the cloud for getting information. As Owl explained to Winnie-the-Pooh, it tells you The Thing to Do.

Links

If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:45, 28 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much!

edit

Thank you for helping improve my draft Draft:Louwailou. Now it's much better, and I feel more comfortable resubmitting it! Woshiyiweizhongguoren (🇨🇳) 12:17, 28 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome. I was happy to help out and improve a draft. Feel free to let me know if there are any other draft articles you are submitting. MarkZusab (talk) 23:31, 29 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Phil Yates

edit

Thanks for finding sources for the Phil Yates article! If you have anything you can add to any of the articles at User:BOZ/Draft pages that would put them a few steps closer to being reinstated as articles. :) I can restore the content of the redlinked articles if you find anything for those. BOZ (talk) 22:14, 29 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for notifying me about this. I plan to look and and try to improve some of those drafts. MarkZusab (talk) 15:59, 27 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 31 March 2019

edit

This week's article for improvement (week 14, 2019)

edit
 
The interior of a gym in The Netherlands, around 1900
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Gym

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Keyboard instrument • Organ (anatomy)


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 1 April 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Wikidata weekly summary #358

edit

16:29, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Georgia distilleries for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Georgia distilleries is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Georgia distilleries until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:22, 3 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Alan Crossman (Structural Engineer)

edit

Thanks for your edits on my original article. One reviewer has rejected the draft saying the person is 'reun of the mill'. I strongly dispute that. I wonder if you have any advice/ thoughts about how I can get the article accepted. Ian.Kirkland76 (talk) 16:03, 4 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Bring your idea for Wikimedia in Education to life! Launch of the Wikimedia Education Greenhouse

edit
Apply for Education Greenhouse


 

Are you passionate about open education? Do you have an idea to apply Wikimedia projects to an education initiative but don’t know where to start? Join the the Wikimedia & Education Greenhouse! It is an immersive co-learning experience that lasts 9 months and will equip you with the skills, knowledge and support you need to bring your ideas to life. You can apply as a team or as an individual, by May 12th. Find out more Education Greenhouse. For more information reachout to mguadalupe wikimedia.org

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:16, 5 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – April 2019

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2019).

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • Two more administrator accounts were compromised. Evidence has shown that these attacks, like previous incidents, were due to reusing a password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately. All admins are strongly encouraged to enable two-factor authentication, please consider doing so. Please always practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.
  • As a reminder, according to WP:NOQUORUM, administrators looking to close or relist an AfD should evaluate a nomination that has received few or no comments as if it were a proposed deletion (PROD) prior to determining whether it should be relisted.

This week's article for improvement (week 15, 2019)

edit
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Story of the Negro

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Gym • Keyboard instrument


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 8 April 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Wikidata weekly summary #359

edit

18:24, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: March 2019

edit
 




Headlines
  • Albania report: WikiFilmat SQ - new articles about the Albanian movie industry!
  • Armenia report: Art+Feminism+GLAM, Collaboration with Hovhannes Toumanian museum
  • Australia report: Art+Feminism 2019 in Australia
  • Brazil report: The GLAM at USP Museum of Veterinary Anatomy: a history of learnings and improvements
  • Colombia report: Moving GLAM institutions inside and outside Colombia
  • Czech Republic report: Edit-a-thon Prachatice
  • France report: Wiki day at the Institut national d'histoire de l'art; Age of wiki at the Musée Saint-Raymond
  • India report: Gujarat Vishw Kosh Trust content donation to Wikimedia
  • Italy report: Italian librarians in Milan
  • Macedonia report: WikiLeague: Edit-a-thon on German Literature
  • Netherlands report: WikiconNL, International Womens Day and working together with Amnesty, Field study Dutch Libraries and Wikimedia
  • Serbia report: Spring residences and a wiki competition
  • Sweden report: UNESCO; Working life museums; Swedish Performing Arts Agency shares historic music; Upload of glass plates photographs
  • UK report: Wiki-people and Wiki-museum-data
  • USA report: Women's History Month and The Met has two Wikimedians in the house
  • Wikidata report: Go Siobhan!
  • WMF GLAM report: Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons; Bengali Wikisource case study
  • Calendar: April's GLAM events
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Gary Stewart (music executive) moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Gary Stewart (music executive), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Snickers2686 (talk) 23:16, 13 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Snickers2686: The article contains five references, from Los Angeles Times, Deadline Hollywood, Variety, Billboard, and The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles. Are you seriously saying that the article "does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published", fails WP:GNG, and contains unreferenced information? Please revert your move. MarkZusab (talk) 23:22, 13 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
@MarkZusab: It needs more body than just a single sentence. Okay, so he died. How was he important? What did he do? As the article stands, it seems insignificant. That's why I moved it to draft to give you a chance to expand it PRIOR to publishing.

This week's article for improvement (week 16, 2019)

edit
 
Various dairy products: milk, feta cheese, yogurt and parmesan cheese (clockwise from upper-left)
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Dairy product

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Story of the Negro • Gym


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 15 April 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

G13

edit

So, are you going to work on all of these stale drafts you are saving? Just curious. Liz Read! Talk! 04:57, 15 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

I do plan to work on the majority of them. However, some of them were rushed and will likely be deleted again in 6 months. MarkZusab (talk) 22:27, 18 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #360

edit

23:00, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

TheWikiWizard - April 2019

edit

Hello, MarkZusab! Here is the April 2019 issue of TheWikiWizard.

Hope you like this month's issue! If you'd like to discuss this issue, please go to this issue's talk page. Happy Reading! --Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 03:06, 16 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Joan Almond vs. Joan Almond articles

edit

Hello @MarkZusab:, It appears that we've both created and have been working simultaneously on draft articles for the same person: Joan Almond. My version of the Joan Almond article is at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:LorriBrown/Joan_Almond. I recently submitted this article to AfC for approval (yesterday); however, it was rejected. :-) Would you consider collaborating on my version rather than continuing your research to expand on your version? Thank you for your consideration! Kind regards, LorriBrown (talk) 18:18, 17 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

@LorriBrown: Thank you for notifying me about this. I appreciate all of the work/research that you have done with your draft. I have since published Draft:Joan Almond to main space, but would greatly appreciate you merging your work into the page. The career section and its references, most of all. I don't have a specific interest in expanding my research into the article at this time, and am also sorry that your draft was rejected. If you are okay with it, I can also merge your text/draft into the article, if you want. Feel free to let me know if you have any other comments or queries. MarkZusab (talk) 21:42, 18 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
@LorriBrown: I apologize for misunderstanding your intent. I have replied to you at IDOH's talk page after deleting Joan Almond. MarkZusab (talk) 01:17, 19 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Shelly (character) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shelly (character) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shelly (character) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CoolSkittle (talk) 23:03, 18 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Geometry of an algebraic curve

edit

About the note at the top of the page. Why is it so important to remove the note about the status of the page? I don't think it is against the policy or anything. I think it's important and useful to have some editorial note at the top for the sake of the other editors and the readers (to avoid the page to be considered as a proper Wikipedia article). -- Taku (talk) 04:46, 19 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Intrusionism

edit

Hi Mark. You declined my PROD on Intrusionism on the grounds that it could be merged and that you’d found sources. The reason I didn’t consider merging it was that I could not find sources that used the term with the meaning defined in the article. I therefore considered it a neologism effectively used by only one person. If you’ve found sources supporting the use of the term with this specific meanjng, could you add them please? Then I’d agree with you that a merge would be a good course of action. Thanks Mccapra (talk) 01:10, 20 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for not getting back to you earlier, but thank you for taking it to AfD. MarkZusab (talk) 15:57, 27 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

I think it would have made sense to merge the entry with Jagdish Bhagwati. FloridaArmy (talk) 17:53, 28 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Ellen Auster

edit

Nice work! Cheers, PKT(alk) 23:28, 20 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thank you and thanks for deprodding the article. I appreciate it. MarkZusab (talk) 23:34, 20 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

19:08, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

This Month in Education: April 2019

edit

This Month in Education

Volume 8 • Issue 4 • April 2019


ContentsHeadlinesSubscribe


In This Issue

Wikidata weekly summary #361

edit

Famousbirthdays.com as a source

edit

Hi MarkZusab. I noticed that you recently used famousbirthdays.com as a source for biographical information in Emma Tremblay . Please note that there is general consensus that famousbirthdays.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. (See (RSP entry)). If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 17:31, 24 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for notifying me. I am aware. MarkZusab (talk) 15:49, 27 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

April 2019

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Prema Sridevi, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Daiyusha (talk) 15:43, 27 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Daiyusha: Please stop placing false warning messages. I am not the creator of that page, and you placed speedy deletion tags that do not apply. The article does "credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject" and it does serve "only to promote or publicise an entity". Feel free to take it to AfD. MarkZusab (talk) 15:47, 27 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
Okay, G11 maybe not but definitely an A7. Daiyusha (talk) 15:51, 27 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
The article does indicate significance as an investigative journalist who was editor of and associated with several prominent Indian news channels. She may or may not be notable, so I suggest you take this to AfD as an alternative to edit-warring. MarkZusab (talk) 15:55, 27 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
I see that you have a history of improperly placing speedy deletion tags, so I suggest you stop doing this in the future. I also recommend you read Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion, Wikipedia:Credible claim of significance, and Wikipedia:Common claims of significance or importance. MarkZusab (talk) 16:09, 27 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disruptive

edit

wtf is abusive, you deprodded without a reason, editwarred instead of discussing first, see talk page Atlantic306 (talk) 19:59, 27 April 2019 (UTC) \Reply

@Atlantic306: You seem to have a deep misunderstanding of what disruptive means, what abusive means, how PROD works, and how editwarring works. Saying "wtf" in response to someone reverting useful changes to an article in what appears to be bad faith is not "abusive" and there is nothing wrong with deprodding without a given reason. I find it ironic that you are accusing me of being disruptive and editwarring, when the only person doing here that is yourself. My only three edits to the page have been a deprod, the addition of wikilinks, and a revert of a disruptive edit. This is not in any way repeatedly overriding the contributions of others, nor is it anywhere close to violating WP:3RR. I recommend that you read WP:MOS, WP:PROD, Wikipedia:Disruptive editing, and Wikipedia:Edit warring. If you want to argue with people other than me about the citation style or promotional language, feel free to continue that on the talk page of the article. MarkZusab (talk) 20:18, 27 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • You know full well that WP:PROD#objecting advises strongly to give a reason for deprodding, my edit was not disruptive as it was removing promotional material added by a blocked suspected UPE editor and you can see on the talk page the link to the discussion where it is confirmed that the referencing system used is not appropriate for websites and does not comply with MOS. Finally, wtf is abusive and discourtious Atlantic306 (talk) 20:26, 27 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
1. I am fully aware of what WP:PROD does and does not advise. I removed the PROD due to it not being an uncontroversial deletion. That does not change the fact that removing a PROD is not disruptive editing.
2. Your edit was disruptive due to the fact that you were reverting a useful and good faith edit. Do you seriously think adding two wikilinks to an article is "obvious promotion"? In addition, your change of wording in the lead of the article was not grammatically correct or following convention. Removing undisclosed paid editing that is promotional is good, but not when you remove good faith and constructive edits from other editors at the same time.
3. There is no policy or consensus that the current system of citing sources may only be used for books. WP:MOS, WP:SFN and WP:SRF do not dictate that it at all. The Village Pump discussion linked to from the talk page also does not discuss its use only in books at all, but does give examples of citing websites.
4. I do not want to argue with you about the meaning of "wtf". I intended it as a ""expression of disbelief" and apologize if you found that a discourtesy.
MarkZusab (talk) 22:34, 27 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 18, 2019)

edit
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Gunilla Persson

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Biodegradable plastic • Dairy product


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 29 April 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Wikidata weekly summary #362

edit

22:27, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Facto Post – Issue 23 – 30 April 2019

edit
Facto Post – Issue 23 – 30 April 2019
 

The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.

Completely clouded?
 
Cloud computing logo

Talk of cloud computing draws a veil over hardware, but also, less obviously but more importantly, obscures such intellectual distinction as matters most in its use. Wikidata begins to allow tasks to be undertaken that were out of easy reach. The facility should not be taken as the real point.

Coming in from another angle, the "executive decision" is more glamorous; but the "administrative decision" should be admired for its command of facts. Think of the attitudes ad fontes, so prevalent here on Wikipedia as "can you give me a source for that?", and being prepared to deal with complicated analyses into specified subcases. Impatience expressed as a disdain for such pedantry is quite understandable, but neither dirty data nor false dichotomies are at all good to have around.

Issue 13 and Issue 21, respectively on WP:MEDRS and systematic reviews, talk about biomedical literature and computing tasks that would be of higher quality if they could be made more "administrative". For example, it is desirable that the decisions involved be consistent, explicable, and reproducible by non-experts from specified inputs.

What gets clouded out is not impossibly hard to understand. You do need to put together the insights of functional programming, which is a doctrinaire and purist but clearcut approach, with the practicality of office software. Loopless computation can be conceived of as a seamless forward march of spreadsheet columns, each determined by the content of previous ones. Very well: to do a backward audit, when now we are talking about Wikidata, we rely on integrity of data and its scrupulous sourcing: and clearcut case analyses. The MEDRS example forces attention on purge attempts such as Beall's list.

Links

If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:27, 30 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 30 April 2019

edit

Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals update #031, 01 May 2019

edit

Back to the drawing board

edit

Implementation of the new portal design has been culled back almost completely, and the cull is still ongoing. The cull has also affected portals that existed before the development of the automated design.

Some of the reasons for the purge are:

  • Portals receive insufficient traffic, making it a waste of editor resources to maintain them, especially for narrow-scope or "micro" portals
  • The default {{bpsp}} portals are redundant with the corresponding articles, being based primarily on the corresponding navigation footer displayed on each of those articles, and therefore not worth separate pages to do so
  • They were mass created

Most of the deletions have been made without prejudice to recreation of curated portals, so that approval does not need to be sought at Deletion Review in those cases.

In addition to new portals being deleted, most of the portals that were converted to an automated design have been reverted.

Which puts us back to portals with manually selected content, that need to be maintained by hand, for the most part, for the time being, and back facing some of the same problems we had when we were at this crossroads before:

  • Manually maintained portals are not scalable (they are labor intensive, and there aren't very many editors available to maintain them)
  • The builders/maintainers tend to eventually abandon them
  • Untended handcrafted portals go stale and fall into disrepair over time

These and other concepts require further discussion. See you at WT:POG.

However, after the purge/reversion is completed, some of the single-page portals might be left, due to having acceptable characteristics (their design varied some). If so, then those could possibly be used as a model to convert and/or build more, after the discussions on portal creation and design guidelines have reached a community consensus on what is and is not acceptable for a portal.

See you at WT:POG.

Curation

edit

A major theme in the deletion discussions was the need for portals to be curated, that is, each one having a dedicated maintainer.

There are currently around 100 curated portals. Based on the predominant reasoning at MfD, it seems likely that all the other portals may be subject to deletion.

See you at WT:POG.

Traffic

edit

An observation and argument that arose again and again during the WP:ENDPORTALS RfC and the ongoing deletion drive of {{bpsp}} default portals, was that portals simply do not get much traffic. Typically, they get a tiny fraction of what the corresponding like-titled articles get.

And while this isn't generally considered a good rationale for creation or deletion of articles, portals are not articles, and portal critics insist that traffic is a key factor in the utility of portals.

The implication is that portals won't be seen much, so wouldn't it be better to develop pages that are?

And since such development isn't limited to editing, almost anything is possible. If we can't bring readers to portals, we could bring portal features, or even better features, to the readers (i.e., to articles)...

Some potential future directions of development

edit

Quantum portals?

edit

An approach that has received some brainstorming is "quantum portals", meaning portals generated on-the-fly and presented directly on the view screen without any saved portal pages. This could be done by script or as a MediaWiki program feature, but would initially be done by script. The main benefits of this is that it would be opt-in (only those who wanted it would install it), and the resultant generated pages wouldn't be saved, so that there wouldn't be anything to maintain except the script itself.

Non-portal integrated components

edit

Another approach would be to focus on implementing specific features independently, and provide them somewhere highly visible in a non-portal presentation context (that is, on a page that wasn't a portal that has lots of traffic, i.e., articles). Such as inserted directly into an article's HTML, as a pop-up there, or as a temporary page. There are scripts that use these approaches (providing unrelated features), and so these approaches have been proven to be feasible.

What kind of features could this be done with?

The various components of the automated portal design are transcluded excerpts, news, did you know, image slideshows, excerpt slideshows, and so on.

Some of the features, such as navigation footers and links to sister projects are already included on article pages. And some already have interface counterparts (such as image slideshows). Some of the rest may be able to be integrated directly via script, but may need further development before they are perfected. Fortunately, scripts are used on an opt-in basis, and therefore wouldn't affect readers-in-general and editors-at-large during the development process (except for those who wanted to be beta testers and installed the scripts).

The development of such scripts falls under the scope of the Javascript-WikiProject/Userscript-department, and will likely be listed on Wikipedia:User scripts/List when completed enough for beta-testing. Be sure to watchlist that page.

Where would that leave curated portals?

edit

Being curated. At least for the time being.

New encyclopedia program features will likely eventually render most portals obsolete. For example, the pop-up feature of MediaWiki provides much the same functionality as excerpts in portals already, and there is also a slideshow feature to view all the images on the current page (just click on any image, and that activates the slideshow). Future features could also overlap portal features, until there is nothing that portals provide that isn't provided elsewhere or as part of Wikipedia's interface.

But, that may be a ways off. Perhaps months or years. It depends on how rapidly programmers develop them.

Keep on keepin' on

edit

The features of Wikipedia and its articles will continue to evolve, even if Portals go by the wayside. Most, if not all of portals' functionality, or functions very similar, will likely be made available in some form or other.

And who knows what else?

No worries.

Until next issue...    — The Transhumanist   00:27, 2 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of The Self-Sufficient-ish Bible for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Self-Sufficient-ish Bible is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Self-Sufficient-ish Bible until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:13, 3 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

We have a problem

edit

I have restored your edit. We have the same problem with the same self-important Wikipedian :-) But my problem is more serious because he has reverted my 7 consecutive edits, then restored only one. By the way; What was wrong with this? I do not want to start an edit war but you can do something about it because the title is really misleading. Regards :-) Vikom talk 17:35, 4 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – May 2019

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2019).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • XTools Admin Stats, a tool to list admins by administrative actions, has been revamped to support more types of log entries such as AbuseFilter changes. Two additional tools have been integrated into it as well: Steward Stats and Patroller Stats.

  Arbitration

  • In response to the continuing compromise of administrator accounts, the Arbitration Committee passed a motion amending the procedures for return of permissions (diff). In such cases, the committee will review all available information to determine whether the administrator followed "appropriate personal security practices" before restoring permissions; administrators found failing to have adequately done so will not be resysopped automatically. All current administrators have been notified of this change.
  • Following a formal ratification process, the arbitration policy has been amended (diff). Specifically, the two-thirds majority required to remove or suspend an arbitrator now excludes (1) the arbitrator facing suspension or removal, and (2) any inactive arbitrator who does not respond within 30 days to attempts to solicit their feedback on the resolution through all known methods of communication.

  Miscellaneous


This week's article for improvement (week 19, 2019)

edit
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Production logo

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Gunilla Persson • Biodegradable plastic


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 6 May 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Wikidata weekly summary #363

edit

16:27, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter

edit
 
April 2019—Issue 001


Tree of Life


Welcome to the inaugural issue of the Tree of Life newsletter!
Newly recognized content

  Sturgeon nominated by Atsme, reviewed by Chiswick Chap
  Eastern brown snake nominated by Casliber, reviewed by Opabinia regalis
  Cactus wren nominated by CaptainEek, reviewed by Sainsf
  Bidni nominated by PolluxWorld, reviewed by DepressedPer
  Crinoid nominated by Cwmhiraeth, reviewed by Chiswick Chap

Newly nominated FAs

 Cretoxyrhina nominated by Macrophyseter
 Eastern brown snake nominated by Casliber



WikiCup heating up

Tree of Life editors are making a respectable showing in this year's WikiCup, with three regular editors advancing to the third round. Overall winner from 2016, Casliber, topped the scoreboard in points for round 2, getting a nice bonus for bringing Black mamba to FA. Enwebb continues to favor things remotely related to bats, bringing Stellaluna to GA. Plants editor Guettarda also advanced to round 3 with several plant-related DYKs.

Wikipedia page views track animal migrations, flowers blooming

A March 2019 paper in PLOS Biology found that Wikipedia page views vary seasonally for species. With a dataset of 31,751 articles about species, the authors found that roughly a quarter of all articles had significant seasonal variations in page views on at least one language version of Wikipedia. They examined 245 language versions. Page views also peaked with cultural events, such as views of the Great white shark article during Shark Week or Turkey during Thanksgiving.

 
Seasonal variation in page views among nine bird species
Did you know ... that Tree of Life editors bring content to the front page nearly every day?

You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:24, 7 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

This Month in GLAM: April 2019

edit
 




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Speedy deletion nomination of How to Buy, Sell, and Profit on eBay

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on How to Buy, Sell, and Profit on eBay, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 10:41, 10 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 20, 2019)

edit
 
Sashimi at a restaurant
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Sashimi

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Production logo • Gunilla Persson


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 13 May 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

A page you started (Lester H. Smith) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Lester H. Smith.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Neither the article nor the sources mention any middle name but I was able to find some other obituaries that use it.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed, Rosguill talk 00:56, 13 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #364

edit

00:48, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of How to Buy, Sell, and Profit on eBay for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article How to Buy, Sell, and Profit on eBay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How to Buy, Sell, and Profit on eBay until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 17:52, 16 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

TheWikiWizard - May 2019

edit

Hello, MarkZusab! Here is the May 2019 issue of TheWikiWizard.

Hope you like this month's issue! If you'd like to discuss this issue, please go to this issue's talk page. Happy Reading! --Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 23:51, 16 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Facto Post – Issue 24 – 17 May 2019

edit
Facto Post – Issue 24 – 17 May 2019
 
Text mining display of noun phrases from the US Presidential Election 2012
 

The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
Semantic Web and TDM – a ContentMine view

Two dozen issues, and this may be the last, a valediction at least for a while.

It's time for a two-year summation of ContentMine projects involving TDM (text and data mining).

Wikidata and now Structured Data on Commons represent the overlap of Wikimedia with the Semantic Web. This common ground is helping to convert an engineering concept into a movement. TDM generally has little enough connection with the Semantic Web, being instead in the orbit of machine learning which is no respecter of the semantic. Don't break a taboo by asking bots "and what do you mean by that?"

The ScienceSource project innovates in TDM, by storing its text mining results in a Wikibase site. It strives for compliance of its fact mining, on drug treatments of diseases, with an automated form of the relevant Wikipedia referencing guideline MEDRS. Where WikiFactMine set up an API for reuse of its results, ScienceSource has a SPARQL query service, with look-and-feel exactly that of Wikidata's at query.wikidata.org. It also now has a custom front end, and its content can be federated, in other words used in data mashups: it is one of over 50 sites that can federate with Wikidata.

The human factor comes to bear through the front end, which combines a link to the HTML version of a paper, text mining results organised in drug and disease columns, and a SPARQL display of nearby drug and disease terms. Much software to develop and explain, so little time! Rather than telling the tale, Facto Post brings you ScienceSource links, starting from the how-to video, lower right.

ScienceSourceReview, introductory video: but you need run it from the original upload file on Commons
Links for participation

The review tool requires a log in on sciencesource.wmflabs.org, and an OAuth permission (bottom of a review page) to operate. It can be used in simple and more advanced workflows. Examples of queries for the latter are at d:Wikidata_talk:ScienceSource project/Queries#SS_disease_list and d:Wikidata_talk:ScienceSource_project/Queries#NDF-RT issue.

Please be aware that this is a research project in development, and may have outages for planned maintenance. That will apply for the next few days, at least. The ScienceSource wiki main page carries information on practical matters. Email is not enabled on the wiki: use site mail here to Charles Matthews in case of difficulty, or if you need support. Further explanatory videos will be put into commons:Category:ContentMine videos.


If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:52, 17 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

NPR Newsletter No.18

edit
 

Hello MarkZusab,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

Niharika Kohli, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:

  • Allow filtering by no citations in page curation
  • Not having CSD and PRODs automatically marked as reviewed, reflecting current consensus among reviewers and current Twinkle functionality.
Reliable Sources for NPP

Rosguill has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.

Backlog drive coming soon

Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.

News
Discussions of interest

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250


Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk) at 19:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reset G13

edit

Hi Mark, only reset G13 for only if pages would survive AfD. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 16:50, 19 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 21, 2019)

edit
 
Ancient Greek letters painted on the body of an Attic black-figure cup
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Letter (alphabet)

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Sashimi • Production logo


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 20 May 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

13:03, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Books & Bytes, Issue 33

edit

  The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 33, March – April 2019

  • #1Lib1Ref
  • Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
  • Global branches update
  • Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 21 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #365

edit

Nomination of Emma Chamberlain for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emma Chamberlain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emma Chamberlain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Abote2 (talk) 23:24, 24 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Clean-up activities

edit

Hi - Please can you make sure you use the edit summaries to explain the nature of your edits. In particular please can you explain why you reverted a couple of clean up actions (i) Mid-Western Regional Hospital. This is a disambiguation page. No hospitals have used this name for a number of years and the article is an orphan (ii) Carlow-Kilkenny Acute Hospitals. This grouping of just two hospitals went their separate ways on the re-organisation of the Irish health service in 2013. So again no hospitals are members of this grouping and the article is an orphan. We do not normally retain short articles like this if they are orphans. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 06:43, 25 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For your diligent work creating innumerable redirects from alternative names for important subjects. signed, Rosguill talk 19:06, 26 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 22, 2019)

edit
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Josephine Bornebusch

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Letter (alphabet) • Sashimi


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 27 May 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Wikidata weekly summary #366

edit

15:33, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Bocadin

edit

Given the improvements you made to the article, especially the addition of sources, I'm surprised you didn't go ahead and remove the PROD tag yourself. Wikiacc () 19:59, 27 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

This Month in Education: May 2019

edit

This Month in Education

Volume 8 • Issue 5 • May 2019


ContentsHeadlinesSubscribe


In This Issue

TheWikiWizard - Update

edit

Dear reader,

Thank you for subscribing to TheWikiWizard. This is a special message letting you know that the June/July/August issues of TheWikiWizard may be delayed, due to the absence of User:Thegooduser. Thegooduser and the other editors of TWW will try their best to deliver these issues to you. Thank you for reading TWW, and we hope to see you again in September 2019. Thank you for your patience and understanding, and enjoy your summer! :-) We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused. Happy Editing!

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 00:04, 31 May 2019 (UTC) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk)Reply

The Signpost: 31 May 2019

edit

This week's article for improvement (week 23, 2019)

edit
 
The official logo of the latest HTML version, HTML5
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

HTML

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Josephine Bornebusch • Letter (alphabet)


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 3 June 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Wikidata weekly summary #367

edit

15:24, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Children's Literature Newsletter April/May 2019

edit
 
Children's Literature April/May 2019

This newsletter sees us embark on a project drive around article creation of some medium, or higher, importance topics that are currently redlinks. Read more and consider joining the work.

Newly Recognized Content

 A Sick Day for Amos McGee Review by Valereee
 Children of Blood and Bone Review by Fearstreetsaga
 Derrick Barnes by Bradv Review by ReaderofthePack
 The Great Migration: Journey to the North by Malexander (BYU)
 Harry B. Neilson by Moonraker

 The Lion & the Mouse Review by Farang Rak Tham
  Newbery Medal
 Scoops (magazine) by Mike Christie
 A Sick Day for Amos McGee Review by Valereee
 This is Not My Hat Review by Ceranthor

Awards in Red

MrLinkinPark333 recently pointed out that on some of our Top importance pages about Children's literature awards there are many redlinks. The three pages with these redlinks are Caldecott Medal, Newbery Medal, and Carnegie Medal (with 0 existing redlinks in the other top importance award article - Astrid Lindgren Memorial Award). As of this newsletter there are 222 redlinks in those three articles. How many can we as a project create over the next 6 weeks? Could we even do better and see if we could create any that earn a Did You Know or even get it up to Good Article status?

As always feel free to head on over to the project discussion page if you find yourself in need of any help as we work to turn these notable entries on some of our most important articles blue.

You are receiving this because you are listed as an active member of the Children's Literature WikiProject or have chosen to subscribe to the newsletter. If you would like to sign-up for just the newsletters or want to be an active member but not get the newsletters you can do that here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 3 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

May 2019 Tree of Life Newsletter

edit
 
May 2019—Issue 002


Tree of Life


Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Newly recognized content

  Cretoxyrhina by Macrophyseter
  Bramble Cay melomys by The lorax/Vanamonde93, reviewed by Jens Lallensack
  Chimpanzee by LittleJerry/Chiswick Chap, reviewed by Tim riley
  Spinophorosaurus by FunkMonk/Jens Lallensack, reviewed by Enwebb
  Trachodon mummy by Jens Lallensack, reviewed by Gog the Mild
  Megabat by Enwebb, reviewed by Jens Lallensack

Newly nominated FAs

  Spinophorosaurus by FunkMonk/Jens Lallensack
  Trachodon mummy by Jens Lallensack




Fundamental changes being discussed at WikiProject Biology

On 23 May, user Prometheus720 created a talk page post, "Revamp of Wikiproject Biology--Who is In?". In the days since, WP:BIOL has been bustling with activity, with over a dozen editors weighing in on this discussion, as well as several others that have subsequently spawned. An undercurrent of thought is that WP:BIOL has too many subprojects, preventing editors from easily interacting and stopping a "critical mass" of collaboration and engagement. Many mergers and consolidations of subprojects have been tentatively listed, with a consolidation of WikiProjects Genetics + Molecular and Cell Biology + Computational Biology + Biophysics currently in discussion. Other ideas being aired include updating old participants lists, redesigning project pages to make them more user-friendly, and clearly identifying long- and short-term goals.

Editor Spotlight: These editors want you to write about dinosaurs

Editors FunkMonk and Jens Lallensack had a very fruitful month, collaborating to bring two dinosaur articles to GA and then nominating them both for FA. They graciously decided to answer some questions for the first ToL Editor Spotlight, giving insight to their successful collaborations, explaining why you should collaborate with them, and also sharing some tidbits about their lives off-Wikipedia.

1) Enwebb: How long have you two been collaborating on articles?

  • Jens Lallensack: I started in the German Wikipedia in 2005 but switched to the English Wikipedia because of its very active dinosaur project. My first major collaboration with FunkMonk was on Heterodontosaurus in 2015.
  • FunkMonk: Yeah, we had interacted already on talk pages and through reviewing each other's articles, and at some point I was thinking of expanding Heterodontosaurus, and realised Jens had already written the German Wikipedia version, so it seemed natural to work together on the English one. Our latest collaboration was Spinophorosaurus, where by another coincidence, I had wanted to work on that article for the WP:Four Award, and it turned out that Jens had a German book about the expedition that found the dinosaur, which I wouldn't have been able to utilise with my meagre German skills. Between those, we also worked on Brachiosaurus, a wider Dinosaur Project collaboration between several editors.

2) Enwebb: Why dinosaurs?

  • JL: Because of the huge public interest in them. But dinosaurs are also highly interesting from a scientific point of view: key evolutionary innovations emerged within this group, such as warm-bloodedness, gigantism, and flight. Dinosaur research is, together with the study of fossil human remains, the most active field in paleontology. New scientific techniques and approaches tend to get developed within this field. Dinosaur research became increasingly interdisciplinary, and now does not only rely on various fields of biology and geology, but also on chemistry and physics, among others. Dinosaurs are therefore ideal to convey scientific methodology to the general public.
  • FM: As outlined above, dinosaurs have been described as a "gateway to science"; if you learn about dinosaurs, you will most likely also learn about a lot of scientific fields you would not necessarily be exposed to otherwise. On a more personal level, having grown up with and being influenced by various dinosaur media, it feels pretty cool to help spread knowledge about these animals, closest we can get to keeping them alive.

3) Enwebb: Why should other editors join you in writing articles related to paleontology? Are you looking to attract new editors, or draw in experienced editors from other areas of Wikipedia?

  • JL: Because we are a small but active and helpful community. Our Dinosaur collaboration, one of the very few active open collaborations in Wikipedia, makes high-level writing on important articles easier and more fun. Our collaboration is especially open to editors without prior experience in high-level writing. But we do not only write articles: several WikiProject Dinosaur participants are artists who do a great job illustrating the articles, and maintain an extensive and very active image review system. In fact, a number of later authors started with contributing images.
  • FM: Anyone who is interested in palaeontology is welcome to try writing articles, and we would be more than willing to help. I find that the more people that work on articles simultaneously with me, the more motivation I get to write myself. I am also one of those editors who started out contributing dinosaur illustrations and making minor edits, and only began writing after some years. But when I got to it, it wasn't as intimidating as I had feared, and I've learned a lot in the process. For example anatomy; if you know dinosaur anatomy, you have a very good framework for understanding the anatomy of other tetrapod animals, including humans.

4) Enwebb: Between the two of you, you have over 300 GA reviews. FunkMonk, you have over 250 of those. What keeps you coming back to review more articles?

  • FM: One of the main reasons I review GANs is to learn more about subjects that seem interesting (or which I would perhaps not come across otherwise). There are of course also more practical reasons, such as helping an article on its way towards FAC, to reduce the GAN backlog, and to "pay back" when I have a nomination up myself. It feels like a win-win situation where I can be entertained by interesting info, while also helping other editors get their nominations in shape, and we'll end up with an article that hopefully serves to educate a lot of people (the greater good).
  • JL: Because I enjoy reading Wikipedia articles and like to learn new things. In addition, reviews give me the opportunity to have direct contact with the authors, and help them to make their articles even better. This is quite rewarding for me personally. But I also review because I consider our GA and FA system to be of fundamental importance for Wikipedia. When I started editing Wikipedia (the German version), the article promotion reviews motivated me and improved my writing skills a lot. Submitting an article for review requires one to get serious and take additional steps to bring the article to the best quality possible. GAs and FAs are also a good starting point for readers, and may motivate them to become authors themselves.

5) Enwebb: What are your editing preferences? Any scripts or gadgets you find invaluable?

  • FM: One script that everyone should know about is the duplink highlight tool. It will show duplinks within the intro and body of a given article separately, and it seems a lot of people still don't know about it, though they are happy when introduced to it. I really liked the citationbot too (since citation consistency is a boring chore to me), but it seems to be blocked at the moment due to some technical issues.
  • JL: I often review using the Wikipedia Beta app on my smartphone, as it allows me to read without needing to sit in front of the PC. For writing, I find the reference management software Zotero invaluable, as it generates citation templates automatically, saving a lot of time.
    • Editor's note: I downloaded Zotero and tried it for the first time and think it is a very useful tool. More here.

6) Enwebb: What would surprise the ToL community to learn about your life off-wiki?

  • FM: Perhaps that I have no background in natural history/science, but work with animation and games. But fascination with and knowledge of nature and animals is actually very helpful when designing and animating characters and creatures, so it isn't that far off, and I can actually use some of the things I learn while writing here for my work (when I wrote the Dromaeosauroides article, it was partially to learn more about the animal for a design-school project).
  • JL: That I am actually doing research on dinosaurs. Though I avoid writing about topics I publish research on, my Wikipedia work helps me to keep a good general overview over the field, and quite regularly I can use what I learned while writing for Wikipedia for my research.

Get in touch with these editors regarding collaboration at WikiProject Dinosaurs!

Marine life continues to dominate ToL DYKs

  Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.

Sent by DannyS712 (talk) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 03:44, 4 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – June 2019

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2019).

 

  Administrator changes

  AndonicConsumed CrustaceanEnigmamanEuryalusEWS23HereToHelpNv8200paPeripitusStringTheory11Vejvančický

  CheckUser changes

  Ivanvector

  Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC seeks to clarify whether WP:OUTING should include information on just the English Wikipedia or any Wikimedia project.
  • An RfC on WT:RfA concluded that Requests for adminship and bureaucratship are discussions seeking to build consensus.
  • An RfC proposal to make the templates for discussion (TfD) process more like the requested moves (RM) process, i.e. "as a clearinghouse of template discussions", was closed as successful.

  Technical news

  • The CSD feature of Twinkle now allows admins to notify page creators of deletion if the page had not been tagged. The default behavior matches that of tagging notifications, and replaces the ability to open the user talk page upon deletion. You can customize which criteria receive notifications in your Twinkle preferences: look for Notify page creator when deleting under these criteria.
  • Twinkle's d-batch (batch delete) feature now supports deleting subpages (and related redirects and talk pages) of each page. The pages will be listed first but use with caution! The und-batch (batch undelete) option can now also restore talk pages.

  Miscellaneous


This Month in GLAM: May 2019

edit
 




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

This week's article for improvement (week 24, 2019)

edit
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Karla Faye Tucker

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: HTML • Josephine Bornebusch


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 10 June 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

17:06, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #368

edit

This week's article for improvement (week 25, 2019)

edit
 
Bookworm damage inside a book
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Bookworm (insect)

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Karla Faye Tucker • HTML


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 17 June 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Wikidata weekly summary #369

edit

20:37, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 26, 2019)

edit
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Legislator

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Bookworm (insect) • Karla Faye Tucker


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:06, 24 June 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Wikidata weekly summary #370

edit

17:29, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter July-August 2019

edit
 

Hello MarkZusab,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important.

QUALITY of REVIEWING

Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR.

Backlog

The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever.

Move to draft

NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations.

Notifying users

Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging.

PERM

Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway.

Other news

School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages.

Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication.


Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

The June 2019 Signpost is out!

edit

Article includes missing bio information.

edit

Hi,

Wikipedia is absolutely hard to understand.

I believe you've done some editing on a page about me. (Fishel Jacobs)

Is it allowed to make a couple of suggestions? These sources supply valid citations.

First, someone might want to add this source, which is a profile with researched sources:

"Hebrew Profile,"Chabadpedia.co.il. http://chabadpedia.co.il/index.php/פישל_ג%27ייקובס

Report about an online database/Talmudic law program over which I preside: https://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/halacha-hashkafa/a-revolution-for-jewish-women-technology-meets-halacha/2019/01/06/

"I recorded my yechidut," Shturem.com. http://shturem.org/index.php?section=news&id=89560

"Collection, karate breaks," Vidoops.com. https://vidoops.com/channel/youtube:UCqoL8jW055_weD-My2lAhkw

"Personal story," Ch79.178.33.108 (talk) 19:45, 30 June 2019 (UTC)abad.org. https://www.chabad.org/therebbe/article_cdo/aid/3915599/jewish/Against-all-Odds.htmReply

"Op-Ed" Israel National News. http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/22017

Profile http://crownheights.info/chabad-news/39257/mishpacha-magazine-profiles-rabbi-fishel-jacobs/

Is it possible to remove the banner?

Best wishes.

79.178.33.108 (talk) 19:45, 30 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 27, 2019)

edit
 
A soil profile depicting bedrock
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Bedrock

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Legislator • Bookworm (insect)


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 1 July 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Wikidata weekly summary #371

edit

Administrators' newsletter – July 2019

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2019).

 

  Administrator changes

  28bytesAd OrientemAnsh666BeeblebroxBoing! said ZebedeeBU Rob13Dennis BrownDeorDoRDFloquenbeam1Flyguy649Fram2GadfiumGB fanJonathunderKusmaLectonarMoinkMSGJNickOd MishehuRamaSpartazSyrthissTheDJWJBscribe
1Floquenbeam's access was removed, then restored, then removed again.
2Fram's access was removed, then restored, then removed again.

  Guideline and policy news

  • In a related matter, the account throttle has been restored to six creations per day as the mitigation activity completed.

  Technical news

  • The Wikimedia Foundation's Community health initiative plans to design and build a new user reporting system to make it easier for people experiencing harassment and other forms of abuse to provide accurate information to the appropriate channel for action to be taken. Community feedback is invited.

  Miscellaneous


21:22, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

June 2019 Tree of Life Newsletter

edit
 
June 2019—Issue 003


Tree of Life


Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Newly recognized content

  Masked booby by Casliber and Aa77zz, reviewed by Jens Lallensack
  Rook (bird) by Cwmhiraeth, reviewed by J Milburn
  Vernonopterus by Ichthyovenator, reviewed by Super Dromaeosaurus
  Campylocephalus by Ichthyovenator, reviewed by Super Dromaeosaurus
  Unionopterus by Super Dromaeosaurus, reviewed by Ashorocetus
  Big Cat, Little Cat by Barkeep49, reviewed by J Milburn
  Félicette by Kees08, reviewed by Nova Crystallis

Newly nominated content

  Masked booby by Casliber
  Adelophthalmidae
  Plains zebra by LittleJerry
  Letter-winged kite by Casliber



Relative WikiWork
Project name Relative WikiWork
Cats
4.79
Fisheries and fishing
4.9
Dogs
4.91
Viruses
4.91
ToL
4.94
Cetaceans
4.97
Primates
4.98
Sharks
5.04
All wikiprojects average
5.05
Dinosaurs
5.12
Equine
5.15
Bats
5.25
Mammals
5.32
Aquarium fishes
5.35
Hypericaceae
5.38
Turtles
5.4
Birds
5.46
Australian biota
5.5
Marine life
5.54
Animals
5.56
Paleontology
5.57
Rodents
5.58
Amphibians and Reptiles
5.64
Fungi
5.65
Bivalves
5.66
Plants
5.67
Algae
5.68
Arthropods
5.69
Hymenoptera
5.72
Microbiology
5.72
Cephalopods
5.74
Fishes
5.76
Ants
5.79
Gastropods
5.8
Spiders
5.86
Insects
5.9
Beetles
5.98
Lepidoptera
5.98
Spineless editors overwhelmed by stubs

Within the Tree of Life and its many subprojects, there is an abundance of stubs. Welcome to Wikipedia, what's new, right? However, based on all wikiprojects listed (just over two thousand), the Tree of Life project is worse off in average article quality than most. Based on the concept of relative WikiWork (the average number of "steps" needed to have a project consisting of all featured articles (FAs), where stub status → FA consists of six steps), only seven projects within the ToL have an average rating of "start class" or better. Many projects, particularly those involving invertebrates, hover at an average article quality slightly better than a stub. With relative WikiWorks of 5.98 each, WikiProject Lepidoptera and WikiProject Beetles have the highest relative WikiWork of any project. Given that invertebrates are incredibly speciose, it may not surprise you that many articles about them are lower quality. WikiProject Beetles, for example, has over 20 times more articles than WikiProject Cats. Wikipedia will always be incomplete, so we should take our relatively low WikiWork as motivation to write more articles that are also better in quality.

Editor Spotlight: Showing love to misfit taxa

We're joined for this month's Editor Spotlight by NessieVL, a long-time contributor who lists themselves as a member of WikiProject Fungus, WikiProject Algae, and WikiProject Cephalopods.

1) Enwebb: How did you come to edit articles about organisms and taxonomic groups?

  • Nessie: The main force, then and now, driving me to create or edit articles is thinking "Why isn't there an article on that on Wikipedia?" Either I'll read about some rarely-sighted creature in the deep sea or find something new on iNaturalist and want to learn more. First stop (surprise!) is Wikipedia, and many times there is just a stub or no page at all. Sometimes I just add the source that got me to the article, not sometimes I go deep and try to get everything from the library or online journals and put it all in an article. The nice thing about taxa is the strong precedent that all accepted extant taxa are notable, so one does not need to really worry about doing a ton of research and having the page get removed. I was super worried about this as a new editor: I still really dislike conflict so if I can avoid it I do. Anyway, the most important part is stitching an article in to the rest of Wikipedia: Linking all the jargon, taxonomers, pollinators, etc., adding categories, and putting in the correct WikiProjects. Recently I have been doing more of the stitching-in stuff with extant articles. The last deep-dive article I made was Karuka at the end of last year, which is a bit of a break for me. I guess it's easier to do all the other stuff on my tablet while watching TV.

2) Enwebb: Many editors in the ToL are highly specialized on a group of taxa. A look at your recently created articles includes much diversity, though, with viruses, bacteria, algae, and cnidarians all represented—are there any commonalities for the articles you work on? Would you say you're particularly interested in certain groups?

  • Nessie: I was a nerd from a time when that would get you beat up, so I like odd things and underdogs. I also avoid butting heads, so not only do I find siphonophores and seaweeds fascinating I don't have to worry about stepping on anyone's toes. I go down rabbitholes where I start writing an article like Mastocarpus papillatus because I found some growing on some rocks, then in my research I see it is parasitized by Pythium porphyrae, which has no article, and how can that be for an oomycete that oddly lives in the ocean and also attacks my tasty nori. So then I wrote that article and that got me blowing off the dust on other Oomycota articles, encouraged by the pull of propagating automatic taxoboxes. Once you've done the taxonomy template for the genus, well then you might as well do all the species now that the template is taken care of for them too. and so on until I get sucked in somewhere else. I think it's good to advocate for some of these 'oddball' taxa as it makes it easier for editors to expand their range from say plants to the pathogenic microorganisms of their favorite plant.
My favorite clades though, It's hard to pick for a dilettante like me. I like working on virus taxonomy, but I can't think of a specific virus species that I am awed by. Maybe Tulip breaking virus for teaching us economics or Variola virus for having so many smallpox deities, one of which was popularly sung about by Desi Arnaz and then inspired the name of a cartoon character who was then misremembered and then turned into a nickname for Howard Stern's producer Gary Dell'Abate. Sorry, really had to share that chain, but for a species that's not a staple food it probably has the most deities. But anyway, for having the most species that wow me, I love a good fungus or algae, but that often is led by my stomach. Also why I seem to research so many plant articles. You can't eat siphonophores, at least I don't, but they are fascinating with their federalist colonies of zooids. Bats are all amazing, but the task force seems to have done so much I feel the oomycetes and slime moulds need more love. Same thing with dinosaurs (I'm team Therizinosaurus though). But honestly, every species has that one moment in the research where you just go, wow, that's so interesting. For instance, I loved discovering that the picture-winged fly (Delphinia picta) has a mating dance that involves blowing bubbles. Now I keep expecting them to show me when they land on my arm, but no such luck yet.

3) Enwebb: I noticed that many of your recent edits utilize the script Rater, which aids in quickly reassessing the quality and importance of an article. Why is it important to update talk page assessments of articles? I also noticed that the quality rating you assign often aligns with ORES, a script that uses machine-learning to predict article quality. Coincidence?

  • Nessie: I initially started focusing on WikiProject talk page templates because they seem to be the key to data collecting and maintenance for articles, much more so than categories. This is where you note of an article needs an image, or audio, or a range map. It's how the cleanup listing bot sorts articles, and how Plantdrew does his automated taxobox usage stats. The latter inspired me to look for articles on organisms that are not assigned to any ToL WikiProjects which initially was in the thousands. I got it down to zero with just copypasta so you can imagine I was excited when I saw the rater tool. Back then I rated everything stub/low because it was faster: I couldn't check every article for the items on the B-class checklists. Plus each project has their own nuances to rating scales and I thought the editors in the individual projects would take it from there. I also thought all species were important, so how can I choose a favorite? Now it is much easier with the rater tool and the apparent consensus with Abductive's method of rating by the pageviews (0-9 views/day is low, 10-99 is med, 100-999 is high...). For the quality I generally go by the ORES rating, you caught me. It sometimes is thrown off by a long list of species or something, but it's generally good for stub to C: above that needs formal investigation and procedures I am still learning about. It seems that in the ToL projects we don't focus so much on getting articles to GA/FA so it's been harder to pick up. It was a little culture shock when I went on the Discord server and it seemed everyone was obsessed with getting articles up in quality. I think ToL is focusing on all the missing taxa and (re)organizing it all, which when you already have articles on every anime series or whatever you can focus on bulking the articles up more. In any event, on my growing to-do list is trying to get an article up to FA or GA and learn the process that way so I can better do the quality ratings and not just kick the can down the road.

4) Enwebb: What, if anything, can ToL and its subprojects do to better support collaboration and coordination among editors? How can we improve?

  • Nessie: I mentioned earlier that the projects are the main way maintenance is done. And it is good that we have a bunch of subprojects that let those tasks get broken up into manageable pieces. Frankly I'm amazed anything gets done with WikiProject Plants with how huge its scope is. Yet this not only parcels out the work but the discussion as well. A few editors like Peter coxhead and Plantdrew keep an eye on many of the subprojects and spread the word, but it's still easy for newer editors to get a little lost. There should be balance between the lumping and splitting. The newsletter helps by crossing over all the WikiProjects, and if the discord channel picked up that would help too. Possibly the big Enwiki talk page changes will help as well.

5) Enwebb: What would surprise the ToL community to learn about your life off-Wikipedia?

  • Nessie: I'm not sure anything would be surprising. I focus on nature offline too, foraging for mushrooms or wild plants and trying to avoid ticks and mosquitos. I have started going magnet fishing lately, more to help clean up the environment than in the hopes of finding anything valuable. But it would be fun to find a weapon and help solve a cold case or something.
June DYKs

  Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.


sent by ZLEA via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:29, 3 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thank you

edit

Thank you for pointing out the mistakes I did in my draft Draft:Romanian_Crown_Estate. I was not aware that in the draft the Categories must be preceded by a semicolon. Now I know and I'll remember for the next time. Out of curiosity, what is the next step with my Draft? I guess it's waiting for review. Or do I still need to change/adapt something? Leochato (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:19, 4 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

This Month in Education: June 2019

edit

This Month in Education

Volume 8 • Issue 6 • June 2019


ContentsHeadlinesSubscribe


In This Issue

This week's article for improvement (week 28, 2019)

edit
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Sadomasochism

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Bedrock • Legislator


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 8 July 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Abrahahm lincon listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Abrahahm lincon. Since you had some involvement with the Abrahahm lincon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 09:49, 8 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #372

edit

20:12, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: June 2019

edit
 




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Books & Bytes Issue 34, May – June 2019

edit

  The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 34, May – June 2019

  • Partnerships
  • #1Lib1Ref
  • Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
  • Global branches update
  • Bytes in brief

French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:21, 12 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Move Draft to Wikipedia, is it ready?

edit

Hi,

Can I move my draft Wikipedia page/article Draft:Romanian_Crown_Estate. I assume I can, since before it was under review and now I see a new button "Move". I clicked once on the Move button and now I'm being asked to choose a new title and there I need to choose from a drop down list a sort of category such as (Article), User, Wikipedia... According to my understanding my draft can be moved to an Article. Could you please help me by confirming or correcting my above understanding. This is my first article here on Wikipedia, I'm very happy about it, but I prefer to ask, instead of making a mistake Leochato (talk) 20:35, 14 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 29, 2019)

edit
 
Legal status of cannabis possession for non-medical use (2018)

  Legal
  Illegal but decriminalized
  Illegal but often unenforced
  Illegal

See also countries that have legalized medical use of cannabis.
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Decriminalization of marijuana

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Sadomasochism • Bedrock


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 15 July 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

15:29, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #373

edit

Editing News #1—July 2019

edit

Read this in another languageSubscription list for this multilingual newsletter

 

Did you know?

Did you know that you can use the visual editor on a mobile device?

Every article has a pencil icon at the top. Tap on the pencil icon   to start editing.

Edit Cards

 

This is what the new Edit Cards for editing links in the mobile visual editor look like. You can try the prototype here: 📲 Try Edit Cards.

Welcome back to the Editing newsletter.

Since the last newsletter, the team has released two new features for the mobile visual editor and has started developing three more. All of this work is part of the team's goal to make editing on mobile web simpler.

Before talking about the team's recent releases, we have a question for you:

Are you willing to try a new way to add and change links?

If you are interested, we would value your input! You can try this new link tool in the mobile visual editor on a separate wiki.

Follow these instructions and share your experience:

📲 Try Edit Cards.

Recent releases

edit

The mobile visual editor is a simpler editing tool, for smartphones and tablets using the mobile site. The Editing team has recently launched two new features to improve the mobile visual editor:

  1. Section editing
    • The purpose is to help contributors focus on their edits.
    • The team studied this with an A/B test. This test showed that contributors who could use section editing were 1% more likely to publish the edits they started than people with only full-page editing.
  2. Loading overlay
    • The purpose is to smooth the transition between reading and editing.

Section editing and the new loading overlay are now available to everyone using the mobile visual editor.

New and active projects

edit

This is a list of our most active projects. Watch these pages to learn about project updates and to share your input on new designs, prototypes and research findings.

  • Edit cards: This is a clearer way to add and edit links, citations, images, templates, etc. in articles. You can try this feature now. Go here to see how: 📲Try Edit Cards.
  • Mobile toolbar refresh: This project will learn if contributors are more successful when the editing tools are easier to recognize.
  • Mobile visual editor availability: This A/B test asks: Are newer contributors more successful if they use the mobile visual editor? We are collaborating with 20 Wikipedias to answer this question.
  • Usability improvements: This project will make the mobile visual editor easier to use.  The goal is to let contributors stay focused on editing and to feel more confident in the editing tools.

Looking ahead

edit
  • Wikimania: Several members of the Editing Team will be attending Wikimania in August 2019. They will lead a session about mobile editing in the Community Growth space. Talk to them about how editing can be improved.
  • Talk Pages: In the coming months, the Editing Team will begin improving talk pages and communication on the wikis.

Learning more

edit

The VisualEditor on mobile is a good place to learn more about the projects we are working on. The team wants to talk with you about anything related to editing. If you have something to say or ask, please leave a message at Talk:VisualEditor on mobile.

PPelberg (WMF) (talk) and Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 21:25, 15 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Gary Stewart (music executive)

edit

Hello MarkZusab,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gary Stewart (music executive) for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 TT me 14:59, 21 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 30, 2019)

edit
 
The Montsoreau Flea Market is the largest flea market in the Loire Valley, France
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Flea market

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Decriminalization of marijuana • Sadomasochism


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 22 July 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Wikidata weekly summary #374

edit

13:07, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Editing News #1—July 2019

edit

18:33, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 31, 2019)

edit
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Butter churning in Nepal

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Flea market • Decriminalization of marijuana


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 29 July 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Wikidata weekly summary #375

edit

21:42, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

This Month in Education: July 2019

edit

This Month in Education

Volume 8 • Issue 7 • July 2019


ContentsHeadlinesSubscribe


In This Issue

The Signpost: 31 July 2019

edit

Tree of Life Newsletter

edit
 
July 2019—Issue 004


Tree of Life


Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Newly recognized content

  List of felids by PresN
  Masked booby by Casliber
  Letter-winged kite by Casliber, reviewed by Jens Lallensack
  Plains zebra by LittleJerry, reviewed by starsandwhales
  Ornithogalum umbellatum by Michael Goodyear, reviewed by Jens Lallensack
 


Newly nominated content

  Letter-winged kite by Casliber
  Megabat by Enwebb
  Onychopterella by Super Dromaeosaurus
  Dvulikiaspis by Super Dromaeosaurus
  Kosmoceratops by FunkMonk
  Clussexx Three D Grinchy Glee by Hunter Kahn
  Giant golden-crowned flying fox by Enwebb
  Myxomatosis by Rabbit Vet

  Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.

Sent by ZLEA via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:59, 1 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – August 2019

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2019).

  Guideline and policy news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • Following a research project on masking IP addresses, the Foundation is starting a new project to improve the privacy of IP editors. The result of this project may significantly change administrative and counter-vandalism workflows. The project is in the very early stages of discussions and there is no concrete plan yet. Admins and the broader community are encouraged to leave feedback on the talk page.
  • The new page reviewer right is bundled with the admin tool set. Many admins regularly help out at Special:NewPagesFeed, but they may not be aware of improvements, changes, and new tools for the Curation system. Stay up to date by subscribing here to the NPP newsletter that appears every two months, and/or putting the reviewers' talk page on your watchlist.

    Since the introduction of temporary user rights, it is becoming more usual to accord the New Page Reviewer right on a probationary period of 3 to 6 months in the first instance. This avoids rights removal for inactivity at a later stage and enables a review of their work before according the right on a permanent basis.


This week's article for improvement (week 32, 2019)

edit
 
The human body has several organs.
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Organ (anatomy)

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Butter churning in Nepal • Flea market


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 5 August 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

13:24, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #376

edit

Bots Newsletter, August 2019

edit
Bots Newsletter, August 2019
 

Greetings!

Here is the 7th issue of the Bots Newsletter, a lot happened since last year's newsletter! You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding/removing your name from this list.

Highlights for this newsletter include:

ARBCOM
  • Nothing of note happened. Just like we like it.
BAG

BAG members are expected to be active on Wikipedia to have their finger on the pulse of the community. After two years without any bot-related activity (such as posting on bot-related pages, posting on a bot's talk page, or operating a bot), BAG members will be retired from BAG following a one-week notice. Retired members can re-apply for BAG membership as normal if they wish to rejoin the BAG.

We thank former members for their service and wish Madman a happy retirement. We note that Madman and BU Rob13 were not inactive and could resume their BAG positions if they so wished, should their retirements happens to be temporary.

BOTDICT

Two new entries feature in the bots dictionary

BOTPOL
  • Activity requirements: BAG members now have an activity requirement. The requirements are very light, one only needs to be involved in a bot-related area at some point within the last two years. For purpose of meeting these requirements, discussing a bot-related matter anywhere on Wikipedia counts, as does operating a bot (RFC).
  • Copyvio flag: Bot accounts may be additionally marked by a bureaucrat upon BAG request as being in the "copyviobot" user group on Wikipedia. This flag allows using the API to add metadata to edits for use in the New pages feed (discussion). There is currently 1 bot using this functionality.
  • Mass creation: The restriction on mass-creation (semi-automated or automated) was extended from articles, to all content-pages. There are subtleties, but content here broadly means whatever a reader could land on when browsing the mainspace in normal circumstances (e.g. Mainspace, Books, most Categories, Portals, ...). There is also a warning that WP:MEATBOT still applies in other areas (e.g. Redirects, Wikipedia namespace, Help, maintenance categories, ...) not explicitely covered by WP:MASSCREATION.
BOTREQs and BRFAs

As of writing, we have...

  • 20 active BOTREQs, please help if you can!
  • 14 open BRFAs and 1 BRFA in need of BAG attention (see live status).
  • In 2018, 96 bot task were approved. An AWB search shows approximately 29 were withdrawn/expired, and 6 were denied.
  • Since the start of 2019, 97 bot task were approved. Logs show 15 were withdrawn/expired, and 15 were denied.
  • 10 inactive bots have been deflagged (see discussion). 5 other bots have been deflagged per operator requests or similar (see discussion).
New things
Other discussions

These are some of the discussions that happened / are still happening since the last Bots Newsletter. Many are stale, but some are still active.

See also the latest discussions at the bot noticeboard.

Thank you! edited by: Headbomb 17:24, 7 August 2019 (UTC)Reply


(You can subscribe or unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding or removing your name from this list.)

This Month in GLAM: July 2019

edit
 




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

This week's article for improvement (week 33, 2019)

edit
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Great Spirit

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Organ (anatomy) • Butter churning in Nepal


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 12 August 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Wikidata weekly summary #377

edit

18:19, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Salah Eddin Zaimeche Al-Djazair

edit

Hello, MarkZusab,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Salah Eddin Zaimeche Al-Djazair, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

  1. Edit the page
  2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 TT me 11:16, 13 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Missing citations

edit

Hi MarkZusab, I think I fixed the missing citations (due to the removal of Prabook.com) on the Joanne Jackson Johnson article. :-) LorriBrown (talk) 03:07, 16 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to project revival

edit

Dear user, I, with Willbb234, are a attempting to revive the Wikiproject Requested Articles, of which you are a member. If you wish to be a part of our effort, feel free to add your signature in it's talk page. Best regards, Eni vak (speak) 16:28, 17 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #378

edit

This week's article for improvement (week 34, 2019)

edit
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Bianca Wahlgren Ingrosso

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Great Spirit • Organ (anatomy)


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 19 August 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

15:21, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 35, 2019)

edit
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Pitchfork

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Bianca Wahlgren Ingrosso • Great Spirit


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 26 August 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Wikidata weekly summary #379

edit

The Signpost: 30 August 2019

edit

August 2019 Tree of Life Newsletter

edit
 
August 2019—Issue 005


Tree of Life


Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Newly recognized content

  Letter-winged kite by Casliber
  Megabat by Enwebb
  Rock parrot by Casliber
  Adelophthalmidae by Super Dromaeosaurus
  Giant golden-crowned flying fox by Enwebb, reviewed by Starsandwhales
  Myxomatosis by Rabbit Vet, reviewed by Chiswick Chap
  Tylopterella by Super Dromaeosaurus, reviewed by Starsandwhales and Enwebb
  Kosmoceratops by FunkMonk, reviewed by Jens Lallensack
  Slender glass lizard by SL93, reviewed by Casliber
  Guano by Enwebb, reviewed by Chiswick Chap
  Dvulikiaspis by Super Dromaeosaurus, reviewed by Casliber
  Rock parrot by Casliber, reviewed by The Rambling Man
  Leptospirosis by Cerevisae, reviewed by Ajpolino
  Hepatitis E by Ozzie10aaaa, reviewed by Casliber
  Cardabiodon by Macrophyseter, reviewed by FunkMonk
  Clostridium tetani by Ajpolino, reviewed by Chiswick Chap

Newly nominated content

  Kosmoceratops by FunkMonk
  Western yellow robin by Casliber
  Pekarangan by Dhio270599
  Hibbertopterus by Ichthyovenator












  Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.

Sent by ZLEA via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 15:43, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 36, 2019)

edit
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Organ (anatomy)

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Pitchfork • Bianca Wahlgren Ingrosso


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 2 September 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Your draft article, Draft:Banjul Breweries

edit
 

Hello, MarkZusab. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Banjul Breweries".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CASSIOPEIA(talk) 01:59, 2 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #380

edit

09:07, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

This Month in Education: August 2019

edit

This Month in Education

Volume 8 • Issue 8 • August 2019


ContentsHeadlinesSubscribe


In This Issue

Administrators' newsletter – September 2019

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2019).

 

  Administrator changes

  BradvChetsfordIzno
  FloquenbeamLectonar
  DESiegelJake WartenbergRjanagTopbanana

  CheckUser changes

  CallaneccLFaraoneThere'sNoTime

  Oversight changes

  CallaneccFoxHJ MitchellLFaraoneThere'sNoTime

  Technical news

  • Editors using the mobile website on Wikipedia can opt-in to new advanced features via your settings page. This will give access to more interface links, special pages, and tools.
  • The advanced version of the edit review pages (recent changes, watchlist, and related changes) now includes two new filters. These filters are for "All contents" and "All discussions". They will filter the view to just those namespaces.

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


This week's article for improvement (week 37, 2019)

edit
 
A vegetable soup prepared using udon noodles
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Vegetable soup

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Organ (anatomy) • Pitchfork


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 9 September 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Wikidata weekly summary #381

edit

This Month in GLAM: August 2019

edit
 




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

New Page Review newsletter September-October 2019

edit
 

Hello MarkZusab,

Backlog

Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Coordinator

A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.

This month's refresher course

Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired Ballonman, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.

Deletion tags

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.

Paid editing

Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines' (SNG). Alternatives to deletion
  • Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves once more with notability guidelines for organisations and companies.
  • Blank-and-Redirect is a solution anchored in policy. Please consider this alternative before PRODing or CSD. Note however, that users will often revert or usurp redirects to re-create deleted articles. Do regularly patrol the redirects in the feed.
Not English
  • A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, and if they do have potential, tag as required, then move to draft. Modify the text of the template as appropriate before sending it.
Tools

Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it will also correctly populate the logs.

Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.

Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.

DannyS712 bot III is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

TheWikiWizard - September 2019

edit

Hello, MarkZusab! Here is the September 2019 issue of TheWikiWizard.

We Hope you like this month's issue! If you'd like to discuss this issue, please go to this issue's talk page. Happy Reading! Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 21:44, 14 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 38, 2019)

edit
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Miniature book

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Vegetable soup • Organ (anatomy)


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 16 September 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Wikidata weekly summary #382

edit

This week's article for improvement (week 39, 2019)

edit
 
Animation illustrating the discovery history of satellite galaxies of the Milky Way over the last 100 years. The classical satellite galaxies are in blue (labeled with their names), SDSS-discoveries are in red, and more recent discoveries (mostly with DES) are in green.
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Satellite galaxy

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Miniature book • Vegetable soup


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 23 September 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Wikidata weekly summary #383

edit

Structured Data - blogs posted in Wikimedia Space

edit

There are two separate blog entries for Structured Data on Commons posted to Wikimedia Space that are of interest:

  • Working with Structured Data on Commons: A Status Report, by Lucas Werkmeister, discusses some ways that editors can work with structured data. Topics include tools that have been written or modified for structured data, in addition to future plans for tools and querying services.
  • Structured Data on Commons - A Blog Series, written by me, is a five-part posting that covers the basics of the software and features that were built to make structured data happen. The series is meant to be friendly to those who may have some knowledge of Commons, but may not know much about the structured data project.
I hope these are informative and useful, comments and questions are welcome. All the blogs offer a comment feature, and you can log in with your Wikimedia account using oAuth. I look forward to seeing some posts over there. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 21:33, 23 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 35, July – August 2019

edit

  The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 35, July – August 2019

  • Wikimania
  • We're building something great, but..
  • Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
  • A Wikibrarian's story
  • Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:58, 27 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 40, 2019)

edit
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Aaron Fechter

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Satellite galaxy • Miniature book


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:17, 30 September 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

The Signpost: 30 September 2019

edit

Wikidata weekly summary #384

edit

16:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

This Month in Education: September 2019

edit

This Month in Education

Volume 8 • Issue 9 • September 2019


ContentsHeadlinesSubscribe


In This Issue

September 2019 Tree of Life Newsletter

edit
 
September 2019—Issue 006


Tree of Life


Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Newly recognized content

  Kosmoceratops by FunkMonk
  Onychopterella by Super Dromaeosaurus
  Western yellow robin by Casliber
  Western yellow robin by Casliber, reviewed by Josh Milburn
  Apororhynchus by Mattximus, reviewed by Chiswick Chap
  Pekarangan by Dhio-270599, reviewed by Cerebellum
  Fritillaria by Michael Goodyear, reviewed by Chiswick Chap
  Embioptera by Chiswick Chap and Cwmhiraeth, reviewed by Vanamonde93
  Durio graveolens by NessieVL, reviewed by Dunkleosteus77
  Big brown bat by Enwebb and Gen. Quon, reviewed by Dunkleosteus77
  King brown snake by Casliber, reviewed by Dunkleosteus77
  Staffordshire Bull Terrier by Atsme, reviewed by FunkMonk
  Ambush predator by Chiswick Chap, reviewed by Enwebb
  Belemnitida by Dunkleosteus77, reviewed by Chiswick Chap

Newly nominated content

  Apororhynchus by Mattximus
  Meinhard Michael Moser by J Milburn
  St. Croix macaw by FunkMonk
  Paleocene by Dunkleosteus77
  Orcinus meyeri by Dunkleosteus77
  Snakefly by Chiswick Chap and Cwmhiraeth
  Tricolored bat by Enwebb
  Halloween darter by Enwebb






  Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.

Sent by ZLEA via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 22:26, 1 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – October 2019

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2019).

  Guideline and policy news

  • Following a discussion, a new criterion for speedy category renaming was added: C2F: One eponymous article, which applies if the category contains only an eponymous article or media file, provided that the category has not otherwise been emptied shortly before the nomination. The default outcome is an upmerge to the parent categories.

  Technical news

  • As previously noted, tighter password requirements for Administrators were put in place last year. Wikipedia should now alert you if your password is less than 10 characters long and thus too short.

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • The Community Tech team has been working on a system for temporarily watching pages, and welcomes feedback.

This week's article for improvement (week 41, 2019)

edit
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Frenemy

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Aaron Fechter • Satellite galaxy


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 7 October 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Wikidata weekly summary #385

edit

15:35, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: September 2019

edit
 




Headlines
  • Colombia report: The GLAM team from Wikimedia Colombia in OpenConLatAm
  • Finland report: Photographs and events
  • France report: European Heritage Days
  • Indonesia report: Image donation by Indonesian Air Force
  • Italy report: Wikimedia Italia Summer School
  • Sweden report: Open cultural heritage; More libraries in Africa on Wikidata; Global MIL Week 2019 Feature Conference; Kulturhistoria som gymnasiearbete; Wiki Loves Monuments
  • UK report: Oxford, Khalili Collections and Endangered Archives
  • USA report: Hispanic Heritage and Disability Awareness Month
  • Special story: Help the Movement Learn about Content Campaigns & Supporting newcomers in Wikidata training courses!
  • Wikidata report: Tie a knot in your handkerchief
  • WMF GLAM report: GLAM Manager Role Announced!
  • Calendar: October's GLAM events
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

This week's article for improvement (week 42, 2019)

edit
 
The U.S. Navy guided missile cruiser USS Josephus Daniels (CG-27) maneuvers around an island as it passes through the Strait of Magellan en route to Punte Arenas, Chile, on 1 July 1990, during exercise "Unitas XXXI", a combined exercise involving the naval forces of the United States and nine South American nations.
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Strait of Magellan

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Frenemy • Aaron Fechter


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:15, 14 October 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Wikidata weekly summary #386

edit

23:55, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Editing News #2 – Mobile editing and talk pages – October 2019

edit

Read this in another languageSubscription list for this multilingual newsletter

Inside this newsletter, the Editing team talks about their work on the mobile visual editor, on the new talk pages project, and at Wikimania 2019.

Help

edit

What talk page interactions do you remember? Is it a story about how someone helped you to learn something new? Is it a story about how someone helped you get involved in a group? Something else? Whatever your story is, we want to hear it!

Please tell us a story about how you used a talk page. Please share a link to a memorable discussion, or describe it on the talk page for this project. The team would value your examples. These examples will help everyone develop a shared understanding of what this project should support and encourage.

Talk Pages

edit

The Talk Pages Consultation was a global consultation to define better tools for wiki communication. From February through June 2019, more than 500 volunteers on 20 wikis, across 15 languages and multiple projects, came together with members of the Foundation to create a product direction for a set of discussion tools. The Phase 2 Report of the Talk Page Consultation was published in August. It summarizes the product direction the team has started to work on, which you can read more about here: Talk Page Project project page.

The team needs and wants your help at this early stage. They are starting to develop the first idea. Please add your name to the "Getting involved" section of the project page, if you would like to hear about opportunities to participate.

Mobile visual editor

edit

The Editing team is trying to make it simpler to edit on mobile devices. The team is changing the visual editor on mobile. If you have something to say about editing on a mobile device, please leave a message at Talk:VisualEditor on mobile.

 
What happens when you click on a link. The new Edit Card is bigger and has more options for editing links.
 
The editing toolbar is changing in the mobile visual editor. The old system had two different toolbars. Now, all the buttons are together. Tell the team what you think about the new toolbar.
  • In September, the Editing team updated the mobile visual editor's editing toolbar. Anyone could see these changes in the mobile visual editor.
    • One toolbar: All of the editing tools are located in one toolbar. Previously, the toolbar changed when you clicked on different things.
    • New navigation: The buttons for moving forward and backward in the edit flow have changed.
    • Seamless switching: an improved workflow for switching between the visual and wikitext modes.
  • Feedback: You can try the refreshed toolbar by opening the mobile VisualEditor on a smartphone. Please post your feedback on the Toolbar feedback talk page.

Wikimania

edit

The Editing Team attended Wikimania 2019 in Sweden. They led a session on the mobile visual editor and a session on the new talk pages project. They tested two new features in the mobile visual editor with contributors. You can read more about what the team did and learned in the team's report on Wikimania 2019.

Looking ahead

edit
  • Talk Pages Project: The team is thinking about the first set of proposed changes. The team will be working with a few communities to pilot those changes. The best way to stay informed is by adding your username to the list on the project page: Getting involved.
  • Testing the mobile visual editor as the default: The Editing team plans to post results before the end of the calendar year. The best way to stay informed is by adding the project page to your watchlist: VisualEditor as mobile default project page.
  • Measuring the impact of Edit Cards: The Editing team hopes to share results in November. This study asks whether the project helped editors add links and citations. The best way to stay informed is by adding the project page to your watchlist: Edit Cards project page.

PPelberg (WMF) (talk) & Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 16:51, 17 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

2019 US Banknote Contest

edit
  US Banknote Contest  
November-December 2019

There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons.

In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate.


If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:29, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 43, 2019)

edit
 
A vignette thought to represent Medjed, Greenfield papyrus, British Museum
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Medjed (god)

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Strait of Magellan • Frenemy


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 21 October 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Your draft article, Draft:Bertille de Baudinière

edit
 

Hello, MarkZusab. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bertille de Baudinière".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:05, 21 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

14:35, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #387

edit

TheWikiWizard - October 2019

edit

Hello, MarkZusab! Here is the September 2019 issue of TheWikiWizard.

We hope you like this month's issue! If you'd like to discuss this issue, please go to this issue's talk page. Happy Reading! --Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 01:43, 23 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 02:05, 23 October 2019 (UTC) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk)Reply

This Month in Education: October 2019

edit

This Month in Education

Volume 8 • Issue 10 • October 2019


ContentsHeadlinesSubscribe


In This Issue

This week's article for improvement (week 44, 2019)

edit
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Audience

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Medjed (god) • Strait of Magellan


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 28 October 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

16:16, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #388 & Wikidata Birthday

edit

Editing News #2 – Mobile editing and talk pages

edit

11:11, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Mildred Washington

edit
 

Hello, MarkZusab. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mildred Washington".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 04:02, 31 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 31 October 2019

edit

October 2019 Tree of Life Newsletter

edit
 
October 2019—Issue 007


Tree of Life


Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Newly recognized content

  Meinhard Michael Moser‎ by J Milburn
  Paleocene by Dunkleosteus77, reviewed by Casliber
  Clussexx Three D Grinchy Glee by Hunter Kahn, reviewed by Valereee
  Halloween darter by Enwebb and Cwmhiraeth, reviewed by J Milburn
  Deathwatch beetle by Cwmhiraeth, reviewed by Enwebb



Newly nominated content

  King brown snake by Casliber
  Paleocene by Dunkleosteus77
  Megarachne by Ichthyovenator
  List of canids by PresN
  Devils Hole pupfish by Enwebb
  Dryomyza anilis by AnuBalasubramanian
  Plasmodium knowlesi by Ajpolino
  Black coral by Aven13

  Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 03:34, 3 November 2019 (UTC) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk)Reply

New Page Review newsletter November 2019

edit
 

Hello MarkZusab,

This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon.

Getting the queue to 0

There are now 805 holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action.
Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.
Want to join? Consider adding the NPP Pledge userbox.
Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some really cool awards.

Coordinator

Admin Barkeep49 has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers.

This month's refresher course

Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources.

Tools
  • It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list.
  • It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar.
Reviewer Feedback

Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13.

Second set of eyes
  • Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the Monitoring the system section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing good work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR.
  • Do be sure to have our talk page on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers.
Arbitration Committee

The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights.

Community Wish list

There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion.


To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – November 2019

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2019).

  Guideline and policy news

  • A related RfC is seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure.

  Arbitration


This week's article for improvement (week 45, 2019)

edit
 
Concert attendees at the Electric Daisy Carnival, Los Angeles, California, 2010
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Concert

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Audience • Medjed (god)


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 4 November 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Wikidata weekly summary #389

edit

16:48, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 46, 2019)

edit
 
The Coleco Gemini video game console, a console clone of the Atari 2600 produced by Coleco in 1983
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Coleco Gemini

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Concert • Audience


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 11 November 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Wikidata weekly summary #390

edit

22:03, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: October 2019

edit
 




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

This week's article for improvement (week 47, 2019)

edit
 
The National Museum is a Czech museum institution intended to systematically establish, prepare, and publicly exhibit natural scientific and historical collections. It was founded in 1818 and is located in Prague.
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

National Museum (Prague)

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Coleco Gemini • Concert


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 18 November 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Wikidata weekly summary #391

edit

20:17, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

List of birds of Jinja edits

edit

Thank you for upgrading List of birds of Jinja - it's overdue. However, you need to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style WP:MOS. Only the first word of common names is capitalized, unless more of the name is normally a proper noun. For example: White-faced whistling duck and Sao Tome paradise flycatcher. Scientific names (genus and specific epithet) are always italicized: Dendrocygna viduata. Items on bullet-holed lists are not additionally separated by commas. And the Orders which are fully capitalized should be reduced to only a leading capital like Anseriformes already is. Craigthebirder (talk) 22:42, 20 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 36

edit

  The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 36, September – October 2019

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:21, 21 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 48, 2019)

edit
 
The steam hammer is a type of hammer
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Hammer

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: National Museum (Prague) • Coleco Gemini


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 25 November 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

16:52, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #392

edit

This Month in Education: November 2019

edit

This Month in Education

Volume 8 • Issue 11 • November 2019


ContentsHeadlinesSubscribe


In This Issue

Special Notice for TheWikiWizard

edit

Dear Reader, You may have noticed that you did not receive a mailing for the November 2019 Issue, this is due to thegooduser being very busy with schoolwork and other important life issues. We do apologize that you have not received the November issue, and we will continue to work very hard to deliver to you the December Special Issue for 2019. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused. If you like hearing about Wikipedia News and events, don't forget that The Signpost (our rival paper) does cover such events, in case we do not publish an issue on time. Thank you for subscribing and we will work very hard to deliever the December Issue. Best, --Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 02:39, 28 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 04:10, 29 November 2019 (UTC) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk)Reply

The Signpost: 29 November 2019

edit

This week's article for improvement (week 49, 2019)

edit
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Coffee cake

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Hammer • National Museum (Prague)


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 2 December 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Administrators' newsletter – December 2019

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2019).

 

  Administrator changes

  EvergreenFirToBeFree
  AkhilleusAthaenaraJohn VandenbergMelchoirMichaelQSchmidtNeilNYoungamerican😂

  CheckUser changes

  Beeblebrox
  Deskana

  Interface administrator changes

  Evad37

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


Wikidata weekly summary #393

edit

16:58, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

November 2019 Tree of Life Newsletter

edit
 
November 2019—Issue 008


Tree of Life


Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Newly recognized content

  King brown snake by Casliber
  List of canids by PresN
  Tricolored bat by Enwebb, reviewed by Cwmhiraeth
  Alopias palatasi by Macrophyseter, reviewed by Dunkleosteus77
  Deep biosphere by RockMagnetist (DCO visiting scholar), reviewed by Jens Lallensack








Newly nominated content

  Eastern green mamba by Casliber
  A History of the Birds of Europe by Jimfbleak
  Anastrepha ludens by OstapKukhar
  Castorocauda by Dunkleosteus77
  Aedes taeniorhynchus by XuLily
  Drosophila silvestris by Mmhua
  Dryopithecus by Dunkleosteus77
  Christmas Island flying fox by Dunkleosteus77
  Christmas imperial pigeon by Dunkleosteus77
  Drosophila subobscura by Andrewoh29
  Ceratitis capitata by Nikhilaggarwal123
  Woolly rhinoceros by Thylacinus cynocephalus
  Ooedigera by Dunkleosteus77

  Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 5 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 6 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Bio drafts

edit

Hey there MarkZusab! Thanks for volunteering to work on the pages I had linked to at User:BOZ/Draft pages which had been deleted previously. :) If you want to take a look at the other two after doing what you can on the three that were just undeleted, then I will see what I can do about making those available as well!  :) BOZ (talk) 03:25, 7 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 1938 New England hurricane into Thirty-Eight: The Hurricane That Transformed New England. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:17, 7 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 8 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 50, 2019)

edit
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Brain Electrical Oscillation Signature Profiling

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Coffee cake • Hammer


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 9 December 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 9 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #394

edit

16:38, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: November 2019

edit
 




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 11 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 14 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

December 2019

edit

  Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Category:Wikia a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Category:Fandom (website). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. —37.42.107.237 (talk) 13:13, 15 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 51, 2019)

edit
 
A ballet leap performed with modern, non-classical form in a contemporary ballet
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Ballet

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Brain Electrical Oscillation Signature Profiling • Coffee cake


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 05:10, 16 December 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Weekly Summary #395

edit

00:16, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 18 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 19 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Happy holidays

edit

New Page Review newsletter December 2019

edit

 

Reviewer of the Year
 

This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.

Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.

Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.

Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.

Top 10 Reviewers over the last 365 days
Rank Username Num reviews Log
1 Rosguill (talk) 47,395 Patrol Page Curation
2 Onel5969 (talk) 41,883 Patrol Page Curation
3 JTtheOG (talk) 11,493 Patrol Page Curation
4 Arthistorian1977 (talk) 5,562 Patrol Page Curation
5 DannyS712 (talk) 4,866 Patrol Page Curation
6 CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk) 3,995 Patrol Page Curation
7 DragonflySixtyseven (talk) 3,812 Patrol Page Curation
8 Boleyn (talk) 3,655 Patrol Page Curation
9 Ymblanter (talk) 3,553 Patrol Page Curation
10 Cwmhiraeth (talk) 3,522 Patrol Page Curation

(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)

Redirect autopatrol

A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.

Source Guide Discussion

Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.

This month's refresher course

While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:11, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 52, 2019)

edit
 
When cooking with alcohol to prepare a flambé, alcohol is ignited
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Cooking with alcohol

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Ballet • Brain Electrical Oscillation Signature Profiling


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 23 December 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

20:06, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 24 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 25 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 26 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Janette Sherman for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Janette Sherman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janette Sherman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Michepman (talk) 15:24, 26 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 27 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 27 December 2019

edit

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 28 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 1, 2020)

edit
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

List of pasta

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Cooking with alcohol • Ballet


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 30 December 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 30 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #396

edit

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 2 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 3 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

December 2019 Tree of Life Newsletter

edit
 
December 2019—Issue 009


Tree of Life


Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Newly recognized content

  Apororhynchus by Mattximus
  Eastern green mamba by Casliber
  Christmas Island flying fox by Dunkleosteus77, reviewed by Enwebb
  Devils Hole pupfish by Enwebb, reviewed by Jens Lallensack
  Castorocauda by Dunkleosteus77, reviewed by SUM1
  Ocelot by Sainsf, reviewed by Dunkleosteus77
  Snakefly by Chiswick Chap and Cwmhiraeth, reviewed by Sainsf





Newly nominated content

  Cactus wren by CaptainEek
  Drosophila mettleri by Jillian Shah
  Boring Billion by Dunkleosteus77
  Calliphora vomitoria by Y.shiuan
  Pubal by Samotny Wędrowiec
  Poinsettia by Enwebb
  Steller's sea ape by Dunkleosteus77
  Christmas darter by Enwebb and Cwmhiraeth
  Egyptian fruit bat by Enwebb and Asanc445
  Paranthropus by Dunkleosteus77
  Segnosaurus by FunkMonk
  Argentinosaurus Slate Weasel

  Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 4 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – January 2020

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2019).

  Guideline and policy news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


This week's article for improvement (week 2, 2020)

edit
 
The pilot in command of an aircraft is the person aboard who is ultimately responsible for its operation and safety during flight. This would be the captain in a typical two- or three-pilot aircrew, or "pilot" if there is only one certificated and qualified pilot at the controls of an aircraft.
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Captain

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: List of pasta • Cooking with alcohol


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 6 January 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Wikidata weekly summary #397

edit

21:21, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 7 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 11 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

This Month in GLAM: December 2019

edit
 




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

This week's article for improvement (week 3, 2020)

edit
 
Various computer hardware components within a desktop computer
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Computer hardware

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Captain • List of pasta


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 13 January 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 13 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

TheWikiWizard - January 2020

edit

Hello, MarkZusab! Here is the January 2020 issue of TheWikiWizard.

We hope you like this month's issue! If you'd like to discuss this issue, please go to this issue's talk page. Happy Reading! --Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 04:00, 13 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 04:10, 13 January 2020 (UTC) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #398

edit

Tech News: 2020-03

edit

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:40, 13 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 14 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 17 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 19 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 4, 2020)

edit
 
A prayer meeting and hymn singing
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Prayer meeting

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Computer hardware • Captain


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 20 January 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 20 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #399

edit

19:41, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 21 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 23 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

You recreated a sockpuppet‘s page

edit

More at Bashkardi people talk. —2.247.251.202 (talk) 00:21, 24 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 24 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 25 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 26 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 5, 2020)

edit
 
The Serengeti ecosystem is a geographical region located in northern Tanzania, Africa. It spans approximately 30,000 km2 (12,000 sq mi), and hosts the second largest terrestrial mammal migration in the world. Pictured is a leopard in a tree in the Serengeti.
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Serengeti

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Prayer meeting • Computer hardware


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 27 January 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

The Signpost: 27 January 2020

edit

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 27 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #400

edit

18:53, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 28 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 29 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 30 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 31 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 37

edit

  The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 37, November – December 2019

Read the full newsletter

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:10, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – February 2020

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2020).

  Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, partial blocks are now enabled on the English Wikipedia. This functionality allows administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces rather than the entire site. A draft policy is being workshopped at Wikipedia:Partial blocks.
  • The request for comment seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure closed with wide-spread support for an alternative desysoping procedure based on community input. No proposed process received consensus.

  Technical news

  • Twinkle now supports partial blocking. There is a small checkbox that toggles the "partial" status for both blocks and templating. There is currently one template: {{uw-pblock}}.
  • When trying to move a page, if the target title already exists then a warning message is shown. The warning message will now include a link to the target title. [137]

  Arbitration

  • Following a recent arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee reminded administrators that checkuser and oversight blocks must not be reversed or modified without prior consultation with the checkuser or oversighter who placed the block, the respective functionary team, or the Arbitration Committee.

  Miscellaneous



G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 2 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 6, 2020)

edit
 
The The Dapper Dans are a barbershop quartet that performs at Disneyland in Anaheim, California.
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Barbershop quartet

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Serengeti • Prayer meeting


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 3 February 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

This Month in Education: January 2020

edit

This Month in Education

Volume 9 • Issue 1 • January 2020


ContentsHeadlinesSubscribe


In This Issue

Wikidata weekly summary #401

edit

20:05, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 4 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

January 2020 Tree of Life Newsletter

edit
 
January 2020—Issue 010


Tree of Life


Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Newly recognized content

  Megarachne by Ichthyovenator
  Christmas imperial pigeon by Dunkleosteus77, reviewed by FunkMonk
  Paranthropus by Dunkleosteus77, reviewed by IJReid
  Orcinus meyeri by Dunkleosteus77, reviewed by Enwebb
  Christmas darter by Enwebb and Cwmhiraeth, reviewed by J Milburn
  Saxifragales by Michael Goodyear, reviewed by starsandwhales
  Segnosaurus by FunkMonk, reviewed by Jens Lallensack
  Dryopithecus by Dunkleosteus77, reviewed by Jens Lallensack
  Drosophila subobscura by Andrewoh29, reviewed by Jens Lallensack
  Egyptian fruit bat by Enwebb, reviewed by FunkMonk
  Scale insect by Chiswick Chap and Cwhmiraeth, reviewed by Dunkleosteus77

Newly nominated content

  Wolf by LittleJerry
  Segnosaurus by FunkMonk
  The Goldfinch (painting) by Jimfbleak
  Dryomyza anilis by AnuBalasubramanian
  Pigs in culture by Chiswick Chap
  Coronariae by Michael Goodyear
  Neanderthal by Dunkleosteus77
  Gharial by BhagyaMani
  Honeynut squash by
  James John Joicey by RLO1729
  Gigantorhynchus by Mattximus
  Ardipithecus ramidus by Dunkleosteus77

  Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 5 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 9 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 7, 2020)

edit
 
The Pyramid Texts are the oldest known corpus of ancient Egyptian religious texts dating to the Old Kingdom.
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Religious text

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Barbershop quartet • Serengeti


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 10 February 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Wikidata weekly summary #402

edit

19:12, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: January 2020

edit
 




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 12 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 13 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020

edit
 

Hello MarkZusab,

Source Guide Discussion

The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.

Redirects

New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.

Discussions and Resources
Refresher

Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 8, 2020)

edit
 
The metric length of one kilometre is equivalent to the imperial measurement of 0.62137 miles.
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Length

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Religious text • Barbershop quartet


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 17 February 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Wikidata weekly summary #403

edit

16:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 19 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 20 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 22 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 9, 2020)

edit
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Nature reserve

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Length • Religious text


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:06, 24 February 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 24 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #404

edit

21:00, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 25 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 26 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 27 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 28 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 29 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 1 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 1 March 2020

edit

This week's article for improvement (week 10, 2020)

edit
 
A company is a legal entity made up of an association of people, be they natural, legal, or a mixture of both, for carrying on a commercial or industrial enterprise.
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Company

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Nature reserve • Length


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 2 March 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 2 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – March 2020

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2020).

  Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, the blocking policy was changed to state that sysops must not undo or alter CheckUser or Oversight blocks, rather than should not.
  • A request for comment confirmed that sandboxes of established but inactive editors may not be blanked due solely to inactivity.

  Technical news

  • Following a discussion, Twinkle's default CSD behavior will soon change, most likely this week. After the change, Twinkle will default to "tagging mode" if there is no CSD tag present, and default to "deletion mode" if there is a CSD tag present. You will be able to always default to "deletion mode" (the current behavior) using your Twinkle preferences.

  Miscellaneous



Wikidata weekly summary #405

edit

February 2020 Tree of Life Newsletter

edit
 
February 2020—Issue 011


Tree of Life


Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Newly recognized content

  Segnosaurus by FunkMonk
  The Goldfinch (painting) by Jimfbleak
  Gharial by BhagyaMani, reviewed by Dunkleosteus77
  Steller's sea ape by Dunkleosteus77, reviewed by Hog Farm
  Poinsettia by Enwebb, reviewed by Starsandwhales
  Honeynut squash by , reviewed by Ealdgyth

Newly nominated content

  Danuvius guggenmosi by Dunkleosteus77
  Denisovan by Dunkleosteus77
  Homo luzonensis by Dunkleosteus77
  Homo naledi by Dunkleosteus77
  Horseshoe bat by Enwebb
  Cimicidae by Cwmhiraeth and Chiswick Chap

  Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.


00:36, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 3 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

This Month in Education: February 2020

edit
This Month in Education

Volume 9 • Issue 1 • February 2020


ContentsHeadlinesSubscribe
In This Issue

Right wing vandalism

edit

What should Wikipedians do to stop vandalism by Nazis and fascists?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by HomerAndHesoid (talkcontribs) 08:30, 4 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 7 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 11, 2020)

edit
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Transglobe Expedition

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Company • Nature reserve


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 9 March 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Wikidata weekly summary #406

edit

17:15, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: February 2020

edit
 




Headlines
  • Armenia report: Wiki project on Museums with My Armenia
  • Brazil report: Moreira Salles Institute GLAM initiative in Brazil
  • Finland report: The Helsinki then and now exhibition
  • France report: GLAM related blogposts
  • Indonesia report: Proposing collaboration with museums in Bali; First Wikisource training in the region
  • Netherlands report: Students write articles about Media artists, Public Domain Day 2020, Wiki Goes Caribbean, WikiFridays at Ihlia - Wikimedia Nederland in January & February 2020
  • Norway report: Wikipedia editing workshop with the Norwegian Network for Museums
  • Serbia report: Great dedication of librarians
  • Sweden report: Historic photos; Support for international Wikimedia community; Library training tour; Many GLAMs improved on Wikidata
  • UK report: Kimonos and Khalili
  • Ukraine report: Winning photos Wiki Loves Monuments shown in different cities; Libraries Lead an All-Ukrainian Challenge
  • USA report: Black History Month and Open Access Anniversaries
  • Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons report: Summary of pilot projects, and what's next
  • Wikidata report: Leap into Wikidata!
  • WMF GLAM report: New Team Leadership, GLAM-Focused Grants Review, OpenGLAM Declaration Research
  • Calendar: March's GLAM events
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 13 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

TheWikiWizard/Workshop/Issues/Feburary/March 2020

edit

Hello, MarkZusab! Here is the Feb/March 2020 issue of TheWikiWizard.

We hope you like this month's issue! If you'd like to discuss this issue, please go to this issue's talk page. Happy Reading! Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 03:36, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 20:27, 14 March 2020 (UTC) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 15 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 12, 2020)

edit
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Darts

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Transglobe Expedition • Company


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:06, 16 March 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Wikidata weekly summary #407

edit

21:16, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 18 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 20 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 13, 2020)

edit
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Ignorance

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Darts • Transglobe Expedition


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 23 March 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Wikidata weekly summary #408

edit

17:08, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 25 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 29 March 2020

edit

Wikidata weekly summary #409

edit

This Month in Education: March 2020

edit
This Month in Education

Volume 9 • Issue 3 • March 2020


ContentsHeadlinesSubscribe


In This Issue

17:25, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2020

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2020).

  Guideline and policy news

  • There is an ongoing request for comment to streamline the source deprecation and blacklisting process.

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • The WMF has begun a pilot report of the pages most visited through various social media platforms to help with anti-vandalism and anti-disinformation efforts. The report is updated daily and will be available through the end of May.

March 2020 Tree of Life Newsletter

edit
 
March 2020—Issue 012


Tree of Life


Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Newly recognized content

  Argentinosaurus by Slate Weasel and Jens Lallensack
  Wolf by LittleJerry
  Horseshoe bat by Enwebb, reviewed by Chiswick Chap
  Cimicidae by Cwmhiraeth and Chiswick Chap, reviewed by Enwebb
  Coronariae by Michael Goodyear, reviewed by Dank
  Ardipithecus ramidus by Dunkleosteus77, reviewed by starsandwhales
  Ooedigera by Dunkleosteus77, reviewed by Hog Farm
  Bathyphysa conifera by Awkwafaba, reviewed by Chiswick Chap
  Calliphora vomitoria by Y.shiuan, reviewed by Jens Lallensack

Newly nominated content

  Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations by Britishfinance
  Bathyphysa conifera by Awkwafaba
  Moniliformidae by Mattximus
  Disease X by Britishfinance
  Mandarin Patinkin by Rhododendrites




  Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 4 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 5 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 15, 2020)

edit
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

The Sims (video game)

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Meatloaf • Ignorance


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 6 April 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 6 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #410

edit

19:02, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Editing news 2020 #1 – Discussion tools

edit

19:05, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: March 2020

edit
 




Headlines
  • Australia report: Know My Name; Public libraries of Queensland join Wikidata
  • Colombia report: Gender gap, Wikipedia and Libraries from the GLAM team
  • France report: WikiGoths; WikiTopia Archives
  • Indonesia report: Volunteers' meet-up; Wiki Cinta Budaya 2020 structured data edit-a-thon
  • Ireland report: Video tutorials; Celtic Knot Conference 2020
  • Kosovo report: WoALUG and NGO Germin call Albanian Diaspora to contribute to Wikipedia
  • Netherlands report: Nationaal Museum van Wereldculturen contributes to Wikimedia Commons again; Student research on GLAM-Wiki at Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Serbia report: March Highlights - Everything is postponed
  • Sweden report: FindingGLAMs; Wikipedia in libraries; Art from the Thiel Gallery Collections; Kulturhistoria som gymnasiearbete
  • UK report: Colourful Kimonos from Khalili
  • USA report: Women & Editing in the time of virus
  • Special story: COVID-19
  • Wikidata report: Lockdown Levellings
  • WMF GLAM report: Mapping GLAM-Wiki collaborations
  • Calendar: April's GLAM events
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 12 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 16, 2020)

edit
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Anna Lindh

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: The Sims (video game) • Meatloaf


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 13 April 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Nomination of Joseph Geierman for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph Geierman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Geierman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 06:22, 13 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

15:30, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Editing news 2020 #1 – Discussion tools

edit

Read this in another languageSubscription list

 
This early version of the Reply tool automatically signs and indents comments.

The Editing team has been working on the talk pages project. The goal of the talk pages project is to help contributors communicate on wiki more easily. This project is the result of the Talk pages consultation 2019.

 
In a future update, the team plans to test a tool for easily linking to another user's name, a rich-text editing option, and other tools.

The team is building a new tool for replying to comments now. This early version can sign and indent comments automatically. Please test the new Reply tool.

  • On 31 March 2020, the new reply tool was offered as a Beta Feature editors at four Wikipedias: Arabic, Dutch, French, and Hungarian. If your community also wants early access to the new tool, contact User:Whatamidoing (WMF).
  • The team is planning some upcoming changes. Please review the proposed design and share your thoughts on the talk page. The team will test features such as:
    • an easy way to mention another editor ("pinging"),
    • a rich-text visual editing option, and
    • other features identified through user testing or recommended by editors.

To hear more about Editing Team updates, please add your name to the "Get involved" section of the project page. You can also watch   these pages: the main project page, Updates, Replying, and User testing.

PPelberg (WMF) (talk) & Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 15:45, 13 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #411

edit

Nomination of Shahid Buttar for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shahid Buttar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahid Buttar (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:59, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

COI at NRH2O

edit

I started a discussion about the COI possibility at Talk:NRH2O. - AH (talk) 23:16, 16 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

@AttackHelicopter51: Thank you for starting that discussion. MarkZusab (talk) 14:25, 21 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Corona (film)

edit
 

The article Corona (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film, just has one notable source, not enough for a standalone article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY2008 22:38, 17 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 18 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Civil

edit

Please remain civil. CassiantoTalk 20:02, 18 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 19 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Starting Page for a cryptocurrency project

edit

hello im RichardJansma and i want to create my first article of a company/webside regarding cryptocurrency.

now I have made a draft and such but I'm not sure if its good enough.... now i hope that you could help me look into it if you have time and maybe get me started with Wikipedia (its kinda overwhelming) RichardJansma (talk) 21:15, 19 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #412

edit

TheWikiWizard - April 2020

edit

Hello, MarkZusab! Here is the April 2020 issue of TheWikiWizard.

We hope you like this month's issue! If you'd like to discuss this issue, please go to this issue's talk page. Happy Reading & stay safe! --Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 02:05, 19 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Spill Book Assistance

edit

Thank you for your help with the novel Spill! I still want to get an image of the cover added to the box on the right. How were you able to get it published? Other approvers said it did not have enough references. This is great! I want to link Les Standiford's page with the article too so that the novel listed on his page directs to the Spill book page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spill_(book) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Les_Standiford

@Jshipley528: I'm glad that I could help. I was able to get it published by adding independent / reliable references to the article, along with showing that the book was notable per WP:NBOOK. I have also linked the author's article to the book's article for you. The page Wikipedia:WikiProject Books/Images has information about adding a book cover that you may find useful. MarkZusab (talk) 14:22, 21 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

18:45, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

John Atterbury

edit

Thanks for your work on this article which you deprodded. The sources you’ve added don’t seem to do much to add notability at all. Do you have any substantial coverage that could help improve the article, before I nominate for WP:AFD? Thanks. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 11:31, 21 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Cardiffbear88: I think there may be confusion here, as I was not the person who removed the PROD. I have no issue with you bringing the article to AFD. MarkZusab (talk) 14:15, 21 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Crazy paving (medicine)

edit

You removed COVID wikiproject template from Crazy paving (medicine) ("removed COVID-19 template, articles does not mention the topic") - isn't it enough that its only incoming links are from Coronavirus disease 2019 and COVID-19 testing? – attomir (talk | contribs) 23:27, 23 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Attomir: No, it's not. The article is about a medical term that can apply to numerous conditions, not specific to COVID-19. The reason those were the only two incoming links was because it is an obscure term. I have added a third incoming link. Thank you for creating the article. MarkZusab (talk) 23:41, 23 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
I've mostly moved the content from Crazy paving which was about pavement. :) I'm unable to judge whether it's an important sign with respect to COVID diagnosis, so not going to argue. So, "case closed" for me. – attomir (talk | contribs) 00:01, 24 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Richard Miller (author)

edit

In case you're interested, I have moved my draft out of userspace to Draft:Richard Miller (author) for more collaboration. ☆ Bri (talk) 23:44, 24 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 25 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 26 April 2020

edit

This week's article for improvement (week 18, 2020)

edit
 
Elements of the human body by mass. Trace elements are less than 1% combined (and each less than 0.1%).
Hello, MarkZusab.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Human body

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Russian Academy of Natural Sciences • Anna Lindh


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 27 April 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Wikidata weekly summary #413

edit

G13 Eligibility Notice

edit

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 29 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Issue 38, January – April 2020

edit

  The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 38, January – April 2020

  • New partnership
  • Global roundup

Read the full newsletter

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC)