Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

edit
Hello Marko M! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! Kukini
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical
 

Kukini 13:39, 17 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. Glad to be here. --Marko M 13:42, 17 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

You are most welcome. Kukini 13:47, 17 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Request

edit

You are Serbian? You need to do something about this Mieciu guy for Kosovo war, this sick man keeps on reverting things and playing hiw own game, especially with border issue, make sure he is taken out. First he changed 75 km, before that dates, now God knows what else...


Yes I am a Serb and I am new here, so I can’t do much to help you. I don’t think that behind Mieciu actions hide bad intentions. It’s very hard, almost impossible to precisely pinpoint crash site. Even 75 km north-east of Tirana is well within the range of Yugoslav air defense. If it would be easier for you, I can say that there are a lot of first hand testimonies from Yugoslav soldier who fought with KLA on Yugoslav border, in region of border outpost Kosare, who claims that Apache helicopters were used to support KLA attacks. Some of them could be damaged enough to crash on return to base.

Please, read this citation[1]. It’s probably something you already know, but I don’t know if Mieciu knows it:

The U.S. Army's only disastrous operation in Gulf War II (at least the only one we know about) took place on March 24, when 33 Apache helicopters were ordered to move out ahead of the 3rd Infantry Division and to attack an Iraqi Republican Guard regiment in the suburbs of Karbala. Meeting heavy fire from small arms and shoulder-mounted rocket-propelled grenades, the Apaches flew back to base, 30 of them shot up, several disablingly so. One helicopter was shot down in the encounter, and its two crewmen were taken prisoner.

Events in Somalia and Gulf War prove that modern helicopters could be shot down by small arms and RPG fire.

I believe that CNN is far from reliably source but I can’t provide you with reliably sources that claims differently. At the end it’s only two Apache helicopters and two dead pilots. Whatever was the reason for this crashes, they convinced US Army that conditions in Albania and Kosovo are far more dangerous for Apaches then for their targets. --Marko M 11:11, 2 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging for Image:User MarkoM.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:User MarkoM.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:10, 2 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Markos Photo of Lt-35 (Pz 35)

edit

Hallo, I corrected your photo. Here you have it, please feel free to palce it to wiki page instead of yours original or tell me to delete it if you dont wnat to be it on this link: http://hartmann.valka.cz/fotogalerie/upload/Lt-35.jpg

Hartmann, erich-hartmann@email.cz

Kosovo War

edit

A war is always a war and I have no intention of showing any sides of the conflict in better light. Serbia today is a much different country than it was in 1999 and changes are going in the right way. I have been trying to find some reliable information on serbian internet sites to put some sources into this article but I was unable to find any. An official report from this conflict by the "Federal Republic of Yugoslavia" would sort out many issues. I belive that NATO numbers documenting it's losses (without damaged and written off/crashed at landing aircraft) are correct. I may have been unneceserilly rude to you as I have had bad experiences with pro-serbian editors on wikipedia in the past. Have a nice day. Mieciu K 01:02, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Kosovo: country debate

edit

Hello. There's a discussion going on Talk:List of countries as to whether or not Kosovo should be included in that list. You have contributed to the Kosovo articles and I thought you might be interested. The articles List of countries and Annex to the list of countries (where the inclusion criteria reside) are both relevant. Cheers. DSuser 13:28, 28 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi again. It's probably a minor point, but there a discussion and vote going on at Talk:Kosovo#Kosovo:_terminology as to whether or not it's better to use Kosovo rather than Kosovan or Kosovar in the Wikipedia articles. Perhaps you have no interest, in which case sorry to bother you! DSuser 15:47, 31 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Slika aviona SOKO 522

edit

Reci mi, molim te, kom prilikom si slikao zuti SOKO 522 u bloku 30 na novom Beogradu? Ako se ne varam u pitanju je avion iz Aero-muzeja. Otkud on tu? Kako su ga i zasto popeli na to odignuce ispred ulaza u te zgrade?

Veljko Stevanovich 5. 8. 2007. 8:05 UTC+1

Fotku je napravio moj brat ispred ulaza u B92. Koliko znam ovaj avion su šetali po Novom Beogradu pa je čak jedno vreme bio i na Ušću. Ne znam šta je sad s njim, ali mislim da se ne radi o avionu iz Muzeja vazduhoplovstva. Pozdrav, --Marko M 11:21, 7 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Foča

edit

Yes BBC and similar UK or USA media is having funny thinking about our history. Second problem is that we are having multiple Balkan sources about Foča in 1942. We can change BBC with that sources ?--Rjecina (talk) 17:59, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

For me really it is not important which is source about that. Only important thing is that we are having source, because there has been many attempts to delete that section of article--Rjecina (talk) 18:08, 29 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply


Здраво Марко, дали се још бавиш фотографијом ? Нисма ништа пратио. --PetarM (talk) 09:37, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Reply