Martingluckman

Welcome!

Hello, Martingluckman, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Vaidya Bhagwan Dash, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! O Fortuna!^{...Imperatrix mundi.} 14:57, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vaidya Bhagwan Dash

The article Vaidya Bhagwan Dash has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. O Fortuna!^{...Imperatrix mundi.} 14:57, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Zuma

Hello. Wikipedia works on consensus and reliable sourcing. You have now been reverted by three different editors, primarily because the sources you present are pure speculation. For that matter, the Breaking Defense page mentions direct observations of the satellite, when it is well understood that Zuma, if in orbit, is not yet directly visible from the ground due to its orbital track. Simply put, please discuss on the Zuma talk page what you are wanting to change in the article and find consensus. If you continue to try and force your edit into the article, you will be blocked for disruption. — Huntster (t @ c) 21:16, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

It is not that the speculations are not interesting, is that in Wikipedia, speculations have a way becoming toxic and misleading, that is why we do not include them. That is not negotiable. For a longer explanation please read: WP:SPECULATION. -BatteryIncluded (talk) 22:09, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Udo Ehrenfeld (September 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Udo Ehrenfeld and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 14:00, 30 September 2023 (UTC)