Mascarbone, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Mascarbone! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 27 February 2021 (UTC)


Welcome!

edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 15:46, 4 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Kenya into History of Kenya. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 13:13, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

March 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to History of Estonia—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Paper9oll (🔔🧾) 12:24, 19 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Politics of the Republic of China, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Firestar464 (talk) 04:52, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Guyana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Granger. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Moldova, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ACUM.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 14 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

April 2021

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please be careful with adding bare URLs to articles, as they are prone to link rot. Best regards! NoonIcarus (talk) 17:37, 18 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Please provide attribution in your edit summary when copying from one page to another

edit

A few months ago, Diannaa notified you about how you must provide attribution in the edit summary or in a null edit that you copied text from another article. In this edit, you copied text from Ghana and didn't provide attribution. See Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia for more information. Please note if you continue to not respect copyrights you may be blocked from editing. — Berrely • TalkContribs 11:48, 1 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

  Hello Mascarbone! Your additions to History of Iraq have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:24, 24 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

January 2022

edit

  Your edit to Censorship in Ecuador, Ecuador, Guinea-Bissau, and Brazil–Mexico relations have been removed in whole or in part, as it appears you added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:06, 15 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Copy within

edit

Thanks for identifying the source of the material in your edit.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.

I've noticed that this guideline is not very well known, even among editors with tens of thousands of edits, so it isn't surprising that I point this out to some veteran editors. S Philbrick(Talk) 21:48, 4 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Politics of East Timor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CNRT.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 21 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Copying within Wipedia

edit

Thanks for identifying the source of the material in your edit.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.

I've noticed that this guideline is not very well known, even among editors with tens of thousands of edits, so it isn't surprising that I point this out to some veteran editors, but there are some t's that need to be crossed.S Philbrick(Talk) 13:36, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

May 2023

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to History of Norway, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. TylerBurden (talk) 23:06, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Greece
added a link pointing to 2023 Greek legislative election
History of modern Greece
added a link pointing to 2023 Greek legislative election
Politics of Greece
added a link pointing to 2023 Greek legislative election
Third Hellenic Republic
added a link pointing to 2023 Greek legislative election

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 18 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Istanbul, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2019 Istanbul mayoral election.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 15 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Berlin

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Berlin, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:09, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Demographics of Berlin

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Demographics of Berlin, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:42, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Weird linkage

edit

M, in 3 different edits, you used the link, piped through a miscapitalied redirect, [[2022 russian invasion of ukraine|2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine]]. Why? Why not just link 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine directly? I fixed them. Dicklyon (talk) 05:20, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Economy of Lebanon

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Economy of Lebanon, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:43, 27 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on History of Lebanon

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page History of Lebanon, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:45, 27 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on History of Lebanon

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page History of Lebanon, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL" error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:45, 27 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Lebanon

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Lebanon, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:46, 27 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Edit request

edit

Hey! I saw that you recently edited Iran's page with the Iranian attack on Israel. There are major problems with that and it doesn't include some very important info. Please change it to this so users know the full context:

"On 13 April 2024, the Iranian Armed Forces launched a major retaliatory attack on Israel and the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights with UAVs, cruise and ballistic missiles. The attack was in response to the Israeli airstrike on the Iranian embassy in Damascus. Several countries in the West Asia closed their airspaces a few hours before Iran launched its standoff attack. The American, British, and Jordanian air forces and navy helped Israel to shoot down the Iranian drones, while France, which intervened at the request of Jordan, deployed its navy to provide radar coverage. At least nine missiles had struck two Israeli air bases, namely the Nevatim and Ramon. The attack caused Israel spending over $1.3 billion overnight to defend against the strikes. Although the attack didn't include casualties and was intended to saturate the anti-missile defences, it was the biggest ever drone strike in the world, the biggest missile attack in Iranian history, and its first ever direct attack on Israel. It was also the first time since 1991 that Israel itself was attacked by a state force."

Here all the sources you need for citations:

https://sg.news.yahoo.com/us-helps-israel-repel-iran-124610945.html

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/apr/15/iran-attack-shows-israeli-deterrence-policy-shattered-netanyahu-criticshttps://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/apr/15/iran-attack-shows-israeli-deterrence-policy-shattered-netanyahu-critics

https://news.sky.com/story/all-out-war-or-not-in-the-middle-east-bidens-test-at-the-most-dangerous-moment-13114955

https://responsiblestatecraft.org/iran-israel-war-2667774489/

https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/iran-s-attack-stark-reminder-of-lost-us--israeli-deterrence

https://english.ahram.org.eg/NewsContent/50/1203/522025/AlAhram-Weekly/World/Israel%E2%80%99s-deterrence-strategy-collapsing.aspx

https://www.rusi.org/news-and-comment/in-the-news/iran-attack-shows-israeli-deterrence-policy-shattered-netanyahu-critics-say

https://www.semafor.com/article/04/16/2024/israel-urges-iran-sanctions-as-it-calibrates-response-to-attack

https://thehill.com/policy/international/4593202-bolton-labels-iranian-strikes-as-massive-failure-of-israeli-and-american-deterrence/

https://www.israeltoday.co.il/read/washington-sold-out-israels-deterrence-to-save-irans/

https://jcpa.org/to-respond-or-not-to-respond-is-that-the-real-question/

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/4/14/true-promise-why-and-how-did-iran-launch-a-historic-attack-on-israel

http://iranpress.com/aliaspage/277652

https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/analysis-three-takeaways-from-irans-attack-on-israel/article68064678.ece Farnaj57 (talk) 08:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply