April 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm Discospinster. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, DeRay Mckesson, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ... discospinster talk 01:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cuban-American Bar Association, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English and Spanish. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 20:09, 24 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Placement of inline references

edit

Hi, it's great that you're adding references to articles, but I want to point out that if there's a comma after a statement inline references for this statement should always be placed after said comma (same goes for almost all other kinds of punctuation, see MOS:REFPUNCT, but I noticed the comma issue in particular in your edits). I've corrected this for two of your edits, but it would be great if you could go through your past edits and make sure that that is the case for the references you added, and, of course, please follow this rule in your future edits. Thanks! Felida97 (talk) 23:09, 25 July 2024 (UTC) PS: You also added "Dr." to a subject's lead in one of your edits, which was also not in line with the Manual of Style (see MOS:DOCTOR), which you should keep in mind for future edits (I've reverted this instance already).Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kerry Casey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Director.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:24, 1 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uriel Bertran (August 2)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 18:23, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Mason7512! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 18:23, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asian-Colombians has been accepted

edit
 
Asian-Colombians, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:48, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2013 Zacatecas State Elections (August 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 18:45, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Somos Región Colombia has been accepted

edit
 
Somos Región Colombia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 15:41, 8 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Om Ki Reo Escena, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Tiempo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:55, 8 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uriel Bertran has been accepted

edit
 
Uriel Bertran, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:42, 14 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hernando González Acosta (August 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Miminity was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 10:33, 20 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Day of Combating Sand and Dust Storms (August 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OhHaiMark was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
OhHaiMark (talk) 17:33, 26 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

New page reviewer granted

edit
 

Hi Mason7512, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! signed, Rosguill talk 21:27, 26 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Social and Political Front, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Tiempo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply