July 2021

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ahmed Zaki (actor) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:59, 13 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Okay I’ll redo the edit thank you Masry684 (talk) 23:01, 13 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Welcome

edit

Hello, Masry684, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Helen(💬📖) 23:14, 13 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

It’s my pleasure thank you Masry684 (talk) 13:32, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much I really appreciate it Masry684 (talk) 18:48, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Nefertiti and Akhenaton

edit
 

The article Nefertiti and Akhenaton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, couldn't find any professional critic reviews in a WP:BEFORE or anything else, except videos/database entries. Fails WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 13:07, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello, no problem Film source from Imdb. Thanks Masry684 (talk) 17:23, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Back Again (1957 film)

edit

Hello, Masry684,

Thank you for creating Back Again (1957 film).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article needs more references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 01:20, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your message How to improve all film pages Thank you Masry684 (talk) 05:25, 29 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

You mean the links in the page? Please advise more thanks Masry684 (talk) 15:50, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Ahmed Zaki (actor)
added a link pointing to Egyptian
Hassan al-Imam
added a link pointing to Egyptian
Paris and Love (1971 film)
added a link pointing to Lebanese

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Good morning, My Dear Wife (1969 film)

edit

Hello, Masry684,

Thank you for creating Good morning, My Dear Wife (1969 film).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The image on this page needs to be reaized to a more appropriate size. Failure to take action will see the article go to deletion. Add some more references, kindly.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 07:22, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Sunrise and Sunset (1970 film)

edit

Hello, Masry684,

Thank you for creating Sunrise and Sunset (1970 film).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Resize the image on this page, else, the image will be challenged. Kindly add more references to this article, and repair the error in the existing reference, thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 07:53, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve My Wife's Dignity (1967 film)

edit

Hello, Masry684,

Thank you for creating My Wife's Dignity (1967 film).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Kindly resize the image in this article. Repair the error in the reference and add more references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 08:14, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Money and Women (1960 film)

edit
 

The article Money and Women (1960 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 11:15, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Paris and Love (1971 film)

edit
 

The article Paris and Love (1971 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as nothing of substance was found in a WP:BEFORE that could help support notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 15:12, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Those People of the Nile (1972)

edit
 

The article Those People of the Nile (1972) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as nothing of substance was found in a WP:BEFORE that could help support notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 15:14, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Dearer than my Life

edit
 

The article Dearer than my Life has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as nothing of substance was found in a WP:BEFORE that could help support notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:27, 29 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Flames of Vengeance

edit
 

The article Flames of Vengeance has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as nothing of substance was found in a WP:BEFORE that could help support notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:29, 29 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Game of the Wicked (1989 Egyptian film)

edit
 

The article Game of the Wicked (1989 Egyptian film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as nothing of substance was found in a WP:BEFORE that could help support notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:29, 29 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Good Morning, My Dear Wife

edit
 

The article Good Morning, My Dear Wife has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as nothing of substance was found in a WP:BEFORE that could help support notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:29, 29 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Wakeful Eyes

edit
 

The article Wakeful Eyes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as nothing of substance was found in a WP:BEFORE that could help support notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:30, 29 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Sunrise and Sunset (film)

edit
 

The article Sunrise and Sunset (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as nothing of substance was found in a WP:BEFORE that could help support notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:31, 29 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Salah Zulfikar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Egyptian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 29 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of A Husband on Holiday

edit
 

The article A Husband on Holiday has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 12:05, 29 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Those are known films Please advise what can be done to keep English pages for those films specifically that there are Arabic pages for all of them thank you for understanding Masry684 (talk) 15:48, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Love Until Worship

edit
 

The article Love Until Worship has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as nothing of substance was found in a WP:BEFORE that could help support notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 16:53, 29 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Minister in Plaster

edit
 

The article Minister in Plaster has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as nothing of substance was found in a WP:BEFORE that could help support notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 16:54, 29 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Per this edit, a listing on an online database does not indicate if a film is notable or not per WP:NF. What you will need is some indication of notability, you can find a list of indications at WP:NFO if you are not able to find significant coverage online. BOVINEBOY2008 16:32, 31 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of My Wife's Dignity

edit
 

The article My Wife's Dignity has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as nothing of substance was found in a WP:BEFORE that could help support notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 16:55, 29 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

It’s a very famous film in Egypt it is on imdb Masry684 (talk) 15:47, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of The Killers (1971 film)

edit
 

The article The Killers (1971 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as nothing of substance was found in a WP:BEFORE that could help support notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 16:55, 29 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

It is on imdb thanks Masry684 (talk) 15:47, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

The film is authentic and very well known in Egyptian Cinema history. Thanks Masry684 (talk) 00:12, 13 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Linking countries and languages

edit

Please do not link countries and languages in the film infobox. It goes against WP:OVERLINK AND the documentation at Template:Infobox film. BOVINEBOY2008 00:09, 13 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Okay thank you and apologies Masry684 (talk) 00:12, 13 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Love Until Worship moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Love Until Worship, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 08:18, 21 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Virgo (film) moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Virgo (film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 08:22, 21 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Please do not move articles to mainspace after they have failed AfC without addressing the concerns, as you did here. This is not productive. BOVINEBOY2008 00:45, 29 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Secret Visit moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Secret Visit, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 20:06, 24 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Divine Love (1959 film) has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Divine Love (1959 film). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:12, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Divine Love (1959 film) (August 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 02:34, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Masry684! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:34, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank you no problem I’ll try improving draft Masry684 (talk) 00:12, 28 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Divine Love (1959 film) (August 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by FormalDude were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
––FormalDude talk 08:58, 28 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Secret Visit (film) (August 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 01:36, 29 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Meeting at the Tower for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Meeting at the Tower is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meeting at the Tower until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

––FormalDude talk 02:22, 29 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of My Wife's Dignity (1967) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article My Wife's Dignity (1967) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Wife's Dignity (1967) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

––FormalDude talk 02:23, 29 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of A Husband on Holiday (film) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A Husband on Holiday (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Husband on Holiday (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

––FormalDude talk 02:24, 29 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Wicked Game (film) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wicked Game (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wicked Game (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

––FormalDude talk 02:24, 29 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Good morning, my Dear Wife for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Good morning, my Dear Wife is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good morning, my Dear Wife until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

––FormalDude talk 02:26, 29 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Secret Visit (film) (August 31)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 14:29, 31 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Alert

edit

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Shrike (talk) 06:40, 1 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Secret Visit (film) (September 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 06:10, 7 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Meeting at the Tower. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:16, 9 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Issuing level 2 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

edit

  Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with My Wife's Dignity (1967). Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:16, 9 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

September 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Uness232. Your recent edit(s) to the page Ottoman Empire appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Uness232 (talk) 20:02, 9 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Secret Visit (film) (September 10)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This draft has been resubmitted again without including a Reception section, and so still not satisfying film notability guidelines.

The resubmissions without complying with instructions are wasting the time of the reviewers and of the author. The film is probably notable, but this submitter is not making any progress with this draft.

This draft has been Rejected by a reviewer in the Articles for Creation review process. DO NOT resubmit this draft or attempt to resubmit this draft or prepare or submit a draft that is substantially the same as this draft without discussing the reasons for the rejection. You may request a discussion with the rejecting reviewer, or you may request a discussion with the community at the Teahouse. A discussion will not necessarily agree to a resubmission.

It should be noted that the reviewer has not decided that the topic is not notable. An article on the topic may be accepted in the future. However, there is no reason to think that this draft will become an article, and there is evidence that this draft will never become an article. If there is to be an article on this topic, this draft must first be blown up and started over.

If this draft is resubmitted without discussion and without starting it over, or if an attempt is made to resubmit this draft or an equivalent draft, without addressing the reasons for the Rejection by starting over, a partial block or a topic-ban may be requested against the submitting editor.

You may ask for advice about Rejection at the Teahouse.

Robert McClenon (talk) 09:34, 10 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Issuing level 3 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at A Husband on Holiday (film), you may be blocked from editing. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:40, 12 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Issuing level 4 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at My Wife's Dignity (1967). This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:48, 12 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Issuing level 4 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Wicked Game (film). This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:52, 12 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

September 2021

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 13:23, 12 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve The Other Man (1973 film)

edit

Hello, Masry684,

Thank you for creating The Other Man (1973 film).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Two references don't work. Please see the guidelines at WP:NFO.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 21:21, 16 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Virgo (1970 film)

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Virgo (1970 film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 06:59, 19 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Fortune and Females moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Fortune and Females, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 12:00, 4 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

It is a famous film in Egypt. Please advise what to add to get the page published. Thanks Masry684 (talk) 13:45, 5 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Virgo (film) (October 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 19:52, 14 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Virgo (film) (October 22)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 09:32, 22 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Minor edits

edit

Hello,

Thanks for your edits. It seems that you mark all your edits as "minor edits". For example, this edit was marked minor but it is not a WP:Minor edit. So please be careful. Thanks! VR talk 06:23, 4 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

Yes, actually I do this a lot. I’ll be careful in the upcoming edits. Thanks Masry684 (talk) 13:44, 5 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ahmed Zulfikar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Egyptian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 31 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

An honest mistake. Will correct it. Thanks Masry684 (talk) 20:33, 1 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism

edit

I reverted your edits on Russia. They were not constructive. Try to understand that adding content to a country article, when it doesn't focus mainly on it, is vandalism. Mspriz (talk) 12:21, 14 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Okay thanks for the advice. 🙏🏻 Masry684 (talk) 23:38, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Virgo (film) has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Virgo (film). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:27, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Virgo (film) (January 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 23:34, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Memory of a Night of Love

edit
 

The article Memory of a Night of Love has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 14:18, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Virgo (film) (January 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Bilorv (talk) 12:47, 21 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

قم بحذف بالشاذوذيق لالبان من مقال الحرب المصريه العثمانية

edit

تمام Dullygust (talk) 15:13, 10 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of film producers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Other Man.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 31 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Typo. Thanks Masry684 (talk) 23:46, 31 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Fortune and Females

edit
 

Hello, Masry684. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fortune and Females".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 14:01, 4 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks 🙏🏻 Masry684 (talk) 16:33, 4 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Cinema of Egypt into Film industry. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 00:28, 25 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Okay sure I’ll arrange the paragraph in my own words. Thanks Masry684 (talk) 03:31, 2 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

May 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Lone-078. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Nectanebo II, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Lone-078 (talk) 16:07, 5 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Okay sure I’ll make sure to add citations next time. Thanks Masry684 (talk) 00:13, 15 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Secret Visit (film)

edit
 

Hello, Masry684. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Secret Visit".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:45, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks 🙏🏻 Masry684 (talk) 00:47, 21 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Virgo (film)

edit
 

Hello, Masry684. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Virgo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:28, 25 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Laila Taher

edit

Hello, Masry684,

Thank you for creating Laila Taher.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for this. It would be maybe useful to add a project tag to the talk page - but I'd also wonder if more references can be added, perhaps from Arabic sources, that show Laila clearly passes WP:NACTOR...

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Alexandermcnabb}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:10, 26 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Alright thanks for the tips 🙏🏻 Masry684 (talk) 22:52, 26 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Salah Zulfikar filmography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forbidden Women.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:30, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Typo. Thanks 🙏🏻 Masry684 (talk) 07:50, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Edit seemed unconstructive

edit

Hello. You, or someone with this IP address, made an edit that has been or will be undone because it didn't seem to be constructive. Please use the sandbox if you'd like to experiment – and if you need any help, feel free to ask at the Teahouse. Click here to familiarize yourself with our policies, guidelines and best practices. Thanks. Quandarie 19:28, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Okay thanks will take care next time Masry684 (talk) 20:50, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Salah Zulfikar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Director.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 11 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Awards

edit

Please be aware of the fact that awards are not honorary prefixes, so your edit for Kamal Rifaat was reverted. Egeymi (talk) 11:13, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Okay, will take care next time. Thanks Masry684 (talk) 12:25, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Zulfikar family

edit

Hi why is this الأسرة الأباظية in Arabic and not اسرة ذوالفقار. Thanks Mccapra (talk) 21:57, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Typo. Automatic correction. Adjusted it already. Thanks Masry684 (talk) 21:59, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Secret Visit (film)

edit
 

Hello, Masry684. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Secret Visit".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 07:30, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Masry684 (talk) 10:25, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Al-Qadiat raqm 1

edit
 

The article Al-Qadiat raqm 1 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 00:11, 1 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Battle of Ismailia (1952) moved to draftspace

edit

  An article you recently created, Battle of Ismailia (1952), is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, click the Submit the draft for review! button atop the article. Please also see WP:TONE. Silikonz💬 01:22, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I added more than 20 citations! British pathe, newyork times as an example are more than reliable sources. Thanks Masry684 (talk) 01:34, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for that. Please remember to always do so; the article was entirely free of references for a good while. Silikonz💬 01:38, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Battle of Ismailia (1952)

edit

Hi thanks for creating this article. When we translate or borrow from other language wikis it’s a requirement to acknowledge the source. The best way to do this is to include it in your edit summary (e.g. “translated from ar.wiki”) and there’s also a translation template you can add to the talk page. I’ve added it for you. Happy editing and please leave a message on my talk page if you need any help Mccapra (talk) 22:24, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sure, will do. Thanks Masry684 (talk) 10:04, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Inappropriate page move

edit

I have restored Ronaldo (Brazilian footballer) after your inappropriate page move. You need to request a move for such potentially controversial moves to see if there is a consensus to move the article to the proposed title.-- Ponyobons mots 20:38, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Okay, I really didn’t know that. Thanks for the tip 🙏🏻 Masry684 (talk) 20:44, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Order of Sciences and Arts (Egypt)

edit

Hi in your list of notable recipients you’ve included three books rather than people. I guess this is a mistake? Mccapra (talk) 03:00, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Yes, you’re right. The books writers not the books itself. Will delete it. Thanks Masry684 (talk) 08:54, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Top 100 Egyptian films for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Top 100 Egyptian films is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top 100 Egyptian films until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jovian Eclipse 19:03, 29 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Laila Taher

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Laila Taher, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:08, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Ezz El-Dine Zulficar Films

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ezz El-Dine Zulficar Films, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:13, 7 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

dates

edit

Please check the date format for the articles before you add something containing dates, thanks. Egeymi (talk) 12:06, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Okay sure Masry684 (talk) 16:05, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Magda El-Khatib

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Magda El-Khatib, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:42, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Crimsonalfred2022 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Crimsonalfred2022. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  The WordsmithTalk to me 01:19, 12 July 2024 (UTC)Reply