User talk:Mastercane FRX9500S

User talk:Mastercane F X/Archive.

RE: Haiyan

I think Haiyan is too big and important of a storm for you to work on. It's the deadliest Philippine typhoon on record. If you want to work on it, I won't stop you, but it's going to be difficult. I suggest starting out with an easier article. If you don't want to do a list, than there a lot of easier storm articles to work on. But I wouldn't suggest starting with such an important storm. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:29, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

I know Haiyan is too big but I am going to do it. Hypercyclone 2 (talk) 14:34, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Then I will not be mentoring you, good luck on such a big project. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 15:24, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

no wait fine please I want mentorship with you I will work on Haiyan later. Sorry for not knowing this its just I was playing Mariokart World, Fortnite and Rocket League on my Switch 2o Hypercyclone 2 (talk) 18:15, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

OK, I already gave you tasks for the List of Marianas Islands typhoons. If you're still up for it, let's start with that, unless there's another list you'd rather work on. For example, both Louisiana and Maryland's hurricane lists only go back so far. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:58, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

I think I am so mad right now

I am done with this game where everyone reverts everything and having Admin Abuses. I was homeschooled since October 15 2025 and that bites!!!, I don't know what is happening to me, if no one wants to help, then fine, they will see how someone who has severe ADHD will suffer and that someone is me. I moved already to the Hypothetical Hurricanes Wiki, and I feel better there than here. If anyone needs me or wants to help, let me know. I am not retiring but am taking a Wikibreak to help myself. And I will come back later when I feel better. Hypercyclone 2 (talk) 23:17, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

game? idk Jklm45s (talk) 15:04, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

For your information

Hi, Hypercyclone 2, you'll likely not be pleased about this but I have suppressed a number of edits to your userspace which reveal too much personally identifiable information about yourself. I've done this per policy and for your own protection and safety on-line as you are a self-declared minor. I'm really sorry about that and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add it. For some useful information on privacy and safety, take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages. -- Risker (talk) 03:17, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Also one thing, Kiko is NOT my real name, I use it as my slightly altered name, but my real name starts with an F, but I am not going to say it, also please do not edit my user page, it is mine and I don't want anyone to ruin it. Sorry for not responding to it, I was busy with lots of things. Hypercyclone 2 (talk) 17:41, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

And also I am not pleased. Hypercyclone 2 (talk) 17:44, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi Hypercyclone 2, please read WP:UOWN - "They are not a personal homepage, and do not belong to the user." You don't own your user page, and other people might edit it if there is something problematic on the user page. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:51, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

okay then, I will do that when I am done with my homework. Hypercyclone 2 (talk) 17:55, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Disappearance

Next week I am inactive. Hypercyclone 2 (talk) 17:14, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

\You're already inactive but you can use this template 🥏FrizzBTalk🥏 01:13, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

A fox for you!

cute fox

🍋 🍋(talk!) 20:24, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

Attention needed at username change request

Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. HurricaneZeta^C 00:26, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

I just responded, sorry I was busy being on Fandom. Hypercyclone 2 (talk) 00:56, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Your Teahouse question

Did you find what you needed here somewhere else?

I don't know the answer but I just saw that no one actually answered the question.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 00:33, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

I think the answer to that question is in Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2025 September 3#Hurricane "related" templates - all of those templates were deleted. HurricaneZeta^C 15:26, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Contentious topics notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in weather events. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:05, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

What's this? Mastercane F X (talk) 04:06, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Also, sorry for the late reply, I was very busy with other things. Mastercane F X (talk) 04:09, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

I know I was disruptive editing with Typhoon Rai (Super Typhoon Odette) (I was not logged out, I was still in my account, @Hurricanehink, if any of you want to do anything you all want, you can do it if you have to, I am deeply sorry for that. I am sorry also to @The Bushranger. Mastercane F X (talk) 04:16, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Also I almost forgot, I renamed my account from Hypercyclone 2 to Mastercane F X Mastercane F X (talk) 04:17, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

forgot about it

Re: Rai

You need to be mindful when you are working on articles. Edits like this should not have a basic edit summary like "irrelevant", or calling this edit a "fix when you're just moving words around, neither are very helpful. If you'd like to be helpful, then try adding info that's missing in the Rai article. For example, there were typhoon warnings in Palau - were there any effects there too? That would be more useful then working on the lead of the article. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 05:32, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Hink, hey, but anyways, why you did not respond to me in the past few weeks, also I understand that I must be mindful, and the Rai article was supposed to be this: Typhoon Rai known in the Philippines as Super Typhoon Odette is how Rai should have been written down and was always like that. Mastercane F X (talk) 13:12, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

And also you already knew that I changed my username now. Mastercane F X (talk) 13:13, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

I am feeling kinda dissapointed right now, I am already blocked from 2 Wikis from Fandom for using ChatGPT, and being immature. both until January Mastercane F X (talk) 13:15, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Also, the Rai article is already locked until the 29th. Mastercane F X (talk) 13:16, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

By the way, the Rai article was supposed to be this: Typhoon Rai known in the Philippines as Super Typhoon Odette is how Rai should have been written down and was always like that is faulty reasoning, specifically appeal to tradition, because you're justifying a version of the text because its always been that way. Avoid using logical fallacies in your arguments. FourNoddlers (talk) 02:31, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

Reminding you of this since you've made additional edits to Typhoon Rai. @Mastercane F X, if you cannot explain the problem without using fallacies, do not "fix" it. FourNoddlers (talk) 17:21, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

@FourNoddlers please stop with that, and maybe an Edit War already started, with people messing up the [[Typhoon Rai|Rai article. Mastercane F X (talk) 18:58, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

@Mastercane F X:, don't accuse people of "messing up" an article without any basis. That is unproductive to the whole editing community, including some people who are trying to fix longstanding issues. You are a new editor, so you might not be aware of all of Wikipedia's policies. I agree with FourNodlers, if you cannot explain what the problems are, then don't keep adding to the edit war. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:00, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

I am reminding you not to edit based on fallacies, as you've done in Typhoon Rai. Please discuss at Talk:Typhoon Rai#Fully protected before making any changes to the article. FourNoddlers (talk) 19:04, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

As I said, if you're trying to help out with the Rai article, there are a lot of things to do with the article. It's very immature to focus only on the first sentence and not the rest of the article. Your comment - "the Rai article was supposed to be this" - is very immature. We are in the process of trying to figure out what articles should or shouldn't be, but focusing almost exclusively on the first sentence is very short-sighted. If you don't want to get blocked, then don't be immature and don't make dumb edits. I already suggested an article to work on previously, so if you don't want to work on that, and if you don't want to work on the Rai article outside of the lead, then there's not much more to discuss. Also, stop using ChatGPT for writing. If you can't do your own research to find reliable sources, then you shouldn't be editing. And yes I know you changed your user name. Is there anything else you need? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:09, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

I don't have anything else for now, I were homeschooled for 2 months and now I have someone to watch me, I have been nagvigating toward relationships and friendship and how to be with my crush. Mastercane F X (talk) 18:35, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Also, what does "Re" mean? Mastercane F X (talk) 23:51, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

I almost forgot, later I am going to play Fortnite once again on the Switch 2 I have, and also the Super Mario Party Jamboree game (switch 2 edition, so I am going to be very busy. Mastercane F X (talk) 23:53, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Re: means “regarding”. It’s a way of replying to someone. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 01:27, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

You know what? I think that I am no mad again, and I have been going through so many periods of severe autism and severe ADHD, and now I am now in one, so forgot about me in Wikipedia for now, I am quitting until further notice! Mastercane F X (talk) 22:51, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

but it is just a like 1-2 days. Then I will come back. Mastercane F X (talk) 22:52, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

Warning/question

Mastercane, your edits have been disruptive lately. You have contributed toward edit wars, you introduced grammar errors while saying "Who did this" in your edit summary, you added information with no citation, saying people are "messing up" articles without contributing to the discussions. It seems like you're only interested in editing the leads of articles. I have to ask, are you here to help write an encyclopedia? If so, how do you plan on contributing? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:12, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

Hink, I know you gave me a warning and I understand, and also I am sorry for that, I thought it would still help, but now, I quit editing this article for now. I am more active on Fandom's Hypothetical Hurricanes Wiki (but I am blocked again) I was blocked 2 times there, 1: for 2 weeks, I was using AI there and became banned there. 2 (current), I was using an AI profile picture there, and I am blocked till the 20th of January 2026, I am leaving the edit war I was doing. I have been struggling toward severe austisim/severe ADHD, and in Mid-October, I was suspended from school for 2 fucking months, and I am also struggling toward how to be in relationships with others, how to be a better editor and I need help.

- sorry for swearing, I was mad cause of what I did. Mastercane F X (talk) 19:59, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

You need to pick a topic that you want to work on. Don’t just focus on important storms, and the lead of their articles. There are a lot of articles that need work. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

Final warning

You have been warned multiple times to engage in discussion with Typhoon Rai. This edit was not helpful, where you said "please stop reverting my edits, all this already started an edit war, just leave the lead part of the article alone." As I've said elsewhere, the first sentence should not say "Philippines" twice. Secondly, the note already mentions that Odette was known as a Super Typhoon and when it was reclassified as such. You are not being helpful by saying "just leave the lead part of the article alone". That is not going to happen. The lead is the first thing that readers will see, so it needs to be accurate and correct. If you keep on making changes without discussing first, then you will be blocked for disruptive editing. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:41, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

I am already blocked from a wiki from Fandom for AI, and I don't want to be blocked here, fine then I will stop editing this article for now then. Mastercane F X (talk) 19:09, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

You're allowed to edit the article, and there are even a lot of things that need to be done in the Rai article. For example, impacts in the Federated States of Micronesia, Vietnam aftermath, or adding more info to the impact section. Just please stop changing the lead. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:38, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

In Vietnam, the damage from Rai was not really bad, but maybe Micronesia why not? Mastercane F X (talk) 19:43, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

There might be more Vietnam information, is what I mean. Hopefully you can find more info for other area. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:55, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Typhoon Rai for 72 hours. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:10, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

perfect. Mastercane F X (talk) 22:10, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

I will wait then for 72 hours. Mastercane F X (talk) 22:11, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Typhoon Rai shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing a page's content back to how you believe it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree with your changes. Please stop editing the page and use the talk page to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. Wikipedia provides a page explaining how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can request help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution such as a third opinion. In some cases, you may wish to request page protection while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.

If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule— if things indicate that you intend to continue reverting content on the page. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:11, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

a 72 hour break on just an article is too short, I wished I was blocked from editing articles. but for 72 hours. I am currently more active on Fandom. Mastercane F X (talk) 22:23, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

You didn't do anything egregious enough to be blocked from editing all articles. In fact, I wish you would work on other articles. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:32, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Block me no matter what. Mastercane F X (talk) 17:08, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Self-requesting blocks

You requested @Hurricanehink (courtesy ping) to block you for 72 hours. There's a category of administrators who will consider self-blocks. You can also use WikiBreak Enforcer, which technically prevents you from logging in for a certain period. I strongly recommend against disrupting Wikipedia to get blocked. FourNoddlers (talk) 22:14, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Them WHY you don't block me from editing for 72 hours instead of hink? instead of a 72 hour block from only an article, are you an Admin? Mastercane F X (talk) 15:55, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

@Mastercane F X: - FourNoddlers is not an admin. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 16:45, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Hink, block me from editing for 72 hours no matter what. Mastercane F X (talk) 13:11, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Nah I'm good. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:20, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

I'm not an admin, and I wouldn't consider self-requested blocks if I were. Looks like Hurricanehink also does not consider self-requested blocks. If you really want to be blocked for 72 hours, contact an administrator listed in Category:Wikipedia administrators willing to consider placing self-requested blocks or use WikiBreak Enforcer. FourNoddlers (talk) 03:55, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

@Toadspike is going to self-block me. But for 24 hours. Mastercane F X (talk) 17:05, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

About Hypothetical Hurricanes Wiki

@Mastercane F X, i have did research about that Wiki and they allow me to be free, so yes, i will join the Wiki soon (i have already joined Reddit) Mickomicks (talk) 21:43, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

you like it? Mastercane F X (talk) 13:10, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Yessir Mickomicks (talk) 13:39, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Infact u are free to follow my acc if possible try Ripmblox thats my acc Mickomicks (talk) 13:39, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

do you have an HHW account yet? Mastercane F X (talk) 14:19, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Also I can't play Roblox, I am not allowed to cause there are predators there. I play Minecraft and Fortnite however, but anyways, when you have your Fandom account ready, message me on my HHW message wall. @Mickomicks Mastercane F X (talk) 15:55, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Eh, its Ripmblox, also known as my Fandom account Mickomicks (talk) 21:27, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

I play Roblox, but your concern of predators is valid since the mind of that Corporation is literally loose (banned Schlep for catching child predators) Mickomicks (talk) 21:42, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Whats your username in HHW? Mickomicks (talk) 02:20, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

@Mastercane F X i made a community in Fandom Mickomicks (talk) 02:29, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

My username on HHW is Mastercane F X Mastercane F X (talk) 14:27, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Noted Mickomicks (talk) 15:07, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Do you have yo hhw user link? Mastercane F X (talk) 16:03, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Yes Mickomicks (talk) 16:05, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Its this profile by the way Mickomicks (talk) 16:06, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Message me on HHW, on my message wall, cause, I am blocked there for AI till the 20th Mastercane F X (talk) 18:14, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

If its ok, can you send your link? Mickomicks (talk) 00:18, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

January 2026

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Typhoon Durian. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. HurricaneZeta^C 17:27, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to make inappropriate or abusive edit summaries or comments, you may be blocked from editing. FrizzBTalk 15:16, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

I am already blocked Mastercane F X (talk) 15:17, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Please read WP:CIR, WP:DE, and WP:EW. You don't own any articles. FrizzBTalk 15:21, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

I am just mad and scared, and I am sorry for my abusive behavior with @FourNoddlers, also, I don't own any articles, it is just that my mental heath is worsening and I have ADHD, I am deeply sorry for that. Mastercane F X (talk) 15:31, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

@Mastercane F X Hey mate, you okay? You can reach out to me over email if you need anything. – LuniZunie_(talk) 16:45, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Self-requested block

I have blocked you from mainspace for 24 hours per your request . Normally I would not grant such requests from users who have recently received so many warnings, but it seems to me like a short break from the stress of Wikipedia may do you some good. When you come back, please take to heart the advice given by your fellow editors above. Toadspike [Talk] 19:49, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

I needed a break cause I want to. Mastercane F X (talk) 14:08, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

I felt stressed out and Wikipedia is affecting my mental heath, I have moved to Fandom, the Hypothetical Hurricanes Wiki, and my own Wiki I created, the Hypothetical Cars Wiki. Mastercane F X (talk) 17:06, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Hope you feel better, sorry for giving you the warning.

HurricaneZeta^C 18:31, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks, that should make me feel better. Mastercane F X (talk) 19:15, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

+1 FrizzBTalk 15:32, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Re: lead

No, not every typhoon article should be formatted the same way. If you assume that every article has to be treated the same way, then you won't be able to have flexibility. Also, for storms that only affect the Philippines, it doesn't have to say "known locally as [NAME] by PAGASA", just "known locally as [NAME]". Also, "known locally as [NAME] by PAGASA" is bad grammar, so no, that should not be the standard. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:42, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

But Durian, Xangsane, Vongfong, and Rai were written down like this. Mastercane F X (talk) 13:33, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Hey @Mastercane F X, how is the ADHD Thing going? Are you doing good? Mickomicks (talk) 13:34, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

One of my advices is to get enough sleep and atleast try to take a break from Wikipedia (like Semi-retiring) Mickomicks (talk) 13:35, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

And just so you know, for the whole month or two, i will still be active in Wikipedia Mickomicks (talk) 13:36, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Still severe, but is getting better, check Hypothetical Cars Wiki, my wiki, and find a avatar (profile picture) for your fandom account. Mastercane F X (talk) 13:35, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Also, I got better sleep. Mastercane F X (talk) 13:36, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Nice Mickomicks (talk) 13:36, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Also can i get a link to the Hypothetical Cars Wiki, i am interested Mickomicks (talk) 13:36, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

check your notification from Fandom. Mastercane F X (talk) 13:38, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

However, I am the Bureaucrat and Wiki leader of the Hypothetical Cars Wiki, but, don't worry it is not like Wikipedia. Mastercane F X (talk) 13:39, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Yes i know, you literally look like you are suffering from what i call “So called rules” Mickomicks (talk) 13:41, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Like, you cant even be yourself in Wikipedia Mickomicks (talk) 13:42, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

yo right Mastercane F X (talk) 15:55, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Semi-retiring

For now, I am semi-retiring from Wikipedia for a few days, cause, what I have done with @FourNoddlers and @Hurricanehink was unfair, and I asked @Toadspike to give me a 24 hour block previously, what I have done was unfair, so to avoid all this, I am semi-retiring, which means that I will not be very active that much anymore, I am more active on the Hypothetical Hurricanes Wiki, but not here. Mastercane F X (talk) 18:56, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

@Hurricanehink? Mastercane F X (talk) 16:26, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Block me

Block me no matter what, I feel happier when I am blocked. Mastercane F X (talk) 16:33, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Disruptive behavior

Your behavior in numerous articles has been unacceptable. In the article Tropical Storm Fung-wong (2014), you engaged in an edit war to remove an adjective from the lead sentence. You did not follow up on the concerns I addressed in Talk:Tropical Storm Fung-wong (2014), and your recent revert did not acknowledge the concerns I raised.

In the article Hurricane Andrew, you engaged in another edit war, this time restoring content that does not conform to MOS:INTRO and WP:V. In your edit summary, you invited another editor to challenge my edits and implied that you and the editor would confront my edits to the lead sections of other articles. That is more evident when you reverted my copyediting of Typhoon Saola (2023)'s lead section with a generic edit summary three minutes later.

I know you've made numerous requests to be blocked from this site, but if you want to continue editing in this topic, stop edit-warring. If someone reverts your edit, do not revert it. Instead, discuss the issue at an appropriate venue (usually the involved article's talk page) and work on a resolution. FourNoddlers (talk) 01:13, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

MOS:INTRO is irrlevent, leads are not to be what u want. Mastercane F X (talk) 14:01, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

I'm unsure about the intentions of your comment. Are you justifying your actions in Hurricane Andrew, or are you discrediting my explanation for removing unverified content in the lead section of said article? FourNoddlers (talk) 15:19, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Yes I am justifying, Hink says leads are not supposed be written like this. Mastercane F X (talk) 15:30, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

What Hurricanehink said wasn't a practice approved by the Wikipedia community, unlike the content in MOS:INTRO and WP:V, so no one is required to follow or enforce his preferred practices if they are discouraged by a Wikipedia policy or guideline. Even if MOS:INTRO does not apply, the removed content was unverified, and reinstatement must include a citation from a reliable source that directly supports the affected content, which neither you nor MarioProtIV did. Also, the way you're approaching these disputes is disruptive. You were reminded to resolve disputes and not engage in edit wars. If you're not willing to abide by Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, or deviate from them without satisfactory reasoning, then you should not edit Wikipedia at all. FourNoddlers (talk) 15:50, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Leads?! okay, 1st from September to November of 2025, people were talking about the see also sections, and now they are messing up the Lead part of all those articles such as Typhoon Haiyan and Typhoon Rai, leads should be written down like this like Haiyan:

Typhoon Haiyan known in the Philippines as Super Typhoon Yolanda as an example, leads should be written like this, not like this:

Typhoon Haiyan, locally named Yolanda by PAGASA.

So if you really think writing stuff like this down helps? this is why I always revert your "lead copyedits". Mastercane F X (talk) 16:01, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

This problem arose from numerous disputes involving Mickomicks about how the lead sentence should be written for tropical cyclones named by PAGASA. You were invited to the discussion because of your involvement, but your explanation consisted of only appeal to tradition. You did not base your argument on Wikipedia policies or guidelines, nor did you use logic to explain the flaws of other participants' proposals and justify your preferred option. FourNoddlers (talk) 16:12, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Welp.

OK, I have to admit "damaging" was good Jklm45s (talk) 18:56, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

thanks. Mastercane F X (talk) 20:13, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Hypo-track-2025-11-29T16-22-38.webp

Thanks for uploading File:Hypo-track-2025-11-29T16-22-38.webp. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:30, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Opps, sorry, I didn't know that, I made the image anyways. Mastercane F X (talk) 16:07, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Jlina sim.webp

Thanks for uploading File:Jlina sim.webp. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:31, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

I also made this image myself. Mastercane F X (talk) 16:07, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Yeah, it's for his sandbox Jklm45s (talk) 13:15, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Nida article

Hi, I blanked and redirected the Typhoon Nida (2009) article to its section in 2009 Pacific typhoon season. This was because it had the same information that was in the season article and had minimal land impacts. However, don't be sad about this, as this is common for articles (and has happened to featured articles that have been up for over 20 years). You can actually go to that season article and expand on the meteorological history/preparations/impacts of storms in each section. If you find a storm has a lot of impacts, you can even start an article on it. And I hope you're feeling better mental health-wise. HurricaneZeta^C 22:18, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

hello zeta, and yes, I am feeling better. SPCMastercaneAlt2 (talk) 17:48, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm really sorry for thinking your alt was an a5 sockpuppet, made a really big mistake there Cicada1010 (talk) 19:05, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Editing

Once again, please stop focusing just on the leads of articles, and stop recreating articles that were merged. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 17:28, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Will do. Mastercane F X (talk) 18:25, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Private topic between me and MFX

Hey, i saw that you actually hated to revert my edits but you had to follow the rules. Its actually ok since you are the only person in Wikipedia to ever stand on my side. But i have an offer: Do you want to become one of my best friends? I respect your decision if yes or no and i wont pressure you to accept the status. Mickomicks (talk) 14:19, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Sure, you can join Fandom too, and we can follow each other here. Mastercane F X (talk) 14:52, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you very much, bro Mickomicks (talk) 15:09, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Should we chat here for a while? Mickomicks (talk) 15:10, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Ye nvm Mickomicks (talk) 15:23, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Sorry for the late reply, I was busy cause I am currently at school. Mastercane F X (talk) 16:01, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Also, sure, why not. Mastercane F X (talk) 16:02, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

I finished with my exams, i hope i pass Mickomicks (talk) 05:16, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

hey, I have a test today also. Hope I pass. Mastercane F X (talk) 13:19, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Good luck Mickomicks (talk) 13:42, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

passes the test! Mastercane F X (talk) 14:10, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Nice!, i hope i passed mine, no results Yet Mickomicks (talk) 14:30, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

• A reminder that this is not a social networking site. Please take this elsewhere.--Jasper Deng (talk) 07:55, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

February 2026

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a social network. Wikipedia is not a place to socialize or write things that are not directly related to improving the encyclopedia. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. We're sorry if this message has discouraged you from editing here, but the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia. Thank you. Jasper Deng (talk) 19:29, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

My bad Mastercane F X (talk) 12:59, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

I recommend you and @Mickomicks communicate by HHW or email. GiftedIceCream 15:10, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

test

test 🌀 Mastercane F X 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 17:00, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Effects of Hurricane Hugo in South Carolina

Hello, Mastercane F X. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Effects of Hurricane Hugo in South Carolina, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:08, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

March 2026

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If an edit seems like vandalism but you cannot confirm that it likely is, don't warn the user. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please stop placing block templates on user talk pages. You are not an admin. GiftedIceCream 00:19, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Sorry, then. 🌀 Mastercane F X 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 12:15, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi MFX, how do i get a username style like yours Mickomicks (talk) 12:46, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

See WP:SIGTUT. GiftedIceCream 14:15, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Typhoon Merbok (2022), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. GiftedIceCream 19:44, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

why? 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 14:38, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Sorry, but you need a source for that edit. GiftedIceCream 17:32, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Cyclone Fytia has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cyclone Fytia. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:30, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Cyclone Fytia has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cyclone Fytia. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:01, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Warning about merging article

Hey there, a few notes about merging articles. First off, discussions should be open for two weeks to determine if there is a consensus. Second off, if you do merge an article, you need to actually incorporate the content. Not just remove the article link and claim that the article is merged. Third, in the future, if you do merge a good article, you also need to remove it from the good article list, and update the talk page. So unless you are familiar with all of this, I suggest you do not merge article articles in the future. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 18:04, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Mastercane F X/sandbox

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as User:Mastercane F X/sandbox, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:06, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Sorry then, I will refrain from doing this. 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 15:26, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Final warning

Consider this a final warning. Saying I don't care, I can do edit warring if I have to is unproductive and contributes toward editing warning. You will be blocked if you continue edit warring. In the mean time, please voice your thoughts on either a project page, or on the talk page, if you want to change things. However, you keep going changing the article unnecessarily, by having redundant wording that looks bad. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:00, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

@Hurricanehink Please, I am tired of all of those leads being like this and I don't care if I get blocked, wanna block me?! go ahead then. 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 19:59, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

And also I am more active on Hypothetical Hurricanes Wiki, not on Wikipedia that much anymore! 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 20:23, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Sidiefi (talk) 20:34, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

April 2026

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  EvergreenFir (talk) 20:38, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Hey there, I am sorry for everything, I promise from now on I will use Wikipedia only for building an encyclopedia, or an exchange for a partial block instead. 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 21:04, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Hey @EvergreenFir Can you review my unblock request? 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 21:53, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

@EvergreenFir: You may want to block SPCMastercaneAlt2 as well. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 22:54, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Yes, I want my alt account blocked, it is so I don't do sockpuppetry/block evasion. 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 01:47, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

@EvergreenFir You may want to block Masterstorm 67 as well, but they hadn't used the account since November. GiftedIceCream 14:13, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mastercane FRX9500S (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Okay, I am sorry for what I have done, I did not mean to be like this, I just don't want to risk an indefinite block, and from now on, I will be better, I promise that I will be better, work on and reflect everything I have done, I promise not to be like this ever again, I am sorry pleasee forgive me and accept my unblock request, I am sorry for everything. To avoid another indefinite block, I would promise now to make edit summeries like these before and to not edit warring like this again, I would to appeal me block so I can return to unrestricted editing again. :- 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 21:03, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I'm going to be honest this sounds a lot like "this is what I need to say to get unblocked" instead of a genuine understanding of the issues that led to the block and an actual plege to avoide them in the future. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:08, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The problem with your "unrestricted editing again" is that many times you have refused to engage in discussion or add to the conversation. You insist on articles to be formatted a certain way, regardless of other user's opinions/arguments. So it's not just about the edit summaries. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:32, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Also note that because Mastercane and I have interacted so many times, this is me responding as a user, and not as an administrator. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:33, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Hey Hurricanehink, so I don't want to risk another indefinite block again, can't I just be blocked from the Article mainspace for like, just 5 days or a week, I am sorry for how I acted up. 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 21:35, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Also I now promise (and for real) to use the talk page from now on instead of edit warring from now on when I am unblocked once again, to avoid risking me being indefed again. 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 21:36, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Appeal #2

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mastercane FRX9500S (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

As my other unblock request was denied, I now want to know if I can be unblocked so I can refrain from further edit warring on articles such as Phanfone and Haiyan, to avoid another indef block on me, I will use the talk pages before editing, or an exchenge for my block to be for like a week or 2 weeks, or a partial block instead, can you aprove my request this time?

Decline reason:

Closing this unblock request in light of discussion below where the editor agrees to take the standard offer. PhilKnight (talk) 00:13, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 22:18, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

You seem more sorry because you are blocked, and less sorry for your actions. If you were truly sorry, you would take a step back from Wikipedia for a bit and reflect on what you need to do differently, instead of immediately requesting an unblock. Indefinite blocks don't just happen randomly, they happen after warnings were ignored. I would suggest contributing to other wiki's such as Wikipedia:Simple English Wikipedia instead. An indefinite block is not infinite, so "exchanging" your block for a shorter one does not work.

I would recommend not making multiple unblock requests so quickly, you are just going to get the same answer and people are going to be less likely to want to actually help in future appeals. While I've only been on Wikipedia for a short time, I have not yet seen a user get unblocked by requesting two unblocks within two hours of their block. – LuniZunie_(talk) 22:22, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Also, I know an indefinite block is not infinite, but when is more recommended for a new unblock request in case my other request in denied? 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 22:24, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

in case my other request in denied. Again, this suggests you do not actually acknowledge the issues with your actions. There should never be a case where you immediately request an unblock after your unblock is denied. – LuniZunie_(talk) 22:27, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

So, how I can fix this, have any ideas for me at least? 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 22:28, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Stay off Wikipedia for a while, and reflect. Maybe go edit Wikipedia:Simple English Wikipedia, show that you are constructive; not disruptive. – LuniZunie_(talk) 22:29, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

I should also add, a block is preventative, not punishment. Reducing it to a two week block reads as a plea bargain, which would suggest it is punishment; it's not, the block is in place to prevent disruption, you need to be able to show you are beyond that. – LuniZunie_(talk) 22:24, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

How? like, how long I have to wait until I can make another unblock request or how long will be my block, I am not mad or anything, it is just that I don't like an indef block on me. 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 22:26, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Until you show you have changed. And that's not going to happen over the course of 2 hours, or even a day, or even likely a week. – LuniZunie_(talk) 22:28, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

I don't expect 2 hours, hopefully I get unblocked by Friday or the weekend 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 22:29, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

hopefully I get unblocked by Friday or the weekend

And once again, this shows you are really only apologizing to be unblocked. The conversation we've had shows me nothing has changed. – LuniZunie_(talk) 22:31, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Then fine, I prefer waiting until you admins think I am ready. 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 22:32, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

I think you should take the standard offer, which is six months of waiting and editing on other projects like Commons or the simple english Wikipedia. HurricaneZeta^C 22:32, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

@HurricaneZeta I don't think I can 6 months, anything shorter than that? 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 22:32, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

If you keep asking for shorter, I suspect the admins viewing your unblock requests will be more and more likely to want you to wait longer. – LuniZunie_(talk) 22:34, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

The page I linked says

The six-month threshold can be adjustable under special circumstances. If an editor shows unusually good insight into the circumstances that led to the block and sets out a credible proposal for how they will deal with those issues in future, then a return might be considered sooner.

But still, you will have to wait some time, and if you do want to be unblocked, why not start now? The six months will pass anyway, regardless of if you work towards an unblock or not, and your best bet is to put them to use and constructively contributing and showing that you've moved past what led to this block. HurricaneZeta^C 22:36, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

I won't be on Wikipedia after 6 months cause I have more school stuff to do, if there is anything else that can help other than 6 months, can you give me something at least, I understand what I have done was unacceptable and I know, I am not going to make another unblock request yet, whenever you all think, you all can let me know on my talk page or message me on Hypothetical Hurricanes Wiki. 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 22:39, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

I really think the best thing for you right now is to take a step back, blocks can be frustrating and you don't think the best after they occur. So take a step back; using the HH wiki is a good plan to show you can cooperate, and I still do believe you should look into the Simple English Wikipedia. Just start working on it now, and hopefully in the future you will be able to show your progress. – LuniZunie_(talk) 22:44, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Or this to @HurricaneZeta @GiftedIceCream and @LuniZunie and also @Hurricanehink I prefer if, I don't get unblocked in 2 weeks, or get my full block turned into a partial block, then I will take the standard offer, but I want a second chance for editing as I promise not to do furthur edit warring and use the article talk pages from now on, if I get unblocked in 2 weeks, then I will return, but do what I promised, if not, then I will take the standard offer and wait 6 months (10/4/2026). Would that be okay? 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 01:50, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

It's up to the reviewing admin, but I'd say no. You had your warnings, you had multiple, this should not be treated as a warning; you are beyond that. – LuniZunie_(talk) 02:12, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

None of us are admins, so we can't do anything here. GiftedIceCream 18:06, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Also, the standard offer is six months of silence, not six months of complaining. GiftedIceCream 18:07, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Quick question, are you an admin? 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 22:30, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

No, why? – LuniZunie_(talk) 22:31, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Also @LuniZunie to me, you look like an admin. 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 22:39, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi, sorry, but I did indeed ping you to a discussion related to the articles you were edit-warring multible times and you never responded. I know editing with ADHD is difficult, but you made wrong decisions here. I know you have the potential to be a good editor, but for now you deserve to be blocked. Hopefully I see you in six months. See you on hhw then. Courtesy ping@HurricaneZeta@LuniZunie GiftedIceCream 23:56, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Or maybe shorter, I hope. 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 01:02, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

I am not inclined to charge my block. Another admin may so do if they wish to. EvergreenFir (talk) 04:10, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

@EvergreenFir Of course, as usual with messy things, it's gotten messier. The user who initially started the ANI case that "led" to this block, Sidiefi, has been blocked (and glocked) as a sockpuppet of WMF-banned user Andrew5. Do I think the block should be overturned because of that? Absolutely not. But it is likely worth noting as I have suspicion that the ANI report was made with a specific goal in mind (which I further suspect was to actually get @Hurricanehink: in trouble, and less so Mastercane). – LuniZunie_(talk) 23:27, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

As everyone is saying: you are not, remotely, giving the slightest clue that you understand how your behaviors led to your block. You're (speaking frankly) frantically begging for your block to be reduced or lifted, which shows that you're more concerned about being blocked than the actual cause of your having been blocked. Take the standard offer. Edit on other projects to demonstrate that you can edit productively and without issue, and in six months your block can be appealed. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:16, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) @Mastercane FRX9500S I also have ADHD (so do a lot of other editors), but perhaps it might help to have someone explain things in a different way.

Blocks are only to prevent problems, they don't punish editors. Here's the difference:

Punishment

You say sorry after you've been punished. Sorry is a way to show regret, but that word can't stop things on it's own. It can't prevent anything from happening. Saying sorry isn't enough to remove a block.

Prevention

Blocks are preventative, to stop things from happening. This means that blocks can only be removed when the thing you're trying to prevent is gone.

Why you were blocked

In this case, the block was made to prevent you from disrupting the Wikipedia website. Admins need to know that you won't continue to disrupt Wikipedia if they remove the block.

They don't have that right now - the evidence is that you're currently having problems with controlling your behaviour, this has been going on for a few months by your own admission - see these posts of yours from November onwards:

You know that editing Wikipedia isn't good for you right now, you should learn to listen to your own instincts.

It takes hard work and treatment to learn how to deal with ADHD symptoms, especially when you're young and your brain is still developing. It's not physically possible for you to have overcome the problems you've been having for months in only two hours, and no-one expects you to. That's why everyone is encouraging you to either try an easier project for a few months, or just focus on yourself and your education, then come back here then you're a little older.

It seems like it's a long time to wait, but it really isn't.

This is honestly for your own good, we don't want you to be unblocked then blocked again, especially since you've said how much Wikipedia disputes stress you out. You can look at coming back to Wikipedia in the future, but this isn't the time for that - you have other things you need to do first. Blue Sonnet (talk) 04:56, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Also to @Hurricanehink and @The Bushranger, @GiftedIceCream and also @EvergreenFir I understand now the reason for my indefinite block for WP:NOTHERE, I was edit warring on Typhoon Phanfone and Haiyan, and, as I thought right was more important than editing, I now find consensus more important, I want a 2nd chance for Wikipedia to earn a 2nd chance without taking the standard offer, or exchanging my indefinite full block to an indefinite partial block (Article) mainspace only, or for a topic ban, as I now understand what as caused me for my indefinite block, to avoid more incedents like these, I will have to strictly follow Wikipedia's 5 pillars I read, as I promise not to do furthur edit warring, I would like to know if my full block be turned into a partial block or changed into an topic ban or I can be fully unblocked but for 1 last chance, if I fail, then I will take 6 months from the standard offer when am indefinitely blocked again, as I now know everything, I want a 2nd chance, it might not be possible, but I can try at least. I am not just promising anymore, I will show you all by demonstrating that I can be more of a better editor cause I am a member of WikiProject:Tropical Cyclones, I will use the talk page from articles more often, I will listien strictly to Wikipedia's rules, as I will refrain from violating the rules, I have been improving rapidly in behivour, and, if not, then I will then wait 6 months, but, I will demonstrate that I am more mature now. 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 16:13, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

I'm not an admin so I can't do anything. :) GiftedIceCream 19:11, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

I don't see you getting unblocked. If you do, it will almost certainly be under a supervisory WP:Mentorship which is usually discouraged. You have also not addressed the attitude that you seemed to have expressed with your "I don't care if I get blocked, wanna block me?! go ahead then." comment, which is the other proximate reason for your block.

I'm not an admin. All I can do is suggest to @Hurricanehink, The Bushranger, and EvergreenFir: unblock conditions, which they need not adopt:

• Mastercane operates under a strict 0RR in tropical cyclone articles and 1RR elsewhere, with an indefinite block for any violations thereof unless immediately self-reverted.
• Mastercane is placed under a supervisory mentorship, ideally by an admin, and is required to obey that mentor until further notice, with blocks for any violations thereof. This explicitly includes any comment like "I don't care if I get blocked, wanna block me?! go ahead then." Said supervisory mentor must agree to the supervisory nature of the mentorship and the nature of this situation before the unblock and the block will be reinstated if said supervisory mentor resigns as such and a new one is not promptly in place.
• Mastercane agrees that any form of WP:IDHT towards community feedback is unacceptable, and that any disagreements with said feedback must be brought to their mentor.
• Mastercane agrees that we are WP:NOTTHERAPY, and that they need to seek their own professional care for their neurotype, with Wikipedia editors not responsible for any disruption resulting from it.
• No social networking like in #Private topic between me and MFX is allowed, to include any and all exchanging of outside-Wikipedia contact information or personal information.

Personally, I'm willing to think these are reasonable conditions, and the only ones I would accept in lieu of following the standard offer. Even then, I do not view these as much better than the standard offer and still think that's the simplest way forward.

Unless an admin adopts these conditions or other conditions that would allow you to be unblocked earlier, please do not reply further. You're only resetting the 6-month timer each time and furthermore, your ability to edit this page will likely be revoked if you continue much further. In the unlikely event that an admin does make such an offer, the only thing you should be commenting is accepting said offer. Jasper Deng (talk) 19:55, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Also, please semi-protect my talk page cause an A5 sock encouraged me to do sockpuppetry/block evasion. 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 20:32, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

It looks like they've stopped - several of us have this page bookmarked so we'll keep an eye on it & undo their edits.

If it gets too bad (e.g. they start spamming) then it can absolutely be protected - for now I think we're ok.

Ignore anyone who looks suspicious or says anything weird, they usually just want attention so don't let them have any of yours. They might also try to get you to leave lots of posts and get into trouble, so watch out for that.

You can either wait for one of us to spot their shenanigans or even undo their edits yourself, if you prefer - you can remove anything from your own Talk page except for declined block appeals. Blue Sonnet (talk) 20:50, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

(off-topic)

I guess chances of me becoming an admin might be gone. 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 12:58, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia administrators have usually been editing for at least a couple of years and have tens of thousands of edits. It's a very complicated, difficult role with lots of different responsibilities.

You could possibly become an administrator at some point in the future, but it'll take a lot of time and effort to get there. Blue Sonnet (talk) 13:05, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Instead of viewing "being an administrator" as the goal(which is just a set of tools) have your goal as "be a good contributor". Once you have an extensive history that shows a good understanding of Wikipedia policies, and a need for the tools, others will be willing to forgive and forget past mistakes. 331dot (talk) 14:45, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

So, what is going to happen to me? 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 15:10, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Can you review my unblock request? 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 16:15, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Mastercane, in no uncertain terms, you definitely need significant time off Wikipedia.

You basically blew it completely when you said things like "I don't care if I get blocked, wanna block me?! go ahead then." That shows a clear and willful disregard for Wikipedia policies and guidelines as well as, crucially, community feedback. Those are why you are blocked indefinitely–because a finite block would have sent the wrong message. The one block I have ever received, 15 years ago, was indefinite, and it forced me to learn about WP:BLP; at the time, I was less mature and might've ignored a finite block. You are likely blocked indefinitely for the same reason.

The difference between how I approached my block and yours is that I showed a willingness to heed that policy going forward in more than a superficial way, and I fully acknowledged why the policy existed. If you want any chance of becoming an admin, this is fundamental.

Basically, you making those comments in response to Hink's warning and then repeatedly filing unblock requests was seen as WP:IDHT. The standard offer will be your way of showing that you have changed that. Jasper Deng (talk) 17:12, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Mastercane FRX9500S, note that the standard offer applies for 6 months after your last edit on this project (which would currently be October 7th PT). Every edit you make resets this timer. I would urge you to constructively edit either on a separate WMF wiki, or on another wiki. Please don't respond, just go ahead and edit on those other projects. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 19:00, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Kind of a pointless comment but I already notified them. GiftedIceCream 19:56, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

@Mastercane FRX9500S If lots of people are telling you the same thing, it's probably the truth. I don't know if you've read my post above where I've tried to explain things to you as clearly as I can, but I don't think your appeal is going to be accepted.

If/when it's declined, the best thing you can do is turn off notifications & do something else for at least six months. Make sure you've got an email address linked in case you forget your password, but turn off all notifications from English Wikipedia so you're not tempted to come back before it's time to return.

I've not seen anyone be unblocked through the Standard offer in less time than that, so it's important that you accept this time limit. Wikipedia isn't going anywhere in the meantime. Blue Sonnet (talk) 20:01, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Also, do not create WP:SOCKPUPPETs as they reset the timer. GiftedIceCream 13:29, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

I have not done sockpuppetry, block evasion cause I don't want my block to be extended, if I do, then, an editor might start a sockpuppet investigations and I don't want to make things worse 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 15:11, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

That's good! I think they were just letting you know because some people don't read through the warnings and get themselves into trouble 🙂 Blue Sonnet (talk) 14:14, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

UTRS appeal

UTRS appeal #112001 was declined as a duplicate, as you have an open appeal here and still have access to your talk page. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:04, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Please Take the WP:OFFER

Mastercane, my advice to you, which I hope you heed, is to log out of English Wikipedia and not even visit this page for six months. There are many reasons WP:OFFER exists and why it specifies at least six months; one reason is that it's considered a good display for a blocked editor that they have self control to stay away from Wikipedia.

This is not an emergency, yet you're repeatedly talking about wanting to be unblocked quickly as if it is, and talking about things like administration, which would be years away. Each additional unblock request or attempt to negotiate timed block make it appear that you haven't really reckoned with the behavior that led to the block in the first place. You seem far more focused on getting the unblock, than what will actually lead to an unblock: addressing the conduct issues that caused it in the first place.

We have a nearly limitless world with nearly infinite possibilities for other worthy activities that you can do in the meantime. You're young; go explore some of those, and come back here in six months or a year or five years or 10 years or whenever you're ready so that this will be a more positive experience for both you and this project. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 20:06, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

How I can survive 6 months being blocked? 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 14:59, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

The standard offer is usually pretty consistent, and the exception is most likely to be when the person shows unusually good insight into their conduct and offers a coherent program for improvement. That is not the case, so far; if anything, you've made your case for a short-term unblock weaker not stronger.

That you talk about Wikipedia editing in terms of survival is a really concerning thing to say. It's certainly a sign that time away from Wikipedia may very well be beneficial to you. This is a collaborative project to build a large encyclopedia; that's all it is. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 18:21, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Also, can the standard offer be ajustable? 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 15:04, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

It is adjustable in the sense that the 6 month period will reset if you violate conditions (attempted sockpuppettry, etc). It will not be shorter than 6 months. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:11, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

A few people have suggested that you try editing Simple English Wikipedia for six months, it uses less complex language than English Wikipedia and is often used by blocked editors as a sort of "parole" - a place to learn how to edit properly and get lots of evidence to support a future appeal here.

If you work hard at Simple Wikipedia, you can say: "Look at my history, it's safe to unblock me because I'm a great editor now - just see all the good work I've done on Simple!" when you appeal in six months or so.

Having that sort of proof can completely change the outcome of an appeal, so it's very highly recommended to do this if at all possible.

It also means that you don't have to stop editing completely - you're just working on a "sister" project for a little while, a slightly different website to this one. The Standard offer is set at six months because you need that time to build up enough history for admins to get a proper understanding of how you've developed and grown since you were blocked. Any less, and they won't be able to make a fair decision on your case.

I personally know of around a dozen currently-blocked editors who are doing exactly that as we speak; I also know of the same amount of editors who had their appeal accepted as a result of their hard work at Simple Wikipedia. Some even became admins or checkusers with they returned - editors with very important and complex roles, who need to be trustworthy and good at their work.

They were in exactly the same place you are now - blocked and needing proof that they can be trusted to edit Wikipedia productively and responsibly.

You don't even need to wait to see the outcome of your appeal, you can use this same account & start working at Simple Wikipedia right now if you like.

At least take a look around and see how things work over there, it's very similar & uses almost identical formatting, wikitext, mark-ups etc. You'll be doing exactly the same thing you do over here, so it's a great place to spend your time.

Just go to simple.wikipedia.org & start editing! Make sure to read their instructions and help pages first, as well as this very important page. Blue Sonnet (talk) 20:28, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Alright, I guess Simple Wikipedia is my only option, I will wait 6 months if I don't get unblocked within the end of the month, or until an admin wants to give me 1 last chance. 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 20:47, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

I think that's a really good idea, good luck at Simple!

BTW If you need any help with an appeal when you come back, please feel free to let me know - if you look at my user page you'll see I help a lot of people with block appeals, so I would be happy to give you a hand in the future if you wanted. Blue Sonnet (talk) 20:55, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Advice

Ignore the person telling you to make sockpuppets. He's a long-term troll who is banned from editing all Wikimedia Foundation wikis. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 19:40, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Yes, I am not going to make sockpuppets, I won't listen, I will just wait until something happens. 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 20:26, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Appeal/Unblock #3

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mastercane FRX9500S (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

As I know understand everything that has led to my indefinite block and actually, I ment that I will take the stand offer and wait until October 4, 2026 now if I don't get unblocked within the end of the month, the reasons were, which I heard were these: * I was edit warring continuously on tropical cyclone articles even after I was warned multiple times, along with @Mickomicks, but whenever I get unblocked I will no longer engage in edit warring on articles and not change anything major unless using the article talk page, and I failed to do that before (and on January 4 or 3, I had to get partially blocked for 72 hours from the Typhoon Rai article) * I went up making edit summaries that were against the rules, such as "I don't care, I can do edit warring if I have to", I will promise now to make better edit summaries * And there was something called "Private topic between me and MFX" (made by Mickomicks), I have not used talk pages to discuss other topics since then, as I promise not to. * And I went up saying complete disregard of @Hurricanehink's final warning of edit warring This is all that led to my indefinite block, I already read the second chance, and I want to earn trust back by the Wikipedia communmity and so I can participate in WikiProject:Tropical cyclones, I really thought the leads were important, but, I guess I was wrong, I understand the concerns of @EvergreenFir @Jasper Deng @GiftedIceCream and @The Bushranger as well as @Blue Sonnet as well as @HurricaneZeta, but, I really want to return to Wikipedia, I have not done sockpuppetry/block evasion, this will be my last appeal for me, I want to exchange my indefinite block into (if possible): * An indefinite partial block (article mainspace only) * A temporaily block (1 month, but with my talk page revoked) * An editing restriction or sanction or topic ban on certain articles * When I can be fully unblocked but with 1 last chance, but if I waste it, then, I will prefer an indefinite block again and I will wait 6 months for another appeal. I really now (and for real) know what cause my indefinite block, I never knew that I could risk an indefinite block, I thought going to be temporarily, but I did not expect an indefinite block, which I don't want nor I wanted, I am really wanting trust back by Wikipedia, as I promise not to do problems which were mentioned by you admins, I am really wanting 1 last chance, if it gets rejected, then I will wait until October 4, 2026, but I want 1 last chance, this will be my last unblock request for now, I now understand everything I want to earn back trust. 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 13:12, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

FRX9500S has agreed to take Standard Offer and try again sometime on or after October 9, 2026. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:09, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator comment) I don't think this will be accepted, if you look at the bottom of the declined appeals you'll see that access to your Talk page may be removed if too many unsuccessful appeals are made.

I strongly recommend that you delete this new section (including this post of mine) & wait out the Standard offer at Simple like we discussed - if you were going to be unblocked then it would have happened already. Blue Sonnet (talk) 13:17, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Just to confirm, you can remove open (blue) appeals, but not declined (orange) appeals. Blue Sonnet (talk) 13:20, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

I know that, but this is my last one before I don't start new ones for a long time (6 months) 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 13:23, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

then I will wait until October 4, 2026. You really shouldn't, since the earliest you can take the standard offer now is October 9th, 2026. The standard offer counts any editing as resetting the timer. You have still been editing your talk page, asking for an unblock. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 13:24, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

My blocked started on April 4, 2026, and I am waiting for an unblock or partial unblock, also, a question, are you an admin? 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 13:27, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

No, I am not. The standard offer says explicitly having made no edits using a named or temporary account on the English Wikipedia. Talk page edits count as edits. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 13:37, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Then, fine, I will then, just wait until something happens or just use simple Wikipedia. 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 13:38, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Admins might overlook occasional Talk page comments, but the official appeal template is definitely resetting the timer.

If you change your mind and want it removed before an admin sees it, let me know and I'll do it for you if you like. Blue Sonnet (talk) 13:57, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Mickomicks can't comment because this page is Extended-Confirmed Protected. GiftedIceCream 14:09, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Mastercane, please stop. Every edit makes you wait longer. Several appeals in a short amount of time don't go over well and will all probably be declined for the same reason. So far, you haven't made any edits on simple, do you want to start there? HurricaneZeta^C 15:28, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

I have communicated with them off-wiki about the Spanish Wikipedia. GiftedIceCream 15:32, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

So you said you'll accept the standard offer and edit on simple, only to directly contradict that with another unblock request??! That shows you cannot be trusted to be honest. The reviewing admin is advised to remove talk page access because you have made it clear that you are wasting the community's time.--Jasper Deng (talk) 15:53, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

I highly doubt that the above was even an unblock request. GiftedIceCream 15:57, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Too late anyway since it was declined and closed. It was really not a good idea for Mastercane to do that, sadly. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 20:02, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Okay okay, fine, I guess I will wait. 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 16:05, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

I don't my talk page revoked then, fine! I guess I will wait then Jasper. 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 16:08, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note that the unblock template was broken partway through, hiding a full half of the text in it. I've fixed it. I agree: Mastercane, step back, take the standard offer, and do not make further requests. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 16:25, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

  Fine, but, which day (specific, I can make a new one, like when in October (6 months)? 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 16:53, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

  10/9/26 GiftedIceCream 16:55, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

  Okay then, I will wait until October 9 2026. 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 17:05, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Last appeal/unblock request - 4/22/2026

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mastercane FRX9500S (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Based on what I read from Wikipedia's read, I now know the reason why for my indefinite block, again, I am wanting a new unblock request and this will be, and for real the last one, I just already read Wikipedia's strict polices and that the goal of Wikipedia is about building an encyclopedia, not to engage in edit wars, I will not engage in edit warring anymore, instead of taking the standard offer and waiting WP:Rules, and polices, I have not done sockpuppetry/block evasion cause I don't want my block to be extended, as a member of WikiProject:Tropical cyclones, I will not engage in further edit warring, I have been a editor for, at least a few months, here are what I know: Five pillars: The foundation of everything. It explains that Wikipedia mus tbe neutral, verifiable, and freely editable, because it is a Free Encyclopedia

Neutral point of view: Editors have to write balances facts, no opinions, no bias.

Verifiability: Anything added must be from reliable sources.

No original research: Editors should added only what is published, not their own ideas nor conclusions.

As what I already read, I wanted to know if I can be unblocked already without taking the standard offer, but I heard that it can adjustable under special circumstances, I will not do further edit wars, I will want a second chance for Wikipedia so I can resume on editing this encyclopedia, I am wanting to know if I can be unblocked, I already read the 5 pillars of Wikipedia, so, I will not break these rules to avoid another indefinite block, I will strictly follow Wikipedia polices, and I am wanting to earn trust back the encyclopedia, I already did some edits on the Simple English Wikipedia, so, I want to get another chance to show that I have improved. 🌀 Mastercane FRX9500S 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 12:43, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I, seemingly alongside several others, thought you were taking the standard offer. Someone else has also pointed out that this is your second "last appeal" before taking the standard offer. This to me shows your word can't be trusted, which alone makes me want to decline this request. Nonetheless, onwards I shall proceed.

We review these unblock requests with a focus on several things, including whether you can show that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for, you will not do it again, and you will make productive contributions instead (quoted from WP:GAB, already linked several times on this page). This unblock request is so lightweight on detail about why your edits were inappropriate and how you would avoid getting into the same situation again. It tells me you have a vague grasp of the problem, but not how you would solve it without getting another block. So, this unblock request taken at face value also fails to convince otherwise

I'll be blunt - it's clear that these unblock requests aren't going anywhere, so I'll help you along and remove your talk page access so you can stop continuing to paint yourself further into a corner. I'll also note that the Standard Offer remains available with an earliest appeal date of 22 October 2026, but you'd do well to give it even longer given your repeated failure to keep your word so far - I'd recommend at least 9-12 months. stwalkerster (talk) 13:55, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator comment) Explicitly promising to wait until October then going back on your word will not earn back the trust of the community. I strongly recommend you delete this appeal before an administrator sees it, otherwise you may lose access to your Talk page on addition to setting the timer on the Standard offer back even further than you already have - this will make it 22 October 2026. Blue Sonnet (talk) 13:09, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Just to reiterate, you already wrote "I am really wanting 1 last chance, if it gets rejected, then I will wait until October 4, 2026, but I want 1 last chance, this will be my last unblock request" in your third appeal.

We just can't believe what you say, you keep breaking your promises & you've done it again now.

For the last time, I urge you to please follow the Standard offer. Blue Sonnet (talk) 13:12, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

I just blocked them again. Alas. Time to file an SPI. -- asilvering (talk) 01:46, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Context

@Mastercane FRX9500S, I'm sad to see that your Talk page access had to be removed because you weren't listening to us. To explain you why this happened, I'd like to show you the following:

Recommendations for you to take the Standard offer

Times you agreed to stop editing/appealing and follow the Standard offer

Times you broke your promise and continued to edit/appeal

You didn't stop, so an administrator had to force you to stop. Don't edit English Wikipedia for at least six months, preferably much longer.

If you choose to edit Simple English Wikipedia please be extremely careful - you've had lots of chances over here but you only get one chance over there. Blue Sonnet (talk) 14:37, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Declined again (on an alt account)

- I just wanted to point out that Mastercane sought another unblock request on an alt account that was blocked.

I understand already everything that led to my indefinite block, and I want 1 last chance, I the reason why I was blocked was because I went up doing edit warring and also saying to @Hurricanehink this: "I don't care! Wanna block me, go ahead then!" is was I said an that this was the reason why I was blocked, I want to be unblocked already, I know now everything that led to my indefinite block, and I want to be unblocked, as I will strictly follow Wikipedia's rules and guidelines, I will not engage in edit wars, but use talk pages instead, I will also not say stuff to other editors like that anymore, I am here to build an encyclopedia here in Wikipedia, not for edit wars, as I won't take the standard offer, I want to bypass it (without socking), I will another chance for editing to show editors that I have improved.

As the user has declined to take the standard offer, I blocked access to the talk page for the alternate account. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:18, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

@Hurricanehink You might also want to remove TPA for Masterstorm 67. HurricaneZeta alt (talk) 19:43, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

@HurricaneZeta alt: done, thanks for the reminder. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:46, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Mastercane, sockpuppeting was a very poor idea. We've all been trying to give you advice that could possibly lead to you being unblocked at some point, and so far, you've ignored all of it, and made your situation far, far worse. The standard offer is basically the "last resort" option. I understand that you don't like this option, but it's your actions that have led you to this point, not anyone else. Last resorts, by definition, don't tend to be enjoyable options. If you choose to not stick to the standard offer, that's fine, but it also means that you've chosen for this to be, for all intents and purposes, the end of the road.

Hopefully, with your talk page access removed, you'll finally understand the seriousness of the issues. I would strongly urge you to log out of Wikipedia, and stay logged out for a few years. With a few years of growing up, and with no additional sockpuppetry, you will have followed the standard offer and may be able to make a convincing case for why you can be a productive editor on English Wikipedia.

Whatever you choose to decide, I wish you the best in your future endeavors, whether or not they include Wikipedia. Being young has a lot of blessings, and I hope you take advantage of them. So many paths are open to you for you to explore, and you're a long way away from having to commit to a few of them. I'm nearly 50 and have a career I greatly enjoy and find incredibly fulfilling, and has earned me a bit of recognition -- some may call it notoriety -- but I am sad sometimes knowing that the general storyline of my tale is basically set at this point. So enjoy your time away from Wikipedia; you may find new experiences that you find even more fulfilling. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 20:01, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

- Mastercane also reached out to me on commons. "Hurricanehink, please, why do I have to take the standard offer, I don't deserve this, I really want to get unblocked already, how I can be unblocked earlier than 6 months?! " I have reported Mastercane to Commons admins. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:27, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Unfortunately, it feels like that this is going to end, sooner or later, with a global lock on this editor. It really is a shame to see this as it was so easily avoidable if the editor could have stopped focusing on their desire to be unblocked for just a minute. The only silver lining is that I believe the community to generally be quite forgiving of long-ago blocks for immaturity of young editors, so perhaps this editor will be back some day as a quality contributor. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 20:34, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Seconded, they really don't seem to understand how this looks from the outside - they don't have the ability to see how disruptive this all is and that their promise to definitely do better this time falls flat when they've also promised to definitely stop appealing if their appeal fails. Except they didn't really mean it, here's another appeal.

They've got the enthusiasm, but it's woefully misdirected and they need to put the effort in to show they can be trusted in future.

They think there's an easy way out or a shortcut, unfortunately there just isn't one. Blue Sonnet (talk) 20:40, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

And just like that, they've made another sockpuppet, now blocked. Absolutely unreal. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 01:59, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

It's best they should stop creating more sockpuppet accounts given this would make it harder for their own account to be unblocked and listen to the other editors advice. Hopefully. Galaxybeing (talk) 02:23, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

That would be absolutely wonderful, unfortunately they don't appear to be able to understand this. They promised they would never create sockpuppets but they've gone ahead and done just that. It's just another broken promise from them, one of many. Blue Sonnet (talk) 04:10, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

@Mastercane FRX9500S I'm replying to this comment on Commons - where you've also been blocked for six months:

I only socked once, but I am out of tricks, the only thing I will do is just find a way without taking 6 months or socking.

That's not possible. You need to wait six months, there is no way around it - if there was another option, we would have told you about it by now.

Imagine how this looks from the outside - how do we know you won't do this to any other Wikipedia rule?

• "I don't feel like providing a source because that takes too long, I'll keep adding my text until I get my way".
• "I don't want to follow copyright guidelines, it's easier to cut and paste straight from this other website".
• "I don't want to follow the Standard offer, I'll keep appealing until I get my way".

You keep trying to find a loophole that doesn't exist, an easy way out that just isn't there.

You can only appeal through the UTRS system on Wikipedia through your original account, but even that can be taken away from you if you continue to misuse the appeals process.

Wikipedia is a private website with set rules that you must follow in order to use this website. You don't get to change or ignore those rules just because you feel like it or don't like them.

Half a dozen people have tried to explain this to you, for goodness' sake please start listening to us. Blue Sonnet (talk) 20:02, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Mastercane, you need to note that editing while logged out is not' a way to do it without following the standard offer or socking. WP:LOUTSOCKING tolls your six months back to the start, and once your TA editing is discovered, any editor may choose to revert your edits, even good edits. It also makes your path back longer and less likely. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 04:54, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

@CoffeeCrumbs Further comments here will be unhelpful, as they're one sock (maybe none) from a ban. GiftedIceCream 14:32, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Sadly, I believe that this is the case. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 15:51, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

I've left my final comment on the matter at Commons - I know I'd literally just written a post saying we should leave them alone, so I'm going to follow my own advice and stop responding further. Their reply to my final post says everything it needs to. Blue-Sonnet 15:57, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

I'm as patient as they come but there's unfortunately no way for us to get through to this editor.

Sock TA's should probably be quietly reported to AIV (Twinkle makes this easy), since there are a couple of CU's who look after those reports & can log a full SPI if necessary.

I think we've all spent more than enough time trying to help this editor, but this is help that they're just not willing to accept. Blue-Sonnet 14:46, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

June 2026

Just as a note, for any future unblock request, that Mastercane has almost certainly been editing while logged out using another nearby ISP, as any TA reviewer can verify, at User_talk:~2026-33324-65. This newest TA is already blocked, not for block evasion, but for consistently making unsourced edits. Mastercane, six months for the purpose of a WP:STANDARDOFFER would now be November 4th. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 04:03, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

The link of this newest TA to the previous TAs that Mastercane was using to WP:LOUTSOCK can be seen here [] for any TAIV. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 04:09, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

It looks like they may have returned via a proxy as Special:Contributions/~2026-34127-74 - I'm afraid I need to start work shortly, is there any chance you could please see what you think? If not, I'll review it when I'm finished. In solidarity, Blue-Sonnet (I'm listening) 04:52, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

It certainly looks similar, but unlike the other TA, I didn't really have any direct evidence to report to SPI, and I really hate not being able to substantiate something better. Especially since this is an area that has had multiple editors with similar problems, like train routes or airline routes. Definitely keeping an eye on that one. Luckily, there are a lot of eyes on this area. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 05:08, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Effects of Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines

Hello, Mastercane FRX9500S. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Effects of Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 21:24, 27 August 2026 (UTC)