Maxine McKeown

Welcome!

Hi Maxine McKeown! I noticed your contributions to Shameless (Camila Cabello song) and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Binksternet (talk) 01:25, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits on the page Bad Girls (M.I.A. song), while it may have been in good faith, was difficult to distinguish from vandalism. To help other editors understand the reason for the changes, you can use an edit summary for your contributions. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ― Qwerfjkl | 𝕋𝔸𝕃𝕂  (please use {{reply to|Qwerfjkl}} on reply) 19:13, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

November 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Star Trek Into Darkness. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. The capitalized 'I' has been agreed upon by consensus. If you wish to change it, you'll need to initiate a discussion at the article's Talk page. DonIago (talk) 17:26, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Confetti (Little Mix album), you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 21:24, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

There's nothing to imply that "glam pop" is related to glam rock in any way Maxine McKeown (talk) 19:16, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jheri Redding, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conditioner. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

February 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Bangerz, you may be blocked from editing. Muhandes (talk) 12:55, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Edit summary

Please see Help:Edit summary#Always provide an edit summary. -- dylx 16:13, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

You failed to use an edit summary again with this edit. Also, genres need to be explicit per WP:EXPLICITGENRE. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 19:36, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

You are still not good with edit summaries. Schwede66 05:31, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

April 2022

Yes. Vroom Vroom would be labelled a soft rock record if a reliable source calls it so, but fortunately, none of the reliable sources do so—for a reason. We do not need original research on Wikipedia. You do not seem to understand WP:EXPLICITGENRE and WP:RS, so please read them thoroughly. Regards. ℛonherry☘ 15:20, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sober (Lorde song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electro.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Disretionary sanctions alerts: BLP and gender-related

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

J. K. Rowling July 2022

This edit is POV and unsourced. The content of the article, and the lead, both enjoy very strong consensus based on a recent well-attended RFC, a recent Featured article review, and it is subject to double disretionary sanctions. Please see WP:FAOWN, and gain consensus for edits. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:51, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

I see you have numerous warnings above for not using reliable sources or sourcing your edits; please become more familiar with WP:RS and WP:P&G-- you are no longer a new editor, and this kind of POV edit to the lead of a controversial BLP should not be happening. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:54, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Don't fiddle with unsourced genres

Streamlining an IP editor's unsourced genres, removing one because you disagree with it, and listing them with bullet points doesn't make you much better than if you had added them yourself. Don't do this again. Remove unsourced genres, don't encourage them. Thank you. Ss112 07:06, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)