This article is well-structured, well-written, and concise. I especially appreciate the “Important Terms to Know” section, and positioning it early in the article maximized its usefulness. It’s pretty well researched, too: there’s authority in the sentences, so I can clearly see that you know what you’re talking about. A few more citations would have been good to see, just to know that it’s all backed up in literature.

I do have two suggestions for improving the content: while the tone is appropriately unbiased and authoritative, it does assume some knowledge about photographs. Some definitions and processes could stand to be fleshed out. For example, I don’t know what an emulsion layer is, even after reading the article. Some more interlinks on various terms would allow readers to learn more about terms they were unfamiliar with without clogging up the article and pulling it away from its original focus. Second, this article clearly defines a collections role, but doesn’t place it within the museum structure. I’m curious to know who a photographic preservation specialist would report to, and if they ever serve on museum staff or freelance instead.

I think it’s an excellent start – it makes me very curious to learn more!

MuseeDesReves (talk) 16:12, 14 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi Mbleech! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 22:52, Saturday, March 31, 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Mbleech. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply