Welcome!

edit

Hi Mdelnegro12! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 04:29, 18 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

2022 Fan Controlled Football season moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, 2022 Fan Controlled Football season, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 13:09, 1 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

February 2022

edit
 

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

  • Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
  • State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
  • Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.
Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:42, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
This block is for edits at Bryan Scott (quarterback), specifically saying that Scott asked you to make edits on his behalf, likely for payment as with many other previous editors there (which has not been disclosed). After gaming the system to subvert the page protection (by making rapid minor edits to your userpage in an attempt to get your edit count up), you made edits to the article consistent with other sockpuppet accounts in order to push Scott's agenda there, contrary to local consensuses. Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:46, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
I am once again asking you to lift my ban, or at least reduce it a substantial amount. Mr. Scott did not pay me what so ever. I was doing it out of the kindness of my heart to provide the correct information onto his page, which is why I got my edit count up. I am a spring football nerd, and want to provide the correct information to everyone. I have no knowledge on if he did pay other people in the past, but I can say that he did not pay me. I do not even know Mr. Scott. As I said before, I like to edit Wikipedia as a hobby to provide the correct information to people. Not being able to edit at all in the previous month was a very hard thing to do, especially seeing other people putting false information down. I really like doing this. Please, I am asking you again to lift my ban. Thank You, God Bless. Mdelnegro12 (talk) 03:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mdelnegro12 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was blocked from editing Wikipedia pages for advertisement and promotions. If I am unblocked I will avoid such behavior 100% of the time and will not come anywhere close at all. In the future, I would only make edits that are credible with cited sources. I am deeply sorry for my actions and I really hope I can become unblocked. I love editing Wikipedia it is one of my favorite hobbies and things to do. I would feel really empty and sad if I can not edit in the future anymore. Thank you

Decline reason:

It is difficult to think that you will abide by Wikipedia guidelines since you already have subverted them by artifically editing to get your edit count up, along with possible sockpuppetry. This also seems to be more than mere hobby for you. You won't be unblocked to make further edits related to Mr. Scott or the USFL at this time, so we would need to know what other edits you want to make as well as any other conflicts of interest you might have. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:16, 23 February 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mdelnegro12 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am once again asking you to lift my ban, or at least reduce it a substantial amount. Mr. Scott did not pay me what so ever. I was doing it out of the kindness of my heart to provide the correct information onto his page, which is why I got my edit count up. I am a spring football nerd, and want to provide the correct information to everyone. I have no knowledge on if he did pay other people in the past, but I can say that he did not pay me. I do not even know Mr. Scott. As I said before, I like to edit Wikipedia as a hobby to provide the correct information to people. Not being able to edit at all in the previous month was a very hard thing to do, especially seeing other people putting false information down. I really like doing this. Please, I am asking you again to lift my ban. Thank You, God Bless.

Decline reason:

This does not add anything meaningful to your previous, declined, unblock request. I'll also note that it is disingenuous for you to say you were getting your edit count up "out of the kindness of my heart". Come on now, you knew you were gaming the system. You knew that was wrong. Or if you didn't, there's no chance we'll ever unblock you (see WP:CIR). Yamla (talk) 10:01, 25 March 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of Dontez Byrd

edit
 

The article Dontez Byrd has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG, all substantial coverage I was able to find was from non-independent sources, such as teams that the subject played for. Coverage in independent sources does not appear to rise above trivial.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. signed, Rosguill talk 20:31, 28 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Dontez Byrd for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dontez Byrd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dontez Byrd until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

signed, Rosguill talk 17:29, 29 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of FCF Glacier Boyz for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FCF Glacier Boyz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FCF Glacier Boyz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MJLTalk 07:58, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:2022 Fan Controlled Football season

edit

  Hello, Mdelnegro12. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2022 Fan Controlled Football season, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:2022 Fan Controlled Football season

edit
 

Hello, Mdelnegro12. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2022 Fan Controlled Football season".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:32, 1 February 2023 (UTC)Reply