User talk:Medtechinventor

August 2026

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 02:34, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Medtechinventor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I am not a Wikipedia writer, contributor or editor. I just opened this account yesterday so I could post my comments in the Fluorediter talk page to explain the connections with Meditorist. I assume you blocked my account because of the shared IP addresses. There is an innocuous explanation. Hopefully you can help me resolve this situation.

I’m Larry Grossman, the subject of the Larry Steven Grossman article and the inventor discussed in the Mini C-arm article. I want to explain the connection between the two articles and respond to the sockpuppetry concern raised about Fluoreditor.

Meditorist is my son. He disclosed the conflict when he sent the Larry Steven Grossman article to Wikipedia. He has a master’s degree from the London School of Economics and has written and published several articles for government and private sector organizations. He has also developed, wrote and edited several of his own websites. He is qualified to write a Wikipedia article and did so without the use of an LLM’s.

Fluoreditor is a neighbor of his and lives in the same apartment building. My son mentioned my invention to her and she decided independently to research and write the Mini C-arm article. She already explained her background in the talk section and she is also qualified to write a Wikipedia article and did so without the use of any LLM’s, as she has also previously stated.

My son spends significant time at my house and I spend time at his apartment. Fluoreditor also comes to my house to do research, since I have an extensive library of pre-internet newspaper and magazine articles and other documentation on the Mini C-arm's history. Because Fluoreditor and my son are neighbors in the same apartment building, they are also on the same building network as each other. Between these overlapping visits our three accounts would reasonably show overlapping IP addresses at various points, even though we are three separate people logging in separately. Shared IP addresses among people who know each other and spend time in each other's homes are common, and overlapping IPs alone don't establish common operation of accounts. My son wanted to write a Wikipedia article about me. Fluoreditor wanted to write an article about the technology and wasn’t interested in writing about me personably. So, instead of doing these two articles together, they decided to do their own articles independent of each other. Although the articles overlap and do share some of the same references, they are two different writers and completed their own research and wrote their articles independently.

Setting the sockpuppetry question aside, the substantive case for the Mini C-arm article stands on its own. This article is about a significant technology that transformed extremity orthopedic surgery and genuinely improves the Wikipedia encyclopedia. The articles claims are supported by independent, verifiable references from reliable sources consistent with the requirements of Wikipedia. From what I have read, notability and verification are what governs whether the article should remain on Wikipedia. Therefore, I ask that the article be restored in full and remain on Wikipedia.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I am not a Wikipedia writer, contributor or editor. I just opened this account yesterday so I could post my comments in the Fluorediter talk page to explain the connections with Meditorist. I assume you blocked my account because of the shared IP addresses. There is an innocuous explanation. Hopefully you can help me resolve this situation. :I’m Larry Grossman, the subject of the Larry Steven Grossman article and the inventor discussed in the Mini C-arm article. I want to explain the connection between the two articles and respond to the sockpuppetry concern raised about Fluoreditor. :Meditorist is my son. He disclosed the conflict when he sent the Larry Steven Grossman article to Wikipedia. He has a master’s degree from the London School of Economics and has written and published several articles for government and private sector organizations. He has also developed, wrote and edited several of his own websites. He is qualified to write a Wikipedia article and did so without the use of an LLM’s. :Fluoreditor is a neighbor of his and lives in the same apartment building. My son mentioned my invention to her and she decided independently to research and write the Mini C-arm article. She already explained her background in the talk section and she is also qualified to write a Wikipedia article and did so without the use of any LLM’s, as she has also previously stated. :My son spends significant time at my house and I spend time at his apartment. Fluoreditor also comes to my house to do research, since I have an extensive library of pre-internet newspaper and magazine articles and other documentation on the Mini C-arm's history. Because Fluoreditor and my son are neighbors in the same apartment building, they are also on the same building network as each other. Between these overlapping visits our three accounts would reasonably show overlapping IP addresses at various points, even though we are three separate people logging in separately. Shared IP addresses among people who know each other and spend time in each other's homes are common, and overlapping IPs alone don't establish common operation of accounts. My son wanted to write a Wikipedia article about me. Fluoreditor wanted to write an article about the technology and wasn’t interested in writing about me personably. So, instead of doing these two articles together, they decided to do their own articles independent of each other. Although the articles overlap and do share some of the same references, they are two different writers and completed their own research and wrote their articles independently. :Setting the sockpuppetry question aside, the substantive case for the Mini C-arm article stands on its own. This article is about a significant technology that transformed extremity orthopedic surgery and genuinely improves the Wikipedia encyclopedia. The articles claims are supported by independent, verifiable references from reliable sources consistent with the requirements of Wikipedia. From what I have read, notability and verification are what governs whether the article should remain on Wikipedia. Therefore, I ask that the article be restored in full and remain on Wikipedia. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am not a Wikipedia writer, contributor or editor. I just opened this account yesterday so I could post my comments in the Fluorediter talk page to explain the connections with Meditorist. I assume you blocked my account because of the shared IP addresses. There is an innocuous explanation. Hopefully you can help me resolve this situation. :I’m Larry Grossman, the subject of the Larry Steven Grossman article and the inventor discussed in the Mini C-arm article. I want to explain the connection between the two articles and respond to the sockpuppetry concern raised about Fluoreditor. :Meditorist is my son. He disclosed the conflict when he sent the Larry Steven Grossman article to Wikipedia. He has a master’s degree from the London School of Economics and has written and published several articles for government and private sector organizations. He has also developed, wrote and edited several of his own websites. He is qualified to write a Wikipedia article and did so without the use of an LLM’s. :Fluoreditor is a neighbor of his and lives in the same apartment building. My son mentioned my invention to her and she decided independently to research and write the Mini C-arm article. She already explained her background in the talk section and she is also qualified to write a Wikipedia article and did so without the use of any LLM’s, as she has also previously stated. :My son spends significant time at my house and I spend time at his apartment. Fluoreditor also comes to my house to do research, since I have an extensive library of pre-internet newspaper and magazine articles and other documentation on the Mini C-arm's history. Because Fluoreditor and my son are neighbors in the same apartment building, they are also on the same building network as each other. Between these overlapping visits our three accounts would reasonably show overlapping IP addresses at various points, even though we are three separate people logging in separately. Shared IP addresses among people who know each other and spend time in each other's homes are common, and overlapping IPs alone don't establish common operation of accounts. My son wanted to write a Wikipedia article about me. Fluoreditor wanted to write an article about the technology and wasn’t interested in writing about me personably. So, instead of doing these two articles together, they decided to do their own articles independent of each other. Although the articles overlap and do share some of the same references, they are two different writers and completed their own research and wrote their articles independently. :Setting the sockpuppetry question aside, the substantive case for the Mini C-arm article stands on its own. This article is about a significant technology that transformed extremity orthopedic surgery and genuinely improves the Wikipedia encyclopedia. The articles claims are supported by independent, verifiable references from reliable sources consistent with the requirements of Wikipedia. From what I have read, notability and verification are what governs whether the article should remain on Wikipedia. Therefore, I ask that the article be restored in full and remain on Wikipedia. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am not a Wikipedia writer, contributor or editor. I just opened this account yesterday so I could post my comments in the Fluorediter talk page to explain the connections with Meditorist. I assume you blocked my account because of the shared IP addresses. There is an innocuous explanation. Hopefully you can help me resolve this situation. :I’m Larry Grossman, the subject of the Larry Steven Grossman article and the inventor discussed in the Mini C-arm article. I want to explain the connection between the two articles and respond to the sockpuppetry concern raised about Fluoreditor. :Meditorist is my son. He disclosed the conflict when he sent the Larry Steven Grossman article to Wikipedia. He has a master’s degree from the London School of Economics and has written and published several articles for government and private sector organizations. He has also developed, wrote and edited several of his own websites. He is qualified to write a Wikipedia article and did so without the use of an LLM’s. :Fluoreditor is a neighbor of his and lives in the same apartment building. My son mentioned my invention to her and she decided independently to research and write the Mini C-arm article. She already explained her background in the talk section and she is also qualified to write a Wikipedia article and did so without the use of any LLM’s, as she has also previously stated. :My son spends significant time at my house and I spend time at his apartment. Fluoreditor also comes to my house to do research, since I have an extensive library of pre-internet newspaper and magazine articles and other documentation on the Mini C-arm's history. Because Fluoreditor and my son are neighbors in the same apartment building, they are also on the same building network as each other. Between these overlapping visits our three accounts would reasonably show overlapping IP addresses at various points, even though we are three separate people logging in separately. Shared IP addresses among people who know each other and spend time in each other's homes are common, and overlapping IPs alone don't establish common operation of accounts. My son wanted to write a Wikipedia article about me. Fluoreditor wanted to write an article about the technology and wasn’t interested in writing about me personably. So, instead of doing these two articles together, they decided to do their own articles independent of each other. Although the articles overlap and do share some of the same references, they are two different writers and completed their own research and wrote their articles independently. :Setting the sockpuppetry question aside, the substantive case for the Mini C-arm article stands on its own. This article is about a significant technology that transformed extremity orthopedic surgery and genuinely improves the Wikipedia encyclopedia. The articles claims are supported by independent, verifiable references from reliable sources consistent with the requirements of Wikipedia. From what I have read, notability and verification are what governs whether the article should remain on Wikipedia. Therefore, I ask that the article be restored in full and remain on Wikipedia. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Medtechinventor (talk) 16:20, 24 August 2026 (UTC)