Welcome!

edit
Hello Mehmoodj1! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 08:54, 29 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

July 2020

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Beatnik Records has been reverted.
Your edit here to Beatnik Records was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-cIqA6xALM) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:54, 29 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Speed records. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DoebLoggs (talk) 12:36, 30 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Speed Records (record label)

edit

Hi there, it's very interesting, but the draft article you created at Draft:Speed Records (record label) is identical to the version that was previously deleted. How did you get a copy of the deleted article? Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:28, 30 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

DJ Fluke moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, DJ Fluke, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 15:41, 5 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Nadeem Mubarak

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nadeem Mubarak requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dtt1Talk 15:43, 5 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Waqar Ex

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Waqar Ex requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dtt1Talk 15:44, 5 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Adhi Adhi Raat

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Adhi Adhi Raat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 15:45, 5 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nadeem Mubarak moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Nadeem Mubarak, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 15:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

August 2020

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use your sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Dtt1Talk 15:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Mehmoodj1, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mehmoodj1|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Ravensfire (talk) 19:27, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Falak Records Music ‎, you may be blocked from editing. Note that removing the notice DOES NOT stop the deletion process. It makes it harder for anyone who may be able to show how the article should be kept to find the discussion though. So not helpful and will ALWAYS be reverted. Please don't do something like that again. Ravensfire (talk) 19:58, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Areeka Haq

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Areeka Haq requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 15:48, 5 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Areeka Haq moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Areeka Haq, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 15:49, 5 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: DJ Fluke (2) (August 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Nkon21 were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 15:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Mehmoodj1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 15:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Falak Best Song 2019 (August 6)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Theroadislong (talk) 10:52, 6 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Tok Hill Music

edit

Hello Mehmoodj1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Tok Hill Music for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Govvy (talk) 11:35, 6 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:B2 Labels

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:B2 Labels, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Loksmythe (talk) 13:40, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: B2 Labels (August 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Loksmythe were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Loksmythe (talk) 13:41, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: DJ Fluke (2) (August 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 18:45, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Falak Best Song 2019 moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Falak Best Song 2019, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ravensfire (talk) 19:24, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

You are kidding, right?

edit

I'm hoping you're just kidding with this edit. One iffy source does not help meet the general notabilty requirement. You've moved several articles recently from draft space into main article space that were unsourced completely in some cases and undersourced in others. Please don't do that - it causes a mess and takes time for other editors to review and handle article that obviously shouldn't be moved yet. You've had multiple articles moved back from these concerns, you need to start reading those messages and the Wikipedia articles they reference - WP:NOTABILITY, Reliable Source would be a good start. Ravensfire (talk) 19:31, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

B2 Labels moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, B2 Labels, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ravensfire (talk) 19:32, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: DJ Fluke (August 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Eagleash (talk) 19:32, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: B2 Labels (August 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Fiddle Faddle 19:45, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Stop moving articles out of draft space

edit

You've moved several in the past hour that aren't even close to ready as full articles. You NEED to stop doing this, it's getting highly disruptive. If you continue, the only option is to go to the Admin incident noticeboard and as you be blocked to stop your disruption. Do you understand this? Ravensfire (talk) 19:52, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Falak Best Song 2019 (August 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Nathan2055 were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nathan2055talk - contribs 20:00, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mehmood J (August 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nathan2055 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nathan2055talk - contribs 20:00, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Areeka Haq (August 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nathan2055 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nathan2055talk - contribs 20:01, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Nadeem Mubarak

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nadeem Mubarak requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Nathan2055talk - contribs 20:10, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Speed Records (record label)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Speed Records (record label) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Nathan2055talk - contribs 20:12, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please start responding to feedback, and stop repeatedly moving unreviewed articles out of draft

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:41, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

Mehmood, a few things: Don't write articles about yourself as you appear to be doing at Draft:Mehmood J. It's not very classy, and it is ethically questionable. We call this having a conflict of interest. Second, Wikipedia is not a forum for promotion. If you try to use it for this purpose, you will discover that the community will go to great lengths to prevent this, including deleting articles and stopping them from being recreated. It would be sad if one day you actually did meet our notability criteria, but couldn't have an article written about you because of the stain that this promotional editing left on your good name. Third, if you are being paid to create articles and edit them, in any way shape or form, you are required to disclose all those relevant details like who is paying you who your client(s) is or are, and any other info. See WP:PAID. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:29, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Image without license

edit

Unspecified source/license for File:Nasir Madni Bayan.jpeg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Nasir Madni Bayan.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 13:45, 12 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Islamic Creative moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Islamic Creative, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 13:45, 12 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Nadeem Mubarak for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nadeem Mubarak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadeem Mubarak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 14:28, 12 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mehmood J (August 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Praxidicae (talk) 14:28, 12 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Islamic Creative (August 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Praxidicae was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Praxidicae (talk) 14:29, 12 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: B2 Labels (August 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nathan2055 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nathan2055talk - contribs 20:53, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jannat Mirza (August 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nathan2055 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nathan2055talk - contribs 20:56, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jannat Mirza (August 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 21:01, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your deletion of AFC prior reviews is unacceptable

edit

The prior reviews form the history of the draft and must be retained intact. Removal is like hoding a bad school report form your parents. Parenst always find out. So do reviewers. Fiddle Faddle 21:08, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Islamic Creative

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Islamic Creative, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fiddle Faddle 21:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Jannat Mirza

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Jannat Mirza, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fiddle Faddle 21:14, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

August 2020

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Draft:Jannat Mirza. Theroadislong (talk) 21:16, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: B2 Labels (August 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Timtrent was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Fiddle Faddle 21:18, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:B2 Labels

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:B2 Labels, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fiddle Faddle 21:18, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jannat Mirza (August 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Timtrent was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Fiddle Faddle 21:20, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Mehmood J

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Mehmood J, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Nathan2055talk - contribs 21:23, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please stop and think

edit

  All you are doing at the moment is causing work for other people. I percieve your multiple submissions of drafts with no ability to succeed to bedisruptive Other editors may be more charitable. YIy are fast heading for a block of your editing. You do not want that.

I understand that you are enthisiastic. Work on one draft at a time, please, and do that well. Do it to the very best of your ability, with good prose, and good references.

Ask for advice, maybe at WP:Teahouse, and take that advice. Fiddle Faddle 21:25, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

It seems it will be your second block if it happens. I predict a substantially longer block. You must learn how to behave here. This is a collaborative project, and may not be used as a promotional tool Fiddle Faddle 21:43, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Areeka Haq

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Areeka Haq, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Nathan2055talk - contribs 21:26, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Falak Shabir (August 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nathan2055 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nathan2055talk - contribs 21:26, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Jannat Mirza

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Jannat Mirza, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Nathan2055talk - contribs 21:44, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Recreation after speedy deletion

edit

You just recreated Draft:Jannat Mirza with the exact same content less than 15 minutes after it was deleted by a patrolling admin. It is 100% not going to get approved in that state. As Timtrent (talk · contribs) said above, all you are doing is wasting everyone's time by having us constantly having to rereview sub-stubs that will never get accepted. Focus on a single draft; my choice would be Draft:Falak Shabir, which is really close to being accepted, you just need a few more reliable sources. But if you keep resubmitting these two-line sub-stubs over and over again, you're probably just going to get blocked again for disruption. Nathan2055talk - contribs 21:49, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

I agree with Nathan2055. That is the one of your drafts that stands the best chance of success. He's right about a block heading your way. It would be a shame if it arrives just as you're trying to get Falak Shabir fully ready. Fiddle Faddle 22:13, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
I'd probably be inclined to block Mehmood for competency concerns given that he's peppering Draft space with articles that don't stand a chance, has never communicated, and can't seem to understand how to contest a deletion using his own words [1][2]. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:16, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
Cyphoidbomb, They received a short acting block very recently. All that seemed to do was to delay the peppering of Draft space. Perhaps a somewhat longer one might catch their attention and cause them to engage on talk pages and the AFC help desk. Blocks are not intended to be punitive, just preventative, and this might prevent future unhelpful behaviours.
Their good work is fine, it's fighting for the poor material that they seem to favour at present Fiddle Faddle 22:23, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

August 2020

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Draft:Jannat Mirza, you may be blocked from editing. The only way to stop a page from being speedy deleted is to either provide a reason why it shouldn't be deleted or improve it to a point where the deletion criteria no longer apply. The removal of CSD tags from a page is flagged in recent changes and will almost always be reverted within minutes. You will almost certainly be blocked if you continue. Nathan2055talk - contribs 21:52, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 01:33, 14 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Nasir Madni Bayan.jpeg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Nasir Madni Bayan.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 09:06, 16 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Mehmoodj per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mehmoodj. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GeneralNotability (talk) 19:07, 17 September 2020 (UTC)Reply