Welcome

edit

Hello, Merrick Sulyma, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 19:05, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zack Keller (May 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:05, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Merrick Sulyma! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 19:05, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zack Keller (May 10)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Snowycats were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Snowycats (talk) 07:51, 10 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zack Keller (May 15)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 07:54, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

June 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm Magitroopa. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ollie's Pack, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 16:50, 10 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 18:06, 17 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

July 2020

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ollie's Pack, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 18:34, 17 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Image without license

edit

Unspecified source/license for File:Nicolas Cantu by Merrick Sulyma.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Nicolas Cantu by Merrick Sulyma.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 01:46, 21 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Nicolas Cantu by Merrick Sulyma.jpg

edit
 

A tag has been placed on File:Nicolas Cantu by Merrick Sulyma.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 02:36, 21 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Parker Simmons moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Parker Simmons, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Fandom Wiki pages and YouTube videos are generally considered to be unreliable. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. lovkal (talk) 23:04, 21 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Parker Simmons (July 22)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 02:12, 22 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Parker Simmons (July 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 16:24, 25 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Griffith Kimmins for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Griffith Kimmins is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Griffith Kimmins until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 18:32, 25 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Parker Simmons (July 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 21:00, 25 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Logan Grove (actor) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Logan Grove (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logan Grove (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bingobro (Chat) 08:41, 31 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

August 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm LaundryPizza03. I noticed that you recently removed content from The Amazing World of Gumball without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 03:30, 19 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dan Povenmire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Director. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 27 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Parker Simmons (September 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 03:36, 9 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

September 2020

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ollie's Pack. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You continue adding back information you were previously reverted on. Please stop adding things you've said not to (only main directors/producers/etc. should be listed, not any 'co's or anything else), and you continue adding characters with a source that literally does not even mention them at all. Magitroopa (talk) 20:08, 12 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Meta Runner

edit

Hello Merrick Sulyma,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Meta Runner for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 10:06, 28 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zack Keller (October 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SL93 (talk) 16:54, 11 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
edit

  Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Meta Runner and List of adult animated internet series. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:44, 25 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dick Figures, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Action.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 13 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Mistaken Identity

edit

Hi, a gumball writer called Tim Mills or Timothy Mills keeps being linked by Merrick Sulyma (if I'm reading the edit history correctly) wrongly, to a Wikepedia page about a completely different Tim Mills. I don't know why the link keeps being added again after it's corrected but it is wrong I'm afraid. There shouldn't be any link on the name Tim Mills or Timothy Mills on the Gumball writers' lists. It's been removed now so please would you leave the name as it is. I was a script editor on those episodes so know very well which tim mills it is! Thank you. Dashdotdash (talk) 01:32, 15 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

December 2020

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 13:21, 23 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Edd Gould, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 27 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

January 2021

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Ollie's Pack. Magitroopa (talk) 04:52, 2 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Adventures of Paddington (2019 TV series), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages British and French.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

February 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Gab4gab. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Draft:Zack Keller, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You restored challenged content without providing the citations required by WP:BURDEN. Gab4gab (talk) 14:40, 15 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Elliott from Earth
added links pointing to British and French
The Amazing World of Gumball
added a link pointing to Lewis MacLeod

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 22 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Parker Simmons for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Parker Simmons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parker Simmons until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:35, 20 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Parker Simmons

edit

  Hello, Merrick Sulyma. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Parker Simmons, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 15 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Parker Simmons

edit
 

Hello, Merrick Sulyma. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Parker Simmons".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 04:14, 13 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

June 2021

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to The Amazing World of Gumball, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Drill it (talk) 22:48, 29 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

August 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Fieryninja. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ninjago (TV series) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Fieryninja (talk) 13:09, 11 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

October 2021

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:45, 31 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Murder Drones moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Murder Drones, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Aloolkaparatha (talk) 17:01, 31 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet investigation

edit
 

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Merrick Sulyma, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Equine-man (talk) 12:30, 16 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Murder Drones for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murder Drones is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder Drones until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 13:25, 16 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited GLITCH, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Administrator.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 30 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Damien Haas (voice actor) moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Damien Haas (voice actor), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DIVINE 📪 03:50, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Damien Haas (voice actor) has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Damien Haas (voice actor). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:08, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Damien Haas (voice actor) (June 22)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TipsyElephant was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
TipsyElephant (talk) 14:33, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

June 2022

edit

  One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Please don't try to claim other peoples' photos as your own work. It's misleading and not at all appropriate. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 03:43, 24 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Damien Haas (voice actor)

edit

  Hello, Merrick Sulyma. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Damien Haas (voice actor), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Damien Haas (voice actor)

edit
 

Hello, Merrick Sulyma. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Damien Haas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:39, 22 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply