User talk:MetricSuperstar/Archive1
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Image copyright problem with Image:Gallery.welles.headshot.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gallery.welles.headshot.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:24, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Gallery.welles.headshot.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Gallery.welles.headshot.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:49, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Do not move articles during an AfD, please
It screws up links to discussion, and tends to cause confusion and bad blood all-around. In the unlikely event this manages to wind up as a "kep", then moves can be discussed. Tarc (talk) 00:26, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:33, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Do not move articles during an AfD, please
It screws up links to discussion, and tends to cause confusion and bad blood all-around. In the unlikely event this manages to wind up as a "kep", then moves can be discussed. Tarc (talk) 00:26, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:33, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
September 2009
Your recent edit to the page Barack Obama Joker poster appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you.--The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 02:16, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Welcome
Your Opinion is More Important than You Think Barnstar | ||
Hello, MetricSuperstar, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like wikipedia and decide to stay. I am sorry that there are so many impersonal warning messages on your talk page. There are many editors who feel that your hard work here is important and valuable, especially me.
If you are looking for help, you can just type: {{helpme}} ...and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Or, please visit New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! If you have any questions at all, please message me. Again, welcome! Ikip (talk) 17:07, 13 September 2009 (UTC) |
Welcome to the WP:Article Rescue Squadron
RE: "Seems everyone that I admire the most for their comments in AfD is a member of this group. Looks like the place to be." That is heartwarming to hear! Let me know on my user talk page if there is anything I can do to help you. It is rough on wikipedia, and it is even more cut throat as a new user. Again, I am always there to help. Just ask.
Hi, MetricSuperstar, welcome to the Article Rescue Squadron! We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying and rescuing articles that have been tagged for deletion. Every day hundreds of articles are deleted, many rightfully so. But many concern notable subjects and are poorly written, ergo fixable and should not be deleted. We try to help these articles quickly improve and address the concerns of why they are proposed for deletion. This covers a lot of ground and your help is appreciated!
If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the talk page, and we will be happy to help you. And once again - Welcome! Ikip (talk) 17:07, 13 September 2009 (UTC) |
Suggestions
- From user talk ikip:
Hi, just wanted to say thanks for welcome message and the barnstar you left for me! I'd like to take up your offer of help. I've been working on the Barack Obama Joker poster since it was nominated for deletion. I was wondering if you could take a look at it's talk page and help me out on the issues raised, specifically Public Domain? and Neutrality & GNG. I'm especially concerned about the Neutrality & GNG points. Both tags were added by the same editor and he deleted my request for his input from his talk page. Thanks! Metty (talk) 18:03, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks again. I didn't mean to offend anyone, I figured since you can find out from the history, it would be okay! Thanks for your help! Metty (talk) 18:19, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- Avoid using editors names. Attempt to make your arguments on the talk page less personal. I refactored out naming editors in one of your sections. Editors will see your edit, and see there name in that edit being criticized, and it will energize them to comment.
- Also: remember, as scholars have found about wikipedia: edits begat edits. Sometimes it is much better to be quiet then make a point about a article.
- Every time you make a comment, this article goes to the top of every person's watchlist. That is something you want to avoid, especially if you are outnumbered. Ikip (talk) 18:16, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- message me again if you need any advice.
- I would suggest activating your email, as anything said on wikipedia can be twisted and later used against you.Ikip (talk) 18:22, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- I activated it. Interesting advice there xD. Thanks. Metty (talk) 18:28, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Admin Help
{{adminhelp}}
Kyle & Jackie O & Jackie O, G and Danni Show are being redirected to each other by users Martin451 and 114.76.21.137. As far as I can tell they are different shows and neither of the redirects were talked about on article talk pages. I left a notice on each of the users talk pages but there have since been more reverts so I decided to contact an admin. Metty 02:24, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
- I suggest you read WP:BLP and WP:Move as well as WP:SOCK Martin451 (talk) 02:37, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, I was a bit abrupt and WP:Bitey with you. Please do not let this put you off wikipedia. Martin451 (talk) 23:56, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
- Yo, Metric, admin here. This isn't straightforward, as there might be sockpuppeting involved, so I have copied your comment to the administrators' incidents noticeboard. Â SkomorokhÂ
- Thanks Skomorokh. Metty 02:45, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
- No worries. Let's sit tight and wait for editors wiser than you or I to have a look :)  Skomorokh 03:03, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
{{Talkback|TomCat4680}}
TomCat4680 (talk) has given you a kitten! Kittens promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Kittens must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{subst:Kitten}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
{{Talkback|TomCat4680}}
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:14, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Happy Halloween!
As Halloween is my favorite holiday, I just wanted to wish those Wikipedians who have been nice enough to give me a barnstar or smile at me, supportive enough to agree with me, etc., a Happy Halloween! Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 23:53, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Happy Thanksgiving!
I just wanted to wish those Wikipedians who have been nice enough to give me a barnstar or smile at me, supportive enough to agree with me, etc., a Happy Thanksgiving! Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 17:15, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
A NobodyMy talk is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
To those who make Good Arguments, who are appreciative, or supportive. Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 04:38, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
|
Content
AfD nomination of Welles Crowther
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Welles Crowther. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Welles Crowther. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Rescue
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armageddon theology WritersCramp (talk) 13:33, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
re 6 Persei
Thank you for contributing this article! Herostratus (talk) 13:18, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
|
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, MetricSuperstar. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, MetricSuperstar. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, MetricSuperstar. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)