Michaelbenis

File:Lorenzo Sassoli de Bianchi.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Lorenzo Sassoli de Bianchi.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:42, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Lorenzo Sassoli de Bianchi.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Lorenzo Sassoli de Bianchi.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:52, 17 November 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 04:52, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Promo-Bologna

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Promo-Bologna requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Everymorning (talk) 13:13, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fondazione del Monte

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Fondazione del Monte requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Everymorning (talk) 13:21, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Everymorning (talk) 13:27, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for Disruptive editing: mass creation of blank pages. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:37, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

• Please note that if you want to create a blank page to use as a space to create an article, you can do this in draft space; instead of creating Promo-Bologna, create Draft:Promo-Bologna, and when it contains enough information to qualify as an article, move it to Promo-Bologna. bd2412 T 13:40, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

• Hi Michael,

I've unblocked you (that was pretty abrupt and uncalled for). But please visit the ANI thread mentioned above and let people know what you're doing. We typically don't create blank pages first, and fill them in later. If you don't return before the thread is archived, then feel free to {{ping}} me when you do return to discuss further. --Floquenbeam (talk) 14:01, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll just delete them all for the time being.

Michaelbenis (talk) 14:02, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

I think that's been taken care of. BD2412's advice is good; draft space is a good place to work on an article, and people will leave you alone while you're working. You don't have to get anyone's permission to move to article space when it's ready, just move it. Thanks for the content you contribute (if you just double your productivity, you'll make up for me, who doesn't produce any!). --Floquenbeam (talk) 14:09, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest policy and disclosure

Hi Michaelbenis. I work on conflict of interest issues here in Wikipedia. Your edits to date seem to be heavily centered on companies in the Italian advertising business called Utenti Pubblicità Associati Promo-Bologna and others. I'm giving you notice of our Conflict of Interest guideline and Terms of Use, and will have some questions for you below.

Hello, Michaelbenis. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Utenti Pubblicità Associati, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.

Question

Wikipedia is a widely-used reference work and managing conflict of interest is essential for ensuring the integrity of Wikipedia and retaining the public's trust in it. As in academia, COI is managed here in two steps - disclosure and a form of peer review.

DIsclosure is the most important, and first, step. Would you please let me know if you have any relationship with Utenti Pubblicità Associati, [romo-Bologna, its management, or contracting agencies hired to write about them?

You can reply here - I am watching this page. Once you do, we can take it from there. Thanks in advance for talking! — Brianhe (talk) 14:55, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Answer

Thanks Brian,

I shall reply as fully as possible. I have answered this in three stages (telephone interruption).

I am an advertising freelance branding consultant, copywriter and creative director.

I have no relationship with UPA or Promo Bologna and have never worked for either organisation (either directly or through agencies).

The new pages I had hoped to create were simply to provide more information on the organisations referred to in the article on Lorenzo Sassoli De Bianchi that I was updating mainly to inform that he was knighted for services to enterprise in 2015.

I created the English page at Sassoli's request in 2010 and it was translated and expanded upon quite well and impartially (including with some accurate additional research e.g. place of birth) in Italian by someone who as far as I am aware had no connection with the company. I thought it would be a good idea to update both pages.

I have provided occasional consultancy services to Valsoia (a of the company that Sassoli owns). I have also worked for UniCredit Bank through an agency but this was prior to Sassoli's involvement and I have not worked for them since. I have no involvement in any other companies owned by Sassoli or by which he is employed or on the board in a voluntary capacity etc.

The original entry in English and updates in English and Italian on Sassoli have been at his request and paid for, but written by me to impartial academic standards (I used to teach literature at the University of York). All the information on the Sassoli page (in English) has been provided by Lorenzo Sassoli himself but has wherever possible also been externally verified and referenced. In deference to your concerns I shall not create the new pages on UPA, Promo Bologna and the rest. In fact I have very little time left to do so today.

I have now finished editing this answer having completed the updates (18:45 GMT) and this is my complete disclosure. Please do not hesitate to get back in touch if you have any further questions, which I will be happy to answer in detail.

Best regards

Michael

Michaelbenis (talk) 16:02, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for replying. I've asked some other editors at the noticeboard to have a look. You'll receive a notice in a moment, with a link to the relevant discussion. Brianhe (talk) 17:49, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 17:54, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Valsoia

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Valsoia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 21:50, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Valsoia logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Valsoia logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Valsoia (October 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Valsoia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:08, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Michaelbenis, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 TT me 13:08, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Valsoia logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Valsoia logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Valsoia (October 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flat Out was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Valsoia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Flat Out (talk) 04:32, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Valsoia

Hello, Michaelbenis. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Valsoia".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:22, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Valsoia

Hello, Michaelbenis. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Valsoia".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 04:38, 2 January 2017 (UTC)