MickeyVonWiki

Your submission at Articles for creation: Black Table (July 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Black Table and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:15, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello, MickeyVonWiki! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:15, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Black Table (July 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mdaniels5757 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Black Table and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 12:52, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Black Table has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Black Table. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:57, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Black Table (July 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Black Table and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:25, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

Hello MickeyVonWiki. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:MickeyVonWiki. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=MickeyVonWiki|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 18:40, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

If you intend to continue, put on your User page and here on your Talk page that you have no paid nor personal connection to the author or publisher. That would clear any question of you being an undeclared paid editor, which could lead to an indefinite block of any editing on any article. As for the draft, it needs a plot summary, which does not need to be referenced, as the book itself is the source. And I strongly advise deleting the character section. David notMD (talk) 15:22, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Sorry for delayed answer. I am still trying to figure out how the Wikipedia works. No, I am not being paid for this in any form. But yes, I was asked by a friend to do this for her. She is a fan of the book series and she does not have the skill set to make the articles. It seems neither do I. I have created a few web pages in my time, but this is so much more difficult. Ps.The book series is notable, as it does fulfil the Wikipedia requirement as a major Award winner in 2022 and 2023 at Next Generation Indie Book Awards MickeyVonWiki (talk) 19:17, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Black Table (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Black Table and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:31, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Please clarify what is missing. I have done everything others who declined it earlier advised me to do. 1. Lot of content was removed as Plot summary is enough. 2. Book qualifies as Wikipedia article as is has won an award listed on Wikipedia's "worthy" awards list. 3. References were removed as they are not necessary, the book itself works as a reference. 4. The article is reliable, as the book exists and has won awards.

Please do not contradict with other reviewers @David notMD, otherwise as new user, I have no idea how to create an article in the future. MickeyVonWiki (talk) 17:47, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

References are required

What I meant was that a reference is not needed for the plot section. References are absolutely required to verify notability of the book. David notMD (talk) 20:12, 12 July 2023 (UTC) I converted the 2022 Indie mention to a ref. However, being a finalist rather than the winner is not sufficient to confirm notability. David notMD (talk) 20:33, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you @David notMD, I will work on the references again. Please do note that Next Generation Indie Book Awards is listing winners and finalists (finalist does not mean all the rest) equally as “Award winners”, which is the requirement for Wikipedia in books category (1.The book has won a major literary award. ) After lot of diggings into the matter, this book is an award winner. The second book from the series is also an award winner, even though it is the winner in science fiction category. MickeyVonWiki (talk) 21:04, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

I am not a Reviewer nor an Administrator. David notMD (talk) 02:17, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Black Table (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mdaniels5757 were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Black Table and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:43, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Black Table (July 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Asilvering were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Black Table and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 04:59, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Black Table

Hello, MickeyVonWiki. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Black Table, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:05, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Black Table

Hello, MickeyVonWiki. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Black Table".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:16, 14 January 2024 (UTC)