MidAtlanticBaby

June 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Wakulla County, Florida, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Aoidh (talk) 16:23, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Please slow down and add sources when you'e adding content to articles. Editing at a rate of several edits a minute is bound to cause mistakes, and many of the edits you've made are inaccurate. For example this edit (which you have made before and was already reverted) but a simple look at the map on that article showing where that county is, followed by clicking the wikilink that was added and looking at the map at North Central Florida makes it immediately obvious that it is not in fact in that region, which the sources in the North Central Florida article verify. That combined with edit summaries like this and this were the reason for ANI discussion and the blocks by User:Drmies in April 2024 and User:Donald Albury in May 2024, yet they are continuing. - Aoidh (talk) 16:53, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

The edits to Gadsden County, Florida and Leon County, Florida are similarly highly inaccurate. I'm not sure if you're using a source that has a different definition for these regions and not including that source, or if the regions are being guessed at and added that way, but these are too many mistakes at too high a rate of editing with no sources whatsoever to support these claims. Edits like this are also not minor edits, please don't mark them as such. - Aoidh (talk) 17:11, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Aoidh, see Levy County, Florida, and probably a bunch of others. MidAtlantic, I said "what. what does that even mean? "part of"? this isn't some administrative entity, and the article already says, "on the Gulf coast in the northwestern part of the U.S. state of Florida"" How many more of those edits are there? I can't tell from your edit summaries; should I ask Alexia? So here is what I will propose, and Aoidh and User talk:Curbon7, I'd appreciate your input: a. you explain in an edit summary what you are doing in the article; b. you stop with the edit summaries that are what some might call completely disruptive BS; c. you stop adding these "is part of the region" things, particularly if there already is a geographic designating. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 17:18, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

@Drmies: Given that they are more focused on refactoring my comments (here and here) than they are with addressing the sockpuppetry or any of the issues with their editing, I don't expect anything productive to follow unfortunately. - Aoidh (talk) 22:18, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

I am currently in the process of reverting many articles on counties in Florida which you placed in the wrong region, or placed in a region you have invented without citing any sources. In other cases you are merely rearranging content without adding any value to the article. In my opinion, your editing is disruptive, and could result in you being blocked from editing if you continue to make such edits. -- Donald Albury 18:20, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Donald Albury, I did a slightly deeper dive. This is their first edit--now look at this. (Alansohn, this user has clashed with you also.) I think I'm going to put on my special glasses. Drmies (talk) 21:09, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

(Personal attack removed) for blocking me on Wikipedia, over (Personal attack removed) minor (Personal attack removed), about me adding (Personal attack removed) regions to articles each county goes to. If you (Personal attack removed) then (Personal attack removed) revert it. Im TIRED of (Personal attack removed) reverting (Personal attack removed) JUST BECAUSE (Personal attack removed). The (Personal attack removed). Gonna revert all of my edits and then block me just because (Personal attack removed).

And (Personal attack removed) if you dont (Personal attack removed). MidAtlanticBaby (talk) 22:19, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Well guess what. Drmies (talk) 22:20, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Spencer, Ponyo, Zzuuzz, Ivanvector, y'all have run checks on and blocked this and a related range. Do you see any need to dig deeper and put a tag on this account? Or is this just crazy busy with vandals? Thanks, Drmies (talk) 21:17, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Somehow, I'm not surprised. Donald Albury 22:03, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

I think we're probably in the right place at this time. And yes, some of that is just crazy busy. Did someone say this is DarwinandBrianEdits? If so, I'd probably agree with that. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 23:25, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

@Donald Albury @Drmies @Zzuuzz You guys, I'm also not even surprised that this user got blocked for the third time. In fact, I remember giving them a general reminder about one of the edits they made to the Newark, New Jersey page, where they just lashed out at me without even heeding it. The reason I also pinged Magnolia is because when she told him about his edit to "West Central Florida", the user told her First of all how about you watch your fucking tone and WHO THE FUCK youre fucking talking to, talking about "no you 'hold on'". The fuck. Drmies, thanks for stepping in to block the account. (also, sorry for the long message.) NoobThreePointOh (talk) 03:48, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Pinging @Magnolia677 here as well. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 03:52, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

I have to go but unfortunately the abuse continues crosswiki over at Drmies' Commons talk page where's DarwinandBrianEdits are now using socks to reinsert continued attacks. MidAtlanticBaby is locked but evaded it by switching to ObsessedWithTheNorth. theinstantmatrix (talk) 04:49, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

I've reverted their edits. That text was extremely long it slowed my computer so damn much. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 04:53, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Well, at this point, it seems like they're not going to stop with the attacks. I give up on reverting and hope a steward globally locks them. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 05:19, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Oh wait, the solution was to manually revert to prevent the user from receiving the notification. Nonetheless, I still hope they get blocked. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 05:42, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Never mind, I guess. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 05:47, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

My check on that range was related to a different case, and was inconclusive anyway. However when checking just now I also found Ladyofborders, which I've blocked and requested global lock. I also agree this is DarwinandBrianEdits, some past checks line up with this new batch of socks, as does their distinctive style of casually threatening to kill people when approached about their similarly distinctive style of category vandalism. They also tried to log in as "MidAtlanticBaby II" which follows their history of using incremental numerals in new sock accounts. I'll start a page on cuwiki. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 14:54, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

• Ivanvector, I can't look at that though I'd like to--I don't have the link to the CU wiki on this device, in this central region. Please run a fresh check, because the baby just logged in, and add that info to the CU wiki, please. Thanks, and have a great day, Drmies (talk) 02:30, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Big thou.jpeg

The file File:Big thou.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Of no value to the encyclopedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Adam Black ^{talk • contribs} 01:36, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Banned

Practically speaking, please consider this user cbanned. Given the number of death threats, which certainly number at least in the hundreds, no admin should be unilaterally lifting this block and I would personally oppose an unblock in any community discussion, ever. Note that no formal move to ban has taken place (de jure), I instead claim this is a de facto cban. --Yamla (talk) 21:10, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Support. Donald Albury 23:09, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Support as well. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 02:35, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Support. MAB's off-wiki actions have violated respective sitewide Community Guidelines by creating multiple accounts. Ahri Boy (talk) 02:24, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Today an ip has posted on mw:Project:Support Desk assisting with the block of this account. Support cban anyways. ToadetteEdit (talk) 12:43, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

I was unaware of the existence of this person until a few minutes ago when I saw UTRS appeal #92617. Without even seeing the rest of their editing history, that one thing was enough to convince me that they should never be unblocked; as far as I am concerned the person is de facto banned. JBW (talk) 20:13, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Support. Geode (talk) 02:31, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

• Support noting user continued their 0 tolerance behavior at UTRS pretending to be other users with fake UTRS tickets.---- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:09, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
• Support. There's no way back for him. PhilKnight (talk) 15:56, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
• Support although they're already de jure banned by virtue of WP:3X and so this discussion is moot. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 02:07, 10 September 2024 (UTC)