User talk:Mike Rosoft/archive7
Just a quick note: User:Lemansbjw has been sending me email, and I basically explained the exact same things to him about the Webdisc article and why it was deleted repeatedly. I've also given him a very detailed explanation about why I blocked him. As is pretty common in situations like this, he proceeded to call me a "tool" and cussing me out over my action. Charming, really.
I warned him in email that I will take it to the admin noticeboard if he continues to harass me off-wiki, and I may also send a message to his ISP. Just thought you should know. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 22:32, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- ...aaaand he's still at it. Seems to believe that the vast majority of users out there would agree with him that his article was just fine and shouldn't have been deleted. *shrug* I will be recommending that his off-wiki harassment of me be taken into account when other admins go to review his block. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 23:26, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Social software in Education
Hi noted your note that this page looks like a research paper. Actually its a guide that is part of a series called "what research has to say for practice" so its not surprising that it looks like a research paper to the observer, there are a lot of researchy type references there. I've removed the removal notice. The article is under construction and please hold off judgement for a few days and untill you have read it in detail Thank you Markvanharmelen (talk) 22:24, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks Mike, cleanup will be in process Markvanharmelen (talk) 11:08, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
Mike, I am the author of the Social Software in Education (but inexperienced in the ways of Wikipedia). Mark uploaded the article with my agreement but having seen the discussion around it, it now seems to me that it would have been better for me as the author to upload it. Since, currently, only Mark and I have made minor edits, would it be better for Mark (or you) to remove the article, and me to upload it again? --FrancesBell (talk) 08:48, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your reply Mike. There are two reasons for Mark to take down the article: 1. Since he uploaded it , it looks as if he is the author (see discussion on Deletion page). 2. It has the wrong title - should be Social Software in Learning. 3. I will think about what to do - may upload article as it stands. I am sorry to mess you about - I am a newbie --FrancesBell (talk) 17:12, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Mike, please could you explain what is a null edit.--FrancesBell (talk) 12:13, 1 November 2008 (UTC) OK Mike, I have checked out the page and see that you have done that edit.--FrancesBell (talk) 12:33, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello. I see you added a speedy deletion template to Junio Hamano once. I'm AfD'ing this article. Your speedy deletion was promptly removed by the article's original author, which I don't think people are supposed to do...
Proposed deletion of Junio Hamano
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Junio Hamano, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 71.61.220.126 (talk) 22:46, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Q re recently unblocked user
Quick question about Just Plain Brittish. Did the IP block fall in the range 79.74.0.0/17 or similar? I have a sneaking suspicion that the user is (yet another) Tom Sayle sock based on some behavioural similarities. [ roux ] [x] 18:24, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- No, that's me. Why? Is this Stereotyper yet again? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.73.54.44 (talk) 14:23, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Done, Mike. [roux » x] 18:16, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I added something to this, since I think it was important to clear that matter up. - Richard Cavell (talk) 00:02, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Another Mother for Peace
Hello! In response to your incredibly speedy deletion of this far-from-complete article from my user page, I must say I disagree with your log note. This article is researched and is neither arguing for or against the organization; it explains how the group began, who was involved and what it did. This organization was especially active and visible during the VietNam war and its yellow&black logo a very prominent sign of those times. Many celebrities, including Paul Newman and Joanna Woodward were involved with the organization. It is part of American history. Wikipedia has many articles about not-for-profit advocacy organizations including Ducks Unlimited, Women Strike for Peace, and the anti-abortion group Operation Rescue, to name just a few. Skybluewater (talk) 22:46, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for your response. I had saved the text elsewhere so you don't need to recover it. Skybluewater (talk) 15:00, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
dear macro soft, i was merely attempting to begin a stub on the artists not much is publically known but the music is decent and has been getting popular please reconsider your deletion for notability, i mean who are you anyways.Tiberius138 (talk) 21:19, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted Schultz bio
Hi Mike - not sure what you were objecting to - I wrote the entire article - and it is all fact -- i was not done in terms of sourcing other articles - but not sure what you think was copyrighted elsewhere? Can you be more specific? Thanks Bill —Preceding unsigned comment added by Em2bill (talk • contribs) 20:49, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
I see that you sited the SPAA article on my bio - I can certify that I wrote and submitted that article to SPAA to support my appearance at their conference last year and this year.
Speedy deletion of a strange article
Hi, sorry. I thought it was an A2 (or international) category for deletion. The writing had weird text, based on some sort of list. Vernon (Versus22) (talk) 10:00, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
- I'm only on the English Wikipedia, so I don't go to other languages on this site. It looked like some sort of language (or strange words), that's the only one I could think of. Vernon (Versus22) (talk) 10:21, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Regarding Gomolo.in I would like to inform you, please don't add this to seedy deletion.-Thanks. Jayanta Nath (Talk|Contrb) 11:00, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You deleted the page below twice today:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amo,_amas,_amat
The first time you said that I was trying to promote a book (which I wasn't) and so I removed the reference to the book that you mentioned. Then you deleted it again, because you said wikipedia is not a dictionary or a source for grammar (which I agree) but the page refers to a Latin phrase, and there are many wiki pages that explain Latin phrases, such as:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_litem
In fact, the only reason why I created the page was because I couldn't find a description in Wikipedia for the Latin phrase in question. Can you please help me understand what I'm doing wrong?
Thanks, Mr. C.
(By the way is this the right way to "Talk" to someone. It seems strange, but I can't seem to find a way to send you an email personally). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Khidhir (talk • contribs) 20:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Your speedy deletion
This article certainly DOES NOT certify as a "speedy deletion." What. I am working on it. It was just created a few minutes ago. And now its subject to deletion? Does that mean that other articles, while being worked on by the original author, should also be deleted? I don't think so. Please view the history before making that judgement again. Prowikipedians (talk) 13:02, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
- And what more disappointing is that the speedy deletion was addressed just ONE MINUTE after the article was created. Prowikipedians (talk) 13:09, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
You might want to read this AFD again. Jmundo pointed something out about blogs and reliable sources you may not be aware of. - Mgm|(talk) 09:24, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
The list of meerkat manor meerkats page
Hi, I was just wanting to get an opinion from an admin about this. On the talk page, I suggested a less confusing way of ordering the meerkat bios so that dead meerkats are grouped together and alive meerkats are grouped together, but everyone said I was trying to avoid spoilers and trying to make it fancrufty. Collectonion, I believe the name is, keeps issuing personal attacks against me, or so it seems. Do you feel like she is issuing personal attacks against me, and do you think you could talk to them about it? Thanks.67.185.90.231 (talk) 20:43, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Deletionist - Croydon Aircraft Company
Look, there's no way this was a candidate for rapid deletion. I had just created the now-damned-by-you article. Please read the documented, accepted and well understood (by most) procedure. And then restore the article so that said procedure can be followed. Paul Beardsell (talk) 12:33, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
In my view what you have done is a prime example of what is the true vandalism which happens here at WP. Paul Beardsell (talk) 12:33, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
User:Hoocares on the Commons
I see you nominated some of this users images for deletion on the Commons, but they have also recently added the following images: File:Idog RED.jpg & File:Idog blue.jpg. Thought you might want to add those to your deletion request. Cheers! -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 19:56, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
213.164.30.107
User 213.164.30.107 continues to ignore your warnings and add malicious content on Pablo Ganguli's page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.235.185.127 (talk) 22:48, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
What the heck is going on? The article had an "under construction" tag and you added an "Unrefernced tag?" Is there some secret race going on to see if people can start tagging articles before they're written. Please, read what you're tagging! First! Before you tag it![1] --KP Botany (talk) 11:33, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
But this edit was useful.
- (Deletion log); 03:55 . . Mike Rosoft (Talk | contribs) deleted "Puneet sharma" (No claim of notability (WP:CSD#A7) - biography)
Thanks for quickly putting it out of its misery. --KP Botany (talk) 11:45, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Some new I-images
Hoocares (talk · contribs) has returned and uploaded some more suspect images, such as File:Idog amp'd.jpg. Just wondering if you could take a look at these. Thanks! -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 01:33, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
dont people want to know what a spiDog is (spider-man iDog)
Hoocares (talk) 00:58, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
procedural advice on rerwrite of deleted page
Hi Mike
I would like to have a go at rewriting a page that has been deleted and has a "bot", it happened a couple of years ago here is the link to the deleted articles current page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Marcome
I have read the guidelines re spam, notability ect.., also I have searched the FAQ and other sources as to the process in this case and the only useful info I have found is that it is a good idea to write the article in a sub page in your user area first which of course I will do.
If I manage to produce an article that meets and satisfies all the relevant criteria for an Encyclopedia entry can you guide me to the information as to the correct process to follow in this case. I am writing to you as I believe you may have had some input previously in tagging the deleted article and hence possibly understand the background and related issues
Nigel447 (talk) 06:59, 5 January 2009 (UTC) Thanks Mike for the quick reply, just for clarity my previous contributions were under the user name Nigelsa, I lost my password and my old email address was closed so following the suggestions in the help section it said it was easiest to set up a new account.
My main article previously is Humanistic Sociology, I believe I can address all the issues regarding the criteria and Hroðul has setup a directory were I can construct it in my user area, I will invite a few admin to look at it when it is finished and if anyone says they would recommend it for deletion I will not post it so there need be no angst, just an encyclopedia, thanks for all your helpNigel447 (talk) 10:09, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
I am not Mikerosoft but I spotted your question. I assume from the original username that the article was written by the musician Marcomé, or her agent or producer, in which case there is another guideline worth reading:
It is much more difficult than it seems to write a neutral objective article about your own livelihood. There are some tips there on what to do after creating a draft on your user page. Here is a link you can use to create your draft, but bear in mind that "blatant advertising" can get deleted from user subpages too (as User:Marcome was) , so write with balance from the start. Here is a link to create your user sub-page: User:Nigel447/Marcomé.
--Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 18:53, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
RfD nomination of Turd Blossum
I have nominated Turd Blossum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. – iridescent 22:53, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
About Lembata
My account was used by my brother when i had supper. He moved the page to the Lembata island. It is absolutely wrong. So, i have no idea to restore the page. The correct is Lembata, because it is an island. Thanks for your help. Cheers. CHJL Discuss 18:44, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, CHJL is making a large number of edits that people are undoing. His talk page is a list of "please don'ts". Lembata was not the only Indonesian island article moved in this manner. --Merbabu (talk) 02:44, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- No, i just made a little number of moved pages. It is only Lembata and Pontianak that i know that i'm wrong. Please if i make some mistakes give me know the policies, because i have found the policies and i cannot find them. By the way, thanks for your service, i will change my password in the future. Cheers. CHJL Discuss 04:43, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Chipmunk
Why on earth did you delete the Chipmunk (artist) page? Search his name in youtube or on myspace, he is a notable artist with hundreds of thousands of fans, he's won plenty of music awards also. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.108.252.252 (talk) 21:49, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Yes he does have fans on Youtube, but if you look they are professionally made music videos, also shown on TV and he has tonnes of airplay on mainstream radio. That surely warrants a Wikipedia page (just as much as any musician), so please restore it. I'm not even a fan but, for someone with complete ignorance of the person, to delete the page is very unreasonable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.108.252.252 (talk) 21:27, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Trifle Day
ok you deleted the wiki on trifle day and i just want you to kno that it is a real holiday that is celebrated across the globe and that just because you have never heard of it doesnt mean that you can go along and delete it. it was sourced and everything i spent hours researching it and for you to go along an delete it really annoys me so please put it back and next time you want to delete something research it slightly. just imagine how you would feel if you if you went to look up your favourite holiday and you couldnt find it i mean come on give me a break maybe if you left your house once in a while you would of heard about it
thank you for your time, ploease return the page on trifle day and next time dont delete before checking or at least leaving it long enough for people to add more so you can see that its a real day Mr trifle
Flourish/Card Manipulation discussion.
Card Manipulation and Card Flourishes are the exact same thing. Card Flourishes use manipulations for "magic", and card manipulation or Extreme Card Manipulation (XCM - published in 2004 Genii Magazine) uses manipulation for manipulation (no magic.) Card Flourishes should be merged with Card Manipulation.
Thank you for your time. Drlmagicman (talk) 09:59, 16 February 2009 (UTC)Drlmagicman
Card Manipulation Revert discussion.
Card Manipulation is not magic, it's shuffling, card throwing, and many more things. The article is off base and inaccurate making it appear as if it is magic. 99% of card manipulation is for non-magical use. Even dealing is a form of card manipulation. I agree that a small section could be used for magic, but most of card manipulation is not and has nothing to do with magic.
Thank you for your time. Drlmagicman (talk) 17:55, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Al Farooj Fresh
Hi, I've noticed that you have deleted Al Farooj Fresh. I had barely begin editing and I feel deleting the article less than 5 minutes after it was created is a bit too strident. As you are an admin, I was wondering if you could 'un-delete' the page and bring it back in order to allow me to prove it's notability. --Roaring Siren (talk) 08:14, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Second Reply to Administrator Mike Rosoft RE: 2D-FT NMR Imaging
At this point no additional material is needed than the one presented in the current version. Please restore promptly the page on Wikipedia with its correct title : "2D-FT NMR Spectroscopy and Imaging"
so that I can implement the Latex2e to HTML conversions needed for the latter part of the article. Thank you. Bci2
>>Please note that three of your comments are incorrect:
1. about being from "PlanetMath" -- incorrect; 2. I am its author on PlanetPhysics, not PlanetMath
and: 3. It is not copied from Wikipedia, as there is no such entry as 2D-FT NMR Imaging on Wikipedia.
I must therefore, respectfully ask you that you withdraw your three comments that are factually incorrect.
This article , as stated at the bottom of my first draft:
"incorporates material from [[PlanetPhysics:{{{planetphysics.org/encyclopedia/2DFTImaging.html}}}|{{{2D-FT MR- Imaging and related Nobel awards}}}]] on PlanetPhysics.prg, which is licensed under the GFDL.
PlanetPhysics is *up* and running--and you can see now my article there, it is not down as you stated (although PM is indeed down!). I accept however, some of your other comments. However, it is *not* a copy of an Wikipedia article as you suggested.
The format is as follows:
This article incorporates material from PlanetPhysics
(Title on PlanetPhysics, which is licensed under the GFDL. where:
The id variable is the PlanetPhysics article's object id, found at the bottom of the PlanetPhysics page: planetphysics.org/encyclopedia/2DFTImaging.html
The title variable is the PlanetPhysics article title: 2D-FT MR- Imaging and related Nobel awards
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bci2/2D-FT_NMR" Nu 09:58, 1 March 2009 (UTC)Bci2Nu 09:58, 1 March 2009 (UTC) March 1st, 2009[UTC]
I am trying to recreate the page for David Choi. His page has been deleted several times for a few different reasons. ONe being that the page was blatant advertising. Another because the page didn't have enough sources to back of the information and the facts were thought to be false. Anoth time it was deleted because it was felt he was not a person of value to be placed on the wiki. I have reasearched him and put together alot of facts regarding him. As far as his worth, I think I have put enough things and sources to back them up to prove that. I wanted to message you because since you are one of the people who has deleted his page in the past I was hoping that you might find time to look over the page and see that it is accurate, and well written. This is also my first Wiki page and I read the rules, and formatting information over MANY times before creating the page. Please feel free to make me aware of any issues with the page, as I would like to adhear to all of the rules of the site, while being able share information about this artist. When I created the page I did not capatolize the last name. When I went to move it I noticed the long history of deletion and the fact that the David Choi page was blocked. I do not wish to step on any toes in this situation but I am new to WP and do not know the proper procedures for unblocking a page. If my newly created page is even worthy of being left up. Any help would be greatly appreciated. I am leaving this message for everyone on the deletion log of the page, not for redundancy but I do not wish to offend/upset anyone who feels this page should have been deleted in the past. Thanks, Chip MileHighCFI (talk) 01:21, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Article Deletion
Hi Mike - just a quick note to let you know that the Ariel solanes article you speedied earlier today has been recreated. Cheers, ponyo (talk) 20:32, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- Please disregard, Discospinster got it! ponyo (talk) 21:01, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Encyclopediaofalabama requesting unblock
See User talk:Encyclopediaofalabama. As you were the blocking admin I thought I should notify you. It's of my personal opinion that in his message he hinted that he would continue his spamming spree; but you're the admin, not me. ThemFromSpace 17:32, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Lauren's Lunches
I was under the impression that the little tag I added would give me time this evening to find the appropriate references. I created the page at lunch, and don't have time to find all the appropriate references during my time at work. I actually didn't add whatever book cover you are referring to. If you could provide the link to it that would be great. In the meantime, I'd request you undelete the article so I can work on the references this evening. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gdawgatlanta (talk • contribs) 20:39, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Sir you are deleting again and again my article plz inform me why you are doing so
Sir I saw many pages about different schools on wikipedia so i wanted to add a little description about my school from here i got my high school diploma but you are again and again deleting that page if you want then im giving you whole the information about my school with reliable references so if my article do not meet your requirements then create the article yourself if you do not have enough time to create it then tell me what should i do to create an article about my school? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Asif zeb008 (talk • contribs) 15:46, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
I re-created this article you deleted 3 years ago or so. I hope it is better. Bearian (talk) 20:14, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
page recreated
The African Church was recreated, 13 minutes after you deleted it.. has it been deleted before? Should it be salted? tedder (talk) 15:38, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Image tagging for File:The Journal of Arthur Stirling.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Journal of Arthur Stirling.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:08, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
i noticed you changed the catagory of the above to Category:Nazi concentration camps on Alderney. upon reflection, this is an improvment. however, should not the new category list:
- Nazi-German concentration camps list
- Neuengamme concentration camp
- Neuengamme concentration camp subcamps list
i noticed that the neuengamme link is in the opening paragraph, but is that sufficient? thank you for your time and help. --diremarc (talk) 22:08, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Maybe a little salt recreated 5 mins after you deleted it. BigDuncTalk 19:59, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Maliyadeva Scout Group
The article Maliyadeva Scout Group has been recreated yet again can it be salted? TeapotgeorgeTalk 15:49, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
One Dark Cloud
Just a quick question as to why "one dark cloud" was deleted as a topic. This is a London band with a web page (www.onedarkcloud.com) who've played a few gigs around the town. If there is there a minimum level of fame for a band, that's fair enough but it seems a little arbitary.
I should add that I didn't create the original entry (it was a friend of the band), but the page on notability doesn't appear to require general recognition of the band. If I'm wrong then I'd be grateful if you could explain the deletion a little clearer, if not then i'm interested in a little more detail as to what would be required to be a valid entry.
Thanks for your help.
Regards Jonathan
Andromnia
Hi! I am a developer of the project Andromnia (Android OS on Samsung Omnia) you just speed deleted. The development didn't start just a few days ago - we were working on it for three months now. OK you're right, the article didn't look good, but I didn't even have the time to improve the article in the 30 minutes you gave us. Would it be possible to move it into my user space or something like this? Thanks! --Netspider (talk) 14:39, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
deletion of Glossary of cides
The article in question is not based on the deleted "-cide" article (as I lack access to it) and (I would conjecture) is probably substantively different from it by being a proper glossary (there being precedent for such recovery in Glossary of graphies attempted deletion). I therefore request its (at least temporary) undeletion, without prejudice to going through prod or AfD. --Cybercobra (talk) 10:20, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- Seeing your message at my talkpage, I find Userification also acceptable. --Cybercobra (talk) 10:24, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
deletion of "Mulyeongari-Oreum"
can you restore it for oneday? or like move it into my user space? i need the information in there I would be glad if you do that thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Naturesos (talk • contribs) 16:33, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Deletion of Justin Frazier entry
Good Morning,
Though it has been some time since I have been on Wiki, I returned to find my section about "me" gone. Being an actor/vocalist from the US, I spent some time reviewing similiar pages and adding content about "MYSELF" and what I was working on. Bio, etc.
I'm not sure if someone added some untrue things to the page, but I have no understanding of how my page about me is "Attack Page"
Please help me solve this and get my area relisted.
Thank you, Justin Frazier —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.81.80.134 (talk) 13:46, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Deletion of The Syndic
The deletion of "The Syndic" seems to be based on a misunderstanding. The deletion message says that the reason for the deletion is that it is "patent nonsense" that in the future the rulers of the U.S. will be divided up into a Syndic, the mob, etc. Well, "The Syndic" is a NOVEL by C. M. Kornbluth, and these things are elements of its plot. It appears that a description of a science fiction novel has been deleted because it was thought that this was a description of possible real world events which were being predicted as a definite future possibility. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.127.200.152 (talk) 23:20, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Deletion of Edits to Eggshells
HI Mike, I'm not understanding why you deleted my edits to the wikipeda page on Eggshells. If you could get back to me on this, maybe we could figure something out. Thanks so much. -Elise —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elisestudent65 (talk • contribs) 15:22, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Adil Omar
We were wondering if you could unblock the creation for the Adil Omar wikipedia page. This artist page was blocked in 2007 when it was created without any references... Since then, he has accomplished a lot more in his field and career, is a notable figure, and we would create a page, professionally and from a neutral viewpoint, with references and reliable sources if you please un-protect it... Do let us know, thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.153.32.143 (talk) 12:11, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Eggshells
Thanks for clearing that up. - Elise —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elisestudent65 (talk • contribs) 15:35, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
In 2005, you questioned the validity of Nicevenn. The article was recently tagged as a hoax, and I have brought it to AfD. If you would like to participate in the discussion, feel free to comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicevenn. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 08:24, 10 December 2009 (UTC)