Mikeb4789

Hello,

I've noticed your work on United States Air Force-related articles. Many of the pages need a bit of cleaning up, and your work on them is very helpful. Thanks for your contributions.

Sincerely,

Acegikmo1 02:58, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)

AT-9

Hi Mikeb - you might want to take a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft, the effort to co-ordinate aircraft articles in the encyclopedia and achieve some kind of consistency to how they're presented. There's a lot of information there, particularly in the page content section, so please don't get intimidated by it! The naming convention used here for US military aircraft is: if the aircraft has an official name, then our articles are named "designation" "name", so F-14 Tomcat. When the aircraft has no official name, our articles are named "manufacturer" "designation", so Boeing C-22, Curtiss AT-9. Cheers and welcome aboard! -- Rlandmann 04:53, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)

The image you contributed also is problematic - the USAF museum site is not a public domain resource (despite being hosted on a .mil server - see http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/warn.htm ). Unfortunately, this means we're going to have to remove it :( Hopefully, given the age of the aircraft, there should be public domain images out there that are easy enough to find to replace it! Sorry to be the bearer of bad tidings so early in your stay here :( --Rlandmann 04:59, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)

"Jeep" is such a common (though unofficial) name, that AT-9 Jeep would probably have been OK as well, and we should definitely have a redirect from there. If that's a redlink when I hit save here, I'll go make it one! --Rlandmann 05:08, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Yes - should be fine. Almost everything on hosted on .mil and .gov is fair game - the USAF Museum being a very rare exception, and one that unfortunately causes a lot of confusion here (don't worry! You're far from the first to make that mistake!). If you give the image the same name as the file you originally uploaded, the new image will just over-write the old one (after prompting you first).

If you're feeling energetic, you might also like to format the article's specifications to line up with the current standard. If not, don't worry about it and I'll clean it up later. --Rlandmann 05:24, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Actually, that data table belongs to an obsolete standard - I've updated the article to use the new layout. I know there's plenty of examples of the old blue table still around the 'pedia, but these are slowly but surely being updated. I'm just sorry for the work you put in - I should have been more explicit when I suggested you standardise :(

I sincerely hope all this "dotting the i's and crossing the t's" hasn't put you off at all - Wikiproject Aircraft needs all the contributors it can get, especially to cover less popular types (ie, anything that's not a front-line combat aircraft) --Rlandmann 22:06, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Ellsworth Air Force Base

I was looking at Ellsworth Air Force Base and noticed that the demographic information for the base was removed from the article and I was wondering why you removed it. The information is valid and it represents those people living on the base at the time of the census. I assume that you've done this to other bases as well, but I have not checked them. Could you please add this information back in? Thanks! RM 20:20, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)

Image:Air Force Reserve Command Shield.jpg has been listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Air Force Reserve Command Shield.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Duplicate Image:89th Airlift Wing.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:89th Airlift Wing.jpg, by Pmsyyz, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:89th Airlift Wing.jpg is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:89th Airlift Wing.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:89th Airlift Wing.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 06:29, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Five star iris cover .jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Five star iris cover .jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:02, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Five star iris cover EP.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Five star iris cover EP.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:03, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Five star iris cover .jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Five star iris cover .jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:23, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Five star iris cover EP.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Five star iris cover EP.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:23, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your contrib about 23rd NORAD ADS!

Hope I'm doing this right... Adding a new talk section just to contact you.

I noticed that you contributed pretty heavily to the Tyndall AFB page in the 23 NORAD ADS section. You write very much like someone who was stationed there. Were you?

If so, let me say Hi to a fellow 23ADS Alum. My name is Kirby L. Wallace and I was transfered to 23rd ADS from IWS there at Tyndall. In fact, the station was so new that it was understaffed at first, and I was the first person, ever, to be qualified first in weapons, and then one of the others. After that I went through the surveillance training and had another distinction of being the first person, ever, to be "dual qualified". Weapons and Surveillance. I think they made that kind of the norm later on, though. But usually you go surviellance first then weapons or ID. And after a few years, you move up to SD. I got out of the AF before getting there though.

Do please feel free to contact me at Kirby at wallaceinfo (followed by a dot and then) "c0m"

Thanks for all your work on the article. It was a really pleasant memory! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.64.61.66 (talk) 21:09, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:5SI 380AEW.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:13, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mikeb4789. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)