Milchama
Plattsburgh alumns and PSTV
editThanks for adding that information. I attend Plattsburgh and I'm guessing you do too.
Thanks again. --waffle iron 19:47, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
Dear Milchima, I am sure you meant well, but your edits to various Burger Ranch related articles infringed many of our rules as well as the rights of our contributors. Please study our guidelines somewhat better before making drastic changes like these. You are also welcome to ask me or any longtime contributor for assistance. Regards, gidonb 18:53, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
From the Afd: Wonderful, I've not been able to find decent sources to puzzle this out. Can you add sources to the article, and expand a little? At the least, add the sources to the talk page so they are available for others? KillerChihuahua?!? 22:23, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Please use edit summaries
editWhen editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.
Doniac Schvice has been proposed for deletion. Please see Talk:Doniac Schvice for details. NickelShoe 00:46, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
After that reversion, I wasn't even sure I had done it right. Your response indicates that I did. Sehr gut. If this website would prevent a-nones from making changes, it would save hundreds and hundreds of wasted hours every day. Registered users sometimes vandalize, but they are far less likely to do so than a-nones are, in my experience. Registered users are more likely to get into Edit Jihads, but at least they can be "reached" and/or dealt with. Wahkeenah 23:42, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
- It's hard to fight the vandals. But if they're actually breaking ground on the new Yankee Stadium tomorrow, then "it's no longer an issue, it's a fact" and vandalism at this point is just sour grapes. Wahkeenah 20:30, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Please use edit summaries
editAuburnPilotTalk 01:30, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- You can see a list of your contributions by clicking "my contributions" at the top of the page. You'll see a list of your edits, as well as which ones do and do not have summaries. You said you "tend to only use the summary field for drastic changes" but it is just as important, if not more important, to use edit summaries when making small changes. These can be hard to find/see and an edit summary helps greatly. Happy Editing! AuburnPilotTalk 15:47, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not sure why you want me to list the articles, but here you go: Independent Television News, WFFF-TV, WCWF, Talk:Starbucks, Fox News Channel, Madison Square Garden, Nassau Veterans Memorial Coliseum, Michael Kay, OLN, ABC Family, UPN, Al Leiter, Barenaked in America, WB (disambiguation), CBS Radio, New York Titans (NLL), John Sterling (sportscaster), ITN ON, NFL Network, KeySpan Park, WFAN, Mike and the Mad Dog, ITV (Apple product), XM Satellite Radio, Toronto Phantoms. These are from the last 50 edits. My original message was not a warning of any kind, just a "tip", if you want to call it that, about a Wikipedia Guideline. AuburnPilotTalk 18:29, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Trey band
editActually, nothing has ever been named "Trey Anastasio Band." It's nowhere on any CD, and it's never been on a ticket. There is no name for this band, and there was no name for the old band. He called last year's band 70 VP in an interview and on his website. EVen today, just like in 99-04, in his news updates,etc, it says "TREY AND HIS BAND." Since this band has no name, it definitely belongs as Trey Anastasio (band)
- SEGA
License tagging for Image:MSG pre 96.GIF
editThanks for uploading Image:MSG pre 96.GIF. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:05, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:1-nets-arena.jpg
editThanks for uploading Image:1-nets-arena.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:33, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:3-nets-arena.jpg
editThanks for uploading Image:3-nets-arena.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:41, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
CitiField is the official name
editHi, I see you reverted the redirects around New Mets Ballpark and CitiField over allegations that the name had not been officially anounced. The AP has reported the deal is official http://www.the-dispatch.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061111/APS/611112945&cachetime=5. Since I am not an administrator, could you please redirect New Mets Ballpark back to CitiField? Thanks. --Zimbabweed 22:02, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Spamming
editI am more than welcome to help you, but you got to stop spamming those messages. semper fi — Moe 17:51, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- And FYI, if {{prod}} is removed from an article, it's sent to AFD. semper fi — Moe 18:01, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- Hi, I just wanted to let you know that sending out a request to many editors asking them to participate in an AfD is a really bad idea. It's usually considered internal spamming and seriously frowned on. You wouldn't want folks frowning at you, would you? However, an Anon editor began deleting your requests...and that goes beyond a bad idea; it's not acceptable at all. I've reverted the posts that he deleted, and dropped in here to offer my (admittedly unsolicited) thoughts. Good luck and happy editing. --Doc Tropics Message in a bottle 05:41, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed you moved this article to Tenacious D in: The Pick of Destiny. I believe this is wrong because the album lacks the word "in" in the title, which implies that it isn't just the soundtrack to the movie, but it's also Tenacious D's second album. MusicBrainz and iTunes both have the album listed as "The Pick of Destiny", which further backs up my opinion that the album was named correctly to begin with.
BurgerRanch
editHi. I added a vote/discussion section for the Burgeranch → Burger Ranch move. I added your comment from the proposal on the WP:RM page into the template, then aded Support as nom in front of your comment on the Discussion page, with the votes. I don't think I have misrepresented your position or affected the sum or substance of your proposal, but you may want to go over there and check it out anyway, as I am always a little bit leery when my edits affect someone's comments. Cheers. -- SigPig |SEND - OVER 09:23, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Lee
editSorry dude. I respect your work with the D. Rock on. Digitaltam 16:15, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Master Exploder
editTogether, do you want to want help me make a good Master Exploder article —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Digitaltam (talk • contribs) 15:05, 22 December 2006 (UTC).
Hell O'Clock News
editDo you think we have enough for that? I'm thinking, brief intro and plot synopsis. If you start the page I will contribute. Do you want me to?
You know the D well. I made the footer template and tour article, and really need some allies to extend the D page more. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Digitaltam (talk • contribs) 15:18, 22 December 2006 (UTC).
License tagging for Image:AYardsBuilding.jpg
editThanks for uploading Image:AYardsBuilding.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:04, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Tenacious D drive
editI made a Kielbasa page, and I felt it was time for a fresh drive for the D pages. I've seen your work, you are a D-Sciple. Will you help me?
Tenacious D Fans 15:51, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
I'm going to fix the images on the D pages. For some reason they were removed. I'm not so good at tagging them to prevent them from being deleted due to copyright. Could you help?
Master Exploder
editOkay dude. I'll make an edit to the discussion page.
Tenacious D Fans 18:30, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- No probs dude Tenacious D Fans 10:38, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Milchama, are you prepared to put your name on the Tenacious D talk page, under the description: The following users are active in maintaining and improving this article. If you have questions regarding verification and sources, they may be able to help...
Wiki Project
editI started a consultation for a D project already. I'm in. Is anyone else?
Tenacious D Fans 21:34, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Help me dude! [1] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tenacious D Fans (talk • contribs) 21:35, 3 January 2007 (UTC).
- Thanks for trying to bail those album songs out. I have started on the project page [2]. I am not quite finished yet. Please message me back your opinions on the page. Tenacious D Fans 16:35, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
You have been invited to join a WikiProject
edit
Tenacious D Fans 11:27, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Dude, I redid the project page, the Beatles template was far to complicated. I have started inviting people will you please too? What do you think of the page?
Tenacious D Fans 11:27, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Why didn't you join the project?
NFL Europa
editHa. I had no idea that they changed the name. It just looked like an innocent typo so I changed it. My bad!!! LightningOffense 14:44, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Tenacious D
editI need your help. I have been working hard on the D page but would like assistance with adding (cited) content for under the title Genre.
Baseball Channel
editWhy are you considering Baseball Channel for deletion. This is an article worth keeping, because it is going to be part of the DireTV MLB television deal. I don't see any reason why it should be deleted.--Choptalk4165 01:05, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Baseball Channel
editYes, but it is still a fact that they are working to develop a baseball channel even without the DirecTV deal. All of the owners approved it in late 2004 and they had just been holding it off to get all of the television deals out of the way. So even with out DirecTV, they are still planning to launch one, DirecTV would just be a launching pad for it to get subcribtions to the channel. I still don't see any reason why this page should be deleted.--Choptalk4165 23:21, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Tenacious D
editThanks for joining the Tenacious D WikiProject. The main article was recently rated good, but I think it can get Featured status. The to-do list on the Tenacious D talk page details everything that needs done in order for the D page to be suitable for Featured article status. Please help out. If you complete a task, please score it out by putting it in between the tags: <s></s>. Please help. Thanks. Tenacious D Fans (talk) 17:27, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Re: FSN (SportsChannel) New York
editSome time ago you left me a message requesting my assistance in the new article on Fox Sports Net New York. As far as its pre-Fox history, there's not much I know about it as I didn't get cable until 1994. All I know is pretty much covered already in the article. And, since I wasn't a Mets, Nets, Islanders, or Devils fan, I really didn't watch SCNY that much, and virtually don't now. BTW, it looks really good so far! Rollosmokes 08:53, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Tenacious D WikiProject
editDude, I'm going to be away from a computer for a while. I completely pimped the TD wikiproject and I am hoping you will keep it from falling inactive. Tenacious D Fans (talk) 05:26, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
I just wanted to tell you that the D article is up for FA status. Tenacious D Fans (talk) 19:51, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
BAseball Channel
editThey already conpleted the deal and have announced that they are going to launch the network. There is no reason why this article should not be started. --Choptalk4165 16:16, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Calvert DeForest
editOkay, you contest the validity of the claims of his death. Fine. Why remove the infobox from the article? Dismas|(talk) 17:53, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
TBS Baseball
editLook i'm not making personal attacks all I’m saying is you don’t run wikipedia just because you say it should say does not mean it should two people disagree with you and nobody has backed you.--68.154.22.149 18:34, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Nets On WWOR
editI appologize, I posted the incorrect link. I meant to post this link which was added in the latest revision. I do apologize for adding last year's link but the overall message was correct. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Owine (talk • contribs) 21:26, 5 April 2007 (UTC).
Why did you list this for AfD? --myselfalso 20:08, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Okay; you might want to check out the page and fix the AfD box because its broken. I guess the page will need to be SALTed. --myselfalso 06:02, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Hizzoner, by Dennisthe2 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Hizzoner is an article that has been discussed at Articles for Deletion (or Miscellany for deletion), where the outcome was to transwiki, and where the transwikification has been properly performed and the author information recorded (CSD A5).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Hizzoner, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Hizzoner itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 19:53, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
No content in Category:Phish tours
editHello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Phish tours, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Phish tours has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Phish tours, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 14:00, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
MSG article split
editYou proposed that the MSG article be split almost a year ago. Did you ever do anything with that? These things should only be open for a limited time. I want to move two sections out right away, see:
- Talk:Madison_Square_Garden#PROPOSAL:_Move_parts_of_this_article_to:_Madison_Square_Garden.2C_L.P.
- Talk:Madison_Square_Garden#Separate_articles_for_MSG_1-3.3F
I also think that maybe there should be ONE additional article, History of Madison Square Garden. What do you think? WikiDon 01:26, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Yankee Stadium outfield dimensions
editAn editor has nominated Yankee Stadium outfield dimensions, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yankee Stadium outfield dimensions and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:14, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Phish Tickets By Mail
editI have nominated Phish Tickets By Mail, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phish Tickets By Mail. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Tenacious D Fan (talk) 13:31, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Trey Anastasio Band
editI have nominated Trey Anastasio Band, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trey Anastasio Band. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Tenacious D Fan (talk) 14:00, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Trey Anastasio (band)
editI have nominated Trey Anastasio (band), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trey Anastasio (band). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Tenacious D Fan (talk) 14:03, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Thorne.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Thorne.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:00, 13 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 18:00, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
editHello Milchama! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 741 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Ray Paczkowski - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Peter Griesar - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Ann Kreiter - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Tony Markellis - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:36, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of The Victor Disc
editI have nominated The Victor Disc, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Victor Disc. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:46, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Milchama/tp
editHi. I moved your page Milchama/tp to User:Milchama/tp as I guessed it was meant to be a user page. Kind regards, --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:06, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
IP block exempt
editI have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.
Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.
Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.
Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).
I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption.-- Cirt (talk) 19:19, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Tony Markellis for deletion
editA discussion has begun about whether the article Tony Markellis, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Markellis until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Student7 (talk) 00:50, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
User:Milchama/Thorne Deletion
editA tag has been placed on User:Milchama/Thorne requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you can assert the notability of the subject, contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}}
at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}
) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and give your reasons on [[Talk:User:Milchama/Thorne|the article's talk page]], but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Glazed Terracotta (talk) 23:12, 20 March 2011 (UTC)Glazed Terracotta
The article The Music Never Stopped has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- no evidence of notability
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:03, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
The article Nets Magazine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable television program.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:39, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
The article Yankees Magazine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable television program.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:39, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Milchama, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia!
I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you worked on, Dragonfly (Trey Anastasio song), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
- edit the page
- remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
- save the page
It helps to explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the Help Desk. Thanks again for contributing! Mattg82 (talk) 00:42, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
AfD and PROD notifications
editHi Milchama,
Back in December, you got either an AfD or PROD notification, which was part of the template testing project's experiments. If you could go here and leave us some feedback about what you think about the new versions of the templates we tested (there are links to the templates), that would be very useful. (You can also email me at mpinchuk wikimedia.org if you want.) Thanks! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 18:37, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Peter Griesar for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Griesar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Griesar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 21:05, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
The article Peter Shapiro (concert promoter) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Thebestofall007 (talk) 06:05, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
The article Peter Shapiro (concert promoter) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No evidence of notability.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 08:46, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 27
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Capitol Theater (Port Chester, New York), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Shapiro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Peter Shapiro (concert promoter)
editIf this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Peter Shapiro (concert promoter) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Cabe6403 (Talk•Sign) 08:45, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
Article notability notification
editHello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Kim Jones (reporter), has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Kim Jones (reporter)" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 14:32, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
November 2013
editHello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Boardwalk Hall may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- The jam band [[Phish]]] played three night runs of shows for Halloween in 2010 and 2013. The 2010 Halloween concert
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:20, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Nancy Newman for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nancy Newman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Newman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hirolovesswords (talk) 13:17, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Warehouse (Dave Matthews Band)
editIf this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Warehouse (Dave Matthews Band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. S Philbrick(Talk) 22:49, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, Milchama. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, Milchama. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Ori Naftaly
editHello, Milchama,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Ori Naftaly should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ori Naftaly .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Milchama. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The article Gamehendge has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 12:50, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Ghosts of the Forest has a new comment
editYour submission at Articles for creation: Ghosts of the Forest (January 9)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ghosts of the Forest and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ghosts of the Forest, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Milchama!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! The Mirror Cracked (talk) 02:08, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
|
Your draft article, Draft:Ghosts of the Forest
editHello, Milchama. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ghosts of the Forest".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 09:31, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Warehouse (Dave Matthews Band) for deletion
editThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warehouse (Dave Matthews Band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
The article Dog Days (American TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Appears to fail notability, nothing found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2019
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 22:51, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)