Miliwaves

Your submission at Articles for creation: Devasis Chattopadhyay (December 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Devasis Chattopadhyay may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 21:25, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Miliwaves! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 21:25, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Devasis has been accepted

Devasis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:19, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks SmokeyJoe. In future also I would like to contribute to Wikipedia!

June 2020

Hello Miliwaves. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Miliwaves. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Miliwaves|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS ^💬 06:18, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

I understand your concern and I respect the Wikipedia guidelines. I declare here that all my edits are purely out of good intent and have been part of the discoveries I have made over the years. I am not in any way associated to a particular topic or entity. I try my best to adhere to all the Wikipedia guidelines and maintain the utmost amount of hygiene while putting up any information on the platform.

If I have failed to adhere to any guidelines of the platform and the community, I would like to rectify them appropriately to ensure correctness. Miliwaves (talk) 14:03, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Miliwaves (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This is to bring to your notice that I have always tried my best to adhere to Wikipedia guidelines and understand the Sockpuppetry policy. This block is no longer necessary and declare that my contributions have always been neutral and I will make sure I continue to make only productive contributions to Wikipedia as a responsible contributor. I also declare that I am in no way associated to the articles I edit or contribute to. My reason for requesting an unblock is that I have never been involved in any form of intentional sockpuppetry. Miliwaves (talk) 13:33, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Simple denial is insufficient. You need to address the concerns raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mahim6785/Archive. Yamla (talk) 13:55, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Miliwaves (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand the concerns raised here and would like to declare I have no affiliation with the user who has previously attempted to create a page on the entity whose page I have created. The previous page was attempted to be created with the profession mentioned before the name of the person. The page created by me is as per Wikipedia guidelines and complete with credible citations. The person is notable for their achievements and meets the criteria to have a Wikipedia article. Miliwaves (talk) 12:39, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This does not adequately address the points made on the page Yamla mentions. 331dot (talk) 00:11, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.