Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 12,534 last month to 12,568 on 27 April). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 125 is ahead of WP:GM who have 86. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 62 out of a total number of 3,603 articles.
Currently we have forty Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The May 2016 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered May 2016 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
17:03, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
No such thing as Yugoslavia
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Just a friendly reminder: I had to expand the country list in the Carabus variolosus article because Yugoslavia no longer exists. References to Yugoslavia should be avoided everything except historical topics. 94.140.68.128 (talk) 15:39, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 12,568 last month to 12,628 on 4 June). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 126 is ahead of WP:GM who have 85. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 62 out of a total number of 3,724 articles.
Currently we have forty Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The June 2016 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered June 2016 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 12,628 last month to 12,769 on 29 June). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 127 is ahead of WP:GM who have 85. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 62 out of a total number of 3,620 articles.
Currently we have forty Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The July 2016 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered July 2016 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
12:02, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2016
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 12,769 last month to 12,795 on 30 July). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 127 is ahead of WP:GM who have 85. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 62 out of a total number of 3,633 articles.
Currently we have forty Yorkshire featured articles:
As of 29 June 2016, we have assessed 100% of all articles with a project banner.
(Some new and additional article talk pages may still require a banner however)
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Celebrations
Celebrations are in order this month as we reach a milestone in the project with 100 editions of the newsletter. It was way back in May 2008 when we introduced the monthly newsletter to project members and I hope that it is still useful to keep members informed of things that are going on in the project. Sometimes you wonder if there is any activity going on and what is happening to the articles in the scope of the project but slowly things are progressing. In May 2008 we only had 3,343 articles to look after, but today that is 12,795. Membership was 45 but is now 82, even though we had a cull of members who were no longer active during that period. Of our identified 15 top-level importance articles, 1 has been promoted to FA-class, 3 have been promoted to GA-class, 1 to B-class, 1 to C-class, while 1 has been demoted to GA-class and another to C-class, note that C-class did not exist in May 2008. We now have 40 FA-class articles and 16 FL-class lists compared to 9 FA-class articles and 7 FL-class lists in May 2008.
Congratulations to all who have helped along the way and be inspired to move things forward over the coming months.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The August 2016 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Delivered August 2016 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Wikipedia editor Jackson Peebles just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for creating this, but do you have any more information on this species? You seem to be an expert, and I think a few more sentences would be a great contribution. Thanks again!
To reply, leave a comment on Jackson Peebles's talk page.
Wikipedia editor Kudpung just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
reads like a list of awards. For a true biographical entry, this article really needs to be expanded with personal information, such as date and place of birth, education, and upbringing.
Wikipedia editor Oiyarbepsy just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Your article is missing what roles she's done as an actor and anything about her modeling work. It's only personal like which should be the least significant part of the article.
To reply, leave a comment on Oiyarbepsy's talk page.
Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Beware of inferring generalities from primary literature. You state "Extensively studied", which is not verified and may be subjective, and as far as we know from sources provided it has been studied in only 1 paper.
To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.
Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Please stop inferring generalities from very specific papers. Consulting a single other source would show the species is not only found in Manada Gap, Pennsylvania. Try citing field guides or "big picture" sources.
To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.
Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
May I ask how you choose your biographical subjects, in science or in general? Hopefully it is not solely by H-index on Scholar. Remember, it is your responsibility to demonstrate the significance of research, not merely mention that research exists.
To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 12,795 last month to 12,822 on 3 September). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 132 is ahead of WP:GM who have 85. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 62 out of a total number of 3,655 articles.
Currently we have forty Yorkshire featured articles:
As of 29 August 2016, we have assessed 100% of all articles with a project banner.
(Some new and additional article talk pages may still require a banner however)
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The September 2016 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Delivered September 2016 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
22:36, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Invitation to the African Destubathon
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hello, Mishae. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Latest comment: 7 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion
Since the previous unblock request was declined due to a block evasion but it was mentioned that I can apply for another one no earlier then January 18 (which is today), I have a faith that community will be generous to grant it because I followed all the rules while being blocked here.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I thoroughly analyzed that my behavior was despicable toward the whole community. I'm planning on writing and edit articles (not their talkpages). I know that I also lied to many of you and it was a stupid decision by me to trick all of you. I will not repeat those mistakes (please see a list bellow of what I will do differently). I'm asking for a 3rd time this wonderful community to let me join. I promise that I wont talk back to the admins and I will head the warnings. In fact, before I was blocked I learned when and when not to use WP:IAR, so you can see that I am improving. I also know that I shouldn't bother you with constant unblock requests, so that way a community can come to a consensus. While I admit that I did block evasion 6 months ago, it was only meant to show my competence. Now I spent another 6 months without a single block evasion which proves that I can and will follow the rules of this project.--Mishae (talk) 20:05, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only. This unblock request was insufficiently convincing such that no admin was inclined to respond in a month. You are welcome to make another unblock request. Yamla (talk) 13:48, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Since somebody told me, I should write it in detail, here:
I was not myself when I started to be disruptive after unblock (I was in process of breaking up with my girlfriend, and I got stressed). I should have took another month off but it came so sudden (adding to it college and all). Due to this suddenness I was so angry that I started to racially insult other editors without thinking about the rules (which is not very common with me). As for my sockpuppet accusations, I admit my wrong here too and it was not nice of me to do it because it too was in violation of our policies.
All of the actions that I did above were wrong because they all were in gross violation of our rules and guidelines, such as WP:Disruptive editing, WP:NPA, suckpuppetry and block evasion.
As for what I will do differently, I already moved couple of steps. Back when I was first blocked in April, I promised @Writ Keeper: not to use WP:IAR and I kept my word. After this block will expire, I will only do constructive edits because after a 2 year block I understood that such behavior was wrong, and if it will happen again, the ArbCom will be the next step. As for racial remarks, I will keep my mouth shut and will remain civil no matter what will happen. So, if admins will be generous to give me another chance, I will greatly improve myself and the community.--Mishae (talk) 20:05, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
The last log entry was simply the second reactivation of TPA to allow appealing. I have no comment on the appeal itself, and the user's relentless attempts to get me to unblock them about a year ago led me to block them on Skype, so I don't particularly wish to get involved again. Best of luck to the appellant and the responders. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉04:52, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
It's Salvidrim!'s decision weather to get involved or not (and I wont push), but I should mention that he never blocked me on Skype, just warned me that he might do so.--Mishae (talk) 06:35, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2016
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanislav Gribkov until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. XXN, 15:06, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 13,038 last month to 13,084 on 29th January). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 140 is ahead of WP:GM who have 85. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 62 out of a total number of 3,765 articles.
Currently we have forty three Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The February 2017 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered February 2017 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vladimir Sidorov until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. XXN, 22:03, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
You are banned from Wikipedia
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 13,084 last month to 13,185 on 28th February). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 140 is ahead of WP:GM who have 85. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 62 out of a total number of 3,785 articles.
Currently we have forty three Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The March 2017 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered March 2017 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
13:42, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Unblock request 3
Latest comment: 7 years ago27 comments6 people in discussion
Since the previous unblock request was declined due to a procedural reason by @Yamla: I'm inclined to resubmit it again!
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I thoroughly analyzed that my behavior was despicable toward the whole community. I'm planning on writing and edit articles (not their talkpages). I know that I also lied to many of you and it was a stupid decision by me to trick all of you. I will not repeat those mistakes (please see a list bellow of what I will do differently). I'm asking for a 3rd time this wonderful community to let me join. I promise that I wont talk back to the admins and I will head the warnings. In fact, before I was blocked I learned when and when not to use WP:IAR, so you can see that I am improving. I also know that I shouldn't bother you with constant unblock requests, so that way a community can come to a consensus. While I admit that I did block evasion 6 months ago, it was only meant to show my competence. Now I spent another 6 months without a single block evasion which proves that I can and will follow the rules of this project.--Mishae (talk) 19:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Since somebody told me, I should write it in detail, here:
I was not myself when I started to be disruptive after unblock (I was in process of breaking up with my girlfriend, and I got stressed). I should have took another month off but it came so sudden (adding to it college and all). Due to this suddenness I was so angry that I started to racially insult other editors without thinking about the rules (which is not very common with me). As for my sockpuppet accusations, I admit my wrong here too and it was not nice of me to do it because it too was in violation of our policies.
All of the actions that I did above were wrong because they all were in gross violation of our rules and guidelines, such as WP:Disruptive editing, WP:NPA, suckpuppetry and block evasion.
As for what I will do differently, I already moved couple of steps. Back when I was first blocked in April, I promised @Writ Keeper: not to use WP:IAR and I kept my word. After this block will expire, I will only do constructive edits because after a 2 year block I understood that such behavior was wrong, and if it will happen again, the ArbCom will be the next step. As for racial remarks, it wont happen again. So, if admins will be generous to give me another chance, I will greatly improve myself and the community.--Mishae (talk) 19:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
@Koavf: Well, I am currently edit a Tajik Wikipedia, but I am still longing to return, yet nobody wants me here for some reason. It sounds like every month I do an unblock request they pretend as they don't hear me.--Mishae (talk) 19:16, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
When and where did I make that remarkable statement? I can't find it anywhere, nor can I imagine why on earth I would say that. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 17:57, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Mishae, my suggestions to you were just that, suggestions. They're opinions gained from reading multitudes of block requests over the years. Even if you follow them to the letter it will still be up to the reviewing admin whether you will be unblocked or not. As it stands, many admins have reviewed your requests and declines to block. You have a couple of options left.
Ask ArbCom to look into your unblock request
ask that your unblock be reviewed by the community at WP:AN.
Accept that your indefinite block will stand for now and try again some time later in the year.
@Blackmane: Well, I sent some users an e-mail but I can't post anything at WP:AN because the system doesn't let me. Should I try to ask anonymously then? It will be in violation of a sockpuppet policy but I don't see other options. So far I will patiently wait for the ArbCom response (if any will follow). Waiting another year to be unblocked, for what? Because admins are busy with username changes and don't care about editors which are trying for a zillion time?--Mishae (talk) 21:53, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
One option is to use the {{helpme}} template to ask an admin to post your appeal to WP:AN. You must not evade your block to post. Alternatively, you can frame your appeal here on your talk page and ping me to post it to WP:AN on your behalf. However, I would remain neutral in the ensuing discussion. Blackmane (talk) 00:57, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Done I've also pinged all the admins and users who have commented on your talk page. The rest is up to the community to decide. Blackmane (talk) 01:40, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
To be impartial, I pinged everybody that had posted to your talk page after you were first blocked. Not doing so would be attempting to bias the discussion. Blackmane (talk) 03:18, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
@Blackmane: To be honest, Not doing so would be attempting to bias the discussion, not at all. Not pinging some editors that came to my talkpage just to cause hysteria and seeking favoritism from other admins wont make it biased, but that's my opinion. It will save me (and possibly you) some nerves as well.--Mishae (talk) 04:09, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
@Kudpung: And according to you I am not a part of this community? She is part of it because she is free and can do whatever she wants and I am blocked and need to keep my mouth shut! As long as she will continue to harass me, I will object to pinging her (at least on my talkpage). After she said lies and deceptions toward me, she didn't have sources to back those comments, but the tone was a harassing one from my view. So, please Kudpung, do not ping her here either. Thank you!--Mishae (talk) 04:09, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Mishae, your entire talk-page history contains the "sources to back those comments". You're just digging yourself in deeper, you realize? I was not going to oppose your unblock or even opine at all, but since you've now proven that you cannot disagree with someone without engaging in falsehoods and personal attacks, and that you revert to this behavior under the least bit of pressure, I will indeed oppose it now. Softlavender (talk) 04:19, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
@Softlavender: So first you harassed me throughout the whole block and now you will oppose my block just because you got insulted by my harassment allegations, really? The way how you sounding now is threatening to my unblock request. There are no falsehoods and personal attacks from my part. How would I talk about you without mentioning your name? Can you stop harassing and threatening me, please? What will make you to change your mind? I will encourage you to change it from oppose to neutral, just because I can't get along with one editor doesn't mean that I can't deal with others.--Mishae (talk) 04:50, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
@Softlavender: And please stop talking as if you are the only one in the community. I'm referring to your comment The community just does not have the manpower to babysit one editor's behavioral liabilities.--Mishae (talk) 04:43, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Mishae, I suggest you strike your question concerning Softlavender's real name. That can be construed as a violation of WP:OUTING. If you were not already indefinitely blocked, an admin would almost certainly indefinitely block you for that. Blackmane (talk) 04:45, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Do you understand @Softlavender: that I want to write articles, not just fiddle with species? And where did you got free websites from? I thought you need to pay for domain?--Mishae (talk) 07:44, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 13,185 last month to 13,234 on 28th March). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 139 is ahead of WP:GM who have 85. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 62 out of a total number of 3,792 articles.
Currently we have forty four Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Place list
This month I would like members to focus their attention on the List of places in Yorkshire article. It would be good that each time you look at an article on a place in Yorkshire that you also check if it is in the list article. You can easily get to the list article from a place article if it uses the {{Infobox UK place}} template as there is a link at the bottom of the template. If it is not present then add the appropriate link to the list.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The April 2017 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered April 2017 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
22:44, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2017
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SkyFallen Entertainment until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. VelellaVelella Talk 17:39, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 13,234 last month to 13,279 on 29th April). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 139 is ahead of WP:GM who have 85. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 62 out of a total number of 3,826 articles.
Currently we have forty five Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Snap general election
In addition to the usual local elections,
with the calling of a snap general election there will be a lot of changes required to articles over the coming couple of months to update the candidates and results for these in articles. There may be a set of new articles required for new MPs elected this time.
We also need to keep an eye out for any bias in articles about those standing for the election and to keep strict ballot paper order for the election results tables in the constituency articles before the results are know. We all have our views on this but we must remain as neutral as possible.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The May 2017 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered May 2017 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
21:44, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Stygodiaptomus
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 13,279 last month to 13,303 on 2nd June). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 139 is ahead of WP:GM who have 85. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 62 out of a total number of 3,842 articles.
Currently we have forty five Yorkshire featured articles:
As of 28 March 2017, we have assessed 100% of all articles with a project banner.
(Some new and additional article talk pages may still require a banner however)
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Snap general election
With the calling of a snap general election there will be a lot of changes required to articles over the coming month to update the candidates and results for these in articles. There may be a set of new articles required for new MPs elected this time.
We also need to keep an eye out for any bias in articles about those standing for the election and to keep strict ballot paper order for the election results tables in the constituency articles before the results are know. We all have our views on this but we must remain as neutral as possible.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The June 2017 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Delivered June 2017 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 13,303 last month to 13,367 on 29 June). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 139 is ahead of WP:GM who have 86. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 63 out of a total number of 3,856 articles.
Currently we have forty five Yorkshire featured articles:
As of 28 June 2017, we have assessed 100% of all articles with a project banner.
(Some new and additional article talk pages may still require a banner however)
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The July 2017 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Delivered July 2017 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Previous issue | Index | Next issue 
Done I've also pinged all the admins and users who have commented on your talk page. The rest is up to the community to decide. Blackmane (talk) 01:40, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Template:Stygodiaptomus has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:51, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
