Misterdoughty

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Henry Doughty (October 21)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/George Henry Doughty.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! —Anne Delong (talk) 00:38, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello! Misterdoughty, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/George Henry Doughty

Hello Misterdoughty. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "George Henry Doughty".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/George Henry Doughty}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 10:02, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Mark Lilley (musician) Official Image.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Mark Lilley (musician) Official Image.jpg, which you've attributed to Mark Johnson. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Lilley (musician) (February 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark Lilley (musician) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mark Lilley (musician), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 09:48, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Mark Lilley Official Image.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Mark Lilley Official Image.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:14, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Lilley (Songwriter) (May 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark Lilley (Songwriter) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mark Lilley (Songwriter), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 13:47, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating Wikipedia's Terms of Use by concealing a paid relationship with the subject of an article.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Yunshui ^雲_水 11:41, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Misterdoughty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

There is no paid relationship, concealed or otherwise, between me and the subject of the article. I was at school with Mark and after following his career for the last thirty-or-so years I created the page to celebrate and share his long and influential musical journey. Mark is aware that I'm creating his page as I've had to ask him for images, references and other source materials but in no way does an employer, client or affiliate relationship exist. No money or other inducements have been or will be exchanged and the only compensation I will receive for creating the article is the satisfaction of successfully having Mark's career noted in Wikipedia. I appreciate it has been an imperfectly written article which has required a few reviews so far and I have done my best to make each requested revision fit with Wikipedia's guidelines but I'm a Wikipedia content creation novice and certainly not someone who would (or should) be paid for doing this because, frankly, I'm not very good at it. The only other thing I can think of is that I'm also creating a new web page for Mark but again there is no paid relationship in that respect, it's just something I occasionally do for friends but if this is in any way a problem or suggests a paid relationship then I'm happy to add a disclosure to this effect, although it really wouldn't be accurate as the website was created as a gift for for Mark because his old website was rather outdated and not mobile friendly. I hope this helps to clarify that my relationship with the subject doesn't benefit or compensate me in any way and is sufficient to remove the block. Thanks. Misterdoughty (talk) 23:13, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Only one open request is needed at a time. I will leave your other one open. SQL^{Query me!} 01:37, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock discussion and other things

Squeeze it dry and shake it out, and you still have a conflict of interest. As to information provided by the subject, no, please, no thank you. We do not want information provided by the subject. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. We need verifiable information from reliable sources with a reputation for fact checking that are unconnected with the subject. Please review WP:MUSIC, the notability guideline for articles about music related subjects. We are not here to "celebrate" the subject. Perhaps it would be best it you consider WP:alternative outlets.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:10, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Misterdoughty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dlohcierekim, I really can't argue with your reply, thank you for being specific about my failings. It was so much easier to comprehend and infinitely less painful to read than the original suggestion that I was being paid to create the page. A quick change of perspective later and It's probably best if I stick to reading articles, rather than attempting to create them. I'm genuinely sorry for crossing so many lines and and completely understand the need for not only the reality check but also the slap on the wrist, although I would be extremely grateful if the block duration could be reduced from 'Indefinite' to 'Some time in the future, long after Andrew's catastrophic attempt to create a page has vanished into the depths of history'. I promise never to attempt to re-create this page and to be more meticulous in understanding and complying with Wikipedia's terms of use in future. Thanks again, Misterdoughty (talk) 21:47, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining this request. You seem to state that you will only read Wikipedia from now on, if that is the case, you don't need to be unblocked as a block does not affect your ability to read Wikipedia, only to edit it. "Indefinite" does not mean "forever"; it only means "until we can be assured there will be no more disruption". If you do wish to be a productive editor, you may make a new unblock request that indicates that you have read and understand WP:COI, declare any COI that you have, and indicate what productive edits you intend to make. 331dot (talk) 08:24, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Lilley (Songwriter) (May 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark Lilley (Songwriter) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mark Lilley (Songwriter), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bradv 04:44, 24 May 2018 (UTC)