User talk:Mlazarus14/sandbox

The content in your section is informative and really connects to Russian fairy tales. Both sections give a great background regarding the topics you chose to write about. I would just suggest adding more citations to your section and fixing some of the grammatical errors within the paragraphs. Other than that, it's really well done. Amayarz (talk) 02:13, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Overall a really good job! You did a really good job content-wise. You provided useful information for both topics. I would suggest adding more citations, especially for the first section where there aren't any. If you used the same source for both you should cite both at the end of each section with the same source. Also, there are a few grammatical errors that can be easily fixed. --Dmastronardi (talk) 03:30, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

I think that you did a great job and that you have really interesting sections here! I would say to add more links in the first section and to fix some of your sentence structure/grammar in the other section. Montananelson (talk) 14:21, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Explain what "with numbers 300-749" is in the Structural Analysis paragraph. Sallyfried (talk) 14:24, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

I think the first sentence of the section "influences" needs some rewording. And Propp's 31 functions should probably be listed. Otherwise, you have some great and interesting information! Maddywright (talk) 14:25, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

I think you should add more information under Analysis. 1oromo (talk) 14:38, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

This was written and organized really well. More information could be included under your analysis portion, and you are missing some commas throughout. Your use of internal links is good also.Caranlee (talk) 14:40, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

This article is good so far, but it seems like it still needs some work. Some sections like the "analysis," or the "31 functions," are undone. Adding to these would complete your article. Additionally, there seems to be a lack of links. Adding links would improve this article a lot. Samwolff450 (talk) 14:41, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

You have a lot of resourceful information with a good amount of links but you might want to find more sources because you only have three at the moment. I like the use of imagery as well. Charlieaabrams (talk) 14:42, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Don't forget to add a comma after freedom in the Influences section: "This separation, combined with increased artistic freedom led Russians to develop techniques that were effective at creating dramatic and interesting stories". In the last sentence, you should reword it and not start the sentence with "And". Did you mean to add a table after "Propp's 31 functions are"? If so, don't forget to fill it out with information or delete it if you don't need it. It caused me a bit of confusion. rebxlee (talk) 14:44, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

I think for the amount of content you have it may be helpful to have more citations and sources. The first section can be edited to eliminate extra words and add commas around some phrases. Also, I think more dates could be added, such as when Propp completed his analysis, and when the communist era in Russia occurred. Mtatherton18 (talk) 14:46, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

I think you could merge this sentence with another in the first paragraph or expand it: They distinguish the genre of Russian fairy tales. Adding more sources would be good due to the sheer amount of information that you have. --Ghurley1 (talk) 14:49, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Yo. are you kidding me. Marisa you suck. this is terrible cmon get it togetherMlazarus14 (talk) 21:14, 4 April 2019 (UTC)