Moc trojan

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Moc trojan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 09:29, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

The Society of the Seven

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Society of the Seven, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://wikibin.org/articles/the-society-of-the-seven.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:05, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on The Society of the Seven requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Society of the Seven. I suspect many of the other secret-society pages you recreated after their deletion suffer from the same problems that are mentioned on that Articles for deletion page. You might want to fix them ASAP, lest they all be deleted and your time be for naught. DMacks (talk) 16:04, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Adelphic Club

The article Adelphic Club has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, dubious notability. A college social club that exists at one campus.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Durova³¹¹ 19:13, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Park Avenue Synagogue

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Park Avenue Synagogue, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.pasyn.org/index.php?page=3. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:16, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Park Avenue Synagogue

The article Park Avenue Synagogue has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Direct copy of this and does not appear to be notable (mentioned in sources, but nothing substantial).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mm40 (talk) 21:19, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

September 2009

Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Park Avenue Synagogue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mm40 (talk) 21:27, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Park Avenue Synagogue. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:33, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

October 2009

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Society of the Seven. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Eeekster (talk) 03:42, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Society of the Seven

A tag has been placed on Society of the Seven requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 03:43, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Society of the Seven, you will be blocked from editing. Eeekster (talk) 03:43, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Jonathan Cohen (vintner)

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Jonathan Cohen (vintner). Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Liberal-Conservative Judaism

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Liberal-Conservative Judaism. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liberal-Conservative Judaism. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Cupola Club

I have nominated Cupola Club, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cupola Club. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. PGPirate 23:37, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Delta Pi Delta

The article Delta Pi Delta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Local frat. Improvement templates repeatedly removed.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 00:28, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Jonathan Cohen (vintner) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jonathan Cohen (vintner) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Cohen (vintner) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JohnCD (talk) 11:46, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Delta Pi Delta for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Delta Pi Delta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delta Pi Delta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Naraht (talk) 19:25, 11 June 2024 (UTC)