Monkeynuts2008
Rhondda Cynon Taff move
editThis is not a cut and dry move. It should be met by consensus on the talk page first. This is an ongoing argument that must be made by a larger group if individuals. Thank you. FruitMonkey (talk) 18:19, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Then start a discussion under the Rhondda Cynon Taff talk page, and reach a consensus. I'm not disagreeing that the page may need to be moved, but lets do it properly. Thanks FruitMonkey (talk) 19:16, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Matthew Nuthall, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.ponty.net/nuthall-matthew. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:16, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Pontypridd RFC
editHave a look at the article, it's not brilliant, but it keeps the images together and shows a sort of evolution. Please undo if you don't think it works. Cheers FruitMonkey (talk) 18:02, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
- I think you will need to go back to the rugby union project page, the problem is there appears to be nobody categorising at present. I must have produced over 300 rugby articles, and these just ain't stubs, but I'm more likely to have them categorised by cross over projects like the Military teams (Matthew Mullineux, Norman Biggs and Hugh Llewellyn Glyn Hughes). You may have better luck with WikiProject Wales. Look for active members and ask them specifically if they can have a quick look. I'm a bit close to the article to feel comfortable to rate myself. Cheers, FruitMonkey (talk) 09:05, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
- I've had a look at all the various templates available for the football kits available http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Football_kit/pattern_list but I think what is there presently is actually the closest to the new kits. If you need to get closer, you may need to make your own. I'm really not that artistic. FruitMonkey (talk) 22:55, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:CelticWarriors-Logo.jpg
edit Thank you for uploading File:CelticWarriors-Logo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 00:58, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
- Have a look at the Cross Keys RFC image I uploaded, the fair use rationale I used on that should apply to the Celtic Warrior image. Any problems, drop me a line and I'll give you a hand. Also if you tell me how you want the jersey's to look like I'll try to find the best fit possible. FruitMonkey (talk) 07:42, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks again FruitMonkey, that's good advice. I've made the amendments, hopefully it'll be adhered to.--Monkeynuts2008 (talk) 08:51, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Fox and Hounds Inn, Llanhari
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Fox and Hounds Inn, Llanhari requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. FunkyCanute (talk) 13:51, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
October 2011
edit
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you have been adding your signature to some of your edits to articles, such as the edit you made to Fox and Hounds Inn, Llanhari. This is a common mistake to make and has probably already been corrected. There is no need to sign your edits to article content, as the article's edit history serves the function of attributing contributions, so you only need to use your signature to make discussions more readable, such as on article talk pages or project pages such as the Village Pump. If you would like further information about distinguishing types of pages, please see What is an article?. Again, thank you for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 16:05, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Fox and Hounds Inn, Llanhari
edit If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Fox and Hounds Inn, Llanhari, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 16:05, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
You'd better have a look at this before you say the Fox and Hounds was where they were discovered... I wish the pub luck, but don't think this is enough to save the article. Peridon (talk) 19:24, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
editHi. When you recently edited Owen Williams (rugby player), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gwent and Blackwood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you. All fixed.--Monkeynuts2008 (talk) 12:49, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Your invitation to participate in a Wikimedia-approved survey in online behavior.
editHello, my name is Michael Tsikerdekis[1][2], currently involved as a student in full time academic research at Masaryk University. I am writing to you to kindly invite you to participate in an online survey about interface and online collaboration on Wikipedia. The survey has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Foundation Research Committee.
I am contacting you because you were randomly selected from a list of active editors. The survey should take about 7 to 10 minutes to complete, and it is very straightforward.
Wikipedia is an open project by nature. Let’s create new knowledge for everyone! :-)
To take part in the survey please follow the link: tsikerdekis.wuwcorp.com/pr/survey/?user=54421042 (HTTPS).
Best Regards, --Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 12:04, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
PS: The results from the research will become available online for everyone and will be published in an open access journal.
UPDATE: This is the second and final notification for participating in this study. Your help is essential for having concrete results and knowledge that we all can share. I would like to thank you for your time and as always for any questions, comments or ideas do not hesitate to contact me. PS: As a thank you for your efforts and participation in Wikipedia Research you will receive a Research Participation Barnstar after the end of the study. --Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 19:14, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
|
Research Participation Barnstar | |
| For your participation in the survey for Anonymity and conformity on the internet. Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 13:57, 8 March 2012 (UTC) |
Nomination of Owen Williams (producer) for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Owen Williams (producer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owen Williams (producer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 04:04, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Ben Phillips (rugby union) for deletion
edit The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Phillips (rugby union) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.