Mralrayz999
Welcome!
editHello, Mralrayz999, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.
There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! EvergreenFir (talk) 23:06, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
I don't enjoy ignorance. Just not even a slight of it. I have come to en-wikipedia to check out the pages that mention history of the Turks, as I, myself is a one. And I am driven out of my mind that I have to witness this incredible ignorance. Those propaganda fullfilled sources that are taking as basis to form an article about a nation's history is far beyond the stupidity. I've done my bachelor of a/s on history at Istanbul University. I had one of the best professors across the middle east and best possible classes on the history of turks. Aforementioned article "history of Turkish people", how it is branded and published, is a disgrace to wikipedia, and it's reability as an encyclopedia. Turkish history is not something that one can claim authority of being a writer on over one of the most visited global encyclopedia. I have every right to report a detail of this issue to the Turkish national directorate of communications, which in a case I shall support the banning of wikipedia in Turkey. This is just not a simple mistake, or it is something that can ignored. You(Editors) are adressing the worldwide audience through the aforementioned article that is a history of a 80 million nation. We, as Turkey, take our history seriously at anywhere at any costs and it's this important for us to not let it be raided over with a bunch of black propaganda.
Mralrayz999 (talk) 23:47, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- Wikipedia reflects reliable sources on topics. These sources may conflict with our personal views, but we as editors should not inject out views into the article. Please use the talk page to present reliable sources to support your suggested edits. EvergreenFir (talk) 01:40, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
ANI
edit
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. FDW777 (talk) 12:35, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
There is a undeniable pro persian propaganda in en wikipedia. Either ban them from editing turkish pages or we will take action! This comes from Ayyıldız Tim. Mralrayz999 (talk) 12:40, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
January 2022
edit
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Wikaviani. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:54, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 13:04, 28 January 2022 (UTC)