Mrjphillip
February 2008
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Pedophilia, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Pedophilia was changed by Mrjphillip (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2008-02-13T22:45:40+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 22:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
The recent edit you made to Pedophilia constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Snowolf How can I help? 22:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC))
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to List of Latter Day Saints, you will be blocked from editing. Alanraywiki (talk) 23:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Alanraywiki may be offensive or unwelcome. If you are the user, please log in under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Mysdaao talk 00:06, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at User talk:Gillyweed, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:48, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Slang
edit"Wikipedia is not a dictionary, usage or jargon guide. Wikipedia articles are not:... Usage guides or slang and idiom guides.". Pretty obvious to me. --NeilN talk ♦ contribs 22:23, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
you're a douche... it is not a slang guide it is an article containing slangMrjphillip (talk) 22:24, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Mrjphillip (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was framed
Decline reason:
Clearly not, the edits were indeed made with this account. — Yamla (talk) 22:40, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hi, the recent edit you made to User talk:NeilN has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. J.delanoygabsadds 19:07, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
The recent edit you made to Vagina constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. J.delanoygabsadds 19:09, 25 February 2008 (UTC))