Mrycraft
Welcome!
Hello, Mrycraft, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Vaniac 23:16, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thank you. Brian W 23:53, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Your links are spam, you seem like you are just promoting yourself or someone near to you. Brian W 23:53, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
January 2010
editI have restored the article, which was deleted under the WP:Proposed deletion process, where an article is deleted if a PROD template is uncontested after seven days. I apologise that you were not notified when the template was placed; however, even after deletion a PRODded article is restored automatically on request. I will notify user Deskford (talk · contribs), who PRODded it, in case he wishes to nominate it under the WP:Articles for deletion process, which would start a discussion, normally lasting seven days, where any user can contribute and your views would be welcome.
The reason given for the PROD was "No evidence of notability. Appears to be self-promotion." Here are some links which may be helpful:
- WP:Notability, a requirement to have a Wikipedia article, which is not a matter of subjective opinion but needs to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Myspace, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and press releases. More detail at WP:Notability (people) and, for musical composers and performers, WP:CREATIVE and WP:MUSICBIO.
- WP:Autobiography
- WP:Conflict of interest
- WP:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest
Regards, JohnCD (talk) 12:41, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Rhythmology
edit
I have nominated Rhythmology, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhythmology. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Deskford (talk) 16:30, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
The above is the standard Wikipedia blurb in relation to a proposed deletion. Apologies for not notifying you when I first nominated the article. Do please look through the links JohnCD (talk · contribs) has added above, and feel free to contribute to the discussion. --Deskford (talk) 16:30, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Nikita borisoglebsky, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.lco.co.uk/IsolatedStorage/702be3af-760d-4ddc-895b-26bd062574f0/RenderSystem/Gateway/Core/?oid=a7f28910-1280-413c-8e31-ed123cef069e&lid=8ad81192-36c4-4e4a-95bb-d5efa82febbf.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 17:19, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
The article Nikita borisoglebsky has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Jared Preston (talk) 15:13, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
March 2011
edit
Your addition to Nikita borisoglebsky has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Shell babelfish 19:47, 5 March 2011 (UTC)