Ms.Aloisia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jim Kalafat (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vanderwaalforces were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jim Kalafat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:31, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Ms.Aloisia! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:31, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

@Vanderwaalforces Thank you for such a quick response to my submission.

There are Gladiators, who have live pages, however, they have fewer to no sources on their pages. For example, Raye Hollitt, Danny Lee Clark (No Sources), Sha-ri Pendleton (1 Source cited), Mark Tucker (all sources are unreliable, also have a tag), Shannon Hall etc. I am not questioning your judgment, nor do I mean any offense, I am just trying to understand the "qualifies for a Wikipedia article", as in my opinion, Jim Kalafat has gained his coverage over time, in my humble opinion, and after looking into the ones who don't have pages, Jim is much more notable than his peers, who have a live page, or not.

I apologize if anything is offensive, I am just trying to make my understanding clear. Kindy, guide me in this regard. Thank you.

P.S. I accessed the list from the page of American Gladiators.

Thank you, again. Ms.Aloisia (talk) 19:55, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

@Ms.Aloisia Hi there, those pages you mentioned, they are nothing but what I call problem pages. You see any article that has a tag on it's top, it is just a problem page that might never get fixed or that might take almost forever before someone decides to fix it. So, I won't want this new draft to be like that too. Just, go back to the draft, add more accurate and reliable sources, specifically, add the missing citations, the (citation needed) parts, and when you're done and confident that it is good to go, resubmit it, ping me here, I will come to check it. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:57, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

@Vanderwaalforces ok. Thank you.

Just one more thing, in the comment you have mentioned "Submission is improperly sourced and athlete". As per the information, I was able to collect, he is a former athlete, and although, the information about his football career is more, his notability is based on his career as a Gladiator. Although, I did find a lot of sources which would expand on his Gladiator career, however, I was afraid, that it might hurt the tone of the article.

Would it be acceptable, if I remove all the information, that requires citation, and resubmit?

Thank you! Ms.Aloisia (talk) 22:12, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

In the lead, Jim Kalafat (also known as Jim Starr) is an American athlete, actor, and producer., I want to urge you to see the notability guideline for athletes at WP:NATHLETE, for actors at WP:NACTOR, and for producers at WP:NPRODUCER, see if this subject can pass any of them, if they can significantly pass notability as an actor, then prove it, if athlete, then prove it and so on. If you try your best and can't prove it, I'd urge you to chill out and wait till the subjects becomes significantly notable. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:29, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Already chill... I do understand that not everything can be done correctly in the first go, there is always room to learn and grow. thank you for you help. Hopefully, I with community's help, I will be able to improve.

I will go through, what you have sent. Thank you. Ms.Aloisia (talk) 22:39, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jim Kalafat has been accepted

Jim Kalafat, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 07:59, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Piet Cremers has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Piet Cremers. Thanks! Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 00:02, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your notification. Ms.Aloisia (talk) 18:31, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your suggestions. I will see to it that they are done. Thank you. Ms.Aloisia (talk) 18:33, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Piet Cremers has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Piet Cremers. Thanks! Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 18:59, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Piet Cremers has been accepted

Piet Cremers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 22:38, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. :) Ms.Aloisia (talk) 22:57, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Bettina Rodriguez Aguilera for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bettina Rodriguez Aguilera is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bettina Rodriguez Aguilera until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fhektii (talk) 12:23, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Ms.Aloisia,

I just wanted to let you know that this editor has been blocked for sockpuppetry. I think that the AFD discussion will continue though and you are invited to participate in it if you haven't already. But I thought I'd let you know because you posted a comment on this editor's talk page.

If you have questions about editing on Wikipedia or COI guidelines, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:49, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello @Liz Thank you so much for your response, I have already commented at AFD, in length, and I did brought them to the Teahouse, and I am very grateful to find support there in detail. Thank you so much. Ms.Aloisia (talk) 23:59, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Streak for the Cash

The article Streak for the Cash has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unambiguous advertisement, none of the sources are in reference to the article, but something similarly named.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Q ^{T C} 23:25, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Streak for the Cash

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Streak for the Cash, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:59, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Antioch Pizza for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Antioch Pizza is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antioch Pizza until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

💥Casualty ^{• Hop along. •} 20:38, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

John M. Eger moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to John M. Eger. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. S0091 (talk) 15:12, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:EuphonyRandolph per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EuphonyRandolph. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Vanamonde93 (talk) 03:57, 18 August 2024 (UTC)