Welcome!

edit
Hello, Mtsvec! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking   if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 00:48, 11 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

April 2011

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page University of Illinois Observatory has been reverted.
Your edit here to University of Illinois Observatory was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.facebook.com/U.of.Illinois.Observatory) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:48, 11 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Regarding the material you've been trying to add to this article, I have little doubt that know or believe it to be true, but we need to have a source which confirms the actual statements which you're attempting to add, Thus, you want to add the name "Bart Bok" to "Harvard's Star Counting Circuit", but I see nothing in the Bart Bok article to confirm this, so it's going to need tobe sourced. Then, you want to add the names of two people as students of Robert Baker, but what you provided is a paper by them about Perseus -- does that paper say that they were Baker's students? Then there's the question of why Baker's students should be in an article about a specific observatory -- did they use the observatory in their published work? All these questions need to be answered, and supported with citations -- that's how Wikipedia works. BMK (talk) 02:48, 3 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Please don't email me, keep this discussion on-Wiki. If you'd like, I can copy your text here. BMK (talk) 20:54, 3 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Non-free rationale for File:JoelStebbins.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:JoelStebbins.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:50, 20 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prairie Observatory (November 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 22:15, 7 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Prairie Observatory

edit
 

Hello, Mtsvec. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Prairie Observatory".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 14:08, 21 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prairie Observatory

edit
 
The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 04:15, 18 June 2016 (UTC)Reply