User talk:Mvcg66b3r/Archives/2019/January

KOSA-TV

Seeing as you don't live locally, you shouldn't have reverted anything. CBS 7 announced 3 weeks ago that KTLE Telemundo 20 would be joining the Grey family stations in January. They also announced that all the news anchors from KTLE would be kept the same and that Channel 20 would become available on the KOSA subchannels. Please note they specifically said KTLE Telemundo 20.

Then today they released this chart on their website. As you can see they announce the addition of 3 stations (Ion, CW, and Telemundo) including Telemundo on 2 different feeds with a HD and SD feed. It also announces they will still have MyNetwork and H&I. It's nothing that's speculative. It is what has been announced by the station live on television. Bigddan11 (talk) 02:44, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

As I have said on your talk page, there's no way seven subchannels (three of them HD) could fit onto KOSA's bandwidth. 7.5–7.7 are most likely KTLE, which is its own station with its own transmitter. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 02:50, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Actually you have no knowledge of what is going on here. KTLE hasn't been it's own station in quite some time. It hasn't had it's own tower since it merged with KWES back in 2014. That's why KWES aired KTLE (Telemundo 20) on 9.2. They are the only station that still has a SD channel available, which is why they are going to have both a SD and HD channel available on Channel 7. It'll be the first time they actually have a HD Channel here in the Permian Basin. What has happened is Grey Media acquired Raycom Media Alabama, and with it they acquired all the NewsWest 9 stations. As has been outlined they are selling NewsWest 9 and keeping it separate, but they kept all the other assets, including translator KWAB. What they have done over the past 3 months is set up a second set of antennas on their towers that has actually increased their digital output from 4 stations to 9 stations on KOSA, so they have the room you claim they don't. They have kept their digital output for Big Spring the same, at 4 stations, and they are going to use the newly acquired KWAB signal for the other three stations in Big Spring. However they have made it where are 7 stations will be able to air on Channel 7 in Odessa/Midland.Bigddan11 (talk) 03:28, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

But KTLE has its own license. It's an analog LPTV, but it will be flash-cut to digital. That LPTV will be home to 7.5, 7.6 and 7.7. Full-power KOSA will have 7.1, 7.2, 7.3 and 7.4. They'll be using the same virtual channel, but on different RF channels (just like KMSP/WFTC and KSTP/KSTC in Minneapolis). Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:33, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

No, you're mistaken. I actually just did a channel rescan. Guess what, we also have a 7-8 available. 7-8 is airing KOSA (SD). So they are available as CBS 7 outlined on the very stations they outlined.Bigddan11 (talk) 03:41, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

This 7.8 must be coming from KTLE, just like 7.5-7.7. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:46, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

added comment

Didn't Change the Date

Thanks for the credit, I guess, but I only made an unimportant change to one word and didn't change any dates. Good eyes though. bobdog54 (talk) 01:41, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

File:New KPBS logo 2019.svg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

File:New KPBS logo 2019 (2).png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:05, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:New KPBS logo 2019.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:New KPBS logo 2019.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:32, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019

Received your inquiry of the correct information necessary to the page WBXX-TV. The system by which Wikipedia requires sources is much too complicated for non-Wikipedia academia. I am not a student of that confusing process. Why do additions for source verification information have to be so difficult to post for articles as proof?

That being said, I have a page attachment from Television and Cable Factbook, Volume 74, ISBN: 1-57696-058-7 published yearly by Warren Communications for calendar year 2006. The television page listing for Crossville, in the state of Tennessee under WBXX-TV, clearly lists a history for the station, that verifies the information change that needed to be made for WBXX-TV. Again, because of the complicated method of adding source information to a Wikipedia page, I did not know how to add it. If you need me to email the attachment to you, I can do that. The attachment supports proof of the change necessary for WBXX-TV. The previous information listing for that television station is wrong without the corrections. I await the method of either sending the attachment for station WBXX-TV to you, or somehow wading through the confusing, complicated, and somewhat ridiculous way of attaching the reference point for WBXX-TV's history.

---

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CECE:C50:55F5:98EB:BDB7:C33F (talk) 16:39, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

File:O Sétimo Guardião logo.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:07, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Thank you

For reminding me why I left Wikipedia! under my original user name, over in 2004. I am in the process of deleting other contributions I have made. There is a certain insanity in trying to make articles more user friendly with the like of you about to sktrike it out without courtesy of discussion. I will leave Wikipedia, far smarter. WWYFW, eh? Sjkoblentz (talk) 03:04, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Forgive me for disagreeing, but the method to contributing to Wikipedia is not as easy as you indicate. For years, I made corrections to erroneous information by either copying the edit style that others have done, or waiting for editors like you to find my additions, questioning them, then accepting the proof that I send to them, and then they added the sources to the corrections, simply because they know how their system operates. I am not a Wikipedia editor, I am only a source who has correct information.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CECE:C50:55F5:98EB:BDB7:C33F (talk) 17:36, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Feel free to disagree all you want. It doesn't make me wrong. And no, in this case, you didn't have correct information, instead your removed correct information. And you did it becuase you felt that the article provided enough back information, which it did, but not in a user friendly fashion. So when you revert factual edits without find out why they were made, you do make yourself an editor. In any event, I am out of here. Sjkoblentz (talk) 23:24, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

FCC.gov

You need to check fcc website for KTBO-TV and KWHB-TV. It said on the website.

@Delcity: Per this entry on KTBO, the 7.9 kW CP is clearly for an auxiliary/backup facility (DX). As for KWHB, why would they greatly reduce OTA coverage? Before / After Mvcg66b3r (talk) 21:15, 30 January 2019 (UTC)