Myopia123

March 2008

Thanks for experimenting with the page Pakistan on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. SMS ^Talk 20:52, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Rahulgandhipic.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Rahulgandhipic.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Rahulgandhipic.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Relata refero (disp.) 18:40, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Indian_Peacekeepers.gif

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Indian_Peacekeepers.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 02:38, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

File:Mumbai 809497988.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

• File:Mumbai 809497988.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 22:38, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Mumbai 809497988.jpg

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:Mumbai 809497988.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you.

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Manoj Kumar Pandey

added links pointing to Captain and KIA

Vikram Batra

added links pointing to Captain and KIA

Jadu Nath Singh

added a link pointing to Naik

Piru Singh

added a link pointing to KIA

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Capitalisation

Please note that it has long since been agreed on Wikipedia that military ranks should not be capitalised unless they are before someone's name. -- Necrothesp (talk) 21:50, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Havildar may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• in the [[Indian Army]] with the duties being taken up by the [[Junior Commissioned Officers]].<ref>{{cite web|title=Indian army ranks|title=Rules of the Raj hindering havildars' promotion|publisher=

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:39, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mumbai 809497988.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Mumbai 809497988.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 16:51, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Army ranks and insignia of India

added links pointing to Captain and Naik

Manoj Kumar Pandey

added a link pointing to Operation Vijay

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Karam Singh Portrait.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Karam Singh Portrait.jpg, which you've attributed to http://www.indianarmy.gov.in/Site/FormTemplete/frmPhotoGalleryWithMenuWithTitle.aspx?MnId=NCvnix4zLfQhf90l3OuEBw%3d%3d&ParentID=1tHir3NYQjroCJ9AgypEwg%3d%3d. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. James ^{(T • C)} • 1:21pm • 02:21, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

It says clearly that the image is being used under Fair Use. Similar to File:Param veer chakra.gif. I don't understand why permission is needed.

September 2014

Hello, I'm M.O.X. I noticed that you made a comment on the page File_talk:Karam_Singh.jpg that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. James ^{(T • C)} • 1:28pm • 02:28, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hoshier Singh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NEFA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		I want to give you this to thank you for your non-stop hard work on the article Jihadi John. It is users like you, who "make these articles happen". JhonsJoe (talk) 02:29, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ashok Chakra Award, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Naik. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

Your recent editing history at Yogendra Singh Yadav shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Note that my removal of the image as a clear NFCC violation is expressly exempted from 3RR restrictions. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 22:42, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to a page, specifically Yogendra Singh Yadav, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 22:42, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Indian military decorations may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• All three branches issue Commendations Cards at the level of the highest officer ([[Chief of the Army Staff (India)|Chief of the Army Staff]], [[Chief of the Naval Staff (India)|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:11, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ghatak Force, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shock Troops. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	You truly deserve this shiny star for your hard work at the Indian Navy related articles and images!! Cheers! ƬheStrikeΣagle 15:08, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United Nations peacekeeping, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Move request for 2014 shootings at Parliament Hill, Ottawa

FYI, a move of 2014 shootings at Parliament Hill, Ottawa has been formally requested. I'd invite you to submit your comments. --Natural R_X 17:38, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bana Singh Portrait.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bana Singh Portrait.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:52, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sanjay Kumar Portrait.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sanjay Kumar Portrait.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:56, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

November 2014

Hi, your edit to Imran Khan has been reverted, just keep in mind, here is not personal rules applicable, one infobox is appropriate as the standards of encyclopedia. Subject is not any more a cricketer, if you want to read yourself, create an article in which you can add all history of his scores. You have to reach a WP:consensus per Due and undue weight instead. I hope this helps. Justice007 (talk) 16:02, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring at Imran Khan

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

• Hello Myopia123. You are now up to three reverts on the infobox. One more revert and you will have broken WP:3RR. Your statement about addition of information not needing consensus is incorrect. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 01:29, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello EdJohnston (talk). My contribution to the article in question meets ALL of wikipedia's guidelines regarding WP:BLP, WP:OR, WP:NPOV and WP:Verifiability. You can read it in detail if you go through the talk page. The person deleting it is violating WP:NPOV. Myopia123 (talk) 01:33, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Your opinion that the other editor is violating NPOV does not grant you an exemption from the WP:Edit warring policy. When there is a dispute, there is no substitute for a discussion. The conflicting parties are expected to have the patience and the skills needed to resolve their conflict. EdJohnston (talk) 01:38, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi EdJohnston (talk). Absolutely. Point taken. As you can see from the Talk Page, I have given multiple points in great detail. The lack of discussion has been from the other party. Myopia123 (talk) 01:40, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

The ingenuity of your discussion risks confusing you on the probable result. If you revert again (prior to getting consensus) you will most likely be blocked. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 01:46, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Well, EdJohnston (talk), as I said in the talk page, my next step will be to initiate an RfC. Not a revert.Myopia123 (talk) 01:53, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Ging, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:59, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Intestar

		The Barnstar of Integrity
		Yep its an unashamedly biased award gift lol but I really respect that you stepped at the most recent ISIL upset. Thanks for the timely intervention. Gregkaye ✍♪ 21:41, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

Talkback

Hello, Myopia123. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 15:41, 21 November 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Stefan2 (talk) 15:41, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Edit warring and BLP violations. Mediaite is not an RS, and calling him "office go fuck yourself" is a problem Gaijin42 (talk) 18:14, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 India–Pakistan border skirmishes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Northern Command. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 30 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the MARCOS page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:46, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Yogendra Yadav Portrait.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Yogendra Yadav Portrait.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 02:24, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yogesh Kumar Joshi has been accepted

Yogesh Kumar Joshi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Onel5969 (talk) 14:50, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Arbitration Enforcement warning: WP:NEWBLPBAN

The following thread[1] was closed at WP:AE wherein you, along with 3 other users, have been admonished for conduct incompatible with WP:BATTLE on pages covered by WP:BLP and thus WP:NEWBLPBAN. In particular the interaction between you and User:Factchecker_atyourservice is noted as the locus of the issue here.
All 4 users are reminded that casting unfounded aspersions about other editors or misrepresenting their communications is unhelpful. Furthermore Factchecker_atyourservice is singled out for ad hominem remarks. Please note that recidivism will result in escalating sanctions. Multiple avenues of dispute resolution are open to resolving disputes productively (rather than trying to “win” by excluding the other) and without breaching the rules. You are all strongly advised to avoid making any personal remarks about other editors, speculating on their intentions or making value judgments about their contributions--Cailil ^talk 13:09, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Visit : Talk:Kargil War

Visit : Talk:Kargil War — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.62.219.125 (talk) 08:55, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Visit Talk:Kargil War

Visit Talk:Kargil War Tejas MRCA (talk) 15:48, 2 July 2015 (UTC) Tejas MRCA (talk) 15:48, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		I want to give you this to thank you for your non-stop hard work on the article Kargil war. Shrikanthv (talk) 07:21, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Comment on Talk:Indo-Pakistani War of 1971

Hello user, you and me were recently involved in edit war on Indo-Pakistani War of 1971. So I have started discussion on Talk:Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 regarding content dispute. Kindly comment on talk page and provide reliable sources for the changes that you want to make. Thank you.--Human  11:03, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

You are the one making changes Human . You provide the sources Myopia123 (talk) 11:15, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

You should provide sources for "Decisive Bangladesh Victory" because you are adding it when it was not there earlier. I will wait for few hours and will wait for your reply on talk page and your sources, if you fail to provide sources for your edits then I will restore original version. Hope you are aware about discretionary sanctions. Thank you. --Human  11:24, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

DS alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--Human  11:27, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Kindly review this edit

Hello,

I am not a regular editor in wikipedia. In fact, I don't know how to edit. I was checking a page you edited and was feeling unsure about the usefulness of one particular edit by someone else. (I hope I am doing this right.)

Would you be kind enough to review this edit? I think it needs a review.

Please ascertain if the material deleted has any useful or salvageable information. Thanks,

117.214.3.116 (talk) 11:08, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Myopia123. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Myopia123. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Myopia123. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

March 2019

Hello, I'm Störm. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Abhinandan Varthaman seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Störm (talk) 09:05, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

HiStörm, I disagree with you 100% and I see that your edits have also since been reverted.Myopia123 (talk) 20:41, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:11 Gorkha Rifles Logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:11 Gorkha Rifles Logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 30 March 2022 (UTC)