Welcome!

Hello, Mystupidstory! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 14:56, 28 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Important Notice

edit

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 09:09, 4 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Signature

edit

Hi, you can just type four tildes "~~~~" like so for an automated signature. You can also customize it, see WP:SIGNATURE. Best regards, SerChevalerie (talk) 19:40, 5 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for pointing your facts on biased article 2020 Delhi riots

edit

This article is written with a biased attitude and has gathered global condemnation on multiple platforms. However the clan of Doug Weller, SerChevalerie, Fouler & Fouler, Slatersteven, Kautilya3, 331dot and El_C are part of a clan who moves in a flock and with utmost no shame counters any independent contributor across world suppressing truth. They bypass reliable source and create a narration of sources which suits their propaganda. Many have asked them to quote from leading reputed newspaper and online news-portal e.g. BBC, TimeNow, TOI, NDTV but they prefer to find those propagandists article sitting in one of those houses which have vested interests. It is of utmost shame that they have soft corner for Islamic terrorism and communism. Am I doing character assassination. Answer is NO. Just dig out there contributions. I am using a AI based bot that summarizes all their edits across Wikipedia and will try to publish it soon. As it is non-structured data so need to put some effort to expose them but I don't have so much time currently. They also had another user with Hinduphobia sentiments called DBigXRay and just google it out to find more details and he was denounced. DBigXRay was tracked down and it will be good to track down the rest of propagandists.

One of them has even mentioned your post as garbage but if you say the same then you will be marked as disrespecting others.

There is no democracy as they will ban a user and will ask to appeal. In general when we debate on platforms or in real we never shut the voice as far as their statements are not opinion and shared from reliable sources. This is worst form of autocracy and we call it curtailing Freedom of Speech. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.56.98.160 (talk) 11:14, 12 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

And what suggestions do you have? Which BBC source have we denied? SerChevalerie (talk) 14:25, 12 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
I feel the same. There seems to be coordinated attempt to maintain a propaganda in this article. Sachin.cba (talk) 08:17, 14 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for informing this. Tbh I don't know about these people and their agenda. It just feels extremely irritating that they can misrepresent facts this easily. Despite being here for a decade, I was not logged in most of the time and most of my edits (grammar fixes and link fixing) were done unsigned. However, after I told a friend of mine that I had donated to Wiki, he said he won't do it stating that many of the wikipedia articles are controlled by fringe groups who pushes in their ideology through small edits all the time and prevent neutral coverage. When I tried to convince him elsewise, he mentioned the lede on the Delhi article. My edits in that article started out as a way to show him that all that somebody had to do was just make an edit request in the Talk section. Looking back, I wonder why I kept on thinking that I must be doing something fundamentally wrong and to be honest, I just agree with my friend now. Once again, thank you for telling me this. Mystupidstory (talk) 12:28, 20 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
That entire discussion was archived by them. Basically I guess they deleted the accounts like SerChevalerie and started with new ones. Mystupidstory (talk) 12:57, 20 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

This is the last clean state of that discussion. Mystupidstory (talk) 12:40, 20 August 2020 (UTC)Reply