Mythbuster121

Welcome!

Hello Mythbuster121! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you you need any help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia • Getting "adopted" by an experienced user How to: edit a page • upload and use images • start an article Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

User community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! JamesBWatson (talk) 11:39, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

• I have just read your recent edit to United Kingdom Census 2011. What you have written is very interesting, but you need to give a source to indicate where the information comes from. If you don't then it is quite likely that the edit will be reverted, as the unsupported word of an anonymous person who chooses to edit Wikipedia is not a reliable source and cannot be verified. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:39, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

• I see that your edits to Bournemouth have been reverted, with the edit summary "Reverted good faith edits by Mythbuster121; Not specifically relevant to Bournemouth." I suggest trying to make sure that edits you make are clearly on topic, or they are likely to be reverted. If there is any doubt as to the relevance, an edit summary explaining what you are doing can help. (Type a brief explanation in the "Edit summary" box just below the editing area before you click on "Save page".) If you need to give a longer explanation than an edit summary can hold then use the talk page of the relevant article. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:27, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Since writing the above I have found that similar remarks apply to your other edits. Not only were inappropriate edits reverted, but also with them edits which (as far as I can see) were perfectly good also went in collateral damage. It is worth being careful. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:26, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kirsty Miller (October 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kirsty Miller and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kirsty Miller, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 00:10, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Mythbuster121! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liancetalk/contribs 00:10, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Kirsty Miller concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kirsty Miller, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:29, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Kirsty Miller

Hello, Mythbuster121. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kirsty Miller".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:02, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Your edit to Draft:Defence Humanists has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 15:44, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Defence Humanists

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Defence Humanists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Defence_Humanists. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Scorpions13256 (talk) 13:46, 8 December 2020 (UTC) I wrote sections of both the article in wikipedia and rational wiki. I do not see a button labeled "Contest this speedy deletion"please advise where on the page this is. This is a work in progress and being developed whilst awaiting publication Wikipedia rules state: Administrators should take care not to speedily delete pages or media except in the most obvious cases. If a page has survived its most recent deletion discussion, it should not be speedily deleted except for newly discovered copyright violations and pages that meet specific uncontroversial criteria; these criteria are noted below. Contributors sometimes create pages over several edits, so administrators should avoid deleting a page that appears incomplete too soon after its creation. I am concerned that there seems to be some malicious intent to prevent this subject matter being created given the number of edits it has been subjected to compared to other articles I have contributed to. How can I raise this concern?

About the speedy deletion

I'm sorry it took me a while to get back to you. I removed the speedy deletion template because I did not know you were the author of the RationalWiki article. Your article does not appear to be in danger of being speedily deleted any time soon. Sorry about the misunderstanding. You just have to wait for a reviewer to accept it and move it to the article space. However, I did remove some content that appeared to be copied from a source from 2005 that you did not say you wrote. We do not allow copying and pasting from other websites. Again, sorry about the confusion.Scorpions13256 (talk) 21:47, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Violation of copyright

Your edit to The Pentagon has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. - Donald Albury 15:57, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Defence Humanists (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mottezen was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Defence Humanists and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Defence Humanists, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mottezen (talk) 08:22, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Defence Humanists

Hello, Mythbuster121. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Defence Humanists, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

April 2022

Hello, I'm RenatUK. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Nord Stream 2, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Renat 22:21, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 14:25, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for that information. I am still learning about this process. However a conclusion that I have reached is that it appears certain interest groups insert questionnable material into wiki entries and then set themselves up as impartial arbitrators to prevent such material from being corrected. I cannot see the reversion that you have raised. Can you reference the wiki entry? Mythbuster121 (talk) 10:11, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Defence Humanists

Hello, Mythbuster121. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Defence Humanists".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:28, 29 May 2023 (UTC)