NANExcella

National varieties of English

In a recent edit to the page Thudiyalur, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to India, use Indian English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand or Ireland, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Alexf^(talk) 13:18, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

speedy deletion of Matchbook (Betting Exchange)

Hey NANExcella, I can see article Matchbook (Betting Exchange) has been nominated for speedy deletion. I am struggling to find what parts promotion the company. All facts given are all found online through genuine sources. All other facts e.g horse racing patterns is commonly included in all other other betting exchanges \ bookmakers Wikipedia's.

Is a more extensive research needed on the history of the company or what is required? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ddrumm1 (talk • contribs) 12:53, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Dear Ddrumm1, the page was deleted when i was last log-in, Could definitely help you to remove the promotional content in the article if it was not deleted. I appreciate your contribution to the Wikipedia. Please contribute here with neutral point of view. Please read Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.NANExcella (talk) 07:57, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, NANExcella, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Moral edits (talk) 21:16, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Deprodding of boygenius

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from boygenius, which you proposed for deletion. Meets WP:BAND #6 "Is an ensemble that contains two or more independently notable musicians". If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the file. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Morgan Ginsberg (talk) 06:53, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Sankara Bhagavadpada for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sankara Bhagavadpada is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sankara Bhagavadpada (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:02, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi Rosguill, I object your deletion contribution to the article 'Sankara Bhagavadpada'. The subject is clearly notable and have enough reliable independent resources. I also answered your doubt on deletion discussion page: here.NANExcella (talk) 07:51, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, NANExcella. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Ranjani Raghavan

Hello NANExcella, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Ranjani Raghavan, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims coverage in reliable sources. If you are interested in learning more about how speedy deletion works, I have compiled a list of helpful pages at User:SoWhy/SDA. You can of course also contact me if you have questions. Thank you. SoWhy 09:16, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Dear User:SoWhy, Thanks for the information. For your information when i added the deletion tag the article was completely a hoax, no ciatation, no wiki format. I notice the article is much better now. The creator of the article User:Anamika Catherine has added resources and improved the article. I agree it may be to soon to add a deletion tag. But i know, where to add a deletion tag. Anyways, Thanks again for the information. NANExcella (talk) 07:37, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Yes, this version was a mess but even it already contained sufficient indicators that the subject might very well be significant, e.g. starring in a serial made by T. S. Nagabharana (citations are not required when it comes to speedy deletion). Also, a short Google News search shows more than 7000 hits, so it was easily determinable that this was not a hoax. My advice is merely that next time you consider checking whether your assumptions are correct before tagging an article and WP:FIXTHEPROBLEMs if possible instead. Regards SoWhy 09:05, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Points are noted. I will take care in future. NANExcella (talk) 05:31, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Manish Garg for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manish Garg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manish Garg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ☆ Bri (talk) 18:17, 4 January 2019 (UTC)