NS Dibyojyoti

July 2019

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Arjun Singh ( politician), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Samf4u (talk) 14:50, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!

The Wikipede and the Picture Tutorial. (image credit)

Welcome!

Hello, Dibyojyoti RC, and welcome to Wikipedia! I have noticed that you are fairly new! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. I also see that some of your recent edits show an interest in the use of images and/or photos on Wikipedia.

Did you know that ...

• ...Wikipedia has a very stringent image use policy?
• ...most images from Flickr, online news websites, and other web sources are copyrighted?
• ...Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously?
• ...freely-licensed images should be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, a central location for images where they can be used on all Wikipedia projects?
• ...we recommend that new users use our "files for upload" process - at least until you get the hang of things?

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Masumrezarock100 Masum Reza^📞 15:44, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Indic Script

- Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at Barrackpore, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:43, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rajyavardhan Singh Rathore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 18

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Barrackpore (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to IPS

Raiganj (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to INC

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:24, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Suvendu Adhikari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minister of Environment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shiva (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Action (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mansukh L. Mandaviya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ministry of Shipping (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Heading level-1

Per MOS:HEAD, please do not change heading levels to level-1, as you did at Vice President of India. The article title is the only level-1 heading. I have fixed that article. Thank you. ―Mandruss ☎ 16:53, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for instructing me. As a user I will obey this in next time. Dibyojyoti RC (talk) 06:43, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rabindranath Tagore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengal Province.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020

Hi Dibyojyoti RC! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at British Raj that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. RegentsPark (comment) 16:39, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Request accepted Dibyojyoti RC (talk) 08:20, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Manoj Verma (IPS) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Manoj Verma (IPS), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 09:32, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manoj Verma (IPS) (September 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KartikeyaS343 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manoj Verma (IPS) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Manoj Verma (IPS), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KartikeyaS (talk) 19:55, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Dibyojyoti RC! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KartikeyaS (talk) 19:55, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Dibyojyoti RC. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Manoj Verma (IPS), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. KartikeyaS (talk) 09:09, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Ok Dibyojyoti RC (talk) 06:30, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Manoj Verma (IPS) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Manoj Verma (IPS). Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 12:03, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

British Raj Flags

Found any reliable sources yet? Kanto7 (talk) 03:14, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

I talked to the author of the publisher of that flag for the reference he get but he didn't paid any response. I would advice to set the flag of the United kingdom as per the history it was used in most of the times. And replace that flag with my proposal flag on the rest of the articles. Now you see what is good. Dibyojyoti RC (talk) 05:06, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Come on find a source. Kanto7 (talk) 03:19, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

See I checked that the source which the file has created has made based on the star of india.png and UK flag. Check it there is no such source present till now. D. ROY CHOWDHARY (talk) 03:30, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Sorry I don't understand what you mean Kanto7 (talk) 23:15, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Blocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NS Dibyojyoti (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Ok! I'm using another user User:DRCNSINDIA because I was being disregarded to honour this account. So I had created that account and worked there. I had tried to make WP:RfA as trial. Although I don't want to be as a admin but to learn this idea how can I nominate to be a admin so that if I qualify all criteria, I will nominate that after five years or more. But I didn't understand it will be harmful more as not expected. I appolozise and ashamed for that. I also behave so rudely in User talk:DRCNSINDIA#Blocked for quick try to request for unblock, I also appolozise for that. From next time I will not be do such account creation so that I would face any difficult. Please review my request carefully. I didn't created any more account right now. Please help me. Please unblock me so that I will not do such vandialism or sock account ever without prior request. Give me last chance and I'm ready to whatever I'm agree with. I am also quick familiar to all Wikipedia guidelines. I will not be in contact with that account created. Let it be what it is now.D. ROY CHOWDHARY (talk) 06:40, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This unblock request is almost incoherent. Regardless, just recently you went out of your way to attempt to mislead us, over on User talk:DRCNSINDIA. As you have worked hard to demonstrate your word cannot be trusted, we cannot unblock you at this time. Your best hope is to go six months with zero edits, then apply under WP:SO. At that time, you will want to demonstrate what steps you have taken to show you can once again be trusted, after you worked hard to show you can't. You'll also need to demonstrate a much greater command of written English, as per WP:CIR. Yamla (talk) 11:01, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note that this user also worked hard to mislead us over at User talk:GPReddy360. --Yamla (talk) 11:02, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Uggh, you also haven't addressed your conflict of interest, despite acknowledging that you have to do so. --Yamla (talk) 11:12, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

1.What will I do for 6 months.?

2. Can I ask questions during block? 3. It's boing to wait for six months with zero edits. I love editing wikipedia for 1 and half years. For six months I have to wait is just like sloth Please give me clue what can I do? If possible don't unblock all account, only allow me to create a new account as well. I will disclose all matter on my previous accounts as well if possible. I will sacrifice everything but allow me to create a account. Without edits, I never worked all time.D. ROY CHOWDHARY (talk) 08:31, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

• No, stay away, your talk page access is only for unblock requests, this is not a chat forum. If you continue posting unrelated messages then your talk page access will also be revoked. Stop this right away. —SpacemanSpiff 08:37, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Ok as you advice says. After 6 months since today I will ask for unblock request once more thank you. D. ROY CHOWDHARY (talk) 09:08, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

So July 2021 (I don’t know if I should comment here) Vamsi20 (talk) 00:12, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

User once again broke their word with an unblock request via UTRS (UTRS appeal #39139) that didn't even bother to address the conflict of interest or the multiple attempts to mislead us. Six months from today is 2021-07-04 and would be the soonest this user is eligible for unblock consideration under WP:SO. Hopefully, the unblock request will address these multiple concerns at that point. --Yamla (talk) 17:32, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

UTRS request addendum

You were not forthcoming about having reset your block in January and I did not check closely enough. You will not, as is stated here on your talk page, be eligible for consideration of an unblock request until July. Thanks, --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:20, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

This user has continued to abuse the UTRS system, making multiple requests across their multiple sockpuppet accounts, most recently in UTRS appeal #45112. They've already been directed here. Further abuse of UTRS should be held against this user. --Yamla (talk) 16:52, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Shiva Nick 2016.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shiva Nick 2016.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

UTRS appeal #61157

is declined Checkuser block noted. Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:46, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Windows Media Center on Windows 8.1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Windows Media Center on Windows 8.1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:52, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Shiva Nick 2016.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shiva Nick 2016.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 19 June 2024 (UTC)