Nategrove

Hello Nategrove and Welcome to Wikipedia! Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction. If you have not already created a account here, note that you do not have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and there are many benefits of having a username. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page. Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia... Getting started Wikipedia Tutorial • How to edit a page • The five pillars of Wikipedia • Manual of Style • Be bold in editing • How to write a great article Getting your info out there Cite your sources • Neutral Point of View • Point of View • Verifiability • Policy Library Getting help New contributors' help page • Where to ask a question • Help Desk • Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikiquette • Civility • Sign your posts • Wikipedians • Conflict resolution • Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes(~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you. Bduke (talk) 00:52, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Chemistry education

The material you have just reverted back to is, I am afraid, completely non-encyclopedic. Wikipedia is not the place to advertise the academic achievements of someone. The fact that it uses the words "we" and "our" is a complete give away on this. It also gives far too much weight to one chemical education researcher. If the person concerned is notable, then start an article on the person. This is very clearly not the place for it. --Bduke (talk) 00:52, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

I hate to tell you this, but the listing on chemistry education is woefully out of date and in no way actually reflects the reality of the discipline. The programs listed do not even offer degrees (with the exception of the University of Arizon and the University of Iowa). Those programs that do, and there are now about two dozen, are not even highlighted. There is no information about the significant, historical figures in the field, nor who is currently working. Hence, the reason for our additions (I say "our" because this is a project initiated as part of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society's desire to increase the availability of information about our field). You said that my addition focused too much on one figure, yet, the text as it exists only mentions a few of the two or three dozen significant researchers in the field. Although there was only one faculty member listed, the plan was to quickly add similar information for the other major figures in the field. We were waiting for the four day probationary period to end so we could add a photo so the other faculty could see what their entry would look like. I have always viewed Wikipedia as a living document that could be continually refined and updated as knowledge evolves. This insistance on maintaining the status quo flies in the face of the original goals of this project. In any event, we want to be able to provide this important information to people who are interested in learning more about what chemistry education researchers do. How would you recommend we do this? Could we add a short section called "Researchers in the Field" to the main chemistry education article and then have a link in that short section to a separate wikipedia page that contains information about the separate faculty and their research programs?--Nategrove (talk) 02:38, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

I have copied your reply to Talk:Chemistry education which is where this discussion should be held to encourage others to comment. I have replied there. --Bduke (talk) 03:34, 2 May 2008 (UTC)