User talk:Neveselbert/Archive 12
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Neveselbert. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 |
The Signpost: 16 May 2024
- News and notes: Democracy in action: multiple elections
- Special report: Will the new RfA reform come to the rescue of administrators?
- Arbitration report: Ruined temples for posterity to ponder over – arbitration from '22 to '24
- Comix: Generations
- Traffic report: Crawl out through the fallout, baby
Overlinked vs underlinked
I mentioned a recent edit of yours at the bottom of Talk:Alice Munro and thought you should know. InedibleHulk (talk) 23:42, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
The redirect British intelligence services has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 1 § British intelligence services until a consensus is reached. UndercoverClassicist T·C 08:40, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2024).
Administrator changes
Bureaucrat changes
Guideline and policy news
- Phase II of the 2024 RfA review has commenced to improve and refine the proposals passed in Phase I.
Technical news
- The Nuke feature, which enables administrators to mass delete pages, will now correctly delete pages which were moved to another title. T43351
Arbitration
- The arbitration case Venezuelan politics has been closed.
- The Committee is seeking volunteers for various roles, including access to the conflict of interest VRT queue.
Miscellaneous
- WikiProject Reliability's unsourced statements drive is happening in June 2024 to replace {{citation needed}} tags with references! Sign up here to participate!
The Signpost: 8 June 2024
- Technology report: New Page Patrol receives a much-needed software upgrade
- Deletion report: The lore of Kalloor
- In the media: National cable networks get in on the action arguing about what the first sentence of a Wikipedia article ought to say
- News from the WMF: Progress on the plan — how the Wikimedia Foundation advanced on its Annual Plan goals during the first half of fiscal year 2023-2024
- Recent research: ChatGPT did not kill Wikipedia, but might have reduced its growth
- Featured content: We didn't start the wiki
- Essay: No queerphobia
- Special report: RetractionBot is back to life!
- Traffic report: Chimps, Eurovision, and the return of the Baby Reindeer
- Comix: The Wikipediholic Family
- Concept: Palimpsestuous
Edit reverts on Elizabeth II
@Neveselbert: Can you please explain why you've reverted all my edits on that article? Note these weren't vandalism, since they were marked as a RedWarn. They were mistakes. If you think they were vandalism, please carefully look at the revisions. If you're saying in the recent revert revision caption "they are not the same links", what do you mean by that? They are both the same links as I've checked. Thanks. PEPSI697 (talk) 23:18, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hi PEPSI697, I made sure to mark my revert as one of a good-faith edit, so, despite the use of RedWarn, there was no intention on my part to imply your edits were made in anything other than good faith. I apologise if it came across any other way. As for the revert itself, I undid it because they're not necessarily equivalent links, even though they target the same page. It's entirely possible 8 May 1945 might be retargeted sometime in the future, even if just to a section to Victory in Europe Day, so I think linking both can be helpful. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 16:43, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- No worries! Now I understand that 8 May 1945 may be retargeted in the future. I understand that you and lots of other contributors are just trying to protect Wikipedia and revert good faith edits, vandalism, mistakes or remove content that doesn't have a reliable source. I just wanted to make sure because I was feeling a little bit suspicious about how you came across, but I knew that was never your intention or the case. Because I know that attacking other contributors violate Wikipedia's policy and could result of a discussion at ANI or result being blocked from editing on Wikipedia, which I previously said, was never your intention. Wikipedia makes it very possible for every editors on Wikipedia to be safe and welcomed (this isn't criticism, it's just me telling what I know about Wikipedia's policy) Please keep protecting Wikipedia and enjoy yourself! PEPSI697 (talk) 06:34, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 July 2024
- News and notes: WMF board elections and fundraising updates
- Special report: Wikimedia Movement Charter ratification vote underway, new Council may surpass power of Board
- In focus: How the Russian Wikipedia keeps it clean despite having just a couple dozen administrators
- Discussion report: Wikipedians are hung up on the meaning of Madonna
- In the media: War and information in war and politics
- Sister projects: On editing Wikisource
- Opinion: Etika: a Pop Culture Champion
- Gallery: Spokane Willy's photos
- Humour: A joke
- Recent research: Is Wikipedia Politically Biased? Perhaps
- Traffic report: Talking about you and me, and the games people play
Administrators' newsletter – July 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2024).
Administrator changes
Technical news
- Local administrators can now add new links to the bottom of the site Tools menu without using JavaScript. Documentation is available on MediaWiki. (T6086)
Miscellaneous
- The Community Wishlist is re-opening on 15 July 2024. Read more
Election box template changes
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like your change to {{Election box winning candidate with party link}} is generating lint errors. For example {{1941 Waitemata by-election}} is now outputting '''''' in the first row of the "±%" column, which renders as '. The problem appears the removal of the space between '''{{{change}}} and ''' in '''{{{change}}} '''. Lint errors: Missing end tag has dozens of Election box errors in the Template namespace. —Bruce1eetalk 07:35, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry about that, Bruce1ee, I must've mistook that space for whitespace. The issue should be fixed now. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 07:49, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, that has fixed it. Lint errors: Missing end tag is still showing dozens of Election box lint errors, but they are false positives and will drop off when the templates are touched. —Bruce1eetalk 08:14, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 22 July 2024
- Discussion report: Internet users flock to Wikipedia to debate its image policy over Trump raised-fist photo
- News and notes: Wikimedia community votes to ratify Movement Charter; Wikimedia Foundation opposes ratification
- Obituary: JamesR
- Crossword: Vaguely bird-shaped crossword
The redirect Former president of the United States has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 24 § Former president of the United States until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 18:54, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – August 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2024).
Technical news
- Global blocks may now target accounts as well as IP's. Administrators may locally unblock when appropriate.
- Users wishing to permanently leave may now request "vanishing" via Special:GlobalVanishRequest. Processed requests will result in the user being renamed, their recovery email being removed, and their account being globally locked.
Arbitration
- The Arbitration Committee appointed the following administrators to the conflict of interest volunteer response team: Bilby, Extraordinary Writ
OJ Simpson main article "In popular culture" section needs updating
On the OJ article bio, the section in the "In popular culture" section needs updating: "In 2018, it was announced Boris Kodjoe would portray Simpson in a film titled Nicole & O.J. The film was never completed." The film has been retitled The Juice and will be released in 2025, so it is no longer accurate to say the film was never completed. 92.17.197.110 (talk) 21:54, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- Reply on 92.17.197.110's talk page ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 19:06, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 August 2024
- In the media: Portland pol profile paid for from public purse
- In focus: Twitter marks the spot
- News and notes: Another Wikimania has concluded.
- Special report: Nano or just nothing: Will nano go nuclear?
- Opinion: HouseBlaster's RfA debriefing
- Traffic report: Ball games, movies, elections, but nothing really weird
- Humour: I'm proud to be a template
Creating new article: Premiership of Lord Liverpool
@Neveselbert Please don’t mind me saying this, but, can we reserve the page “Premiership of Robert Jenkinson, 2nd Earl of Liverpool” to turn it into a actual article about the events that happened and policies that were implemented during the premiership of Lord Liverpool? I have tried to create a new article for this particular topic, but since I’m using a mobile device, I struggle bit to be accommodated to this kind of system. But the main problem is that there numerous “redirects” to the main article at Robert Jenkinson, 2nd Earl of Liverpool so it is difficult already to get a grip on what article to create. Also if the before mentioned “redirect” is turned to a new article, should we start a discussion beforehand to talk about an official title for the article as well? Thank you. Altonydean (talk) 16:54, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Altonydean. You should be able to create a draft at Draft:Premiership of Robert Jenkinson, 2nd Earl of Liverpool, which can then replace the redirect once the draft is complete. The other redirects are already categorised as {{R avoided double redirect}} to Premiership of Robert Jenkinson, 2nd Earl of Liverpool, so when the draft is complete, they can be retargeted to the new article. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 19:09, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Okay thanks @Neveselbert. Also want to ask one more question, when texts from a mother article is copied and pasted on a new article should it be paraphrased or rewritten in order to accommodate into a new version of the same article as well? And also is it okay? Altonydean (talk) 10:15, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Altonydean: you don't have to, just be sure to follow the instructions at WP:COPYWITHIN when doing so. As for your draft, I think you're off to a good start, although if you're looking for more in-depth feedback, I'd give Tim O'Doherty a shout; he has a great amount of experience in drafting articles in this topic area. Also, I think it would be worth notifying WT:POLUK about your discussion of a split. Best of luck, ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 17:49, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you again @Neveselbert Altonydean (talk) 18:16, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Altonydean: you don't have to, just be sure to follow the instructions at WP:COPYWITHIN when doing so. As for your draft, I think you're off to a good start, although if you're looking for more in-depth feedback, I'd give Tim O'Doherty a shout; he has a great amount of experience in drafting articles in this topic area. Also, I think it would be worth notifying WT:POLUK about your discussion of a split. Best of luck, ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 17:49, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Okay thanks @Neveselbert. Also want to ask one more question, when texts from a mother article is copied and pasted on a new article should it be paraphrased or rewritten in order to accommodate into a new version of the same article as well? And also is it okay? Altonydean (talk) 10:15, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Draft article: nearing completion
@Neveselbert I have made some progress at the draft page for the Premiership of Robert Jenkinson, 2nd Earl of Liverpool and there is a lot of significant editing to be done. But fortunately, much of the hard stuff has been overcome and I can finish the article in a few days. Just wanted to thank you again for your support. Also can you fix this for me: [1] Altonydean (talk) 14:03, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Altonydean, I think you've done a great job. Just to let you know, {{Split from}} should be included on the talkpage, rather than on the page itself. In the meantime, you can add {{Draft article}} in its place and submit it for review once you feel it's ready. I'll have a look at fixing that reference. All the best, ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 18:15, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ Theakston, Kevin (March 2013). "Evaluating Prime-Ministerial Performance: The British Experience". Oxford Academic.
{{cite web}}:|archive-url=requires|archive-date=(help)
Complete: submitted for review
@Neveselbert the draft is complete and only one section needs expansion, which I hope other editors might consider extending. Nevertheless, it is almost complete and I have submitted it for review just like you instructed. Thank you so much for your help and assistance. Altonydean (talk) 10:10, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- You're very welcome, Altonydean. Now that the article is live, Robert Jenkinson, 2nd Earl of Liverpool § Premiership (1812–1827) needs cutting down significantly, similar to how John Major was split into Premiership of John Major. I'm not sure whether to remove the subsections myself as I haven't got round to reading the entire new article, so do you think you could have a look to see that all relevant material is included in Premiership of Robert Jenkinson, 2nd Earl of Liverpool, in order for the section to be trimmed down? All the best, ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 20:31, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Unexpected changes
@Neveselbert I admire your abilities and your willingness to help in creating the article for Lord Liverpool Premiership article. Since which I hold in the highest of regard and respect for your advice. But following your recent changes to the main article about Lord Liverpool, which saw countless amounts of content removed just to include it in the premiership section isn’t how I envisioned you would made the improvements. And also, since I specifically didn’t understood what kind of changes you proposed (I was off due to some medication) therefore I think that I would need to revert the edit you made and ask another or several editors about this particular kind of process. Thank you. Altonydean (talk) 06:50, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Altonydean: thank you for your kind words. Regarding the recent edits, the content removed from the main article was already included verbatim in the premiership article, making it duplicative. According to WP:ANOTHER, this process is recommended to avoid redundancy. Now that the content has been restored, it ought to be significantly cut down in line with WP:SYNC to maintain proper synchronisation between the articles. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 19:00, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- I understand @Neveselbert. But these days I’m taking a certain serious medication for an illness of mine and I won’t be able to edit as frequently anymore. But however, I do appreciate your efforts and your help is as always highly valued by me and as well as the wider Wikipedia community. I think, that since the new article for Lord Liverpool has the same information about his premiership, we should expand the content in the new article instead of cutting down the original content. Like, we can expand and write additional information about events and policies that happened and were implemented during his tenure as prime minister that is not mentioned in the original article. This is my opinion and we should have a wider discussion about this if we are to avoid future conflicts. Altonydean (talk) 20:00, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Also @Neveselbert can you re-include more content on the original page? It severely lacks information on certain important topics and areas of history significance. At least include three paragraphs or more paragraphs about sections like on economic policy, liberal policy or dissent and repression perhaps? It also need more contextual information on the foreign policy section as well in the original article. As always good luck and keep going. Altonydean (talk) 20:07, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Adding more content to the parent article at this stage might lead to unnecessary duplication and confusion. Once the child article is more detailed, we can then summarise and include the most relevant information in the parent article. This way, we maintain clarity and coherence across both articles. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 20:50, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Altonydean: I understand, and I appreciate your continued efforts despite your current circumstances. I've removed the duplicative content from the main article and replaced each section with the most relevant paragraphs excerpted from the premiership article using {{Excerpt#Replacing summary section with excerpt of child article}}. This is a temporary solution until we can better summarise these topics in the main article without duplicating content. We can certainly discuss expanding the premiership article further, but for now, this ensures clarity and avoids redundancy. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 20:35, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Ok @Neveselbert but please do not mind me saying this, I think we need a bit more expansion on the original page. I mean like two paragraphs is not enough to summarise any of the important measures Lord Liverpool took in terms of economic or social policy initiatives. I think it needs three more detailed or in-depth information other than simple reductions. Foreign affairs are also important and needs more detail as of the current revision. But I always do support new ideas and proposals, but this seems a bit unprecedented due to the fact that I have previously stated that I would return to editing after my brief interval of rest so I can expand the new article on premiership. Again, I do wholeheartedly agree with many of your points and although at least consider my suggestion to expand a bit on the suggested article sections in the main Lord Liverpool article. Good luck and thanks for your reply. Altonydean (talk) 20:43, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Also @Neveselbert can you re-include more content on the original page? It severely lacks information on certain important topics and areas of history significance. At least include three paragraphs or more paragraphs about sections like on economic policy, liberal policy or dissent and repression perhaps? It also need more contextual information on the foreign policy section as well in the original article. As always good luck and keep going. Altonydean (talk) 20:07, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- I understand @Neveselbert. But these days I’m taking a certain serious medication for an illness of mine and I won’t be able to edit as frequently anymore. But however, I do appreciate your efforts and your help is as always highly valued by me and as well as the wider Wikipedia community. I think, that since the new article for Lord Liverpool has the same information about his premiership, we should expand the content in the new article instead of cutting down the original content. Like, we can expand and write additional information about events and policies that happened and were implemented during his tenure as prime minister that is not mentioned in the original article. This is my opinion and we should have a wider discussion about this if we are to avoid future conflicts. Altonydean (talk) 20:00, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2024).
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, there is a new criterion for speedy deletion: C4, which
applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past
. - A request for comment is open to discuss whether Notability (species) should be adopted as a subject-specific notability guideline.
Arbitration
- Following a motion, remedies 5.1 and 5.2 of World War II and the history of Jews in Poland (the topic and interaction bans on My very best wishes, respectively) were repealed.
- Remedy 3C of the German war effort case ("Cinderella157 German history topic ban") was suspended for a period of six months.
- The arbitration case Historical Elections is currently open. Proposed decision is expected by 3 September 2024 for this case.
Miscellaneous
- Editors can now enter into good article review circles, an alternative for informal quid pro quo arrangements, to have a GAN reviewed in return for reviewing a different editor's nomination.
- A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in September 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 13,900 articles and 26,200 redirects awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!
The Signpost: 4 September 2024
- News and notes: WikiCup enters final round, MCDC wraps up activities, 17-year-old hoax article unmasked
- In the media: AI is not playing games anymore. Is Wikipedia ready?
- News from the WMF: Meet the 12 candidates running in the WMF Board of Trustees election
- Wikimania: A month after Wikimania 2024
- Serendipity: What it's like to be Wikimedian of the Year
- Traffic report: After the gold rush
Ted Heath
What will satisfy you as sufficient consensus? An Rfc? Emiya1980 (talk) 22:44, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Emiya1980: yes, I think that would be the right way to gauge a consensus. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 22:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 September 2024
- In the media: Courts order Wikipedia to give up names of editors, legal strain anticipated from "online safety laws"
- Community view: Indian courts order Wikipedia to take down name of crime victim, editors strive towards consensus
- Serendipity: A Wikipedian at the 2024 Paralympics
- Opinion: asilvering's RfA debriefing
- News and notes: Are you ready for admin elections?
- Recent research: Article-writing AI is less "prone to reasoning errors (or hallucinations)" than human Wikipedia editors
- Traffic report: Jump in the line, rock your body in time
Administrators' newsletter – October 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2024).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Guideline and policy news
- Administrator elections are a proposed new process for selecting administrators, offering an alternative to requests for adminship (RfA). The first trial election will take place in October 2024, with candidate sign-up from October 8 to 14, a discussion phase from October 22 to 24, and SecurePoll voting from October 25 to 31. For questions or to help out, please visit the talk page at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections.
- Following a discussion, the speedy deletion reason "File pages without a corresponding file" has been moved from criterion G8 to F2. This does not change what can be speedily deleted.
- A request for comment is open to discuss whether there is a consensus to have an administrator recall process.
Arbitration
- The arbitration case Historical elections has been closed.
- An arbitration case regarding Backlash to diversity and inclusion has been opened.
- Editors are invited to nominate themselves to serve on the 2024 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission until 23:59 October 8, 2024 (UTC).
Miscellaneous
- If you are interested in stopping spammers, please put MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist and MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist on your watchlist, and help out when you can.
Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
"Donald Trump as rhetorician" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Donald Trump as rhetorician has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 7 § Donald Trump as rhetorician until a consensus is reached. ZimZalaBim talk 02:36, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Shinzo Abe
The short description for Grover Cleveland includes both his terms of office, so why can't the short description for Abe? WP:SHORTDESCRIPTION merely states that most descriptions are very short. There is no requirement that it can't be slightly longer to be specific. Векочел (talk) 20:39, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Векочел, sorry for not getting back to you sooner. I still think that's a bit too verbose, and I think the same of Cleveland's SD as well. I'll try to see if Abe's can be condensed somewhat, while keeping both terms. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 19:11, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- On second thought, having read WP:SDDATES, it recommends
Period in office most important
as the criterion, which can be interpreted as simply including the period in office "most important", which in Abe's case is his latter term. For a case like Cleveland, I would think his latter term would suffice as well, but I won't involve myself there. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 19:33, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Please help
I saw you uploaded this image from trumanlibrary.gov to Commons with a very detailed full caption. Can you tell me if the image in this link can be uploaded to Commons? If so, what is the exact image copyright tag? A similar example is the photo in this link, which was also uploaded to Commons with the copyright tag PD-USGov, but I'm not sure if this is correct or not. Thank you.CalCoWSpiBudSu (talk) 15:37, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Hi CalCoWSpiBudSu. I think that image should be fine over at Commons under
{{PD-US-1978-89}}, but I would still advise double-checking with c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright. Best of luck, ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 20:26, 17 October 2024 (UTC)- Ok I got it, thanks. CalCoWSpiBudSu (talk) 20:45, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 October 2024
- News and notes: One election's end, another election's beginning
- Recent research: "As many as 5%" of new English Wikipedia articles "contain significant AI-generated content", says paper
- In the media: Off to the races! Wikipedia wins!
- Contest: A WikiCup for the Global South
- Traffic report: A scream breaks the still of the night
- Book review: The Editors
- Humour: The Newspaper Editors
- Crossword: Spilled Coffee Mug