Newsbuffstuff
August 2024
edit
Hello, I'm R0paire-wiki. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Desert Tech have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. r0paire (talk) 04:07, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- How do I remove slanderous false statements? It keeps putting them right back? Newsbuffstuff (talk) 04:09, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Seriously, how to you remove false slanderous accusations that have no basis??? Newsbuffstuff (talk) 04:29, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- You didn't answer my question??? Newsbuffstuff (talk) 04:41, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- The content I removed was slanderous with no basis and it's only intent is to harass the company with unfounded statements because of the religious domination of the company founder. It is wrong to continually harass a company or persons for their religion and make numerous false claims that are unfounded just to hurt them financially. Newsbuffstuff (talk) 04:53, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- There is advice here. You must disclose a Conflict of Interest, whether you are paid or not to edit. You have already admitted to having a connection to the company in this edit summary, and have not disclosed your COI. You can request an edit on the talk page using the {{edit COI}} template, but cannot edit directly due to the conflict of interest.
- Edits must also be WP:NPOV and be supported with reliable sources. One of the sources you were removing is from a reliable news network. I see no slander. r0paire (talk) 05:10, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- The article itself was a false accusation based solely on religious affiliation. They claimed wrong doing in the article there was no wrong doing but they didn't publish a retraction so what do you do for that??? Newsbuffstuff (talk) 05:19, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- I do appreciate your suggestions. I am new to wikipedia, and I'm not trying to cause issues or break any rules. I am just trying to contest the false statements that have no basis and I'm hitting a brick wall. If you were me how would you go about getting the content removed? Newsbuffstuff (talk) 05:28, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- The content I removed was slanderous with no basis and it's only intent is to harass the company with unfounded statements because of the religious domination of the company founder. It is wrong to continually harass a company or persons for their religion and make numerous false claims that are unfounded just to hurt them financially. Newsbuffstuff (talk) 04:53, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- So your quick to deny the edit but missing in action defending your action. Religious persecution is illegal and that is exactly what the removed content contains. False Claims with no basis or evidence to support them. Newsbuffstuff (talk) 04:57, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DTNEY1. Thank you. r0paire (talk) 04:40, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Notice
edit
As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Desert Tech, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Newsbuffstuff, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Newsbuffstuff|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Euryalus (talk) 07:55, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Bluntly, you are obviously the same editor as DTNEY1 (talk · contribs) and have a conflict of interest with this article. This doesn't mean you cannot contribute to it, but you must declare your conflict of interest and ideally only post suggested changes to the article talkpage where they can be reviewed by other more neutral editors. Wikipedia does not allow undisclosed COI editing and accounts that attempt it are generally blocked from making further contributions.
FWIW I'ved also made some changes to the article itself to clarify the paragraph on the building seizure and include the company's response that it had not been accused of wrongdoing. Also removed the fairly pointless reference t polygamy in the lead, as it has no relevance to this company or its products. I note you were also trying to remove the reference to Donald Trump Jr, but it is not clear why you consider this slanderous as it seems appropriately sourced. Views welcome. -- Euryalus (talk) 07:56, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your help. I am new to Wikipedia and do not know the rules so I will make sure that I learn and follow them. 136.38.55.128 (talk) 13:54, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Given you are being accused of using multiple accounts, it would be best if you avoided editing while logged out of your account too, so it's clear which edits are yours. AntiDionysius (talk) 13:56, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 15:26, 13 August 2024 (UTC)