January 2023

edit
 

Hello Nhnh15. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Joffe Books, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Nhnh15. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Nhnh15|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 16:31, 13 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

To whom this may concern,
I would like to confirm that I am employed by Joffe Books and have attempted to create this page as part of my job role. Please could the draft be reviewed as we have included references to credible sources such as THE BOOKSELLER. Many thanks! Nhnh15 (talk) 11:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joffe Books (January 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
331dot (talk) 16:33, 13 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hi 331dot,
I have edited the referencing and used articles that have credibility. These articles and references show Joffe Books to meet the criteria for credibility. THE BOOKSELLER is the leading UK magazine covering the publishing industry and is strictly independent of the publishers it covers. The articles referenced are in depth and reliable such as the article covering the Joffe Books prize which addresses the topic in detail and directly. We have also referenced the BBC which is a reliable and notable source for coverage. The new edits also include correct citations and we have removed the bare links. Please could you take another look at the draft for review. Nhnh15 (talk) 13:35, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Nhnh15! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 331dot (talk) 16:33, 13 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joffe Books (February 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
asilvering (talk) 01:11, 8 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Joffe Books

edit

  Hello, Nhnh15. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joffe Books, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:05, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply