Welcome!

edit

Hello, Nihurbu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! CNMall41 (talk) 19:29, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi @CNMall41, thanks for your comment. Yes I do have a conflict of interest with this article and yes it's my first article so I'm not sure whether the article meets all the Wikipedia criteria or not. I'd highly appreciate if you or somebody else could proofread it and telling me your thoughts about the article or adjust it accordingly.
For your information, my main intention is to add LibrePCB to the list of EDA tools in Comparison of EDA software since I think it is totally worth being mentioned and good to know for readers looking for an EDA software. However, it seems that only EDA tools having a dedicated article are allowed to be mentioned. Since I think LibrePCB fulfills the notability guidelines, I decided to start it by myself. But my hope is that the article gets maintained by other, independent people to avoid the conflict of interest in future.
Thanks! Nihurbu (talk) 20:54, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: LibrePCB (May 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Stuartyeates (talk) 10:03, 25 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Nihurbu! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Stuartyeates (talk) 10:03, 25 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lizthegrey was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
lizthegrey (talk) 20:38, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Additionally, I'd like to leave the suggestion that you correct the bare links so that it's clearer what news publication (or blog or website) is the publisher for each citation or note; also, you seem to be misusing footnotes to provide links to corresponding websites of organisations rather than those footnotes providing citations or being genuine explanatory notes. lizthegrey (talk) 20:41, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:LibrePCB has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:LibrePCB. Thanks! Stuartyeates (talk) 00:03, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply