Nitekuzee

June 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Xcelltrasi (talk) 12:02, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

About Srivijaya, before writing Have you done your research? All you write about Srivijaya is related to Medang. For example about Madagaskar:

   The Javanese are all men very experienced in the art of navigation, to the point that they claim to be the most ancient of all, although many others give this honor to the Chinese, and affirm that this art was handed on from them to the Javanese . But it is certain that they formerly navigated to the Cape of Good Hope and were in communication with the east coast of the island of São Lourenço (San Laurenzo — MADAGASKAR, where there are many brown and Javanese-like natives who say they are descended from them.
 – Diogo do Couto, Decada Quarta da Asia
 why do you assume lack of evidence ,Did you know evidence about Majapahit is huge amount source than Srivijaya, how you could say Majapahit lack of evidence but not for Srivijaya.
 because Sriwijaya is kedatuan, there is no such thing as a king but the "head" of the kedatuan  if you keep writing srivijaya "king" i will understand Nitekuzee (talk) 13:41, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Just research please you will know the truth about Srivijaya Nitekuzee (talk) 13:45, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Majapahit—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:08, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

August 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mataram Kingdom. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Pad ^{Griffin's Nest} 15:54, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

April 2024

Your recent editing history at Djong (ship) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.   Aloha27  talk  20:57, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

You have to understand he/she started editing with bias. I simply corrected it based on primary and secondary historical sources. Thank you Nitekuzee (talk) 21:23, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

You need to understand that the three-revert rule is not negotiable. Quite frankly, with your 11(?) reverts, I'm surprised you haven't already been blocked. Regards,   Aloha27  talk  16:12, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Merzostin (talk) 04:57, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Merzostin (talk) 08:35, 11 April 2024 (UTC)