User talk:Niwi3/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Image tagging for File:Resident Evil 3 Cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Resident Evil 3 Cover.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Perfect Dark Expansion Pak Info.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Perfect Dark Expansion Pak Info.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:53, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Good Article Barnstar
		Thanks for patiently sticking with your review of Resident Evil 5 when you could have just quick failed it, and well done on your own nomination of Resident Evil: Revelations. Freikorp (talk) 22:21, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Resident Evil 3: Nemesis

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Resident Evil 3: Nemesis you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 20:40, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Resident Evil 3: Nemesis

The article Resident Evil 3: Nemesis you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Resident Evil 3: Nemesis for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 23:02, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Banjo-Tooie underwater.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Banjo-Tooie underwater.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:48, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Banjo-Tooie underwater.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Banjo-Tooie underwater.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:28, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Experimental Jet Set, Trash and No Star

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Experimental Jet Set, Trash and No Star you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sparklism -- Sparklism (talk) 11:40, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Experimental Jet Set, Trash and No Star

The article Experimental Jet Set, Trash and No Star you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Experimental Jet Set, Trash and No Star for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sparklism -- Sparklism (talk) 15:41, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay, I was offline for a few days. Well done! Are you going to take it to DYK? — sparklism ^hey! 15:47, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

@Sparklism: Thanks and no worries about the delay—I'm aware that we all have a real life outside this site. Yes, I'm thinking about taking it to DYK and will nominate it soon. I'm not a very big fan of DYKs but that part of the article can be very interesting for the general reader. I will let you know when it is done. Cheers :) --Niwi3 (talk) 18:12, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Resident Evil Remake Gameplay.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Resident Evil Remake Gameplay.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Experimental Jet Set, Trash and No Star

Hello! Your submission of Experimental Jet Set, Trash and No Star at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! David Eppstein (talk) 00:18, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Experimental Jet Set, Trash and No Star

Every article helps - thanks Victuallers (talk) 20:16, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Resident Evil (2002 video game)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Resident Evil (2002 video game) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TheTimesAreAChanging -- TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 02:20, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Resident Evil (2002 video game)

The article Resident Evil (2002 video game) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Resident Evil (2002 video game) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TheTimesAreAChanging -- TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 22:41, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Resident Evil (2002 video game)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Don't worry

I didn't lose or misrepresent anything of importance, all of your refs are used and properly. It's all just expansions, shuffles and small fixes. I see your protective of this but there's no need to worry really.

Thanks for your work on RE articles, keep it up. --AggressiveNavel (talk) 07:08, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

commas

If you want to leave out the commas that I added to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Can_Hear_the_Heart_Beating_as_One, it won't be the end of the world, of course, but it is technically correct to place a comma after the year when a date that includes the year appears in the middle of a sentence:

http://www.thepunctuationguide.com/comma.html

When the date appears in the middle of a sentence, commas should appear both before and after the year.

Her arrival on April 10, 1988, was considered a turning point for the company.

wikilinks are done on the first occurrence in the body of the article (not considereing the lead).

You see that comma used less and less often these days, but the old rules still apply.

Thanks, Rwcass75

Lead vs. body re: Wiki links

Hi there. You said "(wikilinks are done on the first occurrence in the body of the article (not considereing the lead)." Rather than arguing, since you may be correct, can you point me to where in Wiki rules it states this? In fact, would also like to know where it states that the article lead is considered as something separate from the article itself? I am a professional journalist and have a journalism degree, and to my knowledge, the lead is considered the beginning of the article, not a separate section entirely. I will refrain from further edits of this nature while waiting for your evidence to the contrary. Thanks. Greg Fasolino (talk) 21:11, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

FAC comments

Hey Niwi, are you available for some FA input on Kill 'Em All at the nomination page? The nom has staled in the past couple of weeks, so your comments will be much appreciated.--Retrohead (talk) 08:00, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

If you're busy to make a detailed review on Kill 'Em All, perhaps you can do a brief source check on Master of Puppets? There are already few comments about that at the nomination page, but the coordinator wants a proper report for reliability.--Retrohead (talk) 11:53, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alien: Isolation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EMP. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Rare Replay

I'm working with @Jaguar to get the Rare Replay articles to GA. I see that you've worked on a bunch before—would you want to join in? User_talk:Jaguar#Something_to_ponder, User_talk:Czar#Rare_Replay_articles – czar 18:19, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

PlayStation Power

Hi. I've been working on Guilty Gear (video game) foor a good time but it has been difficult to find sources to completely source its gameplay. I've already exhausted all the sources I have and it has been difficult to find more reviews. Recently, I discovered MobyGames lists the game's reviews. And it says there's a review in the April 2000 issue of Playstation Power. MobyGames don't have it, neither do Internet Archive. You may be wondering why I'm telling you this. And the answer is this edit. Through Wikipedia search I discovered Resident Evil 3: Nemesis use it as a source. And though it's not the issue I want, you found an edition that is not in the Internet Archive. Could you help me to find the issue I want? Gabriel Yuji (talk) 05:35, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Eric Trautmann for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eric Trautmann is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Trautmann until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle Faddle 07:55, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alien: Isolation

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Alien: Isolation you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 03:21, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alien: Isolation

The article Alien: Isolation you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Alien: Isolation for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 06:01, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alien: Isolation

The article Alien: Isolation you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Alien: Isolation for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 14:01, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of I Can Hear the Heart Beating as One

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article I Can Hear the Heart Beating as One you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 12:40, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of I Can Hear the Heart Beating as One

The article I Can Hear the Heart Beating as One you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:I Can Hear the Heart Beating as One for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:40, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of I Can Hear the Heart Beating as One

The article I Can Hear the Heart Beating as One you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:I Can Hear the Heart Beating as One for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 20:21, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

jpg vs png

As for the "unexplained image change": I only use images in png format as they providea much higher quality than the blurry jpg stuff. LordRapture (talk) 18:02, 14 October 2015 (UTC)