Welcome

edit
Hello, Noslackingnow! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking   if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Crusio (talk) 10:15, 25 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Proposed deletion of Información Filosófica

edit
 

The article Información Filosófica has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced stub with barely any information. Notability doubtful, apparently not indexed anywhere. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 10:22, 25 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Información Filosófica for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Información Filosófica is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Información Filosófica until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Crusio (talk) 11:36, 26 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Noslackingnow, if you can cite some good secondary source that mentions this as being notable, or cite some notable publications or authors who published in it, it might change my vote. I don't speak enough Spanish to try to find this myself. PPdd (talk) 04:45, 1 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

- Thanks PPdd. I added four references - two in Spanish and two in English.